Paper Citation Record · LEDGER

An Evaluation of the Human-Interpretability of Explanation

As of 9 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 10 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:1902.00006.

A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.

pith.paper-citation-record.v1
1902.00006 v2

Coverage vector

measured 0 of 0 reference resolution

Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links

measured 10 of 10 standing notices

One-hop event checks from named stored sources.

Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00

measured 10 of 10 inbound itemization

Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-09T14:45:47.302495Z

measured 1 of 1 external citation measurements

A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.

Source: arxiv_reference, observed 2026-08-05T02:28:24.338817Z

Reference resolution

0 of 0 outbound references displayed

verified exact0
verified fuzzy0
unresolved0
parse uncertain0
malformed identifier0
metadata mismatch0

External citation measurements

125
arxiv_reference, observed 2026-08-05T02:28:24.338817Z

Outbound references

No outbound reference observations are available for this paper version.

Pith citing papers

Observation 14599986-ec1b-4404-8b7f-c0bcb8e364f5 · inbound

A Human-Grounded Evaluation of SHAP for Alert Processing cites this paper.

A Human-Grounded Evaluation of SHAP for Alert Processing An Evaluation of the Human-Interpretability of Explanation

Reference 8

Resolution: verified exact; arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-25T01:25:10.844941Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.

Observation 85223bc1-0ca5-4b4d-8ee3-26e3791d5970 · inbound

Can Domain Experts Rely on AI Appropriately? A Case Study on AI-Assisted Prostate Cancer MRI Diagnosis cites this paper.

Can Domain Experts Rely on AI Appropriately? A Case Study on AI-Assisted Prostate Cancer MRI Diagnosis An Evaluation of the Human-Interpretability of Explanation

Reference 18

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-09T14:45:47.302495Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 3507e5fc-bdd7-41d4-b881-6dc49922e173 · inbound

CASE: Contrastive Activation for Saliency Estimation cites this paper.

CASE: Contrastive Activation for Saliency Estimation An Evaluation of the Human-Interpretability of Explanation

Reference 20

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T05:42:14.294998Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 2e2b1420-84f9-4e82-b581-9d4e632f2cd0 · inbound

Thinking About Thinking: Evaluating Reasoning in Post-Trained Language Models cites this paper.

Thinking About Thinking: Evaluating Reasoning in Post-Trained Language Models An Evaluation of the Human-Interpretability of Explanation

Reference 3

Resolution: verified exact; arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-18T06:51:00.516039Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.

Observation 82cdcf12-d214-4a6d-a91a-e87e52e7efef · inbound

CoAX: Cognitive-Oriented Attribution eXplanation User Model of Human Understanding of AI Explanations cites this paper.

CoAX: Cognitive-Oriented Attribution eXplanation User Model of Human Understanding of AI Explanations An Evaluation of the Human-Interpretability of Explanation

Reference 49

Resolution: verified exact; arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-12T10:01:28.151037Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.

Observation 78a4abe4-ecf2-45f5-8b0d-dd34b8f2ff72 · inbound

Agentic-imodels: Evolving agentic interpretability tools via autoresearch cites this paper.

Agentic-imodels: Evolving agentic interpretability tools via autoresearch An Evaluation of the Human-Interpretability of Explanation

Reference 22

Resolution: metadata mismatch; arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-11T23:36:36.172274Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.

Observation 1e441fd2-d722-465d-bfae-6df82b4c127a · inbound

Prognostic Value of Lung Ultrasound Biomarkers for Readmission Risk in Congestive Heart Failure: A Pilot Data-Driven Analysis cites this paper.

Prognostic Value of Lung Ultrasound Biomarkers for Readmission Risk in Congestive Heart Failure: A Pilot Data-Driven Analysis An Evaluation of the Human-Interpretability of Explanation

Reference 112

Resolution: verified exact; arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-20T15:43:26.422469Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.

Observation 0744aeda-e84f-4916-a779-08515e7ce9d8 · inbound

Validating Causal Abstraction Metrics on Simulated Complex Systems cites this paper.

Validating Causal Abstraction Metrics on Simulated Complex Systems An Evaluation of the Human-Interpretability of Explanation

Reference 170

Resolution: verified exact; arxiv_id, observed 2026-07-02T19:27:18.528055Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.

Observation 0e0bcf45-6907-44df-8c91-75e5d81c143a · inbound

Towards a Unified Multidimensional Explainability Metric: Evaluating Trustworthiness in AI Models cites this paper.

Towards a Unified Multidimensional Explainability Metric: Evaluating Trustworthiness in AI Models An Evaluation of the Human-Interpretability of Explanation

Reference 7

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T02:29:47.738736Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 3f66e956-6fc4-414d-b504-aebac4b7a244 · inbound

Explaining GAND: A Resource on Gender-Ambiguous Natural Data & Contrastive Attribution cites this paper.

Explaining GAND: A Resource on Gender-Ambiguous Natural Data & Contrastive Attribution An Evaluation of the Human-Interpretability of Explanation

Reference 52

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T14:50:19.850289Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.