pith. sign in

arxiv: 0908.1674 · v1 · pith:TMMPW2UKnew · submitted 2009-08-12 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.str-el

A canonical form for Projected Entangled Pair States and applications

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.str-el
keywords injectivepepscannotentangledinvariantpairprojectedsame
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We show that two different tensors defining the same translational invariant injective Projected Entangled Pair State (PEPS) in a square lattice must be the same up to a trivial gauge freedom. This allows us to characterize the existence of any local or spatial symmetry in the state. As an application of these results we prove that a SU(2) invariant PEPS with half-integer spin cannot be injective, which can be seen as a Lieb-Shultz-Mattis theorem in this context. We also give the natural generalization for U(1) symmetry in the spirit of Oshikawa-Yamanaka-Affleck, and show that a PEPS with Wilson loops cannot be injective.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Mapping twist fields to local operators via tensor networks

    quant-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Constructs explicit physical local operators whose expectation values match twist field actions in MPS, exact in the injectivity limit and at the center of orthogonality, with numerical tests in the transverse-field I...