Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

VoiceMask: Anonymize and Sanitize Voice Input on Mobile Devices

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1711.11460 v1 pith:XKFUECH7 submitted 2017-11-30 cs.CR cs.HC

classification cs.CRcs.HC
keywords voiceinputcloudrecognitionspeechuserscontentmobile
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Voice input has been tremendously improving the user experience of mobile devices by freeing our hands from typing on the small screen. Speech recognition is the key technology that powers voice input, and it is usually outsourced to the cloud for the best performance. However, the cloud might compromise users' privacy by identifying their identities by voice, learning their sensitive input content via speech recognition, and then profiling the mobile users based on the content. In this paper, we design an intermediate between users and the cloud, named VoiceMask, to sanitize users' voice data before sending it to the cloud for speech recognition. We analyze the potential privacy risks and aim to protect users' identities and sensitive input content from being disclosed to the cloud. VoiceMask adopts a carefully designed voice conversion mechanism that is resistant to several attacks. Meanwhile, it utilizes an evolution-based keyword substitution technique to sanitize the voice input content. The two sanitization phases are all performed in the resource-limited mobile device while still maintaining the usability and accuracy of the cloud-supported speech recognition service. We implement the voice sanitizer on Android systems and present extensive experimental results that validate the effectiveness and efficiency of our app. It is demonstrated that we are able to reduce the chance of a user's voice being identified from 50 people by 84% while keeping the drop of speech recognition accuracy within 14.2%.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Use Cases for Voice Anonymization

    eess.AS 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Voice anonymization should be designed and evaluated per use case; this paper proposes the first taxonomy of use cases plus requirements derived from a literature review and a public user study.

  2. Speaker Privacy and Security in the Big Data Era: Protection and Defense against Deepfake

    eess.AS 2025-09 accept novelty 1.0 of 10

    A concise survey of voice anonymization, deepfake detection, and speech watermarking as defenses against deepfake speech, with current challenges.

Pith tools