REVIEW 2 cited by
Measurement errors and scaling relations in astrophysics: a review
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
This review article considers some of the most common methods used in astronomy for regressing one quantity against another in order to estimate the model parameters or to predict an observationally expensive quantity using trends between object values. These methods have to tackle some of the awkward features prevalent in astronomical data, namely heteroscedastic (point-dependent) errors, intrinsic scatter, non-ignorable data collection and selection effects, data structure and non-uniform population (often called Malmquist bias), non-Gaussian data, outliers and mixtures of regressions. We outline how least square fits, weighted least squares methods, Maximum Likelihood, survival analysis, and Bayesian methods have been applied in the astrophysics literature when one or more of these features is present. In particular we concentrate on errors-in-variables regression and we advocate Bayesian techniques.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Open Source Planning & Control System with Language Agents for Autonomous Scientific Discovery
A multi-agent LLM system with a Planning & Control strategy performs an autonomous Union2.1 cosmology fit and beats single-LLM baselines on a 50-problem DS-1000 subset.
-
Selection effects in correlated observations with application to distance-ladder observations
Residual correlated-selection effects are weakly detected (1.2–1.9σ) in Cepheid photometry and can shift the distance-ladder Hubble constant down by 0.7–1.1 km/s/Mpc.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.