pith. sign in

arxiv: 2607.00505 · v1 · pith:BL5NAMTVnew · submitted 2026-07-01 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE

FRB20250613A: a remarkable repeating FRB with apparent millisecond-timescale scattering variations

T. Dial , A. T. Deller , Alexa C. Gordon , P. A. Uttarkar , R. M. Shannon , Ziteng Wang , M. Caleb , Wen-fai Fong
show 3 more authors
Marcin Glowacki Kelly Gourdji Joscha N. Jahns-Schindler
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-02 07:56 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE
keywords FRB20250613Arepeating FRBscatteringpolarizationrotation measureBe star binarydwarf galaxyplasma effects
0
0 comments X

The pith

FRB20250613A's scattering, polarization, and millisecond variations indicate a progenitor in the dense stellar wind of a Be star binary companion.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper analyzes bursts from FRB20250613A detected across ASKAP, MeerKAT, and Parkes, revealing large apparent scattering variance on minute-to-hour scales, spectral depolarization varying over days, rotation measure shifts of roughly 300 rad m^{-2} over longer periods, a statistical preference for multi-component burst separations near 6.8 ms, and propagation changes on millisecond timescales. These traits require a nearby turbulent magneto-ionised screen that cannot be explained by a static medium alone. The authors conclude the features align with the source sitting inside the stellar wind of a Be star binary, an environment common in the low-metallicity dwarf galaxy host at z approximately 0.1.

Core claim

The central claim is that the combination of rapid scattering variance, day-scale polarimetric changes, preferred 6.8 ms burst component separations, and especially the millisecond-scale variations in propagation effects are best explained by non-linear plasma effects from the FRB emission itself acting on a nearby turbulent screen, all consistent with the progenitor being embedded in the dense stellar wind of a Be star binary companion.

What carries the argument

The mechanism is the interpretation of millisecond-separated burst components showing different scattering and propagation properties as evidence for non-linear plasma effects driven by the high field strength of the FRB emission rather than geometric changes through a static screen.

If this is right

  • The FRB source resides inside a dense stellar wind that supplies the required turbulent magneto-ionised material.
  • Be star binaries are expected to be relatively common in low-mass, low-metallicity galaxies matching the FRB host.
  • Multi-component bursts carry an intrinsic emission-mechanism preference for separations near 6.8 ms.
  • The circum-burst environment must be highly dynamic on timescales from milliseconds to months.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar millisecond-scale propagation variations could appear in other repeating FRBs located in comparable environments.
  • Multi-wavelength monitoring might reveal periodic signatures from the binary orbit or wind density changes.
  • The non-linear plasma response could serve as a probe of emission-region magnetic field strengths in future high-time-resolution observations.

Load-bearing premise

That variations in scattering and other effects between burst components only milliseconds apart cannot arise from sightline changes through any static screen and must instead be produced by non-linear plasma responses to the FRB's own emission.

What would settle it

A model of a static turbulent screen that fully reproduces the observed millisecond-scale differences in scattering and polarization without requiring non-linear effects, or host-galaxy observations showing no Be star or wind signatures at the FRB location.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.00505 by Alexa C. Gordon, A. T. Deller, Joscha N. Jahns-Schindler, Kelly Gourdji, Marcin Glowacki, M. Caleb, P. A. Uttarkar, R. M. Shannon, T. Dial, Wen-fai Fong, Ziteng Wang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Multi-component bursts from FRB20250613. The letter in front of the burst number represents the telescope which detected the burst i.e. ‘A’ for ASKAP, ‘M’ for MeerKAT and ‘P’ for Parkes (Murriyang). Top panel: Frequency-scrunched time series. The shaded grey band shows the off-pulse sample noise. The red region shows the on-pulse width. The burst reference time is set to the centroid of the burst. Bottom p… view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (cont.) applied as a matched filter when time-averaging to obtain the fre￾quency spectrum: 𝐼( 𝑓 ) = 1/N · ÍN 𝑡 (Wt · 𝐼( 𝑓 , 𝑡)). (4) Spectral Bounding: The width-minimisation algorithm is re￾peated on 𝐼( 𝑓 ) to find the frequency bounds (pf , Nf). (5) RFI Subtraction: The rough on-pulse region defined by (pt , Nt) and (pf , Nf) is used to subtract the baseline using the mean of the off-pulse region. Two ba… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Top panel: DM evolution of FRB20250613. The Square, circle and diamond points show the ASKAP, MeerKAT and Parkes bursts respectively. The ‘red’ points represent the discovery burst A1. Middle panel: burst 𝜏 at 1.0 GHz reference frequency assuming 𝛼 = −4.0. Bottom Panel: Burst RM. RM uncertainties are significantly smaller than the absolute RM values, making it difficult to see them. Each panel is separated… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: SOAR/Goodman 𝑟-band image of the host of FRB 20250613A. The 1𝜎 FRB localisation is shown as a magenta ellipse. 𝑛, semi-minor/semi-major axis ratio (𝑏/𝑎), and position angle. The host is best described by a Sérsic profile with 𝑛 = 0.75, 𝑏/𝑎 = 0.66, and 𝑟𝑒 = 1.40′′ (2.58 kpc assuming WMAP9 cosmology; Hinshaw et al. 2013) which is consistent with a slightly inclined disk galaxy. To quantify the location of th… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Left: Spectral energy distribution of the host of FRB 20250613A, jointly fitting the photometry and spectroscopy. A zoom-in of the observed and modelled spectrum is shown in the bottom panel. Right: Star formation history of the host of FRB 20250613A. The solid blue line represents the median star formation rate and the shaded teal regions are the corresponding 68 per cent CI [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Results of 𝛼 fitting. Left: Burst M11. The top panel shows the time-series with the on-pulse region highlighted in red. The middle panel shows the dynamic spectrum. Channels that are flagged are highlighted in the orange patches on the left side of the spectrum. The panel to the right of the dynamic spectrum shows the sub-banded scattering index fit of 𝛼 = -6.5 ± 1.7. The red line is the least squares fit … view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (a) The ASKAP discovery burst A1. Top panel: Polarisation Position Angle (PA) profile. Middle panel: Time series I, L and V. Bottom panel: Stokes I dynamic spectrum. The break in 𝑥-axis is used to indicate that each component has been analysed separately with a different DM. Data on the leftmost panels of the break are presented at a time resolution of 20 µs and data on the rightmost panels of the break ar… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Results of 𝛼 fitting for the A1 burst. Left side: Component 1 (A1A), 𝛼 = -6.2 ± 1.1. Right side: Component 2 (A1B), 𝛼 = -1.1 ± 1.3. on the order of a few pc cm−3 should be taken with some caution, due to the difficulty in measuring DM for individual bursts via structure maximisation. There is, however, good support for RM varying on timescales of minutes to hours (by ∼20-50 rad m−2 ), as seen in [PITH_FUL… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Distribution of component separation for multi-component burst sample. The ‘blue’ histogram shows the distribution of the full sample whereas the ‘red’ histogram only includes bursts with two components. FRB20220912A (Zhang et al. 2023) and FRB20240114A (Zhang et al. 2025a). However, these distributions span a much larger range in separation. Exploring potential emission mechanisms that pre￾fer such a str… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Fitted burns law parameters for selected bursts. ‘Black circle’ points show fitted parameters using equation 11 and ‘gray square’ points using the un-modified burns law assuming 𝑝 is unity. Horizontal axis is the MJD offset from the first burst A1. P5, P7, P8 and P10. Qualitatively, the separation between individ￾ual burst components are very similar across the sample. To quantify this we isolated the sub-… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Power law fit for 𝜏 ∝ DM𝛽 for the 24 June MeerKAT burst sample. The red dashed line shows a best fit of 𝛽 = 1.8 ± 0.2 assuming an external DM of DMext = 173 pc cm−3 . variations in scattering time and DM should occur on timescales of order the transit time of a clump crossing the LOS. For a clump size of 0.01 AU and a typical stellar wind velocity of 𝑣w ∼1000 km/s (Beskrovnaya et al. 2025) the variations … view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Stellar wind density profile. The black line shows the radial electron density profile of an out-flowing stellar wind shown assuming a stellar surface density of ne,0 = 1×108 cm−3 . The red line is the on-plane density profile of the stellar disk used in Wang et al. (2022) which has a surface density of ne,0 = 1.8×1010 cm−3 and a power-law index of 𝛽 = 4. its host galaxy. There is a comparatively larger k… view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Schematic of the stellar wind toy model. The Be star (shown in blue) creates an isotropic stellar wind (shown in orange) with a mass density of 1/𝑟 2 (depicted by the colour gradient). A NS (shown as a white circle) orbits the Be star with a binary separation of D. The NS magnetic field drives electrons away from the immediate vicinity of the NS creating an electron cavity where the effective electron den… view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Results of nonlinear simulation. Top panel row: Scattering time induced by clumps in the region 𝑑1 to 𝑑2. Black lines shows a scattering time of 1.0 ms. Middle panel row: Integrated DM in the region 𝑑1 to 𝑑2. Black lines show a DM of 0.27 pc cm−3 . Bottom panel row: Observed peak luminosity ratio between the two components at the moment they cease inducing non-linear propagation effects in the stellar win… view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: De-convolved peak luminosity vs scattering timescale scaled to 1.0 GHz as described in Section 4.2. Peak luminosity is calculated using the formula 𝐿𝑝 = 𝐸/𝜎 √ 2𝜋 where 𝜎 is the standard deviation of the un-scattered Gaussian pulse measured by fitting the scattering timescale. MeerKAT bursts with a 𝑆/𝑁 < 15 have been excluded. vide insight into the progenitor and its surroundings, including sub￾stantial va… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

FRB20250613A is a repeating FRB discovered by the Australian SKA Pathfinder and localised to a low-metallicity dwarf galaxy at a redshift of $z = 0.0987 \pm 0.0001$. FRB 20250613A exhibits a plethora of exotic features that likely overlay the imprint of the circum-burst environment on some intrinsic features of the source. Here we perform a comprehensive analysis of bursts detected by ASKAP, MeerKAT, and the Murriyang Parkes radio telescopes. Bursts during the MeerKAT epoch show a large apparent variance in scattering on timescales of minutes to hours. Polarimetric analysis of the full sample shows spectral depolarisation with variability on timescales of days and changes in rotation measure of $\sim$ 300 rad m$^{-2}$ over days to months. This suggests a highly turbulent magneto-ionised environment. We find significant preference for separations of $\sim$6.8$\pm$0.8 ms in multi-component bursts that we suggest is likely intrinsic to the burst emission mechanism. Finally, we find that a subset of bursts exhibit variations in these propagation effects on burst components separated by just milliseconds, that are difficult to explain by changing sightlines, but plausibly due to non-linear plasma effects in the circum-burst environment caused by the high field strength of the FRB emission. These properties, which demand a nearby turbulent screen of material, are all consistent with the FRB progenitor being embedded in the dense stellar wind of a Be star binary companion, objects which are relatively plentiful in low-mass and low-metallicity galaxies like the FRB20250613A host.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper reports multi-telescope (ASKAP, MeerKAT, Parkes) observations of the repeating FRB20250613A, localized to a low-metallicity dwarf galaxy at z=0.0987. It documents minute-to-hour apparent scattering variations during the MeerKAT epoch, day-scale spectral depolarisation, RM changes of ~300 rad m^{-2}, a statistically preferred ~6.8 ms separation in multi-component bursts interpreted as intrinsic, and millisecond-scale variations in propagation effects between burst components. These are interpreted as requiring a nearby turbulent screen with non-linear plasma effects, consistent with the progenitor residing in the dense wind of a Be-star binary companion.

Significance. If the central environmental diagnosis holds, the result would link a repeating FRB to a Be-star companion system in a low-metallicity host, adding to progenitor models since such binaries are relatively common in dwarf galaxies. The multi-telescope dataset and reported RM variability constitute new observational constraints on magneto-ionic environments around FRBs. However, the interpretive step from the data to a 'nearby turbulent screen' and non-linear effects rests on an untested assertion about static-screen geometry.

major comments (2)
  1. [abstract (final paragraph)] Abstract, final paragraph: The claim that millisecond-scale variations in scattering and other propagation effects 'are difficult to explain by changing sightlines' through a static screen (and therefore require non-linear plasma effects) is presented without any quantitative propagation modeling. No phase-screen calculation, ray-tracing simulation, or turbulence-spectrum analysis is referenced to demonstrate that differential paths at the observed 6.8 ms component separation and reported angular scales cannot reproduce the minute-to-hour apparent scattering changes. This assertion is load-bearing for the 'demand a nearby turbulent screen' conclusion and the subsequent Be-star wind interpretation.
  2. [multi-component bursts analysis] The section discussing multi-component bursts and the 6.8 ms separation: While a statistical preference for ~6.8±0.8 ms separations is reported, the manuscript provides no error budget, Monte Carlo test of selection effects, or comparison against simulated burst populations to establish that this preference is intrinsic rather than an artifact of scattering or detection thresholds.
minor comments (1)
  1. [abstract] The abstract states the host is a 'low-metallicity dwarf galaxy' but provides no quantitative metallicity value or reference to the measurement method; this detail should be added for reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed review of our manuscript. We address each major comment below and have revised the paper accordingly to strengthen the presentation of our results and interpretations.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [abstract (final paragraph)] Abstract, final paragraph: The claim that millisecond-scale variations in scattering and other propagation effects 'are difficult to explain by changing sightlines' through a static screen (and therefore require non-linear plasma effects) is presented without any quantitative propagation modeling. No phase-screen calculation, ray-tracing simulation, or turbulence-spectrum analysis is referenced to demonstrate that differential paths at the observed 6.8 ms component separation and reported angular scales cannot reproduce the minute-to-hour apparent scattering changes. This assertion is load-bearing for the 'demand a nearby turbulent screen' conclusion and the subsequent Be-star wind interpretation.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript would be strengthened by quantitative support for the claim that a static screen cannot readily reproduce the observed variations. In the revised version we have added an order-of-magnitude geometric calculation in the discussion section showing that the transverse velocities or screen distances needed to produce millisecond-scale changes via differential sightlines are unphysical for any plausible static screen location. We have also cited relevant phase-screen literature. However, a full ray-tracing or turbulence-spectrum simulation lies beyond the scope of this primarily observational work; we have therefore softened the abstract language from 'demand' to 'strongly suggest' a nearby screen. This is a partial revision. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [multi-component bursts analysis] The section discussing multi-component bursts and the 6.8 ms separation: While a statistical preference for ~6.8±0.8 ms separations is reported, the manuscript provides no error budget, Monte Carlo test of selection effects, or comparison against simulated burst populations to establish that this preference is intrinsic rather than an artifact of scattering or detection thresholds.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this omission. The revised manuscript now includes a full error budget for the 6.8 ms separation that incorporates both measurement uncertainty and the effects of scattering. We have also added a Monte Carlo test that injects synthetic multi-component bursts into the observed noise and scattering conditions and recovers the separation distribution; the test confirms that the observed preference is not produced by selection or detection biases. These additions appear in a new subsection of the methods and are summarized in the results. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; observational interpretation stands on new data

full rationale

The paper reports new multi-telescope observations of FRB20250613A and interprets scattering variations, RM changes, and component separations as evidence for a nearby turbulent screen consistent with a Be-star wind. No derivation chain reduces a claimed prediction or uniqueness result to a fitted input or self-citation by construction. The assertion that ms-scale variations are 'difficult to explain by changing sightlines' is an interpretive judgment, not a self-referential equation or parameter fit. External benchmarks (standard Be-star properties, telescope data) remain independent of the paper's own outputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

This is an observational astronomy paper. The central claim rests on standard radio-propagation physics and the interpretive step that the observed effects require a nearby turbulent screen whose properties match a Be-star wind. No explicit free parameters are introduced in the abstract; the 6.8 ms separation is a measured value. The Be-star companion is an interpretive model rather than a new postulated particle or force.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Scattering, depolarisation, and rotation-measure variations are produced by propagation through magneto-ionised plasma
    Invoked throughout the abstract to interpret all reported effects as environmental rather than intrinsic.
  • domain assumption The source is localised to a low-metallicity dwarf galaxy at z = 0.0987
    Stated as the host environment in the first sentence of the abstract.
invented entities (1)
  • Be star binary companion no independent evidence
    purpose: Provides the dense stellar wind that supplies the required nearby turbulent magneto-ionised screen
    Proposed in the final sentence as the configuration consistent with all observed properties and the host-galaxy type; no direct detection or independent falsifiable prediction is given in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5892 in / 1661 out tokens · 59877 ms · 2026-07-02T07:56:49.921955+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

138 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages · 16 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    High-Mass X-ray binaries in the Small Magellanic Cloud

    High-mass X-ray binaries in the Small Magellanic Cloud. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201527326 , archivePrefix =. 1511.00445 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201527326

  2. [2]

    Catalogue of Be/X-ray binary systems in the Small Magellanic Cloud: X-ray, optical & IR properties

    Catalogue of Be/X-ray binary systems in the Small Magellanic Cloud: X-ray, optical and IR properties. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1283 , archivePrefix =. 1506.01920 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1283

  3. [3]

    , keywords =

    Population synthesis of Be X-ray binaries: metallicity dependence of total X-ray outputs. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3475 , archivePrefix =. 2308.06154 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3475

  4. [4]

    , keywords =

    The Metallicity Dependence of the High-mass X-Ray Binary Luminosity Function. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abcec1 , archivePrefix =. 2011.09476 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abcec1 2011

  5. [5]

    Metallicity dependence of HMXB populations

    Metallicity dependence of high-mass X-ray binary populations. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201525617 , archivePrefix =. 1505.05483 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201525617

  6. [6]

    , keywords =

    Searching for the spectral depolarization of ASKAP one-off FRB sources. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3437 , archivePrefix =. 2308.14387 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3437

  7. [7]

    , keywords =

    A depolarization census of ASKAP fast radio bursts. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1997 , archivePrefix =. 2503.19749 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1997

  8. [8]

    , keywords =

    Extremely band-limited repetition from a fast radio burst source. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3436 , archivePrefix =. 2009.01214 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3436 2009

  9. [9]

    , keywords =

    An ultra-wide bandwidth (704 to 4 032 MHz) receiver for the Parkes radio telescope. , keywords =. doi:10.1017/pasa.2020.2 , archivePrefix =. 1911.00656 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1017/pasa.2020.2 2020

  10. [10]

    Faraday Rotation Measure Synthesis

    Faraday rotation measure synthesis. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20052990 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0507349 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20052990

  11. [11]

    system description , author=

    Australian square kilometre array pathfinder: I. system description , author=. Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  12. [12]

    Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia , volume=

    The commensal real-time ASKAP fast-transients (CRAFT) survey , author=. Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia , volume=. 2010 , publisher=

    2010

  13. [13]

    Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia , volume=

    The commensal real-time ASKAP fast transient incoherent-sum survey , author=. Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  14. [14]

    Astronomy and Computing , pages=

    CELEBI: The CRAFT Effortless Localisation and Enhanced Burst Inspection pipeline , author=. Astronomy and Computing , pages=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  15. [15]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=

    FRB 20230708A, a quasi-periodic FRB with unique temporal-polarimetric morphology , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  16. [16]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    Calculation and Uncertainty of Fast Radio Burst Structure Based on Smoothed Data , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  17. [17]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=

    DYNESTY: a dynamic nested sampling package for estimating Bayesian posteriors and evidences , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  18. [18]

    The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series , volume=

    BILBY: A user-friendly Bayesian inference library for gravitational-wave astronomy , author=. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  19. [19]

    RM-Tools: Rotation measure (RM) synthesis and Stokes QU-fitting

  20. [20]

    Science , volume=

    Magnetic field reversal in the turbulent environment around a repeating fast radio burst , author=. Science , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  21. [21]

    Nature , volume=

    An extreme magneto-ionic environment associated with the fast radio burst source FRB 121102 , author=. Nature , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  22. [22]

    Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia , volume=

    High-time-resolution properties of 35 fast radio bursts detected by the Commensal Real-time ASKAP Fast Transients survey , author=. Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  23. [23]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=

    | V|: new insight into the circular polarization of radio pulsars , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=. 2003 , publisher=

    2003

  24. [24]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=

    Pulsar polarization: a broad-band population view with the Parkes Ultra-Wideband receiver , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  25. [25]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=

    Faraday rotation measure synthesis , author=. Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=. 2005 , publisher=

    2005

  26. [26]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=

    Scattering variability detected from the circumsource medium of FRB 20190520B , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  27. [27]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    Low-frequency, wideband study of an active repeater, FRB 20240114A, with the GMRT , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  28. [28]

    Cambridge observing handbooks for research astronomers

    Handbook of pulsar astronomy , author=. 2005 , series="Cambridge observing handbooks for research astronomers", publisher=

    2005

  29. [29]

    Science , volume=

    Frequency-dependent polarization of repeating fast radio bursts—implications for their origin , author=. Science , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  30. [30]

    The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume=

    Temporal Evolution of Depolarization and Magnetic Field of Fast Radio Burst 20201124A , author=. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  31. [31]

    The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series , volume=

    The first CHIME/FRB fast radio burst catalog , author=. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  32. [32]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=

    On the depolarization of discrete radio sources by Faraday dispersion , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=. 1966 , publisher=

    1966

  33. [33]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    A large-scale magneto-ionic fluctuation in the local environment of periodic fast radio burst source FRB 20180916B , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  34. [34]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=

    MeerKAT discovery of a hyperactive repeating fast radio burst source , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  35. [35]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=

    A sample of fast radio bursts discovered and localized with MeerTRAP at the MeerKAT telescope , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  36. [36]

    Giant pulse characteristics of PSR J0540- 6919 , author=

    The Thousand-Pulsar-Array programme on MeerKAT--III. Giant pulse characteristics of PSR J0540- 6919 , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  37. [37]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    A CHIME/FRB study of burst rate and morphological evolution of the periodically repeating FRB 20180916B , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  38. [38]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=

    Propagation effects at low frequencies seen in the LOFAR long-term monitoring of the periodically active FRB 20180916B , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  39. [39]

    The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume=

    Rotation measure evolution of the repeating fast radio burst source FRB 121102 , author=. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  40. [40]

    Science , volume=

    A sudden change and recovery in the magnetic environment around a repeating fast radio burst , author=. Science , volume=. 2026 , publisher=

    2026

  41. [41]

    Nature , volume=

    A fast radio burst source at a complex magnetized site in a barred galaxy , author=. Nature , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  42. [42]

    The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume=

    A Milliarcsecond Localization Associates FRB 20190417A with a Compact Persistent Radio Source and an Extreme Magnetoionic Environment , author=. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  43. [43]

    Nature , volume=

    A bimodal burst energy distribution of a repeating fast radio burst source , author=. Nature , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  44. [44]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    Statistical and Temporal Analysis of Multicomponent Burst Clusters from the Repeating FRB 20190520B , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  45. [45]

    Burst morphology , author=

    FAST observations of an extremely active episode of FRB 20201124A: I. Burst morphology , author=. Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  46. [46]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    FAST observations of FRB 20220912A: burst properties and polarization characteristics , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  47. [47]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.14707 , year=

    The magnetar model's energy crisis for a prolific repeating fast radio burst source , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.14707 , year=

    work page arXiv

  48. [48]

    FAST observations of an extremely active episode of FRB 20201124A. II. Energy distribution , author=. Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  49. [49]

    Nature , volume=

    A census of baryons in the Universe from localized fast radio bursts , author=. Nature , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  50. [50]

    The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series , volume=

    An overview of chime, the canadian hydrogen intensity mapping experiment , author=. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  51. [51]

    The Astronomical Journal , volume=

    CHIME/FRB outriggers: KKO station system and commissioning results , author=. The Astronomical Journal , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  52. [52]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    CHIME/FRB Outriggers: Design Overview , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  53. [53]

    Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia , volume=

    The CRAFT coherent (CRACO) upgrade I: System description and results of the 110-ms radio transient pilot survey , author=. Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  54. [54]

    The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume=

    Deep synoptic array science: discovery of the host galaxy of FRB 20220912A , author=. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  55. [55]

    The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series , volume=

    The Second CHIME/FRB Catalog of Fast Radio Bursts , author=. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series , volume=. 2026 , publisher=

    2026

  56. [56]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    Polarization properties of 128 nonrepeating fast radio bursts from the first CHIME/FRB baseband catalog , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  57. [57]

    The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume=

    A universal break in energy functions of three hyperactive repeating fast radio bursts , author=. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  58. [58]

    The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume=

    Fast radio bursts from the inspiral of double neutron stars , author=. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  59. [59]

    Nature , volume=

    A fast radio burst associated with a Galactic magnetar , author=. Nature , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  60. [60]

    2020 , author=

    A bright millisecond-duration radio burst from a Galactic magnetar , journal=. 2020 , author=

    2020

  61. [61]

    Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia , volume=

    The MeerKAT telescope as a pulsar facility: System verification and early science results from MeerTime , author=. Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  62. [62]

    Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia , volume=

    PSRCHIVE and PSRFITS: an open approach to radio pulsar data storage and analysis , author=. Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia , volume=. 2004 , publisher=

    2004

  63. [63]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=

    FETCH: A deep-learning based classifier for fast transient classification , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  64. [64]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=

    Radio observations of PSR B1259—63 around periastron , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=. 1996 , publisher=

    1996

  65. [65]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=

    The 1997 periastron passage of the binary pulsar PSR B1259--63 , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=. 2001 , publisher=

    1997

  66. [66]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=

    Stellar wind and stellar disc models of dispersion and rotation measure variations in the PSR B1259--63/SS2883 binary system , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=. 1995 , publisher=

    1995

  67. [67]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    Constraints on the geometry of circumstellar envelopes: optical interferometric and spectropolarimetric observations of seven Be stars , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

  68. [68]

    The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review , volume=

    Classical Be stars: Rapidly rotating B stars with viscous Keplerian decretion disks , author=. The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  69. [69]

    Nature Communications , volume=

    Repeating fast radio burst 20201124A originates from a magnetar/Be star binary , author=. Nature Communications , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  70. [70]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    Rotation measure variations and reversals of repeating FRBs in massive binary systems , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  71. [71]

    The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume=

    The Disk Precession in a Be Star--Magnetar Binary and its Application to the Rotation Measure of FRB 20201124A , author=. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume=. 2026 , publisher=

    2026

  72. [72]

    II-Polarization of individual pulses , author=

    Observations of pulsar radio emission. II-Polarization of individual pulses , author=. Astrophysical Journal, vol. 196, Feb. 15, 1975, pt. 1, p. 83-102. , volume=

    1975

  73. [73]

    Astrophysical Journal, Part 1 (ISSN 0004-637X), vol

    Wave propagation in pulsar magnetospheres-Refraction of rays in the open flux zone , author=. Astrophysical Journal, Part 1 (ISSN 0004-637X), vol. 302, March 1, 1986, p. 138-162. Research supported by the University of California. , volume=

    1986

  74. [74]

    Reviews of Modern Physics , volume=

    The physics of fast radio bursts , author=. Reviews of Modern Physics , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  75. [75]

    The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume=

    Fast radio bursts as strong waves interacting with the ambient medium , author=. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  76. [76]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    Simple analytical approximations for treatment of inverse Compton scattering of relativistic electrons in the blackbody radiation field , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

    2014

  77. [77]

    The European Physical Journal A , volume=

    Perspectives on laser-plasma physics in the relativistic transparency regime , author=. The European Physical Journal A , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  78. [78]

    Overview of the DESI Legacy Imaging Surveys

    Overview of the DESI Legacy Imaging Surveys. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab089d , archivePrefix =. 1804.08657 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab089d

  79. [79]

    , keywords =

    Probabilistic Association of Transients to their Hosts (PATH). , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abe8d2 , archivePrefix =. 2102.10627 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abe8d2

  80. [80]

    C., Crain, J

    The Goodman spectrograph. Ground-based Instrumentation for Astronomy , year = 2004, editor =. doi:10.1117/12.550069 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1117/12.550069 2004

Showing first 80 references.