Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Am I Responsible for End-User's Security? A Programmer's Perspective

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1808.01481 v1 pith:RHSP3CZL submitted 2018-08-04 cs.CR cs.CY

classification cs.CRcs.CY
keywords securityprogrammersend-userstheyapplicationssoftwaredevelopexperts
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Previous research has pointed that software applications should not depend on programmers to provide security for end-users as majority of programmers are not experts of computer security. On the other hand, some studies have revealed that security experts believe programmers have a major role to play in ensuring the end-users' security. However, there has been no investigation on what programmers perceive about their responsibility for the end-users' security of applications they develop. In this work, by conducting a qualitative experimental study with 40 software developers, we attempted to understand the programmer's perception on who is responsible for ensuring end-users' security of the applications they develop. Results revealed majority of programmers perceive that they are responsible for the end-users' security of applications they develop. Furthermore, results showed that even though programmers aware of things they need to do to ensure end-users' security, they do not often follow them. We believe these results would change the current view on the role that different stakeholders of the software development process (i.e. researchers, security experts, programmers and Application Programming Interface (API) developers) have to play in order to ensure the security of software applications.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. From Perception to Protection: A Developer-Centered Study of Security and Privacy Threats in Extended Reality (XR)

    cs.CR 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A 23-developer interview study shows professional XR developers recall few XR-specific threats unprompted, rate unfamiliar attacks lower, and exhibit awareness gaps plus diffusion of responsibility.

Pith tools