pith. sign in

arxiv: 2607.00709 · v1 · pith:NYO33EHFnew · submitted 2026-07-01 · 💻 cs.NI

Mobile Base Station Positioning in Smart Ports Based on Kriged Sparse Measurements and Obstacle Inference

Paulo Furtado Correia , Andr\'e Coelho , Manuel Ricardo This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-02 04:57 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.NI
keywords smart portsmobile integrated access and backhaulradio environment mapordinary krigingobstacle inferencecuboidal blockage modelsparse measurementsbase station positioning
0
0 comments X

The pith

Sparse radio measurements can reconstruct radio environment maps and infer cuboidal obstacles to optimize mobile base station positioning in smart ports.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces the DOCKING framework, which applies ordinary kriging to sparse RSRP and SINR measurements to build radio environment maps, then approximates dominant attenuation areas as compact cuboidal blockage models. These models supply an optimization routine that places mobile integrated access and backhaul nodes, handles user association, and chooses backhaul links, all without requiring obstacle geometry databases. Under realistic port conditions the method reports reconstruction errors below 3 dB at the 90th percentile from 15 percent sampling, obstacle detection above 85 percent true-positive coverage, and capacity increases up to 150 percent in sparse layouts. A field campaign confirms that measured throughput trends match the optimization outputs. A sympathetic reader would care because the work shows how limited radio data alone can support adaptive deployment where full environmental maps are unavailable or quickly outdated.

Core claim

Ordinary kriging reconstructs reference signal received power and signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio fields from 15 percent spatial samples with prediction errors below 3 dB at the 90th percentile; dominant attenuation regions in the resulting map are then represented by compact cuboidal blockage models that achieve over 85 percent true-positive coverage; these abstractions feed a backhaul-aware genetic-algorithm optimizer that determines mobile base-station locations, user associations, and backhaul selections, producing capacity gains reaching 150 percent in sparse deployments while converging in 5-15 seconds per snapshot.

What carries the argument

The DOCKING framework that converts kriged radio environment maps into cuboidal obstacle abstractions for backhaul-aware MIAB placement optimization.

If this is right

  • REM reconstruction achieves prediction errors below 3 dB at the 90th percentile using only 15% spatial sampling.
  • Obstacle characterization exceeds 85% true-positive coverage.
  • Capacity gains reach 150% in sparse deployments.
  • A fast Genetic Algorithm converges within 5-15 s per network snapshot.
  • Field measurements produce throughput trends consistent with the optimization predictions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same kriging-plus-cuboid pipeline could be tested in other obstruction-heavy industrial sites such as warehouses or rail yards.
  • Periodic re-kriging from ongoing user reports might allow the framework to track slowly moving container stacks without new drive tests.
  • Replacing the genetic algorithm with a faster heuristic could make the optimizer suitable for larger networks while preserving the reported accuracy.
  • Adding a small number of dedicated sensors at known locations might tighten the cuboid fits beyond what radio measurements alone achieve.

Load-bearing premise

That dominant attenuation regions identified in the kriged REM can be adequately represented by compact cuboidal blockage models without access to actual geometry databases or detailed propagation physics.

What would settle it

A side-by-side comparison of the inferred cuboidal models against laser-scanned three-dimensional geometry of the same port area, or a controlled measurement campaign that records actual user throughput before and after the optimizer's suggested placements under known sampling densities.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.00709 by Andr\'e Coelho, Manuel Ricardo, Paulo Furtado Correia.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIGURE 1: Panoramic view of a smart port, showing its dynamic logistics landscape. FIABs provide wireless access to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIGURE 2: The five-stage DOCKING pipeline: (1) ground-truth radio metric construction, (2) sparse measurement [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIGURE 3: OKG reconstruction results for SINR (top row) and minimum attenuation (bottom row). From left to right: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIGURE 5: CDFs of the absolute attenuation prediction error [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIGURE 7: Pixel-level classification of the Stage 4 character [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIGURE 8: CDFs of the true positive pixel rate for Stage 4 of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIGURE 9: Representative single-FIAB use case ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIGURE 10: CDFs of the MIAB-augmented capacity gain [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIGURE 11: CDF of convergence time per snapshot for GA0 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIGURE 13: Representative field-demonstration results for RSRP, including OKG prediction, prediction variance, recon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIGURE 14: Downlink UDP throughput at five PoC demon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_14.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Smart-port wireless networks suffer from dynamic radio blockage caused by container stacks and industrial structures, challenging efficient mobile integrated access and backhaul (MIAB) deployment. Existing approaches rely on obstacle maps, geometry information, or computationally intensive propagation models that limit adaptability. This paper presents DOCKING, a radio environment map (REM)-driven framework that converts sparse radio measurements into optimization-ready obstacle representations for MIAB deployment. The framework infers propagation-relevant obstacle abstractions from reconstructed REMs, eliminating the need for obstacle-geometry databases while relying only on known network parameters and sparse measurements. Reference signal received power (RSRP) and signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) observations are reconstructed using Ordinary Kriging (OKG), and dominant attenuation regions are approximated by compact cuboidal blockage models. The inferred geometry feeds a backhaul-aware optimization that determines MIAB placement, user equipment (UE) association, and backhaul selection. Under realistic smart-port conditions, REM reconstruction achieves prediction errors below 3 dB at the 90th percentile using only 15% spatial sampling, while obstacle characterization exceeds 85% true-positive coverage. Capacity gains reach 150% in sparse deployments, and a fast Genetic Algorithm converges within 5-15 s per network snapshot. A field campaign using real measurements validates the workflow, showing throughput trends consistent with optimization predictions. Results demonstrate that sparse radio measurements provide sufficient environmental awareness for practical obstacle-aware MIAB deployment in obstruction-prone industrial environments.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper proposes DOCKING, a framework for mobile integrated access and backhaul (MIAB) positioning in smart ports. It reconstructs radio environment maps (REMs) from sparse RSRP/SINR measurements via Ordinary Kriging, infers compact cuboidal blockage models from dominant attenuation regions without using geometry databases, and feeds these into a backhaul-aware optimizer (using a genetic algorithm) for MIAB placement, UE association, and backhaul selection. Key claims include REM prediction errors below 3 dB at the 90th percentile with 15% spatial sampling, obstacle characterization with >85% true-positive coverage, capacity gains up to 150% in sparse deployments, and validation via a field campaign showing throughput trends consistent with optimizer outputs.

Significance. If the obstacle-inference step can be rigorously validated against independent geometry references, the approach would offer a practical, database-free method for adaptive MIAB deployment in dynamic, obstruction-heavy industrial settings. The combination of kriging-based REM reconstruction with cuboidal abstraction and optimization is a reasonable engineering contribution, though the core novelty rests on the unverified fidelity of the cuboidal models.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim of 'obstacle characterization exceeds 85% true-positive coverage' lacks a defined ground-truth reference or independent geometry database for computing true positives, as the method explicitly avoids such databases. The field-campaign validation only reports consistency between measured throughput trends and optimizer outputs, which does not directly test the cuboidal abstraction fidelity and could be explained by other model components (path-loss exponents, association rules). This is load-bearing for the paper's main contribution.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: Reported performance figures (prediction errors below 3 dB at 90th percentile, 150% capacity gains) are presented without any description of error-bar methodology, data-exclusion criteria, number of Monte-Carlo runs, or statistical tests, preventing verification of the quantitative claims from the available text.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract mentions 'realistic smart-port conditions' and 'a field campaign using real measurements' but provides no details on the measurement campaign scale, equipment, or exact locations, which would aid reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on our manuscript. The comments highlight important aspects of validation clarity that we will address through revisions. We respond to each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim of 'obstacle characterization exceeds 85% true-positive coverage' lacks a defined ground-truth reference or independent geometry database for computing true positives, as the method explicitly avoids such databases. The field-campaign validation only reports consistency between measured throughput trends and optimizer outputs, which does not directly test the cuboidal abstraction fidelity and could be explained by other model components (path-loss exponents, association rules). This is load-bearing for the paper's main contribution.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract claim requires explicit clarification on the ground-truth reference used for the true-positive metric. The 85% figure derives from controlled simulation experiments in which synthetic cuboidal obstacles with known positions serve as ground truth for direct comparison against inferred models; the operational method itself uses only radio measurements and does not require geometry databases. The field campaign supplies complementary end-to-end validation through throughput consistency. We will revise the abstract and insert a concise description of the simulation-based validation protocol (including how true positives are defined) into the manuscript to make this distinction unambiguous. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: Reported performance figures (prediction errors below 3 dB at 90th percentile, 150% capacity gains) are presented without any description of error-bar methodology, data-exclusion criteria, number of Monte-Carlo runs, or statistical tests, preventing verification of the quantitative claims from the available text.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the abstract and results presentation omit the requested statistical details. The reported figures aggregate outcomes from repeated Monte-Carlo trials across varied sampling densities and port layouts; error bars reflect standard deviation across trials, with no data points excluded beyond standard outlier filtering for measurement noise. We will revise the abstract and expand the evaluation section to state the number of Monte-Carlo runs, the precise error-bar methodology, data-exclusion rules, and any hypothesis tests applied. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper describes a workflow of applying standard Ordinary Kriging to sparse RSRP/SINR measurements to reconstruct a REM, then approximating attenuation regions as cuboidal models for input to a backhaul-aware optimizer. Reported metrics (kriging error, true-positive coverage, capacity gains) are presented as outcomes of this pipeline evaluated on field data, with no equations or steps shown that reduce a claimed prediction or result to a fitted input or self-citation by construction. The derivation remains self-contained against the external benchmarks of measurement-based reconstruction and optimization performance.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 1 invented entities

Abstract provides no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities beyond the high-level description; kriging hyperparameters, cuboid fitting thresholds, and GA settings are implicitly required but unstated.

invented entities (1)
  • compact cuboidal blockage models no independent evidence
    purpose: Approximate dominant attenuation regions extracted from kriged REM for use in placement optimization
    Introduced as a simplification that eliminates need for geometry databases; no independent evidence supplied in abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5804 in / 1208 out tokens · 20520 ms · 2026-07-02T04:57:56.522952+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

28 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    6G wireless systems: vision, requirements, challenges, insights, and opportunities,

    H. Tataria, M. Shafi, A. F. Molisch, M. Dohler, H. Sj ¨oland, and F. Tufvesson, “6G wireless systems: vision, requirements, challenges, insights, and opportunities,”Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 109, no. 7, pp. 1166–1199, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2021.3061701. VOLUME , 13 P . F . Correiaet al.: Mobile Base Station Positioning in Smart Ports Based on ...

    work page doi:10.1109/jproc.2021.3061701 2021

  2. [2]

    Scaling-up 5G adoption in smart ports: barriers and enablers,

    A. Potter, Y . Wang, and M. Naim, “Scaling-up 5G adoption in smart ports: barriers and enablers,”Maritime Policy & Management, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 517–534, 2025, doi: 10.1080/03088839.2024.2399524

    work page doi:10.1080/03088839.2024.2399524 2025

  3. [3]

    Customized industrial networks: network slicing trial at Hamburg seaport,

    P. Rost, M. Breitbach, H. Roreger, B. Erman, C. Mannweiler, R. Miller, and I. Viering, “Customized industrial networks: network slicing trial at Hamburg seaport,”IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 48–55, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.1109/MWC.2018.1800045

    work page doi:10.1109/mwc.2018.1800045 2018

  4. [4]

    A survey on 5G coverage improvement techniques: issues and future challenges,

    C. Sudhamani, M. Roslee, J. J. Tiang, and A. Ur Rehman, “A survey on 5G coverage improvement techniques: issues and future challenges,” Sensors, vol. 23, no. 4, Art. no. 2356, 2023, doi: 10.3390/s23042356

    work page doi:10.3390/s23042356 2023

  5. [5]

    Evaluation of radio communication links of 4G systems,

    M. Ayad, R. Alkanhel, K. Saoudi, M. Benziane, S. Medjedoub, and S. S. M. Ghoneim, “Evaluation of radio communication links of 4G systems,”Sensors, vol. 22, no. 10, Art. no. 3923, 2022, doi: 10.3390/s22103923

    work page doi:10.3390/s22103923 2022

  6. [6]

    Radio environment map construction by adaptive ordinary Kriging algorithm based on affin- ity propagation clustering,

    H. Xia, S. Zha, J. Huang, and J. Liu, “Radio environment map construction by adaptive ordinary Kriging algorithm based on affin- ity propagation clustering,”International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 1–14, May 2020, doi: 10.1177/1550147720922484

    work page doi:10.1177/1550147720922484 2020

  7. [8]

    Kriging- based 3-D spectrum awareness for radio dynamic zones using aerial spectrum sensors,

    S. J. Maeng, O. Ozdemir, I. G ¨uvenc ¸, and M. L. Sichitiu, “Kriging- based 3-D spectrum awareness for radio dynamic zones using aerial spectrum sensors,”IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 9044– 9058, 2024, doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2024.3357430

    work page doi:10.1109/jsen.2024.3357430 2024

  8. [9]

    An experimental comparison of ordinary and universal kriging and inverse distance weighting,

    D. Zimmerman, C. Pavlik, A. Ruggles, and M. P. Armstrong, “An experimental comparison of ordinary and universal kriging and inverse distance weighting,”Mathematical Geology, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 375– 390, 1999, doi: 10.1023/A:1007586507433

    work page doi:10.1023/a:1007586507433 1999

  9. [10]

    Ordinary kriging interpolation for indoor 3D REM,

    P. Maiti and D. Mitra, “Ordinary kriging interpolation for indoor 3D REM,”Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, vol. 14, pp. 13285–13299, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s12652-022-03784-2

    work page doi:10.1007/s12652-022-03784-2 2023

  10. [11]

    On integrated access and backhaul net- works: current status and potentials,

    C. Madapatha, B. Makki, C. Fang, O. Teyeb, E. Dahlman, M.-S. Alouini, and T. Svensson, “On integrated access and backhaul net- works: current status and potentials,”IEEE Open Journal of the Com- munications Society, vol. 1, pp. 1374–1389, 2020, doi: 10.1109/OJ- COMS.2020.3022529

    work page doi:10.1109/oj- 2020

  11. [12]

    NR; Study on integrated access and backhaul,

    3GPP, “NR; Study on integrated access and backhaul,” 3GPP TR 38.874 V16.0.0, Jan. 2019

    2019

  12. [13]

    NR; User equipment (UE) procedures in idle and RRC inactive states,

    3GPP, “NR; User equipment (UE) procedures in idle and RRC inactive states,” 3GPP TS 38.304 Release 17, 2023

    2023

  13. [14]

    Paving the way toward mo- bile IAB: problems, solutions and challenges,

    V . F. Monteiro, F. R. M. Lima, D. C. Moreira, D. A. Sousa, T. F. Maciel, B. Makki, and H. Hannu, “Paving the way toward mo- bile IAB: problems, solutions and challenges,”IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society, vol. 3, pp. 2347–2379, 2022, doi: 10.1109/OJCOMS.2022.3224576

    work page doi:10.1109/ojcoms.2022.3224576 2022

  14. [15]

    Resource manage- ment for 5G NR integrated access and backhaul: a semi-centralized approach,

    M. Pagin, T. Zugno, M. Polese, and M. Zorzi, “Resource manage- ment for 5G NR integrated access and backhaul: a semi-centralized approach,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 753–767, 2022, doi: 10.1109/TWC.2021.3098967

    work page doi:10.1109/twc.2021.3098967 2022

  15. [16]

    Image-based obstacle detection methods for the safe navigation of unmanned vehicles: a review,

    S. Badrloo, M. Varshosaz, S. Pirasteh, and J. Li, “Image-based obstacle detection methods for the safe navigation of unmanned vehicles: a review,”Remote Sensing, vol. 14, no. 15, Art. no. 3824, 2022, doi: 10.3390/rs14153824

    work page doi:10.3390/rs14153824 2022

  16. [17]

    Joint modeling of received power, mean delay, and delay spread for wideband radio channels,

    A. Bharti, R. Adeogun, X. Cai, W. Fan, F.-X. Briol, L. Clavier, and T. Pedersen, “Joint modeling of received power, mean delay, and delay spread for wideband radio channels,”IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 69, no. 8, pp. 4871–4882, 2021, doi: 10.1109/TAP.2021.3060099

    work page doi:10.1109/tap.2021.3060099 2021

  17. [18]

    Analysis and simulation of a fair queueing algorithm,

    A. Demers, S. Keshav, and S. Shenker, “Analysis and simulation of a fair queueing algorithm,”ACM SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev., vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 1–12, Aug. 1989, doi: 10.1145/75247.75248

    work page doi:10.1145/75247.75248 1989

  18. [20]

    Positioning of a next generation mobile cell to maximise aggregate network capacity,

    P. F. Correia, A. Coelho, and M. Ricardo, “Positioning of a next generation mobile cell to maximise aggregate network capacity,” in Proc. EAI Int. Conf. Simulation Tools and Techniques (SIMUTools), A. A. Juan, J.-L. Guisado-Lizar, M.-J. Mor´on-Fern´andez, and E. Perez- Bernabeu, Eds. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2025, pp. 341–356, doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-8...

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-031-87345-4 2025

  19. [21]

    Soille,Morphological Image Analysis: Principles and Applications, 2nd ed

    P. Soille,Morphological Image Analysis: Principles and Applications, 2nd ed. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2004, doi: 10.1007/978-3-662- 05088-0

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-662- 2004

  20. [22]

    Factory 5G: A review of industry-centric features and deployment options,

    A. Mahmood, S. F. Abedin, T. Sauter, M. Gidlund, and K. Landern ¨as, “Factory 5G: A review of industry-centric features and deployment options,”IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 24–34, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1109/MIE.2022.3149209

    work page doi:10.1109/mie.2022.3149209 2022

  21. [23]

    DeepREM: Deep-learning- based radio environment map estimation from sparse measurements,

    A. Chaves-Villota and C. A. Viteri-Mera, “DeepREM: Deep-learning- based radio environment map estimation from sparse measurements,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 48697–48714, May 2023, doi: 10.1109/AC- CESS.2023.3277248

    work page doi:10.1109/ac- 2023

  22. [24]

    3D spec- trum awareness for radio dynamic zones using Kriging and ma- trix completion,

    M. Rahman, S. J. Maeng, I. G ¨uvenc ¸, and C.-W. Wong, “3D spec- trum awareness for radio dynamic zones using Kriging and ma- trix completion,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Dyn. Spectrum Access Netw. (DySPAN), Washington, DC, USA, 2024, pp. 439–446. doi: 10.1109/DySPAN60163.2024.10632739

    work page doi:10.1109/dyspan60163.2024.10632739 2024

  23. [25]

    On topology optimization and routing in integrated access and backhaul networks: a genetic algorithm-based approach,

    C. Madapatha, B. Makki, A. Muhammad, E. Dahlman, M.-S. Alouini, and T. Svensson, “On topology optimization and routing in integrated access and backhaul networks: a genetic algorithm-based approach,” IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society, vol. 2, pp. 2273– 2291, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1109/OJCOMS.2021.3114669

    work page doi:10.1109/ojcoms.2021.3114669 2021

  24. [26]

    An integrated access and backhaul approach to sustainable dense small cell network planning,

    A. Al-Dhuhouri, T. Ratnarajah, and M. Sellathurai, “An integrated access and backhaul approach to sustainable dense small cell network planning,”Information, vol. 15, no. 1, Art. no. 19, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.3390/info15010019

    work page doi:10.3390/info15010019 2023

  25. [27]

    Taylor & Francis Group

    Li, Likun and Yu, Kun.Application of Improved HF-DBSCAN Algo- rithm in Analyzing Complex Trajectory Data of Wi-Fi Users in Smart Campus. Taylor & Francis Group

  26. [28]

    Methodology of detection and clas- sification of selected aviation obstacles based on UA V dense image matching,

    M. Lalak and D. Wierzbicki, “Methodology of detection and clas- sification of selected aviation obstacles based on UA V dense image matching,”IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Ob- servations and Remote Sensing, vol. 15, pp. 1869–1883, 2022, doi: 10.1109/JSTARS.2022.3142208

    work page doi:10.1109/jstars.2022.3142208 2022

  27. [29]

    Sur- face extraction and boundary detection based on DBSCAN clustering in 3D point clouds,

    H. Chen, T. Xie, M. L. Menhas, B. Ahmad, H. Huang, and Q. Li, “Sur- face extraction and boundary detection based on DBSCAN clustering in 3D point clouds,” inProc. IEEE 16th International Conference on Electronic Measurement & Instruments (ICEMI), Harbin, China, Aug. 2023, pp. 11–15, doi: 10.1109/ICEMI59194.2023.10270157

    work page doi:10.1109/icemi59194.2023.10270157 2023

  28. [30]

    G. H. Golub and C. F. Van Loan, ”Matrix Computations,” 4th ed. Baltimore, MD, USA: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 2013. P AULO FURTADO CORREIAreceived the de- gree in Electrical and Computer Engineering from Instituto Superior T´ecnico (IST), Lisbon, Portugal, in 1991. He is currently pursuing his Ph.D. in Telecommunications at the University of Porto, conduc...

    2013