Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 36 references

Dirac-vortex modes beyond the continuum limit

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper shows that in discrete lattices the global initial phase of a Kekulé modulation—redundant in the continuum Jackiw–Rossi model—becomes observable and drives a displacement of the Dirac-vortex mode center, which can be converted in

desk verdict Discreteness turns a gauge phase into a real frequency-tuning knob for Dirac-vortex cavities, with an honest but partly fitted quantitative model; the experimental demonstration is solid and deserves peer review. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.20000 v1 pith:RK44FHE7 submitted 2026-07-22 physics.optics physics.app-ph

Jiayu Fan , Jiusi Yu , Aoning Luo , Yiyi Yao , Shijie Kang , Xiexuan Zhang , Haitao Li , Biye Xie
show 2 more authors
Xiao-Dong Chen Xiaoxiao Wu
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticsphysics.app-ph PACS 42.70.Qs
keywords Dirac-vortexmodesKekulémodulationJackiw-Rossimodelphotoniccrystalstopologicalbandgapfrequencytuningmodecenterdisplacementgaugeredundancy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper establishes that in discrete lattices the global initial phase of the periodic Kekulé modulation, which is a redundant gauge degree of freedom in the continuum Jackiw–Rossi model, becomes physically observable when the modulation amplitude is constant (α = 0). In this regime the phase drives a rotation-like displacement of the Dirac-vortex mode center by up to a lattice constant, comparable to the mode's own radius. By adding a sublattice-antisymmetric perturbation across a mirror axis, the paper converts this spatial motion into a continuous, approximately sinusoidal frequency shift of the mode across nearly the entire topological bandgap. A revised continuum model, which inserts a phase-dependent rigid displacement into the ideal zero-mode wavefunction, predicts this spectral response and matches both full-wave simulations and microwave measurements. The result turns the initial phase from an inert choice into a practical control knob for reconfigurable photonic devices.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing ansatz is a displaced Jackiw–Rossi zero-mode wavefunction: Ψ(φ0, r) = Ψ0(r − rc(φ0)), where rc (energy-density-weighted center) moves on a fitted circular trajectory of radius r0 as φ0 varies. This displacement, driven by the central unit cell's fixed Kekulé phase φc, converts the gauge phase into a physical perturbation probe. Evaluated against the sublattice-antisymmetric staggered mass mΔ tanh(y/β) sgn(y) σz⊗I in first-order perturbation theory, it yields a closed-form frequency shift Δf(1)(φ0) proportional to r0 and roughly to sin φ0, matching the simulated and measured tuning.

What would settle it

Measure the mode-center trajectory in full-wave simulations for a central-cell phase different from 0° (e.g., 90°) and compare the radius and the resulting frequency shift to the model's prediction; if the trajectory is not circular or the tuning range changes in a way not captured by the rigid-displacement formula, the ansatz is falsified. Alternatively, compute the mode displacement directly from the discrete lattice Hamiltonian and check whether it matches the fitted circle.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The ideal Jackiw–Rossi model treats the initial phase φ0 as a gauge choice with no observable effect; the paper shows this breaks down in discrete lattices in the constant-amplitude Kekulé regime. There, lattice discreteness makes the initial phase physically felt as a lattice-scale displacement of the DVM center, which traces a phase-dependent trajectory around the vortex core. With a sublattice-antisymmetric perturbation, this displacement causes the mode to sample contrasting sublattice biases, producing a first-order frequency shift that depends sinusoidally on φ0 and can span nearly the entire topological bandgap. The authors capture this by re-centering the ideal zero-mode wavefunction

Load-bearing premise

The model assumes that the entire effect of lattice discreteness on the mode is a rigid circular displacement of the ideal Jackiw–Rossi wavefunction, with radius r0 taken from simulation fits and the central cell phase set by hand to 0°; the frequency-shift prediction is directly proportional to that fitted r0.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In the constant-modulation regime, changing the global initial phase shifts the mode center by about a lattice constant; the effect is largest when the central unit cell's phase is set to 0° and the modulation profile is flat.
  • A sublattice-antisymmetric radius perturbation converts the center motion into frequency tuning; at ΔR = 0.5 mm the tuning range nearly fills the original topological bandgap.
  • The tuning curve is approximately sinusoidal in φ0, a direct consequence of the circular center trajectory; at φ0 = 0° and 180° the shift vanishes.
  • The effect is a qualitative departure from the continuum Jackiw–Rossi model, which predicts no phase-dependent spectral response; experiments and numerics agree with the corrected model.
  • Initial-phase engineering becomes a viable route for reconfigurable devices such as tunable topological cavities and filters.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the center-displacement mechanism holds in other wave platforms, the same phase-controlled tuning should appear in acoustic, elastic, and mechanical Kekulé lattices, making it a generic design principle rather than a photonic-specific effect.
  • The central unit cell's phase φc is effectively a second control knob: adjusting it should change the trajectory radius and therefore the tuning range, which could be tested experimentally by fabricating samples with different φc values.
  • The phase-driven center motion itself could be used as a spatial switch or a way to adiabatically transport the mode around the vortex core, without any dynamical perturbation, since the static tuning mechanism implies strong phase-sensitivity of the mode position.
  • A full tight-binding derivation of rc(φ0) from the discrete Hamiltonian—rather than a fitted circle—would extend the model beyond the constant-modulation regime and may reveal corrections to the rigid-displacement ansatz.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports that the global initial phase ϕ₀ of the Kekulé modulation, which is a gauge degree of freedom in the continuum Jackiw–Rossi model, becomes physically observable in discrete lattices when the modulation profile approaches a constant amplitude (α→0, Eq. (1)). The authors show that the energy-weighted mode center r_c of the Dirac-vortex mode shifts with ϕ₀. By introducing a sublattice-antisymmetric radius perturbation (Eq. (4)), they convert this displacement into a continuous, sinusoidal-like frequency response spanning nearly the entire topological bandgap. Full-wave simulations and four-phase microwave experiments, including real-space field maps and FFT spectra, support the qualitative behavior. A 'revised continuum model' (Eqs. (7)–(10)) is proposed, in which the discreteness effect is absorbed into a rigid displacement r_c(ϕ₀) of the ideal wavefunction, with r_c fitted to a circular trajectory of radius r₀; the resulting frequency shift Δf ∝ r₀ sin ϕ₀ is compared with simulations and experiments.

Significance. The work identifies a concrete mechanism by which lattice discreteness goes beyond the continuum Jackiw–Rossi description and promotes a formerly redundant phase variable into a useful tuning knob. If supported by a quantitative theory, this would be a valuable contribution to reconfigurable topological photonics. The paper combines full-wave simulations, a simplified semi-analytic model, and microwave experiments, which is commendable. However, the predictive power of the semi-analytic model is limited because its key input, the displacement radius r₀, is extracted from the same simulations it is later compared with. The claims of quantitative agreement should therefore be calibrated against this limitation.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3, Eq. (10), Fig. 3(b,d)] The quantitative validation is partly circular: the prediction of Eq. (10) is proportional to r₀, which is the radius of a circle fitted to the mode-center trajectory extracted from full-wave simulations (Fig. 3b). The rigid-displacement assumption in Eq. (8) and the circular form of the trajectory are not derived from the discrete lattice Hamiltonian. Thus, the 'excellent agreement' in Fig. 3(d) is substantially a refitting of the same simulations. Please provide a microscopic derivation or at least a scaling argument for r₀(ϕ_c, α, d₀) from a lattice model, or explicitly state that Eq. (10) is a phenomenological parametrization rather than an ab initio prediction. Also report the fit residuals for the circular trajectory.
  2. [§1 and §3 (CUC phase ϕ_c)] The central unit cell (CUC) phase ϕ_c is introduced in §1 as a 'lever' controlling the radius of the mode-center motion, and then fixed to ϕ_c = 0° in §3 'to maximize the mode-center motion'. This means that the amplitude of the predicted tuning in Eq. (10) depends on a hand-chosen, explicitly optimized parameter. Without a measurement or scaling of r₀(ϕ_c), the tuning range is not predicted independently of this choice. Please provide numerical scans over ϕ_c to demonstrate how the lever works and to show that the main conclusions are robust to this choice.
  3. [Eq. (10) / SI Note 5] The derivation of Eq. (10) is deferred to SI Note 5, which was not included with this manuscript. The key step is therefore not verifiable from the manuscript alone. In addition, the printed Eq. (10) appears to contain a factor 'sgn(sin ϕ₀)' inside an integral, which would produce a non-smooth cusp at ϕ₀ = 0 and π, inconsistent with the smooth sinusoidal curves shown in Fig. 3(d). Please include the full derivation in the main text or in the SI, define all integration variables, and clarify the smoothness of the result at ϕ₀ = 0 and π.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (1)] The α→0 limit is not explicitly defined. The displayed tanh factor is singular at α = 0 unless the limit is taken carefully; the text says 'constant profile', but the precise limiting form should be stated.
  2. [§2, 'nearly the entire bandgap'] Please quantify the tuning range, e.g., as the ratio of the maximum frequency shift to the width of the topological bandgap of the unperturbed lattice. Also clarify whether 'bandgap' refers to the unperturbed lattice or the lattice with ΔR ≠ 0.
  3. [Fig. 3(d)] For ΔR = 0.5 mm, deviations between the semi-analytic result and full-wave simulations appear substantial over part of the phase range. Please provide a residual plot or error bars, and discuss whether the deviations arise from higher-order terms or from a change in r_c when the perturbation is finite.
  4. [§4, experimental methods] The value of β used in the fabricated samples is not stated. Since the simulations fix β = 0.01, please specify the experimental β or comment on the sensitivity of the measured response to fabrication details of the transition region.
  5. [References] Reference [32] is cited to support the claim that changing ϕ₀ shifts the Kekulé bonding texture and thereby affects the mode distribution, but that reference concerns fractional charge and does not directly address mode-center motion in photonic crystals. Please consider citing a more directly relevant lattice model.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the frequency-shift prediction uses a simulation-extracted displacement r0 as an input and is independently checked against experiments.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is not circular. The ideal Jackiw-Rossi Hamiltonian (Eq. 5), zero-mode solution (Eq. 7), and first-order perturbation calculation (Eqs. 9-10) are standard continuum derivations. The only simulation-derived parameter entering the prediction is r0, the radius of the circular fit to the mode-center trajectory (Fig. 3b); this trajectory is an observable of the unperturbed system and is not fitted to the target frequency-shift data. Eq. (10) therefore computes the spectral response from a separately measured/calculated input, and the resulting sinusoidal dependence is checked against both full-wave simulations (Fig. 3d) and, independently, four experimental samples (Fig. 4c). The hand-fixed CUC phase phi_c = 0 is a design choice, not a circular input. The model does not provide a microscopic derivation of r0 from the discrete lattice Hamiltonian, and the derivation of Eq. (10) is deferred to SI Note 5; these are robustness/verifiability limitations rather than equivalence-by-construction. No load-bearing self-citation or imported uniqueness theorem is used. Accordingly, no specific circular step can be exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new particles, forces, or conserved quantities are introduced. The sublattice-antisymmetric perturbation is a designed structural modification, not a new entity. The central quantitative model depends on three hand-set or fitted parameters: the trajectory radius r0, the central-cell phase φc, and the profile sharpness β.

free parameters (3)
  • r0 (radius of fitted mode-center trajectory) = not stated numerically (extracted from full-wave simulation)
    Fig. 3(b): markers are extracted from full-wave simulations and fitted to a circle; Eq. (10) uses r0 to set the magnitude of the frequency shift. It is a fitted parameter, not derived from the lattice model.
  • φc (central unit cell Kekulé phase) = 0°
    The azimuthal angle is undefined at the origin; the authors assign a local phase φc to the central unit cell and fix it to 0° 'to maximize the mode-center motion'. The trajectory radius depends on this choice, so it is a hand-chosen parameter affecting the central effect.
  • β (sharpness of sublattice-antisymmetric profile) = 0.01
    'we choose β = 0.01 to optimize the frequency tuning range' — a hand-tuned design parameter controlling the transition width of the perturbation; not derived from a theory.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The Kekulé-modulated discrete lattice is described by the continuum Dirac Hamiltonian (5) with complex mass m(r) given by Eq. (6).
    This is the standard Jackiw-Rossi mapping used throughout the field; the paper relies on it to define the unperturbed zero mode.
  • standard math The unperturbed DVM zero mode is strictly B-sublattice polarized and an equal-amplitude superposition of K and K' valleys (Eq. 7).
    This is a standard solution of the Jackiw-Rossi equation; the paper uses it as the starting point for perturbation theory.
  • ad hoc to paper The only effect of lattice discreteness on the DVM is a rigid displacement rc(ϕ0) of the continuum wavefunction (Eq. 8).
    No microscopic derivation is given; the displacement is extracted from simulation and inserted into the continuum wavefunction by hand.
  • ad hoc to paper The mode-center trajectory rc(ϕ0) is a circle of radius r0 (fit in Fig. 3b).
    The circular trajectory is fitted to simulation markers; the sinusoidal frequency dependence follows directly from this assumed circle.
  • domain assumption First-order perturbation theory with β→0 is sufficient to compute the frequency shift for ΔR up to 0.5 mm.
    The paper treats Eq. (9) as a first-order perturbation; for the larger ΔR it acknowledges higher-order terms distort the spectrum, so the validity of first-order theory is an approximation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Dirac-vortex modes beyond the continuum limit." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RK44FHE7

@misc{pith2026260720000,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Dirac-vortex modes beyond the continuum limit},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RK44FHE7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.20000}
}
read the original abstract

Dirac-vortex modes (DVMs) in Kekule-modulated lattices provide a topological route to wave confinement and are commonly described by the continuum Jackiw-Rossi model, in which the initial phase acts as a redundant gauge degree of freedom and does not affect observables of the mode. Here we show that this picture breaks down in discrete lattices when the complex mass texture that induces the DVMs no longer satisfies the slowly varying envelope approximation. In this regime, lattice discreteness turns the initial phase into a physically observable parameter that shifts the DVM center. By further introducing a sublattice-antisymmetric perturbation, we convert this phase-dependent center motion into a continuous spectral response of the DVM, enabling its frequency tuning across nearly the entire topological bandgap. Our simulation and experimental results agree well with a revised continuum model accounting for the mode-center motion. Within this perturbative framework, the model shows that the frequency shift exhibits a sinusoidal-like dependence on the initial phase. These findings reveal initial phase-sensitivity of the DVMs realized in lattices, an important and basic feature absent from the ideal continuum Jackiw-Rossi model, and demonstrate initial phase engineering as a potential pathway towards reconfigurable photonic devices.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references

  1. [32]

    E. Lee, A. Furusaki, and B. -J. Yang, Fractional charge bound to a vortex in two- dimensional topological crystalline insulators, Phys . Rev. B 101, 241109 (2020)

    2020

  2. [1]

    Z.-K. Lin, Q. Wang, Y . Liu, H. Xue, B. Zhang, Y . Chong, and J. -H. Jiang, Topological phenomena at defects in acoustic, photonic and solid-state lattices, Nat. Rev. Phys. 5, 483 (2023)

    2023

  3. [2]

    Jalali Mehrabad, S

    M. Jalali Mehrabad, S. Mittal, and M. Hafezi, Topological photonics: fundamental concepts, recent developments, and future directions, Phys. Rev. A 108, 040101 (2023)

    2023

  4. [3]

    Ozawa et al., Topological photonics, Rev

    T. Ozawa et al., Topological photonics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 015006 (2019)

    2019

  5. [4]

    G. Tang, X. He, F. Shi, J. Liu, X. Chen, and J. Dong, Topological photonic crystals: physics, designs, and applications, Laser Photonics Rev. 16, 2100300 (2022)

    2022

  6. [5]

    P. Gao, D. Torrent, F. Cervera, P. San-Jose, J. Sánchez-Dehesa, and J. Christensen, Majorana -like zero modes in Kekulé distorted sonic lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 196601 (2019)

    2019

  7. [6]

    Y . Guan, C. Dutreix, H. González-Herrero, M. M. Ugeda, I. Brihuega, M. I. Katsnelson, O. V . Yazyev, and V . T. Renard, Observation of Kekulé vortices around hydrogen adatoms in graphene, Nat. Commun. 15, 2927 (2024). 24

    2024

  8. [7]

    Gao et al., Topological Dirac-vortex modes in a three-dimensional photonic topological insulator, Nat

    Z. Gao et al., Topological Dirac-vortex modes in a three-dimensional photonic topological insulator, Nat. Commun. 16, 5659 (2025)

    2025

Show all 36 references
  1. [8]

    A. J. Menssen, J. Guan, D. Felce, M. J. Booth, and I. A. Walmsley, Photonic topological mode bound to a vortex, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 117401 (2020)

    2020

  2. [9]

    Zhang, H

    C. Zhang, H. Chen, Y . Su, F. Zhou, L. Zhou, Z. Dong, M. Ren, L. Zhang, Y . Zhang, and Y . Wang, Imaging Kekulé s piral order in graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 156401 (2026)

    2026

  3. [10]

    Ma et al., Room -temperature continuous -wave topological D irac- vortex microcavity lasers on silicon, Light Sci

    J. Ma et al., Room -temperature continuous -wave topological D irac- vortex microcavity lasers on silicon, Light Sci. Appl. 12, 255 (2023)

    2023

  4. [11]

    K. Chen, F. Komissarenko, D. Smirnova, A. Vakulenko, S. Kiriushechkina, I. V olkovskaya, S. Guddala, V . Menon, A. Alù, and A. B. Khanikaev, Photonic D irac cavities with spatially varying mass term, Sci. Adv. 9, eabq4243 (2023)

    2023

  5. [12]

    L. Yang, G. Li, X. Gao, and L. Lu, Topological-cavity surface-emitting laser, Nat. Photon. 16, 279 (2022)

    2022

  6. [13]

    Contractor, W

    R. Contractor, W. Noh, W. Redjem, W. Qarony, E. Martin, S. Dhuey, A. Schwartzberg, and B. Kanté, Scalable single- mode surface - emitting laser via open-Dirac singularities, Nature 608, 692 (2022)

    2022

  7. [14]

    H. Li, J. Y u, J. Fan, S. Kang, B. Hou, Z. Lin, H. Chen, J. Jiang, and X. Wu, Unveiling spin‐orbital angular momentum locking in photonic Dirac vortex cavities, Laser Photonics Rev. e02844 (2026). 25

    2026

  8. [15]

    Niu et al., Realization of a D irac-vortex topological photonic crystal fiber, Nat

    Q. Niu et al., Realization of a D irac-vortex topological photonic crystal fiber, Nat. Commun. 16, 11051 (2025)

    2025

  9. [16]

    H. Xing, Z. Xue, P. P. Shum, and L. Cong, Experimental observation of topological Dirac vortex mode in terahertz photonic crystal fibers, Light Sci. Appl. 15, 97 (2026)

    2026

  10. [17]

    Lin and L

    H. Lin and L. Lu, Dirac -vortex topological photonic crystal fibre, Light Sci. Appl. 9, 202 (2020)

    2020

  11. [18]

    X. Gao, L. Yang, H. Lin, L. Zhang, J. Li, F. Bo, Z. Wang, and L. Lu, Dirac-vortex topological cavities, Nat. Nanotechnol. 15, 1012 (2020)

    2020

  12. [19]

    Yan et al., Realization of topology-controlled photonic cavities in a valley photonic crystal, Phys

    B. Yan et al., Realization of topology-controlled photonic cavities in a valley photonic crystal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 033803 (2025)

    2025

  13. [20]

    Jackiw and P

    R. Jackiw and P. Rossi, Zero modes of the vortex- fermion system, Nucl. Phys. B 190, 681 (1981)

    1981

  14. [21]

    Roy, Topological majorana and D irac zero modes in superconducting vortex cores, Phys

    R. Roy, Topological majorana and D irac zero modes in superconducting vortex cores, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 186401 (2010)

    2010

  15. [22]

    Liu et al., High -power electrically pumped terahertz topological laser based on a surface metallic D irac-vortex cavity, Nat

    J. Liu et al., High -power electrically pumped terahertz topological laser based on a surface metallic D irac-vortex cavity, Nat. Commun. 15, 4431 (2024)

    2024

  16. [23]

    Zhong, X

    M. Zhong, X. Bi, M. Song, N. Mou, D. Zhang, X. Zhuo, J. Hu, B. Xie, X. Ao, and J. Guan, Plasmonic Dirac -vortex lasers via three - dimensional photonic mass vortices engineering, Nat . Commun. 17, 4161 (2026). 26

    2026

  17. [24]

    Chang, X

    S. Chang, X. Gao, Z. Xu, X. Shi, and T. Zhai, Dual -channel Dirac- vortex topological cavity in hexagon photonic crystal, Photon. Res. 13, 2793 (2025)

    2025

  18. [25]

    J. Noh, T. Schuster, T. Iadecola, S. Huang, M. Wang, K. P. Chen, C. Chamon, and M. C. Rechtsman, Braiding photonic topological zero modes, Nat. Phys. 16, 989 (2020)

    2020

  19. [26]

    X. Gao, S. Chang, Z. Li, and T. Zhai, Far fields of two- dimensional TM modes in D irac-vortex topological cavity, Opt . Lett. 50, 245 (2025)

    2025

  20. [27]

    X. Zhou, Z. Lin, W. Lu, Y . Lai, B. Hou, and J. Jiang, Twisted quadrupole topological photonic crystals, Laser Photonics Rev . 14, 2000010 (2020)

    2020

  21. [28]

    Wu and X

    L.-H. Wu and X. Hu, Scheme for achieving a topological photonic crystal by using dielectric material, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 , 223901 (2015)

    2015

  22. [29]

    H. Wang, L. Xu, H. Chen, and J.-H. Jiang, Three-dimensional photonic Dirac points stabilized by point group symmetry, Phys. Rev. B 93, 235155 (2016)

    2016

  23. [30]

    C.-Y . Hou, C. Chamon, and C. Mudry, Electron fractionalization in two-dimensional graphenelike structures, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 186809 (2007)

    2007

  24. [31]

    Jackiw and S

    R. Jackiw and S. -Y . Pi, Chiral gauge theory for graphene, Phys. Rev. 27 Lett. 98, 266402 (2007)

    2007

  25. [33]

    Y . Yang, Y . F. Xu, T. Xu, H.-X. Wang, J.-H. Jiang, X. Hu, and Z. H. Hang, Visualization of a unidirectional electromagnetic waveguide using topological photonic crystals made of dielectric materials, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 217401 (2018)

    2018

  26. [34]

    B. Xie, G. Su, H.-F. Wang, F. Liu, L. Hu, S.-Y . Y u, P. Zhan, M.-H. Lu, Z. Wang, and Y .-F. Chen, Higher-order quantum spin Hall effect in a photonic crystal, Nat. Commun. 11, 3768 (2020)

    2020

  27. [35]

    Chen, W.-M

    X.-D. Chen, W.-M. Deng, F.-L. Shi, F.-L. Zhao, M. Chen, and J. -W. Dong, Direct observation of corner states in second- order topological photonic crystal slabs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 233902 (2019)

    2019

  28. [36]

    T. Liu, K. Bai, Y . Zhang, D. Wan, Y . Lai, C. T. Chan, and M. Xiao, Finite barrier bound state, Light Sci. Appl. 13, 69 (2024)

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.