REVIEW 1 cited by
Solar cycle 25: another moderate cycle?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Surface flux transport simulations for the descending phase of cycle 24 using random sources (emerging bipolar magnetic regions) with empirically determined scatter of their properties provide a prediction of the axial dipole moment during the upcoming activity minimum together with a realistic uncertainty range. The expectation value for the dipole moment around 2020 $(2.5\pm1.1\,$G) is comparable to that observed at the end of cycle 23 (about $2\,$G). The empirical correlation between the dipole moment during solar minimum and the strength of the subsequent cycle thus suggests that cycle 25 will be of moderate amplitude, not much higher than that of the current cycle. However, the intrinsic uncertainty of such predictions resulting from the random scatter of the source properties is considerable and fundamentally limits the reliability with which such predictions can be made before activity minimum is reached.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Constraining the radial decay timescale of solar surface magnetic field through a comparative study of data-assimilative 2D surface flux transport and 3D dynamo models
A comparative analysis of 2D surface flux transport and 3D dynamo models yields a mode-dependent radial decay spectrum with effective timescales τ≈2 yr (l=8) for magnetogram assimilation and τ≈7 yr (dipole) for active...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.