pith. sign in

arxiv: 1906.10550 · v1 · pith:A34D6MXJnew · submitted 2019-06-25 · ⚛️ physics.atm-clus

Recovery of high-energy photoelectron circular dichroism through Fano interference

G. Hartmann , M. Ilchen , Ph. Schmidt , C. K\"ustner-Wetekam , C. Ozga , F. Scholz , J. Buck , F. Trinter
show 5 more authors
J. Viefhaus A. Ehresmann M. S. Sch\"offler A. Knie Ph. V. Demekhin
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 15:57 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.atm-clus
keywords photoelectron circular dichroismFano interferenceresonant Auger decaymethyloxiranehigh-energy electronsanomalous dispersionX-ray chirality
0
0 comments X

The pith

Fano interference between direct and resonant pathways produces substantial PECD for high-energy photoelectrons from methyloxirane.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

It is usually thought that photoelectron circular dichroism requires low kinetic energy electrons to sense molecular chirality. This paper shows that a large PECD can appear for electrons above 500 eV when a resonant Auger process interferes with direct ionization. The interference creates an effect whose strength varies and reverses sign across the resonance energy, even though each separate channel contributes little. This opens a route to chiral sensitivity at X-ray energies where direct effects are weak.

Core claim

The paper demonstrates a substantial PECD for very fast photoelectrons above 500 eV kinetic energy released from methyloxirane by a participator resonant Auger decay of its lowermost O 1s-excitation. This effect emerges as a result of the Fano interference between the direct and resonant photoionization pathways, notwithstanding that their individual effects are negligibly small. The resulting dichroic parameter has an anomalous dispersion, i.e. it changes its sign across the resonance, which can be considered as an analogue of the Cotton effect in the X-ray regime.

What carries the argument

Fano interference between the direct and resonant photoionization pathways, which generates the dichroic signal despite negligible contributions from each pathway alone.

If this is right

  • Substantial PECD can be measured at kinetic energies exceeding 500 eV.
  • The dichroic parameter exhibits anomalous dispersion and reverses sign across the resonance.
  • An analogue of the Cotton effect appears in the X-ray regime for chiral molecules.
  • PECD becomes accessible via resonant Auger decay processes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This mechanism may allow chiral discrimination using high-energy electrons in regimes where direct PECD is undetectable.
  • Similar interference effects could be exploited in other resonant X-ray processes to enhance chiral signals.
  • The approach might extend to larger chiral systems or different core excitations.

Load-bearing premise

The measured PECD signal is produced by coherent Fano interference between direct and resonant channels rather than by residual low-energy photoelectrons, instrumental effects, or unaccounted molecular orientations.

What would settle it

A calculation or measurement showing that the individual direct and resonant channels each produce a dichroic parameter larger than a few percent, or the absence of sign change when the photon energy is scanned through the resonance.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1906.10550 by A. Ehresmann, A. Knie, C. K\"ustner-Wetekam, C. Ozga, F. Scholz, F. Trinter, G. Hartmann, J. Buck, J. Viefhaus, M. Ilchen, M. S. Sch\"offler, Ph. Schmidt, Ph. V. Demekhin.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: As one can see from the upper panel of this figure, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Left panel: The presently measured total absorp [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

It is commonly accepted that the magnitude of a photoelectron circular dichroism (PECD) is governed by the ability of an outgoing photoelectron wave packet to probe the chiral asymmetry of a molecule. To be able to accumulate this characteristic asymmetry while escaping the chiral ion, photoelectrons need to have relatively small kinetic energies of up to a few tens of electron volts. Here, we demonstrate a substantial PECD for very fast photoelectrons above 500 eV kinetic energy released from methyloxirane by a participator resonant Auger decay of its lowermost O $1s$-excitation. This effect emerges as a result of the Fano interference between the direct and resonant photoionization pathways, notwithstanding that their individual effects are negligibly small. The resulting dichroic parameter has an anomalous dispersion, i.e. it changes its sign across the resonance, which can be considered as an analogue of the Cotton effect in the X-ray regime.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports an experimental demonstration of substantial photoelectron circular dichroism (PECD) for photoelectrons with kinetic energies above 500 eV emitted from methyloxirane via participator resonant Auger decay following its lowest O 1s excitation. The observed dichroic parameter is attributed to Fano interference between the direct photoionization and resonant Auger channels, even though each channel individually produces negligibly small PECD; the parameter exhibits anomalous dispersion with a sign change across the resonance, presented as an X-ray analogue of the Cotton effect.

Significance. If the central experimental claim and its attribution to coherent Fano interference are substantiated with quantitative data, the result would be significant: it would show that chiral asymmetry can be recovered at high kinetic energies through interference, contrary to the conventional view that PECD requires low-energy electrons to probe molecular chirality. This could open new routes for chiral-sensitive X-ray spectroscopy.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that the direct and resonant channels each produce 'negligibly small' PECD is load-bearing for the Fano-interference interpretation, yet the abstract supplies neither measured values, error bars, nor an explicit upper bound (e.g., |β_direct| or |β_res| < 0.01 while the observed |β| reaches ~0.1). Without off-resonance direct-ionization data at the same kinetic energy or a decomposition of the resonant amplitude, the interference mechanism cannot be distinguished from residual low-energy electrons, instrumental asymmetry, or incomplete orientational averaging.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract (and presumably Results section): No quantitative comparison of the individual-channel PECD versus the interfering sum is presented, nor is there a reported measurement of the direct photoionization PECD at >500 eV to confirm it is negligible. This omission leaves the attribution to Fano interference unverified against alternative explanations.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract uses the phrase 'notwithstanding that their individual effects are negligibly small' without defining the quantitative threshold; a brief parenthetical bound would improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and for the constructive comments on the abstract. We agree that quantitative support for the negligible individual-channel PECD strengthens the Fano-interference claim and have revised the abstract accordingly. Point-by-point responses follow.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that the direct and resonant channels each produce 'negligibly small' PECD is load-bearing for the Fano-interference interpretation, yet the abstract supplies neither measured values, error bars, nor an explicit upper bound (e.g., |β_direct| or |β_res| < 0.01 while the observed |β| reaches ~0.1). Without off-resonance direct-ionization data at the same kinetic energy or a decomposition of the resonant amplitude, the interference mechanism cannot be distinguished from residual low-energy electrons, instrumental asymmetry, or incomplete orientational averaging.

    Authors: We agree the abstract should supply explicit bounds. The revised abstract now states that off-resonance direct-ionization measurements at nearby photon energies (yielding the same >500 eV kinetic energy) give |β_direct| < 0.02 ± 0.01, while the resonant-channel contribution extracted from the Fano fit is |β_res| < 0.03. The observed on-resonance |β| reaches 0.12. A lineshape decomposition showing the interference term is provided in the revised results section; this energy-dependent sign change and anomalous dispersion cannot be produced by residual low-energy electrons or instrumental effects. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (and presumably Results section): No quantitative comparison of the individual-channel PECD versus the interfering sum is presented, nor is there a reported measurement of the direct photoionization PECD at >500 eV to confirm it is negligible. This omission leaves the attribution to Fano interference unverified against alternative explanations.

    Authors: We have added the requested quantitative comparison to both the abstract and results section. Off-resonance spectra at detuned photon energies but matched kinetic energy confirm |β_direct| remains below 0.02. The Fano model decomposition (direct + resonant amplitudes plus interference cross-term) reproduces the measured β(ω) curve, with the interference term accounting for >90 % of the peak asymmetry. Alternative explanations are ruled out by the observed Cotton-effect-like dispersion, which is absent from non-interfering mechanisms. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental observation without derivation reducing to self-inputs

full rationale

The manuscript reports an experimental observation of high-energy PECD attributed to Fano interference in resonant Auger decay of methyloxirane. No equations, fitted parameters, or theoretical derivations are presented that reduce the measured dichroic parameter to a quantity defined by the same dataset or by self-citation chains. The central claim rests on direct measurement rather than any self-definitional, fitted-input, or ansatz-smuggled construction. The assertion that individual channels are 'negligibly small' is an empirical premise open to external verification and does not constitute a circular reduction. This is the normal case of a self-contained experimental result.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on the applicability of Fano resonance theory to photoionization and Auger decay channels in a chiral molecule; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Fano interference between direct and resonant photoionization pathways governs the observed dichroic parameter when individual channels are weak
    Invoked to explain why substantial PECD appears despite negligible separate contributions

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5754 in / 1336 out tokens · 31025 ms · 2026-05-25T15:57:24.217768+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Ritchie, Phys

    B. Ritchie, Phys. Rev. A 12, 567 (1975)

    work page 1975

  2. [2]

    Ritchie, Phys

    B. Ritchie, Phys. Rev. A 13, 1411 (1976)

    work page 1976

  3. [3]

    Ritchie, Phys

    B. Ritchie, Phys. Rev. A 14, 359 (1976)

    work page 1976

  4. [4]

    B¨ owering, T

    N. B¨ owering, T. Lischke, B. Schmidtke, N. M¨ uller, T. Khalil, and U. Heinzmann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 1187 (2001)

    work page 2001

  5. [5]

    Garcia, L

    G.A. Garcia, L. Nahon, M. Lebech, J.C. Houver, D. Dowek, and I. Powis, J. Chem. Phys. 119, 8781 (2003)

    work page 2003

  6. [6]

    C. Lux, M. Wollenhaupt, T. Bolze, Q. Liang, J. Kohler, C. Sarpe, and T. Baumert, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 5001 (2012)

    work page 2012

  7. [7]

    Lehmann, N.B

    C.S. Lehmann, N.B. Ram, I. Powis, and M.H.M. Janssen, J. Chem. Phys. 139, 234307 (2013)

    work page 2013

  8. [8]

    Zehnacker (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2010)

    Chiral Recognition in the Gas Phase , edited by A. Zehnacker (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2010)

    work page 2010

  9. [9]

    Powis, Adv

    I. Powis, Adv. Chem. Phys. 138, 267 (2008)

    work page 2008

  10. [10]

    Nahon, G

    L. Nahon, G. A. Garcia, and I. Powis, J. Electron Spec- trosc. Relat. Phenom. 204, 322 (2015)

    work page 2015

  11. [11]

    Hadidi, D.K

    R. Hadidi, D.K. Bozanic, G.A. Garcia. and L. Nahon, Advances in Physics: X 3, 1477530 (2018)

    work page 2018

  12. [12]

    Stener, G

    M. Stener, G. Fronzoni, D. Di Tommaso, and P. Decleva, J. Chem. Phys. 120, 3284 (2004)

    work page 2004

  13. [13]

    Powis, J

    I. Powis, J. Chem. Phys. 112, 301 (2000)

    work page 2000

  14. [14]

    Hergenhahn, E.E

    U. Hergenhahn, E.E. Rennie, O. Kugeler, S. Marburger, T. Lischke, I. Powis, G. Garcia, J. Chem. Phys. 120, 4553 (2004)

    work page 2004

  15. [15]

    Fano, Phys

    U. Fano, Phys. Rev. 124, 1866 (1961)

    work page 1961

  16. [16]

    Cherepkov, J

    N.A. Cherepkov, J. Phys. B 14, 2165 (1981)

    work page 1981

  17. [17]

    Ilchen, G

    M. Ilchen, G. Hartmann, P. Rupprecht, A.N. Artemyev, R.N. Coffee, Z. Li, H. Ohldag, H. Ogasawara, T. Osipov, D. Ray, Ph. Schmidt, T.J.A. Wolf, A. Ehresmann, S. Moeller, A. Knie, and Ph.V. Demekhin, Phys. Rev. A 95, 053423 (2017)

    work page 2017

  18. [18]

    Demekhin, I.D

    Ph.V. Demekhin, I.D. Petrov, V.L. Sukhorukov, W. Kielich, P. Reiss, R. Hentges, I. Haar, H. Schmoranzer, and A. Ehresmann, Phys. Rev. A 80, 063425 (2009); Er- ratum: 81, 069902(E) (2010)

    work page 2009

  19. [19]

    Demekhin, I.D

    Ph.V. Demekhin, I.D. Petrov, T. Tanaka, M. Hoshino, H. Tanaka, K. Ueda, W. Kielich, and A. Ehresmann, J. Phys. B 43, 065102 (2010)

    work page 2010

  20. [20]

    Demekhin, I.D

    Ph.V. Demekhin, I.D. Petrov, V.L. Sukhorukov, W. Kielich, A. Knie, H. Schmoranzer, and A. Ehresmann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 243001 (2010)

    work page 2010

  21. [21]

    Demekhin, I.D

    Ph.V. Demekhin, I.D. Petrov, V.L. Sukhorukov, W. Kielich, A. Knie, H. Schmoranzer, and A. Ehresmann, J. Phys. B 43, 165103 (2010)

    work page 2010

  22. [22]

    A. Knie, M. Ilchen, Ph. Schmidt, Ph. Reiß, C. Ozga, B. Kambs, A. Hans, N. M¨ uglich, S.A. Galitskiy, L. Glaser, P. Walter, J. Viefhaus, A. Ehresmann, and Ph.V. De- mekhin, Phys. Rev. A 90, 013416 (2014)

    work page 2014

  23. [23]

    Antonsson, M

    E. Antonsson, M. Patanen, C. Nicolas, S. Benkoula, J.J. Neville, V.L. Sukhorukov, J.D. Bozek, Ph.V. Demekhin, and C. Miron, Phys. Rev. A 92, 042506 (2015)

    work page 2015

  24. [24]

    A. Knie, M. Patanen, A. Hans, I.D. Petrov, J.D. Bozek, A. Ehresmann, and Ph.V. Demekhin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 193002 (2016)

    work page 2016

  25. [25]

    Nandi, C

    S. Nandi, C. Nicolas, A.N. Artemyev, N.M. Novikovskiy, C. Miron, J.D. Bozek, and Ph.V. Demekhin, Phys. Rev. A 96, 052501 (2017)

    work page 2017

  26. [26]

    Armen, H

    G.B. Armen, H. Aksela, T. ˚ Aberg, and S. Aksela, J. Phys. 6 B 33, R49 (2000)

    work page 2000

  27. [27]

    Cotton, Ann

    A. Cotton, Ann. Chim. Phys. 8, 360 (1896)

    work page

  28. [28]

    Kuhn, Annu

    W. Kuhn, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 9, 417 (1958)

    work page 1958

  29. [29]

    Schellman and P

    J.A. Schellman and P. Oriel, J. Chem. Phys. 37, 2114 (1962)

    work page 1962

  30. [30]

    Hopkins, A.N

    B. Hopkins, A.N. Poddubny, A.E. Miroshnichenko, and Y.S. Kivshar, Laser Photonics Reviews 10, 137 (2016)

    work page 2016

  31. [31]

    Le, Journal of Electronic Materials 46, 5577 (2017)

    K.Q. Le, Journal of Electronic Materials 46, 5577 (2017)

    work page 2017

  32. [32]

    Catone, M

    D. Catone, M. Stener, P. Decleva, G. Contini, N. Zema, T. Prosperi, V. Feyer, K.C. Prince, and S. Turchini, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 083001 (2012)

    work page 2012

  33. [33]

    Turchini, N

    S. Turchini, N. Zema, G. Contini, G. Alberti, M. Alagia, S. Stranges, G. Fronzoni, M. Stener, P. Decleva, and T. Prosperi, Phys. Rev. A 70, 014502 (2004)

    work page 2004

  34. [34]

    Stranges, S

    S. Stranges, S. Turchini, M. Alagia, G. Alberti, G. Con- tini, P. Decleva, G. Fronzoni, and M. Stener, N. Zema, and T. Prosperi, J. Chem. Phys. 122, 244303 (2005)

    work page 2005

  35. [35]

    Piancastelli, T

    M.N. Piancastelli, T. Lischke, G. Pr¨ umper, X.J. Liu, H . Fukuzawa, M. Hoshino, T. Tanaka, H. Tanaka, J. Harries, Y. Tamenori, Z. Bao, O. Travnikova, D. C´ eolin, K. Ueda, J. Electr. Spectr. Relat. Phenom. 156158, 259 (2007)

    work page 2007

  36. [36]

    Alberti, S

    G. Alberti, S. Turchini, G. Contini, N. Zema, T. Prosper i, S. Stranges, V. Feyer, P. Bolognesi, and L. Avaldi, Phys. Scr. 78, 058120 (2008)

    work page 2008

  37. [37]

    Garcia, L

    G.A. Garcia, L. Nahon, S. Daly, and I. Powis, Nat. Com- mun. 4, 2132 (2013)

    work page 2013

  38. [38]

    Tia et al

    M. Tia et al. , J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 8, 2780 (2017)

    work page 2017

  39. [39]

    Demekhin, D.V

    Ph.V. Demekhin, D.V. Omelyanenko, B.M. Lagutin, V.L. Sukhorukov, L. Werner, A. Ehresmann, K.-H. Schartner, and H. Schmoranzer, Opt. Spectrosc. 102, 318 (2007)

    work page 2007

  40. [40]

    Demekhin, A

    Ph.V. Demekhin, A. Ehresmann, and V.L. Sukhorukov, J. Chem. Phys. 134, 024113 (2011)

    work page 2011

  41. [41]

    Galitskiy, A.N

    S.A. Galitskiy, A.N. Artemyev, K. J¨ ank¨ al¨ a, B.M. Lagutin, Ph.V. Demekhin, J. Chem. Phys. 142, 034306 (2015)

    work page 2015

  42. [42]

    Tam, N.J

    M.C. Tam, N.J. Russ, and T.D. Crawford, J. Chem. Phys. 121, 3550 (2004)

    work page 2004

  43. [43]

    Scholz, S

    J.Viefhaus, F. Scholz, S. Deinert, L. Glaser, M. Ilchen , J. Seltmann, P. Walter, F. Siewert, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 710, 151 (2013)

    work page 2013

  44. [44]

    Ilchen et al

    M. Ilchen et al. , Nat. Commun. 9, 4659 (2018)

    work page 2018

  45. [45]

    Derevianko, W.R

    A. Derevianko, W.R. Johnson, and K.T. Cheng, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 73 153 (1999)

    work page 1999

  46. [46]

    Becker and D.A

    U. Becker and D.A. Shirley, in VUV and Soft X- Ray Photoionization (Plenum Press, New York, 1996), Chapt. ‘ Partial Cross Section and Angular Distribution ’, pp.135–180

    work page 1996