pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 1707.03021 · v5 · submitted 2017-07-10 · 🌀 gr-qc · astro-ph.HE· hep-ph· physics.space-ph

Recognition: unknown

The observational evidence for horizons: from echoes to precision gravitational-wave physics

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification 🌀 gr-qc astro-ph.HEhep-phphysics.space-ph
keywords blackgravitational-waveholesobservationscloserdecadesdetectorsevidence
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

The existence of black holes and of spacetime singularities is a fundamental issue in science. Despite this, observations supporting their existence are scarce, and their interpretation unclear. We overview how strong a case for black holes has been made in the last few decades, and how well observations adjust to this paradigm. Unsurprisingly, we conclude that observational evidence for black holes is impossible to come by. However, just like Popper's black swan, alternatives can be ruled out or confirmed to exist with a single observation. These observations are within reach. In the next few years and decades, we will enter the era of precision gravitational-wave physics with more sensitive detectors. Just as accelerators require larger and larger energies to probe smaller and smaller scales, more sensitive gravitational-wave detectors will be probing regions closer and closer to the horizon, potentially reaching Planck scales and beyond. What may be there, lurking?

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Testing solitonic boson star interpretations of Sagittarius A* with near-infrared flare astrometry

    astro-ph.HE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Fitting GRAVITY flare astrometry to solitonic boson star models requires masses larger than 4.3 million solar masses, with more diffuse models yielding values closer to the standard black hole mass and thus placing st...

  2. Bayesian Analysis of Massive Boson Star Models for Sagittarius A* Using Near-Infrared Astrometry Data

    astro-ph.HE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Bayesian analysis shows current near-IR astrometry data cannot distinguish massive boson stars from Schwarzschild black holes for Sgr A*.

  3. On the impossibility of observational confirmation of black holes

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    No observational data can confirm the existence of black holes because general relativity imposes fundamental limits on what can be established about them.