Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Unanimous Prediction for 100% Precision with Application to Learning Semantic Mappings

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1606.06368 v2 pith:5A6BPDSF submitted 2016-06-20 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CL

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CL
keywords modelsconsistentdatamethodonlyprecisionpredictprediction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Can we train a system that, on any new input, either says "don't know" or makes a prediction that is guaranteed to be correct? We answer the question in the affirmative provided our model family is well-specified. Specifically, we introduce the unanimity principle: only predict when all models consistent with the training data predict the same output. We operationalize this principle for semantic parsing, the task of mapping utterances to logical forms. We develop a simple, efficient method that reasons over the infinite set of all consistent models by only checking two of the models. We prove that our method obtains 100% precision even with a modest amount of training data from a possibly adversarial distribution. Empirically, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach on the standard GeoQuery dataset.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Uncertainty-Driven Reliability: Selective Prediction and Trustworthy Deployment in Modern Machine Learning

    cs.LG 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A training-dynamics abstention method matches deep ensembles at a fraction of the training cost, and a five-term error budget explains why selective classifiers still fall short of the oracle.

Pith tools