Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Low metallicity natal environments and black hole masses in Ultraluminous X-ray Sources

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 0909.1017 v1 pith:R6E6PH5C submitted 2009-09-05 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.SR

classification astro-ph.HEastro-ph.SR
keywords ulxsblackmetallicitysourcesaccountaccretionholeholes
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We review the available estimates of the masses of the compact object in Ultraluminous X-ray Sources (ULXs) and critically reconsider the stellar-mass versus intermediate-mass black hole interpretations. Black holes of several hundreds to thousands of $M_\odot$ are not required for the majority of ULXs, although they might be present in the handful of known hyper-luminous ($\sim 10^{41}$ erg s$^{-1}$) objects and/or some sources showing timing features in their power density spectra. At the same time, however, stellar mass BHs may be quite a reasonable explanation for ULXs below $\sim 10^{40}$ erg s$^{-1}$, but they need super-Eddington accretion and some suitable dependence of the beaming factor on the accretion rate in order to account for ULXs above this (isotropic) luminosity. We investigate in detail a 'third way' in which a proportion of ULXs contain $\approx 30-90 M_\odot$ black holes formed in a low metallicity environment and accreting in a slightly critical regime and find that it can consistently account for the properties of bright ULXs. Surveys of ULX locations looking for a statistically meaningful relationship between ULX position, average luminosity and local metallicity will provide a definitive test of our proposal.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools