Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Differential Privacy Has Disparate Impact on Model Accuracy

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1905.12101 v2 pith:J4WC7TVL submitted 2019-05-28 cs.LG cs.CRstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.CRstat.ML
keywords modelaccuracydifferentialmodelsprivacytrainingclassificationcost
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Differential privacy (DP) is a popular mechanism for training machine learning models with bounded leakage about the presence of specific points in the training data. The cost of differential privacy is a reduction in the model's accuracy. We demonstrate that in the neural networks trained using differentially private stochastic gradient descent (DP-SGD), this cost is not borne equally: accuracy of DP models drops much more for the underrepresented classes and subgroups. For example, a gender classification model trained using DP-SGD exhibits much lower accuracy for black faces than for white faces. Critically, this gap is bigger in the DP model than in the non-DP model, i.e., if the original model is unfair, the unfairness becomes worse once DP is applied. We demonstrate this effect for a variety of tasks and models, including sentiment analysis of text and image classification. We then explain why DP training mechanisms such as gradient clipping and noise addition have disproportionate effect on the underrepresented and more complex subgroups, resulting in a disparate reduction of model accuracy.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Inclusive Federated Learning Through Compliance-Weighted Noise Allocation in Healthcare AI

    cs.LG 2025-05 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    Compliance-weighted noise allocation in federated healthcare learning claims no accuracy loss versus uniform noise, but its differential privacy guarantee applies only to the aggregator dataset, not client data.

Pith tools