REVIEW 2 cited by
Legal Question Answering using Ranking SVM and Deep Convolutional Neural Network
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
This paper presents a study of employing Ranking SVM and Convolutional Neural Network for two missions: legal information retrieval and question answering in the Competition on Legal Information Extraction/Entailment. For the first task, our proposed model used a triple of features (LSI, Manhattan, Jaccard), and is based on paragraph level instead of article level as in previous studies. In fact, each single-paragraph article corresponds to a particular paragraph in a huge multiple-paragraph article. For the legal question answering task, additional statistical features from information retrieval task integrated into Convolutional Neural Network contribute to higher accuracy.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
GRAF: Graph Retrieval Augmented by Facts for Romanian Legal Multi-Choice Question Answering
The authors release the first Romanian legal MCQA dataset, a law corpus, a legal knowledge graph, and a graph retrieval method that beats standard baselines on most exam settings.
-
Natural Language Processing of Privacy Policies: A Survey
A systematic review of NLP research on privacy policies finds heavy focus on text classification and sparse work on summarization, question answering, and alignment.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.