Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

An investigation of model-free planning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1901.03559 v2 pith:F2FQECM6 submitted 2019-01-11 cs.LG cs.AIstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.AIstat.ML
keywords planningmodel-freeagentalgorithmcombinatorialabilitychallengingcharacteristics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The field of reinforcement learning (RL) is facing increasingly challenging domains with combinatorial complexity. For an RL agent to address these challenges, it is essential that it can plan effectively. Prior work has typically utilized an explicit model of the environment, combined with a specific planning algorithm (such as tree search). More recently, a new family of methods have been proposed that learn how to plan, by providing the structure for planning via an inductive bias in the function approximator (such as a tree structured neural network), trained end-to-end by a model-free RL algorithm. In this paper, we go even further, and demonstrate empirically that an entirely model-free approach, without special structure beyond standard neural network components such as convolutional networks and LSTMs, can learn to exhibit many of the characteristics typically associated with a model-based planner. We measure our agent's effectiveness at planning in terms of its ability to generalize across a combinatorial and irreversible state space, its data efficiency, and its ability to utilize additional thinking time. We find that our agent has many of the characteristics that one might expect to find in a planning algorithm. Furthermore, it exceeds the state-of-the-art in challenging combinatorial domains such as Sokoban and outperforms other model-free approaches that utilize strong inductive biases toward planning.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. On the Role of Computation in Reinforcement Learning

    cs.LG 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Policies with more compute can provably solve and generalize to longer-horizon RL tasks that policies with less compute cannot, and a minimal recurrent (IRU) architecture realizes these benefits.

Pith tools