Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Combating Adversarial Misspellings with Robust Word Recognition

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1905.11268 v2 pith:CYZNCV2P submitted 2019-05-27 cs.CL cs.CRcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.CRcs.LG
keywords recognitionwordadversarialmodelrobustnessaccuracyanalysisclassifier
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

To combat adversarial spelling mistakes, we propose placing a word recognition model in front of the downstream classifier. Our word recognition models build upon the RNN semi-character architecture, introducing several new backoff strategies for handling rare and unseen words. Trained to recognize words corrupted by random adds, drops, swaps, and keyboard mistakes, our method achieves 32% relative (and 3.3% absolute) error reduction over the vanilla semi-character model. Notably, our pipeline confers robustness on the downstream classifier, outperforming both adversarial training and off-the-shelf spell checkers. Against a BERT model fine-tuned for sentiment analysis, a single adversarially-chosen character attack lowers accuracy from 90.3% to 45.8%. Our defense restores accuracy to 75%. Surprisingly, better word recognition does not always entail greater robustness. Our analysis reveals that robustness also depends upon a quantity that we denote the sensitivity.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Are Language Models Agnostic to Linguistically Grounded Perturbations? A Case Study of Indic Languages

    cs.CL 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Pre-trained language models are vulnerable to phonologically and orthographically motivated character substitutions in Indic languages, but less so than to unconstrained random character substitution.

  2. PEEK: Phishing Evolution Framework for Phishing Generation and Evolving Pattern Analysis using Large Language Models

    cs.CR 2024-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The PEEK framework uses GAN-style training and iterative pattern feedback to generate phishing emails, raising the usable sample share from 21.4% to 84.8% and improving detector robustness against evasion attacks.

  3. On the Validity of Traditional Vulnerability Scoring Systems for Adversarial Attacks against LLMs

    cs.CR 2024-12 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    Applying CVSS, DREAD, OWASP, and SSVC to 56 adversarial LLM attacks via three LLM judges yields near-constant factor scores, which the authors take as evidence that these metrics cannot differentiate LLM attacks.

Pith tools