REVIEW 1 cited by
Optimal Algorithms for Testing Closeness of Discrete Distributions
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Optimal Algorithms for Testing Closeness of Discrete Distributions
read the original abstract
We study the question of closeness testing for two discrete distributions. More precisely, given samples from two distributions $p$ and $q$ over an $n$-element set, we wish to distinguish whether $p=q$ versus $p$ is at least $\eps$-far from $q$, in either $\ell_1$ or $\ell_2$ distance. Batu et al. gave the first sub-linear time algorithms for these problems, which matched the lower bounds of Valiant up to a logarithmic factor in $n$, and a polynomial factor of $\eps.$ In this work, we present simple (and new) testers for both the $\ell_1$ and $\ell_2$ settings, with sample complexity that is information-theoretically optimal, to constant factors, both in the dependence on $n$, and the dependence on $\eps$; for the $\ell_1$ testing problem we establish that the sample complexity is $\Theta(\max\{n^{2/3}/\eps^{4/3}, n^{1/2}/\eps^2 \}).$
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
On estimating operator norm distance, with optimal trace distance estimation when one state is pure
Rank-independent quantum estimators achieve Θ(1/ε) queries for operator-norm (and trace) distance when one state is pure, and Õ(1/ε^{3/2}) queries for general states, proving BQP-completeness.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.