Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Benchmarking Automatic Machine Learning Frameworks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1808.06492 v1 pith:32YZZQHP submitted 2018-08-17 cs.LG cs.AIstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.AIstat.ML
keywords datasetsautomlacrossauto-sklearnbestclassificationlearningmachine
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

AutoML serves as the bridge between varying levels of expertise when designing machine learning systems and expedites the data science process. A wide range of techniques is taken to address this, however there does not exist an objective comparison of these techniques. We present a benchmark of current open source AutoML solutions using open source datasets. We test auto-sklearn, TPOT, auto_ml, and H2O's AutoML solution against a compiled set of regression and classification datasets sourced from OpenML and find that auto-sklearn performs the best across classification datasets and TPOT performs the best across regression datasets.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. BOASF: A Unified Framework for Speeding up Automatic Machine Learning via Adaptive Successive Filtering

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    BOASF combines Bayesian optimization with adaptive successive filtering and softmax resource allocation to speed up model selection and hyperparameter optimization in automatic machine learning.

Pith tools