pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 1307.1310 · v1 · submitted 2013-07-04 · 🪐 quant-ph · physics.hist-ph

Recognition: unknown

The Oxford Questions on the foundations of quantum physics

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification 🪐 quant-ph physics.hist-ph
keywords quantumphysicstheoryquestionsrealityrelativitysomebelief
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

The twentieth century saw two fundamental revolutions in physics -- relativity and quantum. Daily use of these theories can numb the sense of wonder at their immense empirical success. Does their instrumental effectiveness stand on the rock of secure concepts or the sand of unresolved fundamentals? Does measuring a quantum system probe, or even create, reality, or merely change belief? Must relativity and quantum theory just co-exist or might we find a new theory which unifies the two? To bring such questions into sharper focus, we convened a conference on Quantum Physics and the Nature of Reality. Some issues remain as controversial as ever, but some are being nudged by theory's secret weapon of experiment.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Are free choices absolute, when internalized in Wigner's friend?

    quant-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Free choices lack absoluteness in an extended Wigner's friend scenario based on the Pusey-Barrett-Rudolph theorem under locality.