REVIEW 2 cited by
Capuchin: Causal Database Repair for Algorithmic Fairness
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Fairness is increasingly recognized as a critical component of machine learning systems. However, it is the underlying data on which these systems are trained that often reflect discrimination, suggesting a database repair problem. Existing treatments of fairness rely on statistical correlations that can be fooled by statistical anomalies, such as Simpson's paradox. Proposals for causality-based definitions of fairness can correctly model some of these situations, but they require specification of the underlying causal models. In this paper, we formalize the situation as a database repair problem, proving sufficient conditions for fair classifiers in terms of admissible variables as opposed to a complete causal model. We show that these conditions correctly capture subtle fairness violations. We then use these conditions as the basis for database repair algorithms that provide provable fairness guarantees about classifiers trained on their training labels. We evaluate our algorithms on real data, demonstrating improvement over the state of the art on multiple fairness metrics proposed in the literature while retaining high utility.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
The Fair Game: Auditing & Debiasing AI Algorithms Over Time
Proposes 'Fair Game', a reinforcement-learning loop in which an auditor's bias criteria, updatable over time, steer a debiasing agent that adapts an ML model's predictions.
-
Data Management for Causal Algorithmic Fairness
Fairness requires causal, not merely correlational, criteria, and data management techniques can be used to detect and enforce such criteria.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.