pith. sign in

arxiv: math/0304198 · v1 · submitted 2003-04-15 · 🧮 math.CO

Dense graphs are antimagic

classification 🧮 math.CO
keywords antimagicgraphsedgesgraphvertexconjecturedegreelabeling
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

An {\em antimagic labeling} of a graph with $m$ edges and $n$ vertices is a bijection from the set of edges to the integers $1,...,m$ such that all $n$ vertex sums are pairwise distinct, where a vertex sum is the sum of labels of all edges incident with the same vertex. A graph is called {\em antimagic} if it has an antimagic labeling. A conjecture of Ringel (see \cite{HaRi}) states that every connected graph, but $K_2$, is antimagic. Our main result validates this conjecture for graphs having minimum degree $\Omega(\log n)$. The proof combines probabilistic arguments with simple tools from analytic number theory and combinatorial techniques. We also prove that complete partite graphs (but $K_2$) and graphs with maximum degree at least $n-2$ are antimagic.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.