REVIEW 3 cited by
Fix your classifier: the marginal value of training the last weight layer
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Neural networks are commonly used as models for classification for a wide variety of tasks. Typically, a learned affine transformation is placed at the end of such models, yielding a per-class value used for classification. This classifier can have a vast number of parameters, which grows linearly with the number of possible classes, thus requiring increasingly more resources. In this work we argue that this classifier can be fixed, up to a global scale constant, with little or no loss of accuracy for most tasks, allowing memory and computational benefits. Moreover, we show that by initializing the classifier with a Hadamard matrix we can speed up inference as well. We discuss the implications for current understanding of neural network models.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
GIF: Generative Inspiration for Face Recognition at Scale
GIF trains face recognition by predicting structured integer codes per identity, cutting classifier cost from linear to logarithmic in the number of identities while improving IJB-B/IJB-C accuracy over efficient-train...
-
LCA: Loss Change Allocation for Neural Network Training
A per-parameter decomposition of training loss change shows that learning is noisy, with only about half of parameters helping per step, some layers hurting overall, and learning spikes synchronized across layers.
-
LightMC: A Dynamic and Efficient Multiclass Decomposition Algorithm
LightMC learns a multiclass ECOC decomposition dynamically by treating the decoder as a softmax layer and updating the coding matrix with per-class gradient averages.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.