Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Variational Bayesian Reinforcement Learning with Regret Bounds

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1807.09647 v4 pith:LINENCOE submitted 2018-07-25 cs.LG cs.AIstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.AIstat.ML
keywords agenthighk-valueslearningnumberreinforcementrewardsuncertainty
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

In reinforcement learning the Q-values summarize the expected future rewards that the agent will attain. However, they cannot capture the epistemic uncertainty about those rewards. In this work we derive a new Bellman operator with associated fixed point we call the `knowledge values'. These K-values compress both the expected future rewards and the epistemic uncertainty into a single value, so that high uncertainty, high reward, or both, can yield high K-values. The key principle is to endow the agent with a risk-seeking utility function that is carefully tuned to balance exploration and exploitation. When the agent follows a Boltzmann policy over the K-values it yields a Bayes regret bound of $\tilde O(L \sqrt{S A T})$, where $L$ is the time horizon, $S$ is the total number of states, $A$ is the number of actions, and $T$ is the number of elapsed timesteps. We show deep connections of this approach to the soft-max and maximum-entropy strands of research in reinforcement learning.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Combining Bayesian Inference and Reinforcement Learning for Agent Decision Making: A Review

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey that organizes combinations of Bayesian inference and reinforcement learning, rates them on four properties, and raises ten open questions.

Pith tools