Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Learning compositionally through attentive guidance

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1805.09657 v4 pith:TL7FFGH4 submitted 2018-05-20 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords sequencecompositionalmodelssolutionsneuraltrainingattentionattentive
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

While neural network models have been successfully applied to domains that require substantial generalisation skills, recent studies have implied that they struggle when solving the task they are trained on requires inferring its underlying compositional structure. In this paper, we introduce Attentive Guidance, a mechanism to direct a sequence to sequence model equipped with attention to find more compositional solutions. We test it on two tasks, devised precisely to assess the compositional capabilities of neural models, and we show that vanilla sequence to sequence models with attention overfit the training distribution, while the guided versions come up with compositional solutions that fit the training and testing distributions almost equally well. Moreover, the learned solutions generalise even in cases where the training and testing distributions strongly diverge. In this way, we demonstrate that sequence to sequence models are capable of finding compositional solutions without requiring extra components. These results helps to disentangle the causes for the lack of systematic compositionality in neural networks, which can in turn fuel future work.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. An Analysis for Reasoning Bias of Language Models with Small Initialization

    cs.CL 2025-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Initialization scale controls whether a transformer learns compositional reasoning or memorized mappings, because reasoning tokens acquire more differentiated embeddings early in training.

Pith tools