Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Step-by-Step: Separating Planning from Realization in Neural Data-to-Text Generation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1904.03396 v2 pith:4OD6WMIT submitted 2019-04-06 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords generationneuralrealizationtextplanningapproachdata-to-textfluent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Data-to-text generation can be conceptually divided into two parts: ordering and structuring the information (planning), and generating fluent language describing the information (realization). Modern neural generation systems conflate these two steps into a single end-to-end differentiable system. We propose to split the generation process into a symbolic text-planning stage that is faithful to the input, followed by a neural generation stage that focuses only on realization. For training a plan-to-text generator, we present a method for matching reference texts to their corresponding text plans. For inference time, we describe a method for selecting high-quality text plans for new inputs. We implement and evaluate our approach on the WebNLG benchmark. Our results demonstrate that decoupling text planning from neural realization indeed improves the system's reliability and adequacy while maintaining fluent output. We observe improvements both in BLEU scores and in manual evaluations. Another benefit of our approach is the ability to output diverse realizations of the same input, paving the way to explicit control over the generated text structure.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Tabular Data Understanding with LLMs: A Survey of Recent Advances and Challenges

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A structured review of table understanding with LLMs that proposes a taxonomy of input representations and identifies three research gaps.

Pith tools