REVIEW 3 cited by
OmniArt: Multi-task Deep Learning for Artistic Data Analysis
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Vast amounts of artistic data is scattered on-line from both museums and art applications. Collecting, processing and studying it with respect to all accompanying attributes is an expensive process. With a motivation to speed up and improve the quality of categorical analysis in the artistic domain, in this paper we propose an efficient and accurate method for multi-task learning with a shared representation applied in the artistic domain. We continue to show how different multi-task configurations of our method behave on artistic data and outperform handcrafted feature approaches as well as convolutional neural networks. In addition to the method and analysis, we propose a challenge like nature to the new aggregated data set with almost half a million samples and structured meta-data to encourage further research and societal engagement.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
ArtiFact: A Large-Scale Multi-Modal Cultural Heritage Dataset
ArtiFact is a new multi-modal dataset of 651k museum records used to benchmark cross-modal error detection with seven error categories and semantic query processing challenges.
-
Art Beyond Semantics: Sheaf-Informed Contrastive Learning for Multi-Relational Representations
CANVAS learns a separate embedding subspace for each art-historical relation and, across three art datasets, beats single-space CLIP models on most retrieval and classification benchmarks.
-
Automating Iconclass: LLMs and RAG for Large-Scale Classification of Religious Woodcuts
Full-page LLM descriptions matched to Iconclass via vector search and RAG classify 590 early-modern religious woodcuts at 87-92% precision, roughly tripling the F1 of the image-only baseline (0.30 to 0.82).
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.