Pith. sign in

REVIEW 72 references

InSituNet: Deep Image Synthesis for Parameter Space Exploration of Ensemble Simulations

T0 review · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read InSituNet learns to map simulation, visualization, and viewpoint parameters to images, allowing users to explore new parameter settings of ensemble simulations without rerunning the simulations.

arxiv 1908.00407 v3 pith:CVXGRMGM submitted 2019-08-01 eess.IV cs.CVcs.GR

Wenbin He , Junpeng Wang , Hanqi Guo , Ko-Chih Wang , Han-Wei Shen , Mukund Raj , Youssef S. G. Nashed , Tom Peterka This is my paper · ORCID
classification eess.IVcs.CVcs.GR
keywords simulationssimulationvisualizationensembleexplorationinsitunetapproachesdeep
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Ensemble simulations, such as climate or cosmology runs, are expensive, and storing their raw output is often impossible. In situ visualization instead saves a few pictures while the simulation runs. InSituNet is a machine-learning model trained on those pictures and the parameter values that produced them. After training, it can synthesize a new picture for a parameter combination that was never simulated, such as a different Hubble constant or wind stress value, without running the simulation again.

The model is a convolutional network that takes simulation, color-mapping, and viewpoint parameters as input and outputs a 256 by 256 image. During training it compares its output with ground-truth images in three ways: pixel differences in a feature space from a pretrained VGG network, and an adversarial discriminator that tries to tell synthetic images from real ones. The paper tests the model on a combustion simulation, a cosmology simulation, and an ocean simulation, reporting pixel and structural similarity scores on held-out parameter settings. It also uses the network's derivatives to show which parameters change the image the most.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The load-bearing assertion is that a trained InSituNet maps (Psim, Pvis, Pview) to a visualization image I so well that users can explore unseen parameter settings: 'With the trained model, users can generate new images for different simulation parameters under various visualization settings' (Section 1, Equation 1). On the Nyx comparison, InSituNet beats both interpolation and GAN-VR on all four metrics (PSNR 28.47 vs 23.93 and 20.67; SSIM 0.803 vs 0.699 and 0.627; Table 6). If correct, this means a surrogate trained only on in situ images can answer what the visualization would look like across the sampled parameter ranges.

Load-bearing premise

The paper assumes the finite set of in situ images spans a parameter-to-image mapping smooth enough for a convolutional regressor to interpolate unseen combinations, and that 100 sampled viewpoints per ensemble member are sufficient (Section 4: 'taking 100 viewpoints for each ensemble member is sufficient to train InSituNet'). This assumption is load-bearing because arbitrary exploration is only tested on held-out points drawn from the same sampling distribution; the paper never tests extrapolation outside the parameter ranges or with visual mappings not enumerated in training. If the true mapping is not smooth in the chosen parameterization, the predicted images and the sensitivity curves in Section 7.5 could diverge from actual simulations.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on standard network training hyperparameters chosen by the authors, plus domain assumptions about smoothness of the parameter-to-image mapping and transferability of VGG features. No new physical entities or equations are introduced.

free parameters (6)
  • lambda (adversarial loss weight) = 0.01
    Selected in Table 3 to balance PSNR, SSIM, EMD, and FID on the Nyx evaluation set; final results use this value.
  • network width k = 32 for SmallPoolFire, 48 for Nyx, 48 for MPAS-Ocean
    Chosen per dataset in Section 7.3.2 to balance accuracy, network size, and training time.
  • training iterations = 125000
    Section 5.4: exit criterion set because the loss converged after this many iterations.
  • viewpoint sample count = 100 per ensemble member
    Section 4: 100 viewpoints sampled as sufficient to train InSituNet.
  • learning rates alpha_R and alpha_D, beta1 = 5e-5, 2e-4, 0
    Section 5.3.2: chosen empirically to stabilize adversarial training, following prior work.
  • training ensemble runs = 3900, 400, 270 per dataset
    Section 7.3.3: selected because the evaluation metrics stabilize at these numbers.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The visualization images of an ensemble simulation vary smoothly enough with simulation, visual mapping, and view parameters for a convolutional regressor to interpolate unseen parameter combinations.
    This is the load-bearing premise behind training on a finite set of parameter-image pairs and then predicting arbitrary parameters (Sections 1, 4, and 5).
  • ad hoc to paper Pretrained VGG-19 features, developed on natural images, are informative for comparing scientific visualization images.
    The feature reconstruction loss uses VGG-19 relu1_2 (Sections 5.1.3 and 5.2.1); transferability to scalar-field renderings is assumed, with the layer choice justified empirically to avoid pooling artifacts.
  • domain assumption Adversarial training with spectral normalization and TTUR converges to a useful regressor rather than mode collapse or instability.
    Section 5.3 relies on these existing GAN stabilization techniques; convergence is asserted from observed loss behavior, not proven.
  • domain assumption The L1 norm of the generated image and its derivatives reflect scientifically meaningful parameter sensitivity.
    Sections 6.2 and 7.5 use backward propagation through the surrogate to rank parameter sensitivity; the paper only validates against the surrogate's own central differences, not against the simulation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of InSituNet: Deep Image Synthesis for Parameter Space Exploration of Ensemble Simulations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CVXGRMGM

@misc{pith2026190800407,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: InSituNet: Deep Image Synthesis for Parameter Space Exploration of Ensemble Simulations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CVXGRMGM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.00407}
}
read the original abstract

We propose InSituNet, a deep learning based surrogate model to support parameter space exploration for ensemble simulations that are visualized in situ. In situ visualization, generating visualizations at simulation time, is becoming prevalent in handling large-scale simulations because of the I/O and storage constraints. However, in situ visualization approaches limit the flexibility of post-hoc exploration because the raw simulation data are no longer available. Although multiple image-based approaches have been proposed to mitigate this limitation, those approaches lack the ability to explore the simulation parameters. Our approach allows flexible exploration of parameter space for large-scale ensemble simulations by taking advantage of the recent advances in deep learning. Specifically, we design InSituNet as a convolutional regression model to learn the mapping from the simulation and visualization parameters to the visualization results. With the trained model, users can generate new images for different simulation parameters under various visualization settings, which enables in-depth analysis of the underlying ensemble simulations. We demonstrate the effectiveness of InSituNet in combustion, cosmology, and ocean simulations through quantitative and qualitative evaluations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.00407 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Workflow of our approach. Ensemble simulations are conducted [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Our in situ training data collection pipeline. Simulation data, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Architecture of Rω, which encodes input parameters into a latent vector with fully connected layers and maps the latent vector into an output image with residual blocks. The size of Rω is defined by k, which controls the number of convolutional kernels in the intermediate layers. The architecture of Rω is shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (11 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Overview of InSituNet, which is a convolutional regression model [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Architecture of Dυ . Input parameters and the predicted/ground truth image are transformed into latent vectors with fully connected layers and residual blocks, respectively. The latent vectors are then incorpo￾rated by using the projection-based method [42] to predict …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Architecture of F (i.e., VGG-19 network), where each layer is labeled with its name. Feature maps are extracted through convolutional layers (e.g., relu1 2) for feature-level comparisons. To produce high quality image synthesis results, we also strive to minimize the f…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Visual interface for parameter space exploration. (a) The three [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Qualitative comparison of InSituNet trained with different loss [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Images generated by InSituNet trained with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Quantitative evaluation of different network architectures con [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_10.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: From the scale of the three charts (i.e., the values along the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Comparison of the visual appearance of the predicted images [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Predicted images of the MPAS-Ocean dataset for different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Forward prediction (top row) and backward subregion sensitivity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_15.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Ahrens, S

    J. Ahrens, S. Jourdain, P. O’Leary, J. Patchett, D. H. Rogers, P. Fasel, A. Bauer, M. Petersen, F. Samsel, and B. Boeckel. In situ MPAS-Ocean image-based visualization. In Proceedings of the International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis, Visualization & Data Analytics Showcase, 2014

    work page 2014

  2. [2]

    Ahrens, S

    J. Ahrens, S. Jourdain, P. O’Leary, J. Patchett, D. H. Rogers, and M. Pe- tersen. An image-based approach to extreme scale in situ visualization and analysis. In Proceedings of the International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis, pp. 424–434, 2014

    work page 2014

  3. [3]

    Aitken, C

    A. Aitken, C. Ledig, L. Theis, J. Caballero, Z. Wang, and W. Shi. Checkerboard artifact free sub-pixel convolution: A note on sub-pixel convolution, resize convolution and convolution resize. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.02937, 2017

    arXiv 2017

  4. [4]

    A. S. Almgren, J. B. Bell, M. J. Lijewski, Z. Luki ´c, and E. V . Andel. Nyx: A massively parallel AMR code for computational cosmology. The Astrophysical Journal, 765(1):39, 2013

    work page 2013

  5. [5]

    A. C. Bauer, H. Abbasi, J. Ahrens, H. Childs, B. Geveci, S. Klasky, K. Moreland, P. O’Leary, V . Vishwanath, B. Whitlock, and E. W. Bethel. In situ methods, infrastructures, and applications on high performance computing platforms. Computer Graphics Forum, 35(3):577–597, 2016

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    Berger, J

    M. Berger, J. Li, and J. A. Levine. A generative model for volume rendering. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 25(4):1636–1650, 2019

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    Bergner, M

    S. Bergner, M. Sedlmair, T. M ¨oller, S. N. Abdolyousefi, and A. Saad. ParaGlide: Interactive parameter space partitioning for computer simu- lations. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics , 19(9):1499–1512, 2013

    work page 2013

  8. [8]

    Biedert and C

    T. Biedert and C. Garth. Contour tree depth images for large data visual- ization. In Proceedings of Eurographics Symposium on Parallel Graphics and Visualization, pp. 77–86, 2015

    work page 2015

Show all 72 references
  1. [9]

    Biswas, G

    A. Biswas, G. Lin, X. Liu, and H.-W. Shen. Visualization of time-varying weather ensembles across multiple resolutions. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 23(1):841–850, 2017

    2017

  2. [10]

    A. Bock, A. Pembroke, M. L. Mays, L. Rastaetter, T. Ropinski, and A. Ynnerman. Visual verification of space weather ensemble simulations. In Proceedings of 2015 IEEE Scientific Visualization Conference , pp. 17–24, 2015

    2015

  3. [11]

    Booshehrian, T

    M. Booshehrian, T. M¨oller, R. M. Peterman, and T. Munzner. Vismon: Facilitating analysis of trade-offs, uncertainty, and sensitivity in fisheries management decision making. In Computer Graphics Forum, vol. 31, pp. 1235–1244. Wiley Online Library, 2012

    2012

  4. [12]

    Bremer, G

    P.-T. Bremer, G. H. Weber, J. Tierny, V . Pascucci, M. S. Day, and J. B. Bell. Interactive exploration and analysis of large-scale simulations using topology-based data segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 17(9):1307–1324, 2011

    2011

  5. [13]

    Brock, J

    A. Brock, J. Donahue, and K. Simonyan. Large scale GAN training for high fidelity natural image synthesis. In Proceedings of International Conference on Learning Representations, 2019

    2019

  6. [14]

    Bruckner and T

    S. Bruckner and T. M¨oller. Result-driven exploration of simulation param- eter spaces for visual effects design. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 16(6):1468–1476, 2010

    2010

  7. [15]

    H. Chen, S. Zhang, W. Chen, H. Mei, J. Zhang, A. Mercer, R. Liang, and H. Qu. Uncertainty-aware multidimensional ensemble data visualiza- tion and exploration. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 21(9):1072–1086, 2015

    2015

  8. [16]

    Coffey, C.-L

    D. Coffey, C.-L. Lin, A. G. Erdman, and D. F. Keefe. Design by dragging: An interface for creative forward and inverse design with simulation en- sembles. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 19(12):2783–2791, 2013

    2013

  9. [17]

    Di and F

    S. Di and F. Cappello. Fast error-bounded lossy HPC data compression with SZ. In Proceedings of International Parallel and Distributed Pro- cessing Symposium, pp. 730–739, 2016

    2016

  10. [18]

    C. Dong, C. C. Loy, K. He, and X. Tang. Image super-resolution using deep convolutional networks. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 38(2):295–307, 2016

    2016

  11. [19]

    Dosovitskiy, J

    A. Dosovitskiy, J. T. Springenberg, and T. Brox. Learning to generate chairs with convolutional neural networks. In Proceedings of 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 1538–1546, 2015

    2015

  12. [20]

    Dutta, C.-M

    S. Dutta, C.-M. Chen, G. Heinlein, H.-W. Shen, and J.-P. Chen. In situ distribution guided analysis and visualization of transonic jet engine simulations. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 23(1):811–820, 2017

    2017

  13. [21]

    Fernandes, S

    O. Fernandes, S. Frey, F. Sadlo, and T. Ertl. Space-time volumetric depth images for in-situ visualization. In Proceedings of 2014 IEEE Symposium on Large Data Analysis and Visualization, pp. 59–65, 2014

    2014

  14. [22]

    S. Frey, F. Sadlo, and T. Ertl. Explorable volumetric depth images from ray- casting. In Proceedings of 2013 XXVI Conference on Graphics, Patterns and Images, pp. 123–130, 2013

    2013

  15. [23]

    L. A. Gatys, A. S. Ecker, and M. Bethge. A neural algorithm of artistic style. arXiv preprint arXiv:1508.06576, 2015

    2015 arXiv

  16. [24]

    L. A. Gatys, A. S. Ecker, and M. Bethge. Texture synthesis using convolu- tional neural networks. In Proceedings of Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 262–270, 2015

    2015

  17. [25]

    I. J. Goodfellow, J. Pouget-Abadie, M. Mirza, B. Xu, D. Warde-Farley, S. Ozair, A. Courville, and Y . Bengio. Generative adversarial nets. In Proceedings of Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 2672–2680, 2014

    2014

  18. [26]

    J. Han, J. Tao, and C. Wang. FlowNet: A deep learning framework for clus- tering and selection of streamlines and stream surfaces.IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 2018, Early Access

    2018

  19. [27]

    K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, and J. Sun. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 770–778, 2016

    2016

  20. [28]

    Heusel, H

    M. Heusel, H. Ramsauer, T. Unterthiner, B. Nessler, and S. Hochreiter. GANs trained by a two time-scale update rule converge to a local nash equilibrium. In Proceedings of Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 6626–6637, 2017

    2017

  21. [29]

    Hochreiter and J

    S. Hochreiter and J. Schmidhuber. Long short-term memory. Neural Computation, 9(8):1735–1780, 1997

    1997

  22. [30]

    F. Hong, J. Zhang, and X. Yuan. Access pattern learning with long short- term memory for parallel particle tracing. In Proceedings of 2018 IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium, pp. 76–85, 2018

    2018

  23. [31]

    X. Hou, L. Shen, K. Sun, and G. Qiu. Deep feature consistent varia- tional autoencoder. In Proceedings of 2017 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision, pp. 1133–1141, 2017

    2017

  24. [32]

    Johnson, A

    J. Johnson, A. Alahi, and F.-F. Li. Perceptual losses for real-time style transfer and super-resolution. In Proceedings of European Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 694–711, 2016

    2016

  25. [33]

    D. P. Kingma and J. Ba. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. In Proceedings of International Conference on Learning Representations, 2015

    2015

  26. [34]

    Kurach, M

    K. Kurach, M. Lucic, X. Zhai, M. Michalski, and S. Gelly. The GAN landscape: Losses, architectures, regularization, and normalization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.04720, 2018

    2018 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Lakshminarasimhan, N

    S. Lakshminarasimhan, N. Shah, S. Ethier, S.-H. Ku, C. S. Chang, S. Klasky, R. Latham, R. Ross, and N. F. Samatova. ISABELA for effec- tive in situ compression of scientific data. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 25(4):524–540, 2013

    2013

  28. [36]

    Ledig, L

    C. Ledig, L. Theis, F. Husz´ar, J. Caballero, A. Cunningham, A. Acosta, A. Aitken, A. Tejani, J. Totz, Z. Wang, and W. Shi. Photo-realistic sin- gle image super-resolution using a generative adversarial network. In Proceedings of 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pat...

    2017

  29. [37]

    Luˇci´c, K

    M. Luˇci´c, K. Kurach, M. Michalski, S. Gelly, and O. Bousquet. Are GANs created equal? A large-scale study. In Proceedings of Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 700–709, 2018

    2018

  30. [38]

    K.-L. Ma. In situ visualization at extreme scale: Challenges and op- portunities. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications , 29(6):14–19, 2009

    2009

  31. [39]

    Matkovi´c, D

    K. Matkovi´c, D. Graˇcanin, B. Klarin, and H. Hauser. Interactive visual analysis of complex scientific data as families of data surfaces. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 15(6):1351–1358, 2009

    2009

  32. [40]

    Mirza and S

    M. Mirza and S. Osindero. Conditional generative adversarial nets. arXiv preprint arXiv:1411.1784, 2014

    2014 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Miyato, T

    T. Miyato, T. Kataoka, M. Koyama, and Y . Yoshida. Spectral normalization for generative adversarial networks. In Proceedings of International Conference on Learning Representations, 2018

    2018

  34. [42]

    Miyato and M

    T. Miyato and M. Koyama. cGANs with projection discriminator. In Proceedings of International Conference on Learning Representations , 2018

    2018

  35. [43]

    Nair and G

    V . Nair and G. E. Hinton. Rectified linear units improve restricted boltz- 10 © 2019 IEEE. This is the author’s version of the article that has been published in IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics. The final version of this record is available at: 10.1109/...

    2019

  36. [44]

    Obermaier, K

    H. Obermaier, K. Bensema, and K. I. Joy. Visual trends analysis in time- varying ensembles. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 22(10):2331–2342, 2016

    2016

  37. [45]

    Orban, D

    D. Orban, D. F. Keefe, A. Biswas, J. Ahrens, and D. Rogers. Drag and track: A direct manipulation interface for contextualizing data instances within a continuous parameter space. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 25(1):256–266, 2019

    2019

  38. [46]

    Pathak, P

    D. Pathak, P. Kr¨ahenb¨uhl, J. Donahue, T. Darrell, and A. A. Efros. Context encoders: Feature learning by inpainting. In Proceedings of 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 2536–2544, 2016

    2016

  39. [47]

    Piringer, W

    H. Piringer, W. Berger, and J. Krasser. Hypermoval: Interactive visual validation of regression models for real-time simulation. In Computer Graphics Forum, vol. 29, pp. 983–992. Wiley Online Library, 2010

    2010

  40. [48]

    J. Poco, A. Dasgupta, Y . Wei, W. Hargrove, C. R. Schwalm, D. N. Huntzinger, R. Cook, E. Bertini, and C. T. Silva. Visual reconciliation of alternative similarity spaces in climate modeling. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 20(12):1923–1932, 2014

    1923

  41. [49]

    Potter, A

    K. Potter, A. Wilson, P.-T. Bremer, D. Williams, C. Doutriaux, V . Pas- cucci, and C. R. Johnson. Ensemble-vis: A framework for the statistical visualization of ensemble data. In 2009 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops, pp. 233–240. IEEE, 2009

    2009

  42. [50]

    S. Reed, Z. Akata, X. Yan, L. Logeswaran, B. Schiele, and H. Lee. Gener- ative adversarial text to image synthesis. In Proceedings of International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 1060–1069, 2016

    2016

  43. [51]

    Ringler, M

    T. Ringler, M. Petersen, R. L. Higdon, D. Jacobsen, P. W. Jones, and M. Maltrud. A multi-resolution approach to global ocean modeling.Ocean Modelling, 69:211–232, 2013

    2013

  44. [52]

    D. E. Rumelhart, G. E. Hinton, and R. J. Williams. Learning internal representations by error propagation. In D. E. Rumelhart, J. L. McClel- land, and CORPORATE PDP Research Group, eds., Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, Vol. 1, ...

    1986

  45. [53]

    Samsel, M

    F. Samsel, M. Petersen, G. Abram, T. L. Turton, D. Rogers, and J. Ahrens. Visualization of ocean currents and eddies in a high-resolution global ocean-climate model. In Proceedings of the International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis...

    2015

  46. [54]

    A. M. Saxe, J. L. McClelland, and S. Ganguli. Exact solutions to the nonlinear dynamics of learning in deep linear neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.6120, 2013

    2013 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Sedlmair, C

    M. Sedlmair, C. Heinzl, S. Bruckner, H. Piringer, and T. M¨oller. Visual parameter space analysis: A conceptual framework. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 20(12):2161–2170, 2014

    2014

  48. [56]

    D. Shepard. A two-dimensional interpolation function for irregularly- spaced data. In Proceedings of the 1968 23rd ACM National Conference, pp. 517–524, 1968

    1968

  49. [57]

    Simonyan and A

    K. Simonyan and A. Zisserman. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. In Proceedings of International Conference on Learning Representations, 2015

    2015

  50. [58]

    Splechtna, K

    R. Splechtna, K. Matkovi´c, D. Graˇcanin, M. Jelovi´c, and H. Hauser. Inter- active visual steering of hierarchical simulation ensembles. InProceedings of 2015 IEEE Conference on Visual Analytics Science and Technology, pp. 89–96, 2015

    2015

  51. [59]

    Tikhonova, C

    A. Tikhonova, C. D. Correa, and K.-L. Ma. Explorable images for visu- alizing volume data. In Proceedings of 2010 IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium, pp. 177–184, 2010

    2010

  52. [60]

    Tikhonova, C

    A. Tikhonova, C. D. Correa, and K.-L. Ma. An exploratory technique for coherent visualization of time-varying volume data. Computer Graphics Forum, 29(3):783–792, 2010

    2010

  53. [61]

    Tikhonova, C

    A. Tikhonova, C. D. Correa, and K.-L. Ma. Visualization by proxy: A novel framework for deferred interaction with volume data. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 16(6):1551–1559, 2010

    2010

  54. [62]

    Torsney-Weir, A

    T. Torsney-Weir, A. Saad, T. M¨oller, H.-C. Hege, B. Weber, J.-M. Ver- bavatz, and S. Bergner. Tuner: Principled parameter finding for image segmentation algorithms using visual response surface exploration. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 17(12):1892–...

    1901

  55. [63]

    J. Wang, L. Gou, H. Yang, and H.-W. Shen. Ganviz: A visual analytics approach to understand the adversarial game. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 24(6):1905–1917, 2018

    1905

  56. [64]

    J. Wang, S. Hazarika, C. Li, and H.-W. Shen. Visualization and visual analysis of ensemble data: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 2018, Early Access

    2018

  57. [65]

    J. Wang, X. Liu, H.-W. Shen, and G. Lin. Multi-resolution climate en- semble parameter analysis with nested parallel coordinates plots. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 23(1):81–90, 2017

    2017

  58. [66]

    H. G. Weller, G. Tabor, H. Jasak, and C. Fureby. A tensorial approach to computational continuum mechanics using object-oriented techniques. Computers in Physics, 12(6):620–631, 1998

    1998

  59. [67]

    C. Xie, W. Xu, and K. Mueller. A visual analytics framework for the detection of anomalous call stack trees in high performance computing applications. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 25(1):215–224, 2019

    2019

  60. [68]

    J. Xie, L. Xu, and E. Chen. Image denoising and inpainting with deep neural networks. In Proceedings of Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 341–349, 2012

    2012

  61. [69]

    Zhang, I

    H. Zhang, I. J. Goodfellow, D. N. Metaxas, and A. Odena. Self-attention generative adversarial networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.08318, 2018

    2018 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Zhang, W

    K. Zhang, W. Zuo, Y . Chen, D. Meng, and L. Zhang. Beyond a Gaussian denoiser: Residual learning of deep CNN for image denoising. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 26(7):3142–3155, 2017

    2017

  63. [71]

    Y . Zhou, Z. Zhu, X. Bai, D. Lischinski, D. Cohen-Or, and H. Huang. Non- stationary texture synthesis by adversarial expansion. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 37(4):49:1–49:13, 2018

    2018

  64. [72]

    J.-Y . Zhu, T. Park, P. Isola, and A. A. Efros. Unpaired image-to-image translation using cycle-consistent adversarial networks. In Proceedings of 2017 International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 2242–2251, 2017. 11

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.