Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Global Convergence of Langevin Dynamics Based Algorithms for Nonconvex Optimization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1707.06618 v3 pith:ZB7WSCJD submitted 2017-07-20 stat.ML cs.LGmath.OC

classification stat.MLcs.LGmath.OC
keywords dynamicsgradientlangevinconvergencelambdastochasticalgorithmsepsilon
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We present a unified framework to analyze the global convergence of Langevin dynamics based algorithms for nonconvex finite-sum optimization with $n$ component functions. At the core of our analysis is a direct analysis of the ergodicity of the numerical approximations to Langevin dynamics, which leads to faster convergence rates. Specifically, we show that gradient Langevin dynamics (GLD) and stochastic gradient Langevin dynamics (SGLD) converge to the almost minimizer within $\tilde O\big(nd/(\lambda\epsilon) \big)$ and $\tilde O\big(d^7/(\lambda^5\epsilon^5) \big)$ stochastic gradient evaluations respectively, where $d$ is the problem dimension, and $\lambda$ is the spectral gap of the Markov chain generated by GLD. Both results improve upon the best known gradient complexity results (Raginsky et al., 2017). Furthermore, for the first time we prove the global convergence guarantee for variance reduced stochastic gradient Langevin dynamics (SVRG-LD) to the almost minimizer within $\tilde O\big(\sqrt{n}d^5/(\lambda^4\epsilon^{5/2})\big)$ stochastic gradient evaluations, which outperforms the gradient complexities of GLD and SGLD in a wide regime. Our theoretical analyses shed some light on using Langevin dynamics based algorithms for nonconvex optimization with provable guarantees.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. When cheap gradients fail: the measurement cost of attacking quantum classifiers

    quant-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Unbiased gradient extraction for attacking quantum classifiers costs at least Θ(d^{5/2}) shots under norm-concentration scaling, and ~d³ for tested deep circuits, so the attacker's relative cost diverges versus classi...

  2. Coherent Ising Machines: The Good, The Bad, The Ugly

    physics.optics 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Coherent Ising machines behave as approximate analog integrators of overdamped Langevin dynamics; hybrid optical-digital versions are bottlenecked by analog-digital conversion, while fully optical versions are estimat...

Pith tools