Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

A Simple Method for Commonsense Reasoning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1806.02847 v2 pith:MKGPHTNO submitted 2018-06-07 cs.AI cs.CLcs.LG

classification cs.AIcs.CLcs.LG
keywords commonsensereasoningmethodmodelsdatafeaturesimportantknowledge
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Commonsense reasoning is a long-standing challenge for deep learning. For example, it is difficult to use neural networks to tackle the Winograd Schema dataset (Levesque et al., 2011). In this paper, we present a simple method for commonsense reasoning with neural networks, using unsupervised learning. Key to our method is the use of language models, trained on a massive amount of unlabled data, to score multiple choice questions posed by commonsense reasoning tests. On both Pronoun Disambiguation and Winograd Schema challenges, our models outperform previous state-of-the-art methods by a large margin, without using expensive annotated knowledge bases or hand-engineered features. We train an array of large RNN language models that operate at word or character level on LM-1-Billion, CommonCrawl, SQuAD, Gutenberg Books, and a customized corpus for this task and show that diversity of training data plays an important role in test performance. Further analysis also shows that our system successfully discovers important features of the context that decide the correct answer, indicating a good grasp of commonsense knowledge.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 314 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. LLM-as-a-Coach: Experiential Learning for Non-Verifiable Tasks

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Training a language model by distilling a coach's written experiential knowledge beats training on a scalar rubric score for open-ended tasks, with better out-of-distribution transfer.

  2. Enhancing Chain-of-Thought Reasoning with Critical Representation Fine-tuning

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    CRFT selects critical internal representations via attention and saliency scores and fine-tunes only them, improving GSM8K accuracy over ReFT from 29.0% to 32.8% on LLaMA-2-7B.

  3. The Maskability Index: Predicting Task-Objective Alignment in Pretrained Language Models

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A five-example DepthRank gap between masked and prefix templates sorts ATOMIC2020 relations into groups that match which prompt style generates better tails.

Pith tools