pith. sign in

arxiv: 2607.00977 · v1 · pith:XQKALOARnew · submitted 2026-07-01 · 💰 econ.GN · q-fin.EC

Competitive effects of transmission constraints in the German electricity market

Pith reviewed 2026-07-02 02:51 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💰 econ.GN q-fin.EC
keywords electricity marketstransmission constraintsmarket powerGerman marketinstrumental variablescapacity withholdingcross-border trade
0
0 comments X

The pith

Reducing scarce import headroom by 1 GW raises the odds of suspected capacity withholding by German power plants by 15%.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines whether limits on electricity imports and exports across borders encourage German gas and coal plants to act strategically in the wholesale market. Using an instrumental variables method on 2022-2024 data, it links tight transmission bounds to greater deviations from a competitive dispatch model, interpreted as withholding or price-depressing behavior. A sympathetic reader would care because the results suggest that adding more cross-border lines could reduce such opportunities and improve market competition. The estimates are specific to periods when headroom is already limited.

Core claim

Transmission constraints significantly elevate the likelihood of suspected market power abuse. When headroom for further imports is already scarce, reducing import headroom by one Gigawatt increases the odds of suspected capacity withholding by 15%. Reducing export headroom by one GW when scarce increases the odds of suspected capacity push-in by 16%.

What carries the argument

2SRI instrumental variables estimation that relates bounds on zonal net position to upward or downward deviations of observed plant dispatch from a modeled competitive benchmark.

Load-bearing premise

The modeled competitive benchmark gives the dispatch that would occur if all plants behaved as price-takers with no market power.

What would settle it

Finding that the deviations from the benchmark are explained by forecast errors or operational constraints unrelated to transmission would undermine the interpretation as suspected abuse.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.00977 by Alice Lixuan Xu, Clemens Stiewe.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Residual demand under binding and non-binding transmission constraints. Net [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Flow-based market coupling Core region participating markets: Austria, Belgium, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Core net position of the German-Luxembourgish market zone within maximum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Histogram of hourly import and export headroom for the German-Luxembourgish [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Input-output data flow chart showing the 3-step construction of the outcome [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Directed acyclic graph for causal identification of the effect of headroom [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Predicted log-odds of strategic deviation as a function of headroom, relative to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Predicted log-odds of strategic deviation as a function of headroom, relative to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: 2SRI headroom decile coefficients. Bars show log-odds differences relative to the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This paper estimates the effect of cross-border transmission constraints on suspected market power abuse in the German wholesale electricity market. Using a 2SRI instrumental variables approach, we study suspected strategic behavior by German gas- and coal-fired power plants in 2022-2024. Cross-border transmission constraints are measured using the maximum and minimum bounds of zonal net position, while suspected market power abuse is measured as the upward or downward deviation of observed dispatch from a modeled competitive benchmark. We find that transmission constraints significantly elevate the likelihood of suspected market power abuse. When headroom for further imports is already scarce, reducing import headroom by one Gigawatt (GW) increases the odds of suspected capacity withholding by 15%. Similarly, reducing export headroom by one GW when it is scarce increases the odds of suspected capacity push-in, a strategy to depress prices, by 16%. These results provide empirical support for interconnection expansion as an instrument to mitigate market power.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper estimates the effect of cross-border transmission constraints on suspected market power abuse by German gas- and coal-fired plants in 2022-2024. Using a 2SRI instrumental-variables strategy, it measures constraints via bounds on zonal net position and suspected abuse via upward/downward deviations of observed dispatch from a modeled competitive benchmark. It reports that scarce import headroom raises the odds of withholding by 15% per GW reduction and scarce export headroom raises the odds of push-in by 16% per GW reduction, concluding that interconnection expansion can mitigate market power.

Significance. If the competitive benchmark is shown to be a reliable counterfactual, the results would supply empirical evidence that transmission constraints amplify strategic behavior and that interconnection policy can serve as a market-power remedy. The application of 2SRI to address endogeneity between constraints and dispatch outcomes is a methodological strength relative to OLS approaches common in the literature.

major comments (3)
  1. [Methods / competitive benchmark construction] The competitive benchmark is the load-bearing assumption for interpreting dispatch deviations as suspected withholding or push-in rather than model misspecification. No validation against periods of low market-power incentive, no comparison to realized dispatch under known competitive conditions, and no sensitivity to omitted technical constraints (ramping, minimum up/down times, start-up costs, reserves) is described; without this the 15-16% odds ratios cannot be distinguished from benchmark error.
  2. [Results / IV specification] The abstract and reported results provide no first-stage diagnostics, instrument strength statistics (e.g., F-statistic, partial R²), or robustness checks for the 2SRI procedure. Because the central claim rests on the IV estimates, absence of these diagnostics prevents assessment of whether the reported effects are identified.
  3. [Results / main estimates] Table or figure reporting the main odds ratios should include the exact definition of 'headroom' (maximum vs. minimum zonal net position) and the precise functional form used to interact scarcity with the continuous headroom variable; without this the 15% and 16% marginal effects cannot be reproduced or compared to alternative specifications.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Data] Clarify the exact sample period, number of plants, and frequency of the dispatch and constraint data in the data section.
  2. [Methods] Add a reference to the source or construction method for the competitive benchmark model (e.g., any optimization software or published algorithm).

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments. We address each major point below and indicate planned revisions to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Methods / competitive benchmark construction] The competitive benchmark is the load-bearing assumption for interpreting dispatch deviations as suspected withholding or push-in rather than model misspecification. No validation against periods of low market-power incentive, no comparison to realized dispatch under known competitive conditions, and no sensitivity to omitted technical constraints (ramping, minimum up/down times, start-up costs, reserves) is described; without this the 15-16% odds ratios cannot be distinguished from benchmark error.

    Authors: We agree the benchmark is central and will expand the methods section with additional robustness checks. We will report sensitivity to ramping and minimum up/down times using available unit-level data, and compare deviation patterns in low-incentive periods (e.g., weekends or low-demand hours). Direct validation against 'known competitive conditions' is limited by the absence of exogenous competitive episodes in 2022-2024, but we will discuss this limitation explicitly and note that the 2SRI design helps isolate constraint effects from benchmark error. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Results / IV specification] The abstract and reported results provide no first-stage diagnostics, instrument strength statistics (e.g., F-statistic, partial R²), or robustness checks for the 2SRI procedure. Because the central claim rests on the IV estimates, absence of these diagnostics prevents assessment of whether the reported effects are identified.

    Authors: We will add a dedicated appendix table with first-stage results, including F-statistics, partial R², and Sanderson-Windmeijer statistics for the 2SRI instruments. We will also include robustness checks varying instrument sets and reporting second-stage sensitivity to first-stage specification. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Results / main estimates] Table or figure reporting the main odds ratios should include the exact definition of 'headroom' (maximum vs. minimum zonal net position) and the precise functional form used to interact scarcity with the continuous headroom variable; without this the 15% and 16% marginal effects cannot be reproduced or compared to alternative specifications.

    Authors: We will revise the relevant table, figure, and text to state explicitly that headroom is defined as the distance to the maximum (import) or minimum (export) zonal net position bound, and that the specification interacts a scarcity dummy (headroom below median) with the continuous headroom measure using a linear interaction term. Updated captions and an equation box will enable exact reproduction. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; empirical estimation on external data with independent benchmark model

full rationale

The paper performs a 2SRI instrumental-variables estimation relating transmission headroom (measured from zonal net-position bounds) to dispatch deviations from a separately modeled competitive benchmark. No derivation chain reduces any claimed result to its own fitted parameters or self-citations by construction. The benchmark is presented as an external counterfactual constructed from optimization given realized prices, demand, and limits; deviations are then regressed on constraint variables using market data external to the model. This structure is self-contained against observable data and does not exhibit self-definitional, fitted-input, or self-citation load-bearing patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the 2SRI IV identification strategy and the assumption that deviations from the competitive benchmark measure market power abuse; these are domain assumptions rather than new entities or fitted parameters visible in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The 2SRI instrumental variables approach identifies the causal effect of transmission constraints on dispatch deviations under standard IV assumptions (relevance, exclusion, monotonicity).
    Invoked by the choice of 2SRI IV to estimate the reported odds ratios.
  • domain assumption Deviations of observed dispatch from the modeled competitive benchmark represent suspected strategic behavior rather than model misspecification or operational factors.
    Required to interpret the outcome variable as suspected market power abuse.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5690 in / 1369 out tokens · 60243 ms · 2026-07-02T02:51:18.913556+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

112 extracted references · 90 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Energy Informatics , volume =

    Forecasting Cross-Border Power Transmission Capacities in. Energy Informatics , volume =. doi:10.1186/s42162-019-0094-y , urldate =

  2. [2]

    Achieving. The. doi:10.1002/9781118775745.ch05 , urldate =

  3. [3]

    Allaz, Blaise and Vila, Jean-Luc , year = 1993, month = feb, journal =. Cournot. doi:10.1006/jeth.1993.1001 , urldate =

  4. [4]

    Estimation of

    Angrist, Joshua D , year = 2001, month = jan, journal =. Estimation of. doi:10.1198/07350010152472571 , urldate =

  5. [5]

    and Graddy, Kathryn and Imbens, Guido W

    Angrist, Joshua D. and Graddy, Kathryn and Imbens, Guido W. , year = 2000, journal =. The

  6. [6]

    and Graddy, Kathryn and Imbens, Guido W

    Angrist, Joshua D. and Graddy, Kathryn and Imbens, Guido W. , year = 2000, month = jul, journal =. The. doi:10.1111/1467-937X.00141 , urldate =

  7. [7]

    Journal of International Economics , volume =

    Cross-Border Trade in Electricity , author =. Journal of International Economics , volume =. doi:10.1016/j.jinteco.2016.03.007 , urldate =

  8. [8]

    , year = 2017, month = sep, series =

    Basu, Anirban and Coe, Norma and Chapman, Cole G. , year = 2017, month = sep, series =. Comparing. doi:10.3386/w23840 , urldate =. National Bureau of Economic Research , file =:23840 , publisher =

  9. [9]

    Screening Instruments for Monitoring Market Power ---

    Bataille, Marc and Bodnar, Olivia and Steinmetz, Alexander and Thorwarth, Susanne , year = 2019, month = jun, journal =. Screening Instruments for Monitoring Market Power ---. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2019.03.011 , urldate =

  10. [10]

    Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy , volume =

    Energy. Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy , volume =. 26780605 , eprinttype =

  11. [11]

    Beyond Borders:

    Beltrami, Filippo and Grossi, Luigi and Liebensteiner, Mario , year = 2025, month = aug, journal =. Beyond Borders:. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108588 , urldate =

  12. [12]

    Strategic Capacity Withholding through Failures in the

    Bergler, Julian and Heim, Sven and H. Strategic Capacity Withholding through Failures in the. Energy Policy , volume =. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2016.12.017 , urldate =

  13. [13]

    Borenstein, Severin and Bushnell, James and Stoft, Steven , year = 2000, journal =. The. doi:10.2307/2601042 , urldate =. 2601042 , eprinttype =

  14. [14]

    , year = 1999, month = oct, journal =

    Borenstein, Severin and Bushnell, James and Knittel, Christopher R. , year = 1999, month = oct, journal =. Market. doi:10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol20-No4-3 , urldate =

  15. [15]

    and Wolak, Frank A

    Borenstein, Severin and Bushnell, James B. and Wolak, Frank A. , year = 2002, month = dec, journal =. Measuring. doi:10.1257/000282802762024557 , urldate =

  16. [16]

    , year = 2009, month = jun, journal =

    Bowden, Nicholas S. , year = 2009, month = jun, journal =. Measuring. doi:10.1016/j.tej.2009.04.006 , urldate =

  17. [17]

    Improving Flow-Based Market Coupling by Integrating Redispatch potential

    Bucksteeg, Michael and Voswinkel, Simon and Blumberg, Gerald , year = 2024, month = may, journal =. Improving Flow-Based Market Coupling by Integrating Redispatch potential. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114093 , urldate =

  18. [18]

    Journal of Regulatory Economics , volume =

    Inefficient Arbitrage in Inter-Regional Electricity Transmission , author =. Journal of Regulatory Economics , volume =. doi:10.1007/s11149-009-9104-5 , urldate =

  19. [19]

    and Mansur, Erin T

    Bushnell, James B. and Mansur, Erin T. and Saravia, Celeste , year = 2008, month = mar, journal =. Vertical. doi:10.1257/aer.98.1.237 , urldate =

  20. [20]

    Water and

    Bushnell, James , year = 1998, urldate =. Water and

  21. [21]

    Energies , volume =

    Electricity. Energies , volume =. doi:10.3390/en10091438 , urldate =

  22. [22]

    arXiv.org , urldate =

    An Empirical Estimate of the Electricity Supply Curve from Market Outcomes , author =. arXiv.org , urldate =

  23. [23]

    Resource and Energy Economics , volume =

    Market Power and Strategic Interaction in Electricity Networks , author =. Resource and Energy Economics , volume =. doi:10.1016/S0928-7655(97)00006-7 , urldate =

  24. [24]

    Generation Failures, Strategic Withholding, and Capacity Payments in the

    Durmaz, Tun. Generation Failures, Strategic Withholding, and Capacity Payments in the. Energy Policy , volume =. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113897 , urldate =

  25. [25]

    Efficient. The. doi:10.1002/9781118775745.ch07 , urldate =

  26. [26]

    Efficient. The. doi:10.1002/9781118775745.part4 , urldate =

  27. [27]

    Efficient. The. doi:10.1002/9781118775745.ch09 , urldate =

  28. [28]

    Efficient. The. doi:10.1002/9781118775745.ch08 , urldate =

  29. [29]

    Efficient. The. doi:10.1002/9781118775745.ch11 , urldate =

  30. [30]

    Efficient. The. doi:10.1002/9781118775745.ch04 , urldate =

  31. [31]

    Electricity. The. doi:10.1002/9781118775745.ch03 , urldate =

  32. [32]

    Fabra, Natalia and Imelda , year = 2023, month = nov, journal =. Market. doi:10.1257/pol.20210221 , urldate =

  33. [33]

    The Flow-Based Market Coupling Domain -

    Felten, Bj. The Flow-Based Market Coupling Domain -. Utilities Policy , volume =. doi:10.1016/j.jup.2020.101136 , urldate =

  34. [34]

    Impact of

    Finck, Rafael , year = 2021, month = jun, journal =. Impact of. doi:10.1007/s00550-021-00520-w , urldate =

  35. [35]

    Electricity Prices during the Energy Crisis in

    Fladung, Till and Saile, Anna , year = 2024, publisher =. Electricity Prices during the Energy Crisis in

  36. [36]

    Strategic

    Fogelberg, Sara and Lazarczyk, Ewa , year = 2019, month = sep, journal =. Strategic. doi:10.5547/01956574.40.5.sfog , urldate =

  37. [37]

    Franke, Andreas , year = 2020, journal =

  38. [38]

    Frequency-. The. doi:10.1002/9781118775745.ch12 , urldate =

  39. [39]

    Front. The. doi:10.1002/9781118775745.fmatter , urldate =

  40. [40]

    Fusar Bassini, Chiara , year = 2025, publisher =. Time. doi:10.5281/zenodo.15204429 , howpublished =

  41. [41]

    Gebhardt, Georg and Hffler, Felix , year = 2013, month = jan, journal =. How. doi:10.5547/01956574.34.1.6 , urldate =

  42. [42]

    Allocating

    Gilbert, Richard and Neuhoff, Karsten and Newbery, David , year = 2004, journal =. Allocating. doi:10.2307/1593768 , urldate =. 1593768 , eprinttype =

  43. [43]

    Measuring the

    Graf, Christoph and Wolak, Frank A , abstract =. Measuring the

  44. [44]

    , year = 2025, month = sep, series =

    Graf, Christoph and Wolak, Frank A. , year = 2025, month = sep, series =. Measuring. doi:10.3386/w34272 , urldate =. National Bureau of Economic Research , file =:34272 , publisher =

  45. [45]

    Green, Richard , year = 2004, month = mar, abstract =. `

  46. [46]

    Handling. The. doi:10.1002/9781118775745.part5 , urldate =

  47. [47]

    Journal of Econometrics , volume =

    Misclassification of the Dependent Variable in a Discrete-Response Setting , author =. Journal of Econometrics , volume =. doi:10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00015-3 , urldate =

  48. [48]

    Impacts of Transmission Congestion on Market Power in Electricity Market , booktitle =

    He, Hui and Xu, Zheng and Cheng, Gaihong , year = 2004, month = oct, pages =. Impacts of Transmission Congestion on Market Power in Electricity Market , booktitle =. doi:10.1109/PSCE.2004.1397553 , urldate =

  49. [49]

    Market Power Monitoring and Mitigation in the

    Helman, Udi , year = 2006, month = may, journal =. Market Power Monitoring and Mitigation in the. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2005.05.011 , urldate =

  50. [50]

    Energy Economics , volume =

    How Aggregate Electricity Demand Responds to Hourly Wholesale Price Fluctuations , author =. Energy Economics , volume =. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107652 , urldate =

  51. [51]

    Understanding Strategic Bidding in Multi-Unit Auctions: A Case Study of the

    Horta. Understanding Strategic Bidding in Multi-Unit Auctions: A Case Study of the. The RAND Journal of Economics , volume =. doi:10.1111/j.0741-6261.2008.00005.x , urldate =

  52. [52]

    Introduction to. The. doi:10.1002/9781118775745.part1 , urldate =

  53. [53]

    Introduction to. The. doi:10.1002/9781118775745.part2 , urldate =

  54. [54]

    Introduction to. The. doi:10.1002/9781118775745.ch02 , urldate =

  55. [55]

    Introduction to. The. doi:10.1002/9781118775745.ch01 , urldate =

  56. [56]

    Investing.com , urldate =

    Coal (. Investing.com , urldate =

  57. [57]

    Investing.com , urldate =

    Dutch. Investing.com , urldate =

  58. [58]

    Sequential

    Ito, Koichiro and Reguant, Mar , year = 2016, month = jul, journal =. Sequential. doi:10.1257/aer.20141529 , urldate =

  59. [59]

    and Kahn, Edward , year = 2002, month = oct, journal =

    Joskow, Paul L. and Kahn, Edward , year = 2002, month = oct, journal =. A. doi:10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol23-No4-1 , urldate =

  60. [60]

    Pricing of Reserves:

    Just, Sebastian and Weber, Christoph , year = 2008, month = nov, journal =. Pricing of Reserves:. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2008.05.004 , urldate =

  61. [61]

    Strategic Behavior in the

    Just, Sebastian and Weber, Christoph , year = 2015, month = oct, journal =. Strategic Behavior in the. doi:10.1007/s11149-015-9270-6 , urldate =

  62. [62]

    Kargus, Tobias and. Multi-. doi:10.2139/ssrn.5250225 , urldate =. Social Science Research Network , langid =:5250225 , publisher =

  63. [63]

    IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution , volume =

    Behavioural Market Power Indices in a Transmission-Constrained Electricity Market , author =. IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution , volume =. doi:10.1049/iet-gtd.2017.0911 , urldate =

  64. [64]

    Heterogeneous

    Kim, Harim , year = 2022, month = may, journal =. Heterogeneous. doi:10.1257/mic.20190367 , urldate =

  65. [65]

    Short-Term Electricity Trading for System Balancing:

    Koch, Christopher and Hirth, Lion , year = 2019, month = oct, journal =. Short-Term Electricity Trading for System Balancing:. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2019.109275 , urldate =

  66. [66]

    The Flow Based Market Coupling Arrangement in

    Kristiansen, Tarjei , year = 2020, month = jan, journal =. The Flow Based Market Coupling Arrangement in. doi:10.1016/j.esr.2019.100444 , urldate =

  67. [67]

    K. Does. The Electricity Journal , volume =. doi:10.1016/j.tej.2008.12.006 , urldate =

  68. [68]

    Kwoka, John and Sabodash, Vladlena , year = 2011, month = may, journal =. Price. doi:10.1007/s11151-011-9294-8 , urldate =

  69. [69]

    and Hers, Sebastiaan , year = 2008, month = apr, journal =

    Lise, Wietze and Hobbs, Benjamin F. and Hers, Sebastiaan , year = 2008, month = apr, journal =. Market Power in the. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2007.12.012 , urldate =

  70. [70]

    Managing. The. doi:10.1002/9781118775745.ch13 , urldate =

  71. [71]

    Managing. The. doi:10.1002/9781118775745.part6 , urldate =

  72. [72]

    Market-. The. doi:10.1002/9781118775745.ch10 , urldate =

  73. [73]

    Assessing Wholesale Competition in the

    Marshall, Luke and Bruce, Anna and MacGill, Iain , year = 2021, month = feb, journal =. Assessing Wholesale Competition in the. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2020.112066 , urldate =

  74. [74]

    Competition Policy: Theory and Practice , author =

  75. [75]

    Competition in the

    Mulder, Machiel , year = 2015, month = apr, journal =. Competition in the. doi:10.5547/01956574.36.2.1 , urldate =

  76. [76]

    Decomposing Changes in Competition in the

    Mulder, Machiel and Schoonbeek, Lambert , year = 2013, month = sep, journal =. Decomposing Changes in Competition in the. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2013.04.006 , urldate =

  77. [77]

    Market Power Implication on Congested Power System:

    Nappu, Muhammad Bachtiar and Bansal, Ramesh Chand and Saha, Tapan Kumar , year = 2013, month = may, journal =. Market Power Implication on Congested Power System:. doi:10.1016/j.ijepes.2012.09.016 , urldate =

  78. [78]

    The Benefits of Integrating

    Newbery, David and Strbac, Goran and Viehoff, Ivan , year = 2016, month = jul, journal =. The Benefits of Integrating. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2016.03.047 , urldate =

  79. [79]

    Mitigating

    Newbery, David , langid =. Mitigating

  80. [80]

    Optimal. The. doi:10.1002/9781118775745.part3 , urldate =

Showing first 80 references.