REVIEW 3 cited by
Neutrino Telescopes as QCD Microscopes
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We present state-of-the-art predictions for the ultra-high energy (UHE) neutrino-nucleus cross-sections in charged- and neutral-current scattering. The calculation is performed in the framework of collinear factorisation at NNLO, extended to include the resummation of small-$x$ BFKL effects. Further improvements are made by accounting for the free-nucleon PDF constraints provided by $D$-meson data from LHCb and assessing the impact of nuclear corrections and heavy-quark mass effects. The calculations presented here should play an important role in the interpretation of future data from neutrino telescopes such as IceCube and KM3NET, and highlight the opportunities that astroparticle experiments offer to study the strong interactions.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
High-energy neutrino event simulation at NLO in Genie for KM3NeT and other observatories
HEDIS, a GENIE extension, implements NLO neutrino-nucleon cross sections with PYTHIA6 hadronization, extending neutrino-telescope event simulation to EeV energies.
-
Letter of Intent: The Forward Physics Facility
Proposes construction of the Forward Physics Facility at the HL-LHC with four complementary detectors to exploit forward neutrinos and new-particle fluxes for neutrino, QCD, astroparticle, and dark-matter measurements.
-
Exploring ultra-high energy neutrino experiments through the lens of the transport equation
Using a line-of-sight transport formalism, the paper finds a 3.1 sigma tension between the KM3NeT ultra-high-energy event and IceCube non-observation under a diffuse power-law flux, with stronger tension for steady po...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.