REVIEW 2 cited by
Node Embedding over Temporal Graphs
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
In this work, we present a method for node embedding in temporal graphs. We propose an algorithm that learns the evolution of a temporal graph's nodes and edges over time and incorporates this dynamics in a temporal node embedding framework for different graph prediction tasks. We present a joint loss function that creates a temporal embedding of a node by learning to combine its historical temporal embeddings, such that it optimizes per given task (e.g., link prediction). The algorithm is initialized using static node embeddings, which are then aligned over the representations of a node at different time points, and eventually adapted for the given task in a joint optimization. We evaluate the effectiveness of our approach over a variety of temporal graphs for the two fundamental tasks of temporal link prediction and multi-label node classification, comparing to competitive baselines and algorithmic alternatives. Our algorithm shows performance improvements across many of the datasets and baselines and is found particularly effective for graphs that are less cohesive, with a lower clustering coefficient.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Dynamic Graph Embedding Through Hub-aware Random Walks
A hub-aware random walk strategy, tuned per dataset by grid search, beats dynnode2vec on graph reconstruction for 8 of 9 temporal networks.
-
A Comparative Study on Dynamic Graph Embedding based on Mamba and Transformers
Mamba-based dynamic graph embedding models achieve comparable or better link prediction than transformer-based models on five benchmarks, with linear instead of quadratic scaling.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.