REVIEW 2 cited by
A Fourier Perspective on Model Robustness in Computer Vision
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Achieving robustness to distributional shift is a longstanding and challenging goal of computer vision. Data augmentation is a commonly used approach for improving robustness, however robustness gains are typically not uniform across corruption types. Indeed increasing performance in the presence of random noise is often met with reduced performance on other corruptions such as contrast change. Understanding when and why these sorts of trade-offs occur is a crucial step towards mitigating them. Towards this end, we investigate recently observed trade-offs caused by Gaussian data augmentation and adversarial training. We find that both methods improve robustness to corruptions that are concentrated in the high frequency domain while reducing robustness to corruptions that are concentrated in the low frequency domain. This suggests that one way to mitigate these trade-offs via data augmentation is to use a more diverse set of augmentations. Towards this end we observe that AutoAugment, a recently proposed data augmentation policy optimized for clean accuracy, achieves state-of-the-art robustness on the CIFAR-10-C benchmark.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
FedFFT: Taming Client Drift in Federated SAM via Spectral Perturbation Filtering
Low-frequency components of client-side SAM perturbations carry most inter-client disagreement; high-pass filtering them yields more consistent federated updates and higher accuracy under non-IID data.
-
RESQUE: Quantifying Estimator to Task and Distribution Shift for Sustainable Model Reusability
RESQUE is a single index, computed from representation angles or cluster-label agreement, that correlates with measured retraining cost, energy, and carbon emissions across several vision models and datasets.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.