Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Are Odds Really Odd? Bypassing Statistical Detection of Adversarial Examples

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1907.12138 v1 pith:WJWSJ3VU submitted 2019-07-28 cs.LG cs.CRstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.CRstat.ML
keywords adversarialexampleslogitsmethodstatisticalclassifier-baseddetectiondetector
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Deep learning classifiers are known to be vulnerable to adversarial examples. A recent paper presented at ICML 2019 proposed a statistical test detection method based on the observation that logits of noisy adversarial examples are biased toward the true class. The method is evaluated on CIFAR-10 dataset and is shown to achieve 99% true positive rate (TPR) at only 1% false positive rate (FPR). In this paper, we first develop a classifier-based adaptation of the statistical test method and show that it improves the detection performance. We then propose Logit Mimicry Attack method to generate adversarial examples such that their logits mimic those of benign images. We show that our attack bypasses both statistical test and classifier-based methods, reducing their TPR to less than 2:2% and 1:6%, respectively, even at 5% FPR. We finally show that a classifier-based detector that is trained with logits of mimicry adversarial examples can be evaded by an adaptive attacker that specifically targets the detector. Furthermore, even a detector that is iteratively trained to defend against adaptive attacker cannot be made robust, indicating that statistics of logits cannot be used to detect adversarial examples.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Obfuscated Activations Bypass LLM Latent-Space Defenses

    cs.LG 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Obfuscation attacks that jointly optimize for target behavior and for low monitor scores bypass sparse autoencoders, probes, and OOD detectors on LLMs, while performance degrades mainly on hard tasks like writing correct SQL.

Pith tools