Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Extractive Summarization using Deep Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1708.04439 v2 pith:K6B4ETF2 submitted 2017-08-15 cs.CL cs.IRcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.IRcs.LG
keywords summaryapproachfeaturesdeepextractivefeatureimproveinformation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper proposes a text summarization approach for factual reports using a deep learning model. This approach consists of three phases: feature extraction, feature enhancement, and summary generation, which work together to assimilate core information and generate a coherent, understandable summary. We are exploring various features to improve the set of sentences selected for the summary, and are using a Restricted Boltzmann Machine to enhance and abstract those features to improve resultant accuracy without losing any important information. The sentences are scored based on those enhanced features and an extractive summary is constructed. Experimentation carried out on several articles demonstrates the effectiveness of the proposed approach. Source code available at: https://github.com/vagisha-nidhi/TextSummarizer

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. LLMCode: Evaluating and Enhancing Researcher-AI Alignment in Qualitative Analysis

    cs.HC 2025-04 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    LLMCode uses IoU and Modified Hausdorff Distance to measure human-LLM coding alignment; two studies with 26 designers show LLMs capture surface coding patterns but not the designer's deeper interpretive lens.

Pith tools