pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.27873 · v1 · pith:PW77B4DJnew · submitted 2026-06-26 · ⚛️ physics.ao-ph

Ocean-atmosphere interaction at the Gulf Stream sea surface temperature front: variability and impacts on midlatitude atmospheric circulation

Luca Famooss Paolini This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 02:19 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.ao-ph
keywords Gulf StreamSST frontocean-atmosphere interactionNorth Atlantic Oscillationeddy-driven jetstorm trackmodel resolutiondecadal variability
0
0 comments X

The pith

Atmospheric response to Gulf Stream front shifts appears only in models finer than 50 km and shows non-stationary decadal covariance with the NAO.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The thesis examines ocean-atmosphere interactions at the Gulf Stream SST front. It shows that simulated atmospheric anomalies from interannual front shifts match reanalysis only when horizontal resolution is finer than 50 km. Locally, diabatic heating is balanced mainly by vertical motion and transient eddy heat transport. At large scales, front shifts produce matching shifts in the North Atlantic eddy-driven jet and storm track through changes in low-level baroclinicity. On decadal scales the NAO and front covary only during 1972-2018, with the NAO leading by three years before 1990 and two years after, a lag attributed to differing oceanic responses.

Core claim

The central claim is that the atmospheric response to interannual meridional shifts of the Gulf Stream SST front is strongly resolution-dependent, reproducing observed anomalies only in simulations finer than 50 km, with local diabatic heating balanced by vertical motion and transient eddy transport, and large-scale homo-directional shifts of the eddy-driven jet and storm track mediated by low-level baroclinicity changes. The NAO and front exhibit decadal covariance exclusively in the 1972-2018 interval, with the NAO leading the front by three years in 1972-1990 and two years in 1990-2018, explained by the fast wind-driven oceanic response, the lagged deep oceanic response, and Rossby-wave p

What carries the argument

Resolution-dependent response to GSF meridional shifts together with the non-stationary NAO-GSF lead-lag relationship driven by wind-driven circulation, deep circulation, and Rossby waves.

If this is right

  • Atmosphere-only models coarser than 50 km systematically under-represent the response of the jet and storm track to GSF variability.
  • GSF shifts produce same-direction displacements of the North Atlantic eddy-driven jet and storm track via altered low-level baroclinicity.
  • The NAO forces GSF shifts through a combination of rapid wind-driven ocean adjustment and slower deep-ocean adjustment, producing a 2-3 year lag.
  • Rossby-wave propagation contributes to the NAO-GSF lag only in the earlier sub-period, implying a change in the dominant forcing pathway after 1990.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Climate models that remain coarser than 50 km will continue to miss a key pathway linking western-boundary-current variability to mid-latitude circulation.
  • The reported non-stationarity raises the possibility that background-state changes alter the relative roles of wind-driven versus wave-mediated ocean responses over time.
  • If the resolution threshold holds, then any future assessment of Gulf Stream influence on European climate will require ensembles that resolve fronts below 50 km.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen time intervals reflect genuine non-stationarity rather than post-hoc selection, and the reanalysis products accurately capture the true lead-lag relationships and mechanism balances without major observational or processing artifacts.

What would settle it

Performing atmosphere-only simulations at 25 km or finer resolution and checking whether the match to observed anomalies strengthens, weakens, or saturates, or testing whether NAO-GSF covariance and the reported lags appear in any interval outside 1972-2018.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.27873 by Luca Famooss Paolini.

Figure 2.1
Figure 2.1. Figure 2.1: Maps of the main oceanic currents connected with the GS. The figure is [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_2_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2.2
Figure 2.2. Figure 2.2: Vorticity balance at the western and eastern boundary because of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_2_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2.3
Figure 2.3. Figure 2.3: Leading empirical orthogonal function of the seasonal SLP anomalies [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_2_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2.4
Figure 2.4. Figure 2.4: Main patterns of the positive (left) and negative (right) NAO phase. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_2_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2.5
Figure 2.5. Figure 2.5: SST (◦C; colour shadings), SLP (hPa; contours; contour interval is 1 hPa) and surface wind (m s−1 ; arrows) anomalies associated with one positive standard deviation departure of the NAO index during winter. The NAO index has been defined as the station index of Hurrell et al. (2003). The figure is a reproduction of Figure 1a in Deser et al. (2010). is true for the negative NAO. Such anomalies represent … view at source ↗
Figure 2.6
Figure 2.6. Figure 2.6: Left panel: Regression of the variance of the meridional eddy velocity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_2_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2.7
Figure 2.7. Figure 2.7: Power spectrum of the winter NAO index over 1899–2022. The NAO [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_2_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2.8
Figure 2.8. Figure 2.8: 4-year average of the near-surface wind-stress divergence (top) and curl [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_2_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2.9
Figure 2.9. Figure 2.9: Schematic of the impact of an oceanic front on the near-surface wind [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_2_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2.10
Figure 2.10. Figure 2.10: Schematic of the climatic responses to the GSF. The green arrow [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_2_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2.11
Figure 2.11. Figure 2.11: Baroclinicity (0.5 and 0.6 day−1 ; solid contours) at 775 hPa and merid￾ional eddy heat flux (10 and 20 K m s−1 ; dashed contours) between 700 and 925 hPa averaged over the 1957–2002 DJF winters. The figure is reproduced from Ambaum and Novak (2014). The black sector over the GS represents the area of interest for the analysis developed in that study. Other aspects Furthermore, the GSF has been shown to… view at source ↗
Figure 2.12
Figure 2.12. Figure 2.12: Schematic diagrams showing the restoration of near-surface baroclin [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p039_2_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3.1
Figure 3.1. Figure 3.1: SST (K; color shaded) anomalies associated to “North” (a) and “South” [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p048_3_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3.2
Figure 3.2. Figure 3.2: Winter-mean latitude of the GSF averaged in the range 50 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p049_3_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: shows the SST composites obtained by averaging all years over the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p049_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: shows near-surface wind, SLP and SHF composite differences on the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p054_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3.3
Figure 3.3. Figure 3.3: SHF (W m−2 ; color shading), SLP (Pa; contours, solid for positive) and near-surface wind (m s−1 ; vectors) response to the GSF shifts in winter (DJF). (a) ERA5. (b, c) EC-Earth. (d, e) MOHC. (f, g) ECMWF. Beside institution name, the model nominal resolution in km is reported. SHF are considered to be positive up￾wards, namely from the ocean to the atmosphere. For models the magenta contours represent S… view at source ↗
Figure 3.4
Figure 3.4. Figure 3.4: 850 hPa zonal wind (m s−1 ; color shaded) response to the GSF shifts in winter (DJF). (a) ERA5. (b, c) EC-Earth. (d, e) MOHC. (f, g) ECMWF. Beside institution name, the model nominal resolution in km is reported. Black dots denote anomalies that were found to be statistically significant at the 90% confidence level (details in section 3.2). Green contours indicate the winter climatology of zonal wind at … view at source ↗
Figure 3.5
Figure 3.5. Figure 3.5: Jet latitude distributions during winter (DJF). As specified in section 3.2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p060_3_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3.6
Figure 3.6. Figure 3.6: 925 hPa meridional air temperature gradient (K [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p061_3_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3.7
Figure 3.7. Figure 3.7: MEHF anomalies (v′T ′ ; m s−1 K; color shaded) at 850 hPa induced by the GSF shifts in winter (DJF). (a) ERA5. (b, c) EC-Earth. (d, e) MOHC. (f, g) ECMWF. Beside institution name, the model nominal resolution in km is reported. Black dots denote anomalies that were found to be statistically significant at the 90% confidence level (details in section 3.2). Green contours indicate the winter climatology of… view at source ↗
Figure 3.8
Figure 3.8. Figure 3.8: Stormtrack anomalies (diagnosed via the variance of the meridional [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p064_3_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: shows the cross-front vertical section of the diabatic heating term [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p065_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: shows the heat budget as indicated above, zonally averaged along the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p066_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3.9
Figure 3.9. Figure 3.9: Cross-front vertical section of diabatic heating term (K day [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p067_3_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: , while similar differences in mechanisms balancing the heating at the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p067_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3.10
Figure 3.10. Figure 3.10: Vertical profiles of composited differences for zonal (terms I and II), [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p068_3_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3.11
Figure 3.11. Figure 3.11: Zonally-averaged omega composited differences (Lagrangian pressure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p069_3_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3.12
Figure 3.12. Figure 3.12: Horizontal distribution of composited differences for zonal (terms I [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p071_3_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3.13
Figure 3.13. Figure 3.13: Horizontal distribution of composited differences for zonal (terms I [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p072_3_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3.14
Figure 3.14. Figure 3.14: Horizontal distribution of composited differences for zonal (terms I [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p073_3_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3.15
Figure 3.15. Figure 3.15: Blocking frequency anomalies (% of blocked days on total days; color [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p076_3_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3.16
Figure 3.16. Figure 3.16: Sea level pressure anomalies (Pa) induced by the GSF shifts in winter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p078_3_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3.17
Figure 3.17. Figure 3.17: Schematic of the atmospheric response to the GSF shifts in winter for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p083_3_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: , time lags of 0–2 years between the GS meridional displacements and the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p089_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4.1
Figure 4.1. Figure 4.1: Histogram of the time lags between GS meridional displacements and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p091_4_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4.2
Figure 4.2. Figure 4.2: Latitude–depth cross section of the winter mean zonal transport (Sv; [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p097_4_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4.3
Figure 4.3. Figure 4.3: a) Detrended and standardized winter GSF (black) and NAO (orange) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p098_4_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4.4
Figure 4.4. Figure 4.4: a) Detrended and standardized winter NAO time series in ERA5 dataset [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p099_4_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4.5
Figure 4.5. Figure 4.5: a) Detrended and standardized winter GSF time series in ERA5 dataset [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p099_4_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4.6
Figure 4.6. Figure 4.6: Lead-lag cross-correlation between the band-pass filtered NAO and GSF [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p100_4_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4.7
Figure 4.7. Figure 4.7: a) Detrended and standardized winter GSF (black) and NAO (orange) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p102_4_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4.8
Figure 4.8. Figure 4.8: a) Detrended and standardized winter GSF (black) and NAO (orange) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p103_4_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4.9
Figure 4.9. Figure 4.9: Lead-lag cross-correlation between the band-pass filtered NAO, GSF and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p104_4_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4.10
Figure 4.10. Figure 4.10: Lead–lag linear regression coefficients for band-pass filtered Ekman [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p105_4_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4.11
Figure 4.11. Figure 4.11: Same as Figure 4.10 but during 1990–2018. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p106_4_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4.12
Figure 4.12. Figure 4.12: Left panel: Band-pass filtered winter GSF (black) and NAO (orange) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p108_4_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4.13
Figure 4.13. Figure 4.13: Left panel: Band-pass filtered winter GSF (black) and NAO (orange) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p109_4_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4.14
Figure 4.14. Figure 4.14: Left panel: Band-pass filtered winter GSF (black) and NAO (orange) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p110_4_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4.15
Figure 4.15. Figure 4.15: Lead–lag cross-correlation between the band-pass filtered NAO, GSF [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p112_4_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: shows a negative peak in the cross-correlation between the DWBC [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p112_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4.16
Figure 4.16. Figure 4.16: Lead–lag linear regression coefficients for band-pass filtered zonal trans [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p113_4_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4.17
Figure 4.17. Figure 4.17: Same as Figure 4.16 but during 1990–2018 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p114_4_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4.18
Figure 4.18. Figure 4.18: Lead–lag linear regression coefficients for band-pass filtered SHF (W [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p115_4_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4.19
Figure 4.19. Figure 4.19: Same as Figure 4.18 but during 1990–2018. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p116_4_19.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4.20
Figure 4.20. Figure 4.20: a) The average evolution of the GSF shifts (solid black line), GSF [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p120_4_20.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: c). As in the R50+ models, the local near-surface baroclinicity is en [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p126_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Sea surface temperature (SST) gradients associated with western boundary currents affect the atmospheric circulation across a range of spatial and temporal scales. Yet, several aspects of ocean-atmosphere interactions linked to oceanic fronts remain unclear. This PhD thesis analyses such interactions for the Gulf Stream SST front (GSF). The first part assesses the atmospheric response to the interannual GSF meridional shifts and its dependence on model horizontal resolution, using ERA5 reanalysis and atmosphere-only simulations forced by observed SST. Results show that the response is strongly resolution dependent, with only simulations finer than 50km resembling observed anomalies. Locally, diabatic heating near the GSF is mainly balanced by vertical motion and transient eddy heat transport. At large-scale, the GSF shifts is associated with a homo-directional shift in the North Atlantic eddy-driven jet and storm track, mediated by changes in low-level baroclinicity. The second part assesses the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO)-GSF interaction and the mechanisms through which the NAO forces the GSF shifts on decadal timescale, using atmosphere and ocean reanalyses. The NAO and GSF covary on decadal timescales only during 1972-2018. This non-stationarity is also reflected in their lead-lag relationship: the NAO leads the GSF shifts by 3 years during 1972-1990 and by 2 years during 1990-2018. The lag is interpreted as the joint effect of the fast response of wind-driven oceanic circulation, the lagged response of deep oceanic circulation, and the propagation of Rossby waves. However, Rossby wave propagation is evident only before 1990, suggesting that its non-stationarity may explain the different NAO-GSF time lag before and after 1990. Overall, the thesis improves understanding of GSF variability and its role in North Atlantic and extratropical climate variability.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a PhD thesis examining ocean-atmosphere interactions at the Gulf Stream SST front (GSF). Using ERA5 reanalysis and atmosphere-only simulations forced by observed SST, the first part shows that the atmospheric response to interannual GSF meridional shifts is strongly resolution-dependent, with only simulations finer than 50 km resembling observed anomalies. Locally, diabatic heating near the GSF is mainly balanced by vertical motion and transient eddy heat transport; at large scales, GSF shifts are associated with homo-directional shifts in the North Atlantic eddy-driven jet and storm track, mediated by low-level baroclinicity changes. The second part uses atmosphere and ocean reanalyses to assess NAO-GSF interactions on decadal timescales, finding covariance only during 1972-2018, with the NAO leading GSF shifts by 3 years (1972-1990) and 2 years (1990-2018). The lag is interpreted as the joint effect of fast wind-driven circulation, lagged deep circulation, and Rossby wave propagation (the latter evident only pre-1990).

Significance. If the results hold, particularly the resolution dependence of the atmospheric response and the non-stationary NAO-GSF relationship with its mechanistic interpretation, the work would improve understanding of how oceanic fronts influence midlatitude circulation and extratropical climate variability. Strengths include the direct comparison of reanalysis with simulations across resolutions and the multi-process explanation linking wind-driven, deep-ocean, and wave mechanisms. The findings have implications for climate model fidelity in the North Atlantic region.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section on NAO-GSF decadal covariance and lead-lag relationships] The division of the record into 1972-1990 and 1990-2018 for the lead-lag analysis and attribution of differing mechanisms (including Rossby wave influence only pre-1990) lacks a priori justification, pre-specified protocol, sensitivity tests to alternative split years, or formal change-point statistics. This selection is load-bearing for the non-stationarity claim and the interpretation of the lag difference in the second part of the thesis.
  2. [Results on resolution dependence of atmospheric response] The claim that the response is 'strongly resolution dependent, with only simulations finer than 50km resembling observed anomalies' requires quantitative support (e.g., pattern correlations, RMSE, or anomaly amplitude ratios) across the tested resolutions to establish the 50 km threshold as robust rather than qualitative.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract should explicitly list all reanalysis products and simulation configurations (number of runs, exact resolutions tested) used in each part.
  2. [Throughout manuscript] Notation for GSF shifts and NAO indices should be defined consistently at the start of each major section to aid readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments, which highlight areas where additional rigor will strengthen the manuscript. We will revise to incorporate quantitative metrics for the resolution dependence and to provide formal justification, sensitivity tests, and change-point analysis for the 1972-2018 period split and associated mechanisms. These changes address both major points directly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Section on NAO-GSF decadal covariance and lead-lag relationships] The division of the record into 1972-1990 and 1990-2018 for the lead-lag analysis and attribution of differing mechanisms (including Rossby wave influence only pre-1990) lacks a priori justification, pre-specified protocol, sensitivity tests to alternative split years, or formal change-point statistics. This selection is load-bearing for the non-stationarity claim and the interpretation of the lag difference in the second part of the thesis.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the period split was identified by inspecting the full-record covariance rather than via a pre-specified protocol. In revision we will add: (i) formal change-point detection (e.g., PELT or binary segmentation on the NAO-GSF cross-covariance time series), (ii) sensitivity tests repeating the lead-lag analysis for split years 1985-1995, and (iii) explicit reporting of how the Rossby-wave signature and lag values vary with these choices. These additions will place the non-stationarity claim on a statistically justified footing. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results on resolution dependence of atmospheric response] The claim that the response is 'strongly resolution dependent, with only simulations finer than 50km resembling observed anomalies' requires quantitative support (e.g., pattern correlations, RMSE, or anomaly amplitude ratios) across the tested resolutions to establish the 50 km threshold as robust rather than qualitative.

    Authors: We agree that the present comparison is largely qualitative. The revised manuscript will include, for the principal response fields (500 hPa geopotential height, surface wind, precipitation), (i) spatial pattern correlations with ERA5, (ii) domain RMSE, and (iii) anomaly-amplitude ratios, all computed for every resolution tested. These metrics will be shown in a new table and will objectively support the 50 km threshold. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: results are direct outputs of reanalysis and simulation comparisons with no derivations or fitted parameters

full rationale

The thesis contains no mathematical derivations, equations, or parameter-fitting steps that could reduce outputs to inputs by construction. All reported findings (resolution dependence, local balances, jet/storm-track shifts, and NAO-GSF lead-lag relationships) are presented as direct empirical results from ERA5 reanalysis and forced simulations. Time-period choices (1972-2018, split at 1990) are stated without any self-referential fitting or uniqueness theorem that would qualify as circular under the enumerated patterns; any concerns about post-hoc selection fall outside the circularity criteria. The analysis is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are described in the abstract; the work draws on existing reanalysis products and standard modeling techniques without new postulates.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5886 in / 1438 out tokens · 69713 ms · 2026-06-29T02:19:13.979572+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

256 extracted references · 213 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Kallberg and P

    P. Kallberg and P. Berrisford and B. J. Hoskins and A. Simmons and S. Uppala and S. Lamy-Thepaut and R. Hine , title =. ERA-40 Project Report Series. 19 , publisher =. 2005 , series =

    2005

  2. [2]

    H. U. Sverdrup , title =. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume =. 1947 , doi =

    1947

  3. [3]

    Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union , volume =

    The westward intensification of wind-driven ocean currents , author =. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union , volume =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/TR029i002p00202 , url =. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/TR029i002p00202 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1029/tr029i002p00202

  4. [4]

    Walter H. Munk. ON THE WIND-DRIVEN OCEAN CIRCULATION. Journal of Atmospheric Sciences. 1950. doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1950)007<0080:OTWDOC>2.0.CO;2

    work page doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1950)007 1950

  5. [5]

    and Hoskins, B

    Brayshaw, DJ. and Hoskins, B. and Blackburn, M. The. 2011. doi:10.1175/2011JAS3674.1

    work page doi:10.1175/2011jas3674.1 2011

  6. [6]

    The B asic I ngredients of the N orth A tlantic S torm T rack

    David James Brayshaw and Brian Hoskins and Michael Blackburn. The B asic I ngredients of the N orth A tlantic S torm T rack. P art I : L and– S ea C ontrast and O rography. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences. 2009. doi:10.1175/2009JAS3078.1

    work page doi:10.1175/2009jas3078.1 2009

  7. [7]

    Hoskins, B. J. and Valdes, P. J. O n the E xistence of S torm- T racks. 1990. doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1990)047<1854:OTEOST>2.0.CO;2

    work page doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1990)047 1990

  8. [8]

    Novak, Lenka and Ambaum, Maarten H. P. and Tailleux, Rémi. The. 2015. doi:10.1175/JAS-D-14-0082.1

    work page doi:10.1175/jas-d-14-0082.1 2015

  9. [9]

    and Sampe, T

    Nakamura, H. and Sampe, T. and Tanimoto, Y. and Shimpo, A. , publisher = AGU, isbn =. Observed. Earth's Climate , pages =. doi:10.1029/147GM18 , year =

    work page doi:10.1029/147gm18

  10. [10]

    and Nakamura, H

    Hotta, D. and Nakamura, H. On the. 2011. doi:10.1175/2010JCLI3910.1

    work page doi:10.1175/2010jcli3910.1 2011

  11. [11]

    Timothy , title =

    Pan, Jiayi and Yan, Xiao-Hai and Zheng, Quanan and Liu, W. Timothy , title =. Geophysical Research Letters , volume =. 2002 , doi =

    2002

  12. [12]

    Small and S.P

    R.J. Small and S.P. deSzoeke and S.P. Xie and L. O’Neill and H. Seo and Q. Song and P. Cornillon and M. Spall and S. Minobe , keywords =. Air–sea interaction over ocean fronts and eddies , journal =. 2008 , note =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dynatmoce.2008.01.001 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.dynatmoce.2008.01.001 2008

  13. [14]

    Atmospheric Response to the Gulf Stream: Seasonal Variations

    Shoshiro Minobe and Masato Miyashita and Akira Kuwano-Yoshida and Hiroki Tokinaga and Shang-Ping Xie. Atmospheric Response to the Gulf Stream: Seasonal Variations. Journal of Climate. 2010. doi:10.1175/2010JCLI3359.1

    work page doi:10.1175/2010jcli3359.1 2010

  14. [15]

    Hoskins, B. J. and Karoly, D. J. The. 1981. doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1981)038<1179:TSLROA>2.0.CO;2

    work page doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1981)038 1981

  15. [16]

    Geophysical Research Letters , volume =

    Parfitt, Rhys and Seo, Hyodae , title =. Geophysical Research Letters , volume =. doi:10.1029/2018GL080135 , year =

    work page doi:10.1029/2018gl080135

  16. [17]

    Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society , volume =

    Parfitt, Rhys and Czaja, Arnaud , title =. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society , volume =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2689 , url =. https://rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/qj.2689 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1002/qj.2689

  17. [18]

    Significance of a Midlatitude SST Frontal Zone in the Formation of a Storm Track and an Eddy-Driven Westerly Jet

    Takeaki Sampe and Hisashi Nakamura and Atsushi Goto and Wataru Ohfuchi. Significance of a Midlatitude SST Frontal Zone in the Formation of a Storm Track and an Eddy-Driven Westerly Jet. Journal of Climate. 2010. doi:10.1175/2009JCLI3163.1

    work page doi:10.1175/2009jcli3163.1 2010

  18. [19]

    Geophysical Research Letters , volume =

    Nakamura, Hisashi and Sampe, Takeaki and Goto, Atsushi and Ohfuchi, Wataru and Xie, Shang-Ping , title =. Geophysical Research Letters , volume =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL034010 , url =. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/2008GL034010 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1029/2008gl034010

  19. [20]

    Ambaum, Maarten H. P. and Novak, Lenka , title =. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society , volume =. doi:10.1002/qj.2352 , year =

    work page doi:10.1002/qj.2352

  20. [21]

    and Minobe, Shoshiro and Kuwano-Yoshida, Akira , title =

    O'Reilly, Christopher H. and Minobe, Shoshiro and Kuwano-Yoshida, Akira , title =. Climate Dynamics , volume =. 2016 , doi =

    2016

  21. [22]

    and Minobe, Shoshiro and Kuwano-Yoshida, Akira and Woollings, Tim , title =

    O'Reilly, Christopher H. and Minobe, Shoshiro and Kuwano-Yoshida, Akira and Woollings, Tim , title =. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society , volume =. 2017 , doi =

    2017

  22. [23]

    and Matthes, Katja , title=

    Omrani, Nour-Eddine and Ogawa, Fumiaki and Nakamura, Hisashi and Keenlyside, Noel and Lubis, Sandro W. and Matthes, Katja , title=. Scientific Reports , year=. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-39392-y , url=

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-019-39392-y

  23. [24]

    and Czaja, A

    Sheldon, L. and Czaja, A. and Vannière, B. and Morcrette, C. and Sohet, B. and Casado, M. and Smith, D. , title =. Tellus A: Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography , volume =. 2017 , publisher =

    2017

  24. [25]

    Geophysical Research Letters , volume =

    Parfitt, Rhys and Czaja, Arnaud and Minobe, Shoshiro and Kuwano-Yoshida, Akira , title =. Geophysical Research Letters , volume =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL067723 , url =. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/2016GL067723 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1002/2016gl067723

  25. [26]

    Lubis and Clare S

    Sandro W. Lubis and Clare S. Y. Huang and Noboru Nakamura and Nour-Eddine Omrani and Martin Jucker. Role of Finite-Amplitude Rossby Waves and Nonconservative Processes in Downward Migration of Extratropical Flow Anomalies. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences. 2018. doi:10.1175/JAS-D-17-0376.1

    work page doi:10.1175/jas-d-17-0376.1 2018

  26. [27]

    Geophysical Research Letters , volume =

    Ogawa, Fumiaki and Omrani, Nour-Eddine and Nishii, Kazuaki and Nakamura, Hisashi and Keenlyside, Noel , title =. Geophysical Research Letters , volume =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL066538 , url =. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/2015GL066538 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1002/2015gl066538

  27. [28]

    and Hasselmann, K

    Frankignoul, C. and Hasselmann, K. , title =. doi:10.1111/j.2153-3490.1977.tb00740.x , year=

    work page doi:10.1111/j.2153-3490.1977.tb00740.x 1977

  28. [29]

    Bjerknes , abstract =

    J. Bjerknes , abstract =. Atlantic Air-Sea Interaction , editor =. 1964 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2687(08)60005-9 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/s0065-2687(08)60005-9 1964

  29. [31]

    D. S. Battisti and U. S. Bhatt and M. A. Alexander. A Modeling Study of the Interannual Variability in the Wintertime North Atlantic Ocean. Journal of Climate. 1995. doi:10.1175/1520-0442(1995)008<3067:AMSOTI>2.0.CO;2

    work page doi:10.1175/1520-0442(1995)008 1995

  30. [32]

    Climate Dynamics , pages=

    Air-Sea interaction over the Gulf Stream in an ensemble of HighResMIP present climate simulations , author=. Climate Dynamics , pages=. 2021 , doi =

    2021

  31. [34]

    and Kelly, K

    Vivier, F. and Kelly, K. A. and Thompson, L. A. Heat Budget in the. 2002. doi:10.1175/1520-0485(2002)032<3436:HBITKE>2.0.CO;2

    work page doi:10.1175/1520-0485(2002)032 2002

  32. [36]

    and Alexander, M

    Deser, C. and Alexander, M. A. and Xie, S. P. and Phillips, A. S. , title =. Annual review of marine science , volume =. doi:10.1146/annurev-marine-120408-151453 , year =

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-marine-120408-151453

  33. [37]

    Timothy and Takeuchi, Kensuke , title =

    Hashizume, Hiroshi and Xie, Shang-Ping and Liu, W. Timothy and Takeuchi, Kensuke , title =. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres , volume =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900684 , url =. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/2000JD900684 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1029/2000jd900684

  34. [38]

    and Inoue, J

    Sato, K. and Inoue, J. and Watanabe, M. , title =. Environmental Research Letters , doi =

  35. [39]

    Dominant A nomaly P atterns in the N ear- S urface B aroclinicity and A ccompanying A nomalies in the A tmosphere and O ceans

    Mototaka Nakamura and Shozo Yamane. Dominant A nomaly P atterns in the N ear- S urface B aroclinicity and A ccompanying A nomalies in the A tmosphere and O ceans. P art I : N orth A tlantic B asin. 2009. doi:10.1175/2008JCLI2297.1

    work page doi:10.1175/2008jcli2297.1 2009

  36. [40]

    Joyce, T. M. and Kwon, Y.-O. and Yu, L. On the. 2009. doi:10.1175/2008JCLI2690.1

    work page doi:10.1175/2008jcli2690.1 2009

  37. [41]

    Joyce, T. M. and Kwon, Y.-O. and Seo, H. and Ummenhofer, C. C. Meridional. 2019. doi:10.1029/2018GL081087

    work page doi:10.1029/2018gl081087 2019

  38. [42]

    and Alexander, M

    Kwon, Y. and Alexander, M. and Bond, N. and Frankignoul, C. and Nakamura, H. and Qiu, B. and Thompson, L. Role of the. 2010

    2010

  39. [43]

    Young-Oh Kwon and Terrence M. Joyce. Northern. 2013. doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00647.1

    work page doi:10.1175/jcli-d-12-00647.1 2013

  40. [44]

    Peter H. Stone. Baroclinic A djustment. 1978. doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1978)035<0561:BA>2.0.CO;2

    work page doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1978)035 1978

  41. [45]

    Andrews, D. G. and Holton, J. R. and Leovy, C. B. , title =. Academic Press , pages =

  42. [46]

    and Pierini, S

    Quattrocchi, G. and Pierini, S. and Dijkstra, H. A. , TITLE =. Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics , VOLUME =. 2012 , NUMBER =

    2012

  43. [47]

    O'Reilly, C. H. and Czaja, A. , title =. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society , volume =. 2015 , doi =

    2015

  44. [48]

    and Ping Chang, P

    Ma, X. and Ping Chang, P. and Saravanan, R. and Montuoro, R. and Nakamura, H. and Wu, D. and Lin, X. and Wu L. Importance of. 2017. doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0154.1

    work page doi:10.1175/jcli-d-16-0154.1 2017

  45. [49]

    and Yeager, S

    Athanasiadis, P.J. and Yeager, S. and Kwon, YO. and others , title =. npj Climate and Atmospheric Science , year =

  46. [50]

    Joyce and Caroline C

    Hyodae Seo and Young-Oh Kwon and Terrence M. Joyce and Caroline C. Ummenhofer. On the Predominant Nonlinear Response of the Extratropical Atmosphere to Meridional Shifts of the Gulf Stream. Journal of Climate. 2017. doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0707.1

    work page doi:10.1175/jcli-d-16-0707.1 2017

  47. [52]

    Joyce and Shenfu Dong

    Claude Frankignoul and Gaelle de Coëtlogon and Terrence M. Joyce and Shenfu Dong. Gulf. 2001. doi:10.1175/1520-0485(2002)031<3516:GSVAOA>2.0.CO;2

    work page doi:10.1175/1520-0485(2002)031 2001

  48. [53]

    Wills and David W

    Samantha M. Wills and David W. J. Thompson and Laura M. Ciasto. On the. 2016. doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0820.1

    work page doi:10.1175/jcli-d-15-0820.1 2016

  49. [54]

    and Frankignoul, C

    Czaja, A. and Frankignoul, C. and Minobe, S. and other. Simulating the. Current Climate Change Reports. 2019. doi:10.1007/s40641-019-00148-5

    work page doi:10.1007/s40641-019-00148-5 2019

  50. [55]

    and Newman, M

    Smirnov, D. and Newman, M. and Alexander, M. A. and Kwon, Y.-O. and Frankignoul, C. Investigating the. 2015. doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00285.1

    work page doi:10.1175/jcli-d-14-00285.1 2015

  51. [56]

    and Ghil, M

    Feliks, Y. and Ghil, M. and Simonnet, E. Low-. 2004. doi:10.1175/1520-0469(2004)061<0961:LVITMA>2.0.CO;2

    work page doi:10.1175/1520-0469(2004)061 2004

  52. [57]

    and Robinson, W

    Willison, J. and Robinson, W. A. and Lackmann, G. M. The. 2013. doi:10.1175/JAS-D-12-0226.1

    work page doi:10.1175/jas-d-12-0226.1 2013

  53. [58]

    Climate Dynamics , year=

    Yang, Haijun and Li, Qing and Wang, Kun and Sun, Yu and Sun, Daoxun , title=. Climate Dynamics , year=. doi:10.1007/s00382-014-2380-5 , url=

    work page doi:10.1007/s00382-014-2380-5

  54. [59]

    Fasullo and Kevin E

    John T. Fasullo and Kevin E. Trenberth. The Annual Cycle of the Energy Budget. Part II: Meridional Structures and Poleward Transports. Journal of Climate. 2008. doi:10.1175/2007JCLI1936.1

    work page doi:10.1175/2007jcli1936.1 2008

  55. [60]

    and Le Traon, P

    Ducet, N. and Le Traon, P. Y. and Reverdin, G. , title =. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans , volume =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JC900063 , url =. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/2000JC900063 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1029/2000jc900063

  56. [61]

    Lisan Yu and Robert A. Weller. Objectively Analyzed Air–Sea Heat Fluxes for the Global Ice-Free Oceans (1981–2005). Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. 2007. doi:10.1175/BAMS-88-4-527

    work page doi:10.1175/bams-88-4-527 1981

  57. [62]

    Hogg and Robert S

    Nelson G. Hogg and Robert S. Pickart and Ross M. Hendry and William J. Smethie , abstract =. The northern recirculation gyre of the gulf Stream , journal =. 1986 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0198-0149(86)90017-8 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/0198-0149(86)90017-8 1986

  58. [63]

    Worthington, L. V. , publisher =. On the. John Hopkins Oceanographic Studies , year =

  59. [64]

    On the transport of the gulf stream between cape hatteras and the grand banks , journal =

    Nelson G Hogg , abstract =. On the transport of the gulf stream between cape hatteras and the grand banks , journal =. 1992 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0198-0149(92)90066-3 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/0198-0149(92)90066-3 1992

  60. [65]

    Holland, W. R. and Harrison, D. E. and Semtner, A. J. Eddy-Resolving Numerical Models of Large-Scale Ocean Circulation. Eddies in Marine Science. 1983

    1983

  61. [66]

    and Mellor, G

    Ezer, T. and Mellor, G. L. numerical study of the variability and the separation of the Gulf Stream, induced by surface atmospheric forcing and lateral boundary flows. Journal of physical oceanography. 1992

    1992

  62. [67]

    Daniel Halkin and T. Rossby. The Structure and Transport of the Gulf Stream at 73°W. Journal of Physical Oceanography. 1985. doi:10.1175/1520-0485(1985)015<1439:TSATOT>2.0.CO;2

    work page doi:10.1175/1520-0485(1985)015 1985

  63. [69]

    Michael A. Spall. Dynamics of the Gulf Stream/Deep Western Boundary Current Crossover. Part II: Low-Frequency Internal Oscillations. Journal of Physical Oceanography. 1996. doi:10.1175/1520-0485(1996)026<2169:DOTGSW>2.0.CO;2

    work page doi:10.1175/1520-0485(1996)026 1996

  64. [70]

    Parsons, A. T. , title=. Journal of Fluid Mechanics , year=. doi:10.1017/S0022112069002308 , url=

    work page doi:10.1017/s0022112069002308

  65. [71]

    Model of world ocean circulation: I

    Veronis, G. Model of world ocean circulation: I. Wind-driven, two layer. Journal of Marine Research. 1973

    1973

  66. [72]

    Rong Zhang and Geoffrey K. Vallis. The Role of Bottom Vortex Stretching on the Path of the North Atlantic Western Boundary Current and on the Northern Recirculation Gyre. Journal of Physical Oceanography. 2007. doi:10.1175/JPO3102.1

    work page doi:10.1175/jpo3102.1 2007

  67. [73]

    and Marshall, David P

    Tansley, Claire E. and Marshall, David P. On the influence of bottom topography and the Deep Western Boundary Current on Gulf Stream separation. Journal of Marine Research. 2000. doi:doi:10.1357/002224000321511179

    work page doi:10.1357/002224000321511179 2000

  68. [74]

    Dana Thompson and W

    J. Dana Thompson and W. J. Schmitz. A Limited-Area Model of the Gulf Stream: Design, Initial Experiments, and Model-Data Intercomparison. Journal of Physical Oceanography. 1989. doi:10.1175/1520-0485(1989)019<0791:ALAMOT>2.0.CO;2

    work page doi:10.1175/1520-0485(1989)019 1989

  69. [75]

    and KäSe, R

    Krauss, W. and KäSe, R. H. and Hinrichsen, H.-H. , title =. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans , volume =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/JC095iC08p13089 , url =. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/JC095iC08p13089 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1029/jc095ic08p13089

  70. [77]

    Johns, W. E. and Shay, T. J. and Bane, J. M. and Watts, D. R. , title =. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans , volume =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/94JC02497 , url =. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/94JC02497 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1029/94jc02497

  71. [78]

    Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans , volume =

    Lee, Tong and Cornillon, Peter , title =. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans , volume =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/95JC01219 , url =. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/95JC01219 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1029/95jc01219

  72. [79]

    Brown and Peter C

    Otis B. Brown and Peter C. Cornillon and Steven R. Emmerson and H.Mark Carle , abstract =. Gulf Stream warm rings: a statistical study of their behavior , journal =. 1986 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0198-0149(86)90062-2 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/0198-0149(86)90062-2 1986

  73. [80]

    The Effect of the New England Seamounts on Gulf Stream Meandering as Observed from Satellite IR Imagery

    Peter Cornillon. The Effect of the New England Seamounts on Gulf Stream Meandering as Observed from Satellite IR Imagery. Journal of Physical Oceanography. 1986. doi:10.1175/1520-0485(1986)016<0386:TEOTNE>2.0.CO;2

    work page doi:10.1175/1520-0485(1986)016 1986

  74. [81]

    Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans , volume =

    Cornillon, Peter and Gilman, Craig and Stramma, Lothar and Brown, Otis and Evans, Robert and Brown, James , title =. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans , volume =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/JC092iC12p12993 , url =. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/JC092iC12p12993 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1029/jc092ic12p12993

  75. [82]

    Reviews of Geophysics , volume =

    Marshall, John and Schott, Friedrich , title =. Reviews of Geophysics , volume =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/98RG02739 , url =. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/98RG02739 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1029/98rg02739

  76. [83]

    Chapter 5.5 Deep convection , editor =

    John Lazier and Robert Pickart and Peter Rhines , abstract =. Chapter 5.5 Deep convection , editor =. 2001 , booktitle =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0074-6142(01)80130-3 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/s0074-6142(01)80130-3 2001

  77. [84]

    , title =

    Krauss, W. , title =. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans , volume =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/JC091iC04p05061 , url =. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/JC091iC04p05061 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1029/jc091ic04p05061

  78. [85]

    Susan Lozier , title =

    M. Susan Lozier , title =. Science , volume =. 2010 , doi =. https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.1189250 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1189250 2010

  79. [86]

    and Lozier, M

    Bower, Amy S. and Lozier, M. Susan and Gary, Stefan F. and B. Interior pathways of the North Atlantic meridional overturning circulation , journal=. 2009 , month=. doi:10.1038/nature07979 , url=

    work page doi:10.1038/nature07979 2009

  80. [87]

    Export of Labrador Sea Water from the subpolar North Atlantic: A Lagrangian perspective , journal =

    Amy Bower and Susan Lozier and Stefan Gary , keywords =. Export of Labrador Sea Water from the subpolar North Atlantic: A Lagrangian perspective , journal =. 2011 , note =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2010.10.060 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.dsr2.2010.10.060 2011

Showing first 80 references.