Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Testing Deep Neural Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1803.04792 v4 pith:AT26H3QB submitted 2018-03-10 cs.LG cs.CVcs.SE

classification cs.LGcs.CVcs.SE
keywords testcriteriadnnscoveragedeepgeneratednetworksneural
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Deep neural networks (DNNs) have a wide range of applications, and software employing them must be thoroughly tested, especially in safety-critical domains. However, traditional software test coverage metrics cannot be applied directly to DNNs. In this paper, inspired by the MC/DC coverage criterion, we propose a family of four novel test criteria that are tailored to structural features of DNNs and their semantics. We validate the criteria by demonstrating that the generated test inputs guided via our proposed coverage criteria are able to capture undesired behaviours in a DNN. Test cases are generated using a symbolic approach and a gradient-based heuristic search. By comparing them with existing methods, we show that our criteria achieve a balance between their ability to find bugs (proxied using adversarial examples) and the computational cost of test case generation. Our experiments are conducted on state-of-the-art DNNs obtained using popular open source datasets, including MNIST, CIFAR-10 and ImageNet.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Influence-Guided Concolic Testing of Transformer Robustness

    cs.SE 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    SHAP-based branch prioritization lets a concolic tester find subtle one-pixel attacks on small Transformer classifiers, but the reported evidence is mixed and the abstract overstates results.

  2. testRNN: Coverage-guided Testing on Recurrent Neural Networks

    cs.NE 2019-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    testRNN is the first coverage-guided testing tool for LSTMs that uses mutation-based test generation and three novel structural coverage metrics to evaluate network robustness.

  3. A Topological Improvement of the Overall Performance of Sparse Evolutionary Training: Motif-Based Structural Optimization of Sparse MLPs Project

    cs.NE 2025-06 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    Grouping neurons into blocks of size 2 with shared weights trims training time by 30 to 43 percent with accuracy losses of 1 to 4 percent on two datasets, by the paper's own measurements.

Pith tools