Thoughts on the Riemann hypothesis
classification
🧮 math.HO
keywords
hypothesisriemannwhetheraddedappearanceaxiombooksbriefly
read the original abstract
The simultaneous appearance in May 2003 of four books on the Riemann hypothesis (RH) provoked these reflections. We briefly discuss whether the RH should be added as a new axiom, or whether a proof of the RH might involve the notion of randomness.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.