Comparing the stochastic nonlinear wave and heat equations: a case study

Mamoru Okamoto; Tadahiro Oh

Comparing the stochastic nonlinear wave and heat equations: a case study

T0 review · 0 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For quadratic stochastic wave and heat equations on the two-dimensional torus, the second-order stochastic term diverges at α=1/2 (wave) and α=1 (heat), so the standard expansion-based solution theory breaks before the scaling-critical…

desk verdict A solid, carefully scoped case study showing that the second-order stochastic term diverges for SNLW at α≥1/2 and for SNLH at α≥1, with the caveat about cancellation explicitly acknowledged. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.03490 v2 pith:6HCSANWL submitted 2019-08-09 math.AP math.PR

Tadahiro Oh , Mamoru Okamoto This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.APmath.PR MSC 35L7135K1560H15

keywords stochasticnonlinearwaveequationheatquadraticnonlinearityfractionalspace-timewhitenoiserenormalizationill-posednessmultilinearsmoothingsingularPDEs

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper compares two singular stochastic PDEs on the two-dimensional torus: the stochastic nonlinear wave equation (SNLW) and the stochastic nonlinear heat equation (SNLH), both with quadratic nonlinearity $u^2$ and additive noise $\langle\nabla\rangle^\alpha \xi$, where $\xi$ is space-time white noise. It establishes that the standard expansion-based solution theory breaks down at $\alpha = \tfrac12$ for SNLW and at $\alpha = 1$ for SNLH: the second-order stochastic term, the Picard second iterate, ceases to exist as a continuous distribution-valued function of time. This matters because scaling analysis had predicted critical values $\alpha = \tfrac34$ (wave) and $\alpha = 2$ (heat), so the theory fails strictly earlier than expected; it also provides the first example in which the stochastic nonlinear wave equation behaves less favorably than its heat counterpart. For $\alpha$ below these thresholds, the paper proves local well-posedness, with a simplified argument in an intermediate wave range thanks to a new multilinear smoothing estimate.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the second-order stochastic term $\Psi = I(:\Phi^2:)$, where $\Phi = I(\langle\nabla\rangle^\alpha \xi)$ is the stochastic convolution (the first Picard iterate), $:\Phi^2:$ is the renormalized square with the divergent variance subtracted, and $I$ is the Duhamel integral operator: $(\partial_t^2 + (1-\Delta))^{-1}$ for the wave equation and $(\partial_t + (1-\Delta))^{-1}$ for the heat equation. The divergence proof shows that for fixed spatial frequency $n$ and time $t$, the variance $\mathbb E[|\widehat{\Psi_N}(n,t)|^2]$ of the truncated Fourier coefficient grows with $N$ (like $N^{-2+4\alpha}$, or like $\log N$ at the threshold), driven by high-to-low frequency interactions $|k|\sim|n-k|\gg|n|$; Kolmogorov's three-series theorem and zero-one law then force almost-sure divergence. On the well-posedness side, the paper exploits multilinear dispersion of the wave propagator to obtain extra regularity $s_\alpha = 1-\alpha$ for $\alpha\le \tfrac14$ and $s_\alpha = \tfrac54 - 2\alpha$ for $\alpha>\tfrac14$, which allows a simplified contraction argument for $\tfrac13\le\alpha<\tfrac{5}{12}$.

What would settle it

Fix a spatial frequency $n$ and time $t>0$. The paper's proof requires the variances $\mathbb E[|\widehat{\Psi_N}(n,t)|^2]$ to diverge as $N\to\infty$ for $\alpha\ge\tfrac12$ (wave) or $\alpha\ge1$ (heat), with rate $N^{-2+4\alpha}$ (or $\log N$ at the threshold). A direct computation finding a subsequence with uniformly bounded variance, or an alternative renormalization in which the singularities of $\Psi$ and $v$ cancel to produce a continuous distribution-valued $u$, would falsify the claim that standard well-posedness breaks at those thresholds.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On $\mathbb T^2$, consider the stochastic nonlinear wave equation $\partial_t^2 u + (1-\Delta)u + u^2 = \langle\nabla\rangle^\alpha \xi$ and the stochastic nonlinear heat equation $\partial_t u + (1-\Delta)u + u^2 = \langle\nabla\rangle^\alpha \xi$. The paper proves that the truncated second-order stochastic terms $\Psi_N$ form a divergent sequence in $C([0,T];\mathcal D'(\mathbb T^2))$ almost surely for $\alpha\ge \tfrac12$ in the wave case and for $\alpha\ge 1$ in the heat case (Propositions 1.6 and 1.9(ii)). Below those thresholds the same objects converge, and local well-posedness of the renormalized equations holds; in the wave case the construction is simplified by an extra multilinear smoothing of order $\tfrac14$ on $\Psi$ (Proposition 1.4). The paper concludes that the standard expansion trick and its higher-order variants break at $\alpha = \tfrac12$ and $\alpha = 1$, before the scaling-critical values $\alpha = \tfrac34$ and $\alpha = 2$ predicted by probabilistic scaling.

Load-bearing premise

The argument equates failure of the expansion method—specifically divergence of the second-order stochastic term $\Psi$—with ill-posedness of the equation itself; if the singularities of $\Psi$ and the residual term $v$ could cancel, a continuous distribution-valued solution might still exist, a case the paper explicitly sets aside.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

For $\alpha\ge\tfrac12$, no solution of the quadratic SNLW on $\mathbb T^2$ can be constructed by the standard expansion trick or its higher-order variants; for $\alpha\ge1$ the same holds for SNLH.
The local well-posedness ranges $0<\alpha<\tfrac12$ (wave) and $0<\alpha<1$ (heat) are sharp within this method, so the effective thresholds are $\tfrac12$ and $1$, not the scaling-critical $\tfrac34$ and $2$.
The wave equation behaves worse than the heat equation: $\Psi$ diverges at the same $\alpha=\tfrac12$ as the renormalized square $:\Phi^2:$, whereas in the heat case $\Psi$ survives until $\alpha=1$ even after $:\Phi^2:$ fails at $\alpha=\tfrac12$.
For $\tfrac13\le\alpha<\tfrac{5}{12}$, the multilinear smoothing lets the wave equation be solved with a smaller enhanced data set, omitting the third-order object that would otherwise be needed.
On $\mathbb T^d$, the divergence of $\Psi$ holds for $\alpha\ge 1-\tfrac d4$, so the wave breakdown precedes the scaling-critical value in dimensions $d=1,\dots,5$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A fair reading of the breakdown is method-specific: the paper proves that expansion-based solution theories cannot work, not that the stochastic PDE has no solution; footnote 4 explicitly leaves open cancellation between the singularities of $\Psi$ and the remainder $v$.
The divergence mechanism—high-to-low energy transfer in the Picard second iterate—mirrors deterministic ill-posedness mechanisms; one could try to turn it into a norm-inflation construction for SNLW at $\alpha\ge\tfrac12$, and to probe whether any non-expansion theory exists there.
The same gap between scaling-critical values and Picard-second-iterate divergence is expected for other low-degree dispersive equations with rough random data, such as quadratic nonlinear Schrödinger equations; the paper hints at this expectation, but testing it is a separate project.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

This is a clean paper that does what it says. The main new results are the divergence of the second-order stochastic term Ψ for the wave equation at α≥1/2 (Proposition 1.6) and the analogous threshold α≥1 for the heat equation (Proposition 1.9(ii)). The wave/heat asymmetry is genuine, and the multilinear smoothing estimate in Proposition 1.4 is a real extension of the Gubinelli–Koch–Oh framework, even if it does not enlarge the well-posedness window.

The proof of Proposition 1.6 is the core of the paper, and I checked it carefully. The divergence is driven by high-to-low interactions with |k|~|n−k|>>|n|. The random variables X_k(n,t) are independent, their second moments satisfy the lower bound (4.64), and the variance sum diverges logarithmically at α=1/2 and as a power for α>1/2. Kolmogorov's three-series theorem plus the zero-one law gives almost-sure non-convergence of the Fourier coefficient, which rules out convergence in C([0,T];D'). The argument is sound. The heat-side divergence uses the same mechanism and is also correct.

The soft spot is exactly the one the authors flag in footnote 4: divergence of Ψ in C_t D'_x does not by itself exclude the possibility that singularities of Ψ and the remainder v cancel to produce a continuous distribution-valued solution. They define ill-posedness as failure of the standard Da Prato–Debussche-type expansion, so the headline claim is accurate within that stated scope. If one wants failure of well-posedness in the broadest sense, that remains open. This is a real limitation but not a flaw, because the paper is explicit about it.

Minor points: the paper is a case study on T^2 with a quadratic nonlinearity, so its significance is within the singular SPDE subfield rather than as a universal principle. Some proofs say 'as in GKO' rather than giving every detail, but the omitted steps are parameter-free technical estimates, and the divergence thresholds themselves are proved here. The 'meta'-theorem in Section 1 is a slightly theatrical way to state a precise result, but it is harmless.

Who gets value: researchers working on stochastic nonlinear wave equations, Da Prato–Debussche expansions, or the gap between scaling predictions and actual solution theory. The paper also provides a clean example of why higher-order expansions can fail before the probabilistically critical threshold. No code or data, which is standard for pure mathematics; the computations are detailed enough to be checked.

This deserves a serious referee. I would send it to review and expect a constructive report, with the main discussion centered on the scope of the ill-posedness claim rather than on the validity of the proofs.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the two-dimensional stochastic nonlinear wave equation (SNLW) and stochastic nonlinear heat equation (SNLH) with a quadratic nonlinearity forced by an alpha-fractional derivative of space-time white noise. For SNLW it proves local well-posedness for 0<alpha<1/2, using a second-order Da Prato-Debussche expansion, and shows that the truncated second-order stochastic term diverges for alpha>=1/2, so that the standard expansion-based solution theory breaks down. For SNLH it proves local well-posedness for 0<alpha<1 and divergence of the corresponding second-order term for alpha>=1. The thresholds 1/2 and 1 are strictly below the scaling-critical values 3/4 and 2 predicted by probabilistic scaling. The divergence is established by identifying a high-to-low frequency interaction, estimating the variance of the relevant Fourier coefficients, and invoking Kolmogorov's three-series theorem and zero-one law.

Significance. The paper makes a valuable and precise contribution to the singular SPDE literature. Its central negative result is cleanly scoped: it shows failure of the Da Prato-Debussche-type expansion machinery rather than asserting non-existence of solutions, and the authors explicitly record the cancellation caveat in footnote 4. The divergence thresholds are proved from first principles with detailed estimates, and the multilinear smoothing result in Proposition 1.4 is of independent interest. The comparison between the wave and heat equations, with the wave equation becoming worse at a lower value of alpha, is a substantive new phenomenon. The proofs use standard tools (Besov paraproducts, energy and Schauder estimates, Wiener chaos, and Kolmogorov criteria) and appear careful and complete; no fitted constants or ad-hoc assumptions are introduced.

minor comments (5)

[Abstract and Theorem 1.1] The phrases 'well-posedness theory breaks' and 'SNLW is ill-posed' could be over-read as a statement about existence or uniqueness of solutions; the precise content is failure of the Da Prato-Debussche-type expansion method. Since footnote 4 already limits the statement, I suggest adding a short qualifier in the abstract to make this conditional nature visible without reading the footnotes.
[§5.3, proof of Proposition 1.9(ii)] The lower bound for E[|Psi_N(n,t)|^2] is established only under the condition t >> |n|^{-2}. To cover arbitrary T>0 in the claim of divergence in C([0,T];D'), the proof should add a sentence explaining that one chooses n in Z^2 with |n|^{-2} << T and then applies the displayed estimate at t=T. As written, the reader may question the small-T case.
[§3.1, equation (3.16)] The symbol Psi is used for the full paraproduct sum Psi = Psi^< + Psi^= + Psi^>, while the preceding text uses Psi^= specifically for the resonant product. This overloaded notation can be confusing; please introduce the full product with a distinct notation or an explicit definition such as Psi_full.
[§2.3 and (3.13)] Lemma 2.2 is stated for 1<p,q<infinity, but estimate (3.13) applies it with q=infinity. The limiting case should be justified by a standard limiting argument or replaced by a suitable fractional Leibniz/product estimate in the L^2 x L^infty setting.
[Title page / abstract header] The running header contains the typo 'COMP ARING'; please correct it to 'COMPARING'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the divergence thresholds are proved by direct variance estimates, not by construction.

full rationale

The paper's central negative claims are derived by direct second-moment computations on the truncated stochastic objects, not by importing the conclusion. Proposition 1.6 computes the second moment of the random variables X_k(n,t), obtains the lower bound (4.64), and then applies Kolmogorov's three-series theorem and the zero-one law to conclude almost-sure divergence of every Fourier coefficient of Psi_N; Proposition 1.9(ii) does the same in the heat case via (5.15) and (5.19). No parameter is fitted and no 'prediction' is a renamed input: the divergence threshold is an output of the variance summability calculation. The positive well-posedness arguments use standard energy and Schauder estimates together with pathwise regularity lemmas; where some technical stochastic-object proofs are deferred to the authors' prior work (e.g., 'as in [30]'), those citations supply parameter-free technical tools and are not equivalent to the ill-posedness threshold. The 'ill-posedness' claim is explicitly scoped to Da Prato-Debussche-type expansions, and footnote 4 candidly records the exceptional cancellation possibility outside that scope; that is a stated limitation, not a circular reduction. Accordingly, no circular step is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to data: alpha is a model parameter and the renormalization constants sigma_N and kappa_N are explicit functions. The stochastic objects Phi, Psi, and Psi-Diamond-Phi are constructed through Wiener integrals rather than being ad hoc postulated entities. The main axioms are standard analytic tools plus an explicit scope assumption about what counts as standard solution theory.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption The noise is a fractional derivative of space-time white noise, realized through a cylindrical Wiener process as in (3.1).
Fixes the model and the regularity scale; all thresholds are relative to this choice of forcing.
domain assumption The standard solution theory is identified with Da Prato-Debussche expansions and their higher-order variants.
The negative results show this expansion family breaks; footnote 4 concedes rare cancellations could in principle preserve a solution, so this axiom defines the scope of the ill-posedness claim.
standard math Besov paraproduct estimates, the wave energy estimate, and the heat Schauder estimate hold as stated in Lemma 2.1, Lemma 2.4, and Lemma 2.5.
These are the workhorse estimates used in the deterministic fixed-point arguments.
standard math Wick's theorem and the Wiener chaos second-moment structure apply to the truncated stochastic objects.
Used in Sections 4 and 5 to compute moments of Phi_N, Psi_N, and their resonant products.
standard math Kolmogorov's three-series theorem and zero-one law are applicable to the independent Fourier-mode contributions.
Used in Proposition 1.6 and Proposition 1.9 to upgrade divergence of variances to almost-sure divergence.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Comparing the stochastic nonlinear wave and heat equations: a case study." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6HCSANWL

@misc{pith2026190803490,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Comparing the stochastic nonlinear wave and heat equations: a case study},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6HCSANWL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.03490}
}

abstract

We study the two-dimensional stochastic nonlinear wave equation (SNLW) and stochastic nonlinear heat equation (SNLH) with a quadratic nonlinearity, forced by a fractional derivative (of order $\alpha > 0$) of a space-time white noise. In particular, we show that the well-posedness theory breaks at $\alpha = \frac 12$ for SNLW and at $\alpha = 1$ for SNLH. This provides a first example showing that SNLW behaves less favorably than SNLH. (i) As for SNLW, Deya (2020) essentially proved its local well-posedness for $0 < \alpha < \frac 12$. We first revisit this argument and establish multilinear smoothing of order $\frac 14$ on the second order stochastic term in the spirit of a recent work by Gubinelli, Koch, and Oh (2018). This allows us to simplify the local well-posedness argument for some range of $\alpha$. On the other hand, when $\alpha \geq \frac 12$, we show that SNLW is ill-posed in the sense that the second order stochastic term is not a continuous function of time with values in spatial distributions. This shows that a standard method such as the Da Prato-Debussche trick or its variant, based on a higher order expansion, breaks down for $\alpha \ge \frac 12$. (ii) As for SNLH, we establish analogous results with a threshold given by $\alpha = 1$. These examples show that in the case of rough noises, the existing well-posedness theory for singular stochastic PDEs breaks down before reaching the critical values ($\alpha = \frac 34$ in the wave case and $\alpha = 2$ in the heat case) predicted by the scaling analysis (due to Deng, Nahmod, and Yue (2019) in the wave case and due to Hairer (2014) in the heat case).

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.03490 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** A typical configuration in Case 2 We now use the following seemingly crude bound: 1 + |κ1(¯n)| & |κ1(¯n)| 1 2 . (4.27) Then, from (4.23) and (4.27) with |nj | ∼ Nj , j = 1, 2, we have Θ1 := 1 + N2 2 θ 1 + |κ1(¯n)| . N 1 2 1 1 + N2 2 θ 1 + hni 1 2 N 1 2 2 θ . N 1 2 1 N 3 2 2 hni 1 2 , (4.28) provided that N3 2 & hni. The bound (4.28) follows from separately considering the cases: hni . N2 and N2 hni . N3 2 , using th… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages

[1]

Bahouri, J.-Y

H. Bahouri, J.-Y. Chemin, R. Danchin, Fourier analysis and nonlinear partial diﬀerential equations, Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences],

work page
[2]

Balan, M

R.M. Balan, M. Jolis, J. Quer-Sardanyons, SPDEs with aﬃne multiplicative fractional noise in space with index 1 4 <H < 1 2, Electron. J. Probab. 20 (2015), no. 54, 36 pp

work page 2015
[3]

Balan, C

R.M. Balan, C. A. Tudor, Stochastic heat equation with multiplicative fractional-colored noise, J. Theoret. Probab. 23 (2010), no. 3, 834–870

work page 2010
[4]

B´ enyi,T

´A. B´ enyi,T. Oh, O. Pocovnicu,Higher order expansions for the probabilistic local Cauchy theory of the cubic nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation onR3, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. Ser. B 6 (2019), 114–160

work page 2019
[5]

Bony, Calcul symbolique et propagation des singularit´ es pour les ´ equations aux d´ eriv´ ees partielles non lin´ eaires,Ann

J.-M. Bony, Calcul symbolique et propagation des singularit´ es pour les ´ equations aux d´ eriv´ ees partielles non lin´ eaires,Ann. Sci. ´Ecole Norm. Sup. 14 (1981), no. 2, 209–246

work page 1981
[6]

Brezis, T

H. Brezis, T. Cazenave, A nonlinear heat equation with singular initial data , J. Anal. Math. 68 (1996), 277–304

work page 1996
[7]

Bringmann, Invariant Gibbs measures for the three-dimensional wave equation with a Hartree nonlinearity II: Dynamics arXiv:2009.04616 [math.AP]

B. Bringmann, Invariant Gibbs measures for the three-dimensional wave equation with a Hartree nonlinearity II: Dynamics arXiv:2009.04616 [math.AP]

arXiv 2009
[8]

Bruned, A

Y. Bruned, A. Chandra, I. Chevyrev, M. Hairer, Renormalising SPDEs in regularity structures, to appear in J. Eur. Math. Soc

work page

Show all 57 references

[9]

Bruned, M

Y. Bruned, M. Hairer, L. Zambotti, Algebraic renormalisation of regularity structures, Invent. Math. 215 (2019), no. 3, 1039–1156

2019
[10]

Catellier, K

R. Catellier, K. Chouk, Paracontrolled distributions and the 3-dimensional stochastic quantization equation, Ann. Probab. 46 (2018), no. 5, 2621–2679

2018
[11]

Chandra, M

A. Chandra, M. Hairer, An analytic BPHZ theorem for regularity structures, arXiv:1612.08138 [math.PR]

arXiv
[12]

Chandra, H

A. Chandra, H. Weber, Stochastic PDEs, regularity structures, and interacting particle systems , Ann. Fac. Sci. Toulouse Math. (6) 26 (2017), no. 4, 847–909

2017
[13]

Christ, J

M. Christ, J. Colliander, T. Tao, Ill-posedness for nonlinear Schr¨ odinger and wave equations , arXiv:math/0311048 [math.AP]. COMPARING STOCHASTIC NLW AND NLH 45

arXiv
[14]

Dalang, Extending the martingale measure stochastic integral with applications to spatially homoge- neous s.p.d.e.’s, Electron

R. Dalang, Extending the martingale measure stochastic integral with applications to spatially homoge- neous s.p.d.e.’s, Electron. J. Probab. 4 (1999), no. 6, 29 pp

1999
[15]

Dalang, L

R. Dalang, L. Quer-Sardanyons, Stochastic integrals for spde’s: a comparison, Expo. Math. 29 (2011), no. 1, 67–109

2011
[16]

D’Ancona, D

P. D’Ancona, D. Foschi, S. Selberg, Atlas of products for wave-Sobolev spaces on R1+3, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 364 (2012), no. 1, 31–63

2012
[17]

Da Prato, A

G. Da Prato, A. Debussche, Strong solutions to the stochastic quantization equations, Ann. Probab. 31 (2003), no. 4, 1900–1916

2003
[18]

Da Prato, J

G. Da Prato, J. Zabczyk, Stochastic equations in inﬁnite dimensions , Second edition. Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, 152. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2014. xviii+493 pp

2014
[19]

de Bouard, A

A. de Bouard, A. Debussche, The stochastic nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation inH 1, Stochastic Anal. Appl. 21 (2003), no. 1, 97–126

2003
[20]

Y. Deng, A. Nahmod, H. Yue, Invariant Gibbs measures and global strong solutions for nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations in dimension two, arXiv:1910.08492 [math.AP]

1910 arXiv
[21]

Deya, A nonlinear wave equation with fractional perturbation , Ann

A. Deya, A nonlinear wave equation with fractional perturbation , Ann. Probab. 47 (2019), no. 3, 1775–1810

2019
[22]

Deya, On a non-linear 2D fractional wave equation , Ann

A. Deya, On a non-linear 2D fractional wave equation , Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar´ e Probab. Stat. 56 (2020), no. 1, 477–501

2020
[23]

Durrett, Probability–theory and examples, Fifth edition

R. Durrett, Probability–theory and examples, Fifth edition. Cambridge Series in Statistical and Proba- bilistic Mathematics, 49. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2019. xii+419 pp

2019
[24]

W. E, A. Jentzen, H. Shen, Renormalized powers of Ornstein-Uhlenbeck processes and well-posedness of stochastic Ginzburg-Landau equations, Nonlinear Anal. 142 (2016), 152–193

2016
[25]

Forlano, T

J. Forlano, T. Oh, Y. Wang, Stochastic cubic nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation with almost space-time white noise, J. Aust. Math. Soc. 109 (2020), no. 1, 44–67

2020
[26]

Forlano, M

J. Forlano, M. Okamoto, A remark on norm inﬂation for nonlinear wave equations, Dyn. Partial Diﬀer. Equ. 17 (2020), no. 4, 361–381

2020
[27]

Fyodorov, B.A

Y.V. Fyodorov, B.A. Khoruzhenko, N.J. Simm, Fractional Brownian motion with Hurst index H = 0 and the Gaussian Unitary Ensemble , Ann. Probab. 44 (2016), no. 4, 2980–3031

2016
[28]

Gubinelli, P

M. Gubinelli, P. Imkeller, N. Perkowski, Paracontrolled distributions and singular PDEs, Forum Math. Pi 3 (2015), e6, 75 pp

2015
[29]

Gubinelli, H

M. Gubinelli, H. Koch, T. Oh, Renormalization of the two-dimensional stochastic nonlinear wave equations, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 370 (2018), no 10, 7335–7359

2018
[30]

Gubinelli, H

M. Gubinelli, H. Koch, T. Oh, Paracontrolled approach to the three-dimensional stochastic nonlinear wave equation with quadratic nonlinearity, arXiv:1811.07808 [math.AP]

arXiv
[31]

Gubinelli, H

M. Gubinelli, H. Koch, T. Oh, L. Tolomeo, Global dynamics for the two-dimensional stochastic nonlinear wave equations, arXiv:2005.10570 [math.AP]

2005 arXiv
[32]

Hairer, Solving the KPZ equation , Ann

M. Hairer, Solving the KPZ equation , Ann. of Math. 178 (2013), no. 2, 559–664

2013
[33]

Hairer, A theory of regularity structures, Invent

M. Hairer, A theory of regularity structures, Invent. Math. 198 (2014), no. 2, 269–504

2014
[34]

Hoshino, KPZ equation with fractional derivatives of white noise , Stoch

M. Hoshino, KPZ equation with fractional derivatives of white noise , Stoch. Partial Diﬀer. Equ. Anal. Comput. 4 (2016), no. 4, 827–890

2016
[35]

Y. Hu, J. Huang, K. Lˆ e, D. Nualart, S. Tindel, Stochastic heat equation with rough dependence in space , Ann. Probab. 45 (2017), no. 6B, 4561–4616

2017
[36]

Kupiainen, Renormalization group and stochastic PDEs, Ann

A. Kupiainen, Renormalization group and stochastic PDEs, Ann. Henri Poincar´ e 17 (2016), no. 3, 497–535

2016
[37]

Mandelbrot, J

B. Mandelbrot, J. Van Ness, Fractional Brownian motions, fractional noises and applications, SIAM Rev. 10 (1968), 422–437

1968
[38]

Mourrat, H

J.-C. Mourrat, H. Weber, Global well-posedness of the dynamic Φ4 model in the plane, Ann. Probab. 45 (2017), no. 4, 2398–2476

2017
[39]

Mourrat, H

J.-C. Mourrat, H. Weber, The dynamic Φ4 3 model comes down from inﬁnity , Comm. Math. Phys. 356 (2017), no. 3, 673–753

2017
[40]

Mourrat, H

J.-C. Mourrat, H. Weber, W. Xu, Construction of Φ4 3 diagrams for pedestrians, From particle systems to partial diﬀerential equations, 1–46, Springer Proc. Math. Stat., 209, Springer, Cham, 2017

2017
[41]

T. Oh, M. Okamoto, T. Robert, A remark on triviality for the two-dimensional stochastic nonlinear wave equation, Stochastic Process. Appl. 130 (2020), no. 9, 5838–5864

2020
[42]

T. Oh, M. Okamoto, L. Tolomeo, Focusing Φ4 3-model with a Hartree-type nonlinearity , arXiv:2009.03251 [math.PR]. 46 T. OH AND M. OKAMOTO

2009 arXiv
[43]

T. Oh, M. Okamoto, N. Tzvetkov, Uniqueness and non-uniqueness of the Gaussian free ﬁeld evolution under the two-dimensional Wick ordered cubic wave equation , preprint
[44]

T. Oh, O. Pocovnicu, N. Tzvetkov, Probabilistic local well-posedness of the cubic nonlinear wave equation in negative Sobolev spaces, to appear in Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble)
[45]

T. Oh, O. Pocovnicu, Y. Wang, On the stochastic nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations with non-smooth additive noise, Kyoto J. Math. 60 (2020), no. 4, 1227–1243

2020
[46]

T. Oh, T. Robert, P. Sosoe, Y. Wang, On the two-dimensional hyperbolic stochastic sine-Gordon equation, Stoch. Partial Diﬀer. Equ. Anal. Comput. (2020), 32 pages. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40072-020-00165-8

2020 doi
[47]

T. Oh, T. Robert, P. Sosoe, Y. Wang, Invariant Gibbs dynamics for the dynamical sine-Gordon model , Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A (2020), 17 pages. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/prm.2020.68

2020 doi
[48]

T. Oh, T. Robert, N. Tzvetkov, Stochastic nonlinear wave dynamics on compact surfaces , arXiv:1904.05277 [math.AP]

1904 arXiv
[49]

T. Oh, T. Robert, Y. Wang, On the parabolic and hyperbolic Liouville equations , arXiv:1908.03944 [math.AP]

1908 arXiv
[50]

T. Oh, P. Sosoe, N. Tzvetkov. An optimal regularity result on the quasi-invariant Gaussian measures for the cubic fourth order nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, J. ´Ec. polytech. Math. 5 (2018), 793–841

2018
[51]

T. Oh, L. Thomann, Invariant Gibbs measure for the 2- d defocusing nonlinear wave equations , Ann. Fac. Sci. Toulouse Math. 29 (2020), no. 1, 1–26

2020
[52]

Peszat, J

S. Peszat, J. Zabczyk, Stochastic evolution equations with a spatially homogeneous Wiener process , Stochastic Process. Appl. 72 (1997), no. 2, 187–204

1997
[53]

Simon, TheP (ϕ)2 Euclidean (quantum) ﬁeld theory, Princeton Series in Physics

B. Simon, TheP (ϕ)2 Euclidean (quantum) ﬁeld theory, Princeton Series in Physics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., 1974. xx+392 pp

1974
[54]

Tindel, C

S. Tindel, C. A. Tudor, F. Viens, Stochastic evolution equations with fractional Brownian motion , Probab. Theory Related Fields 127 (2003), no. 2, 186–204

2003
[55]

Tolomeo, Global well-posedness of the two-dimensional stochastic nonlinear wave equation on an unbounded domain, arXiv:1912.08667 [math.AP]

L. Tolomeo, Global well-posedness of the two-dimensional stochastic nonlinear wave equation on an unbounded domain, arXiv:1912.08667 [math.AP]

1912 arXiv
[56]

J. Walsh, An introduction to stochastic partial diﬀerential equations, ´Ecole d’´ et´ e de probabilit´ es de Saint-Flour, XIV–1984, 265–439, Lecture Notes in Math., 1180, Springer, Berlin, 1986. Tadahiro Oh, School of Mathematics, The University of Edinburgh, and The Maxwell I...

1984
[343]

xvi+523 pp

Springer, Heidelberg, 2011. xvi+523 pp

2011

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Bahouri, J.-Y

H. Bahouri, J.-Y. Chemin, R. Danchin, Fourier analysis and nonlinear partial diﬀerential equations, Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences],

work page

[2] [2]

Balan, M

R.M. Balan, M. Jolis, J. Quer-Sardanyons, SPDEs with aﬃne multiplicative fractional noise in space with index 1 4 <H < 1 2, Electron. J. Probab. 20 (2015), no. 54, 36 pp

work page 2015

[3] [3]

Balan, C

R.M. Balan, C. A. Tudor, Stochastic heat equation with multiplicative fractional-colored noise, J. Theoret. Probab. 23 (2010), no. 3, 834–870

work page 2010

[4] [4]

B´ enyi,T

´A. B´ enyi,T. Oh, O. Pocovnicu,Higher order expansions for the probabilistic local Cauchy theory of the cubic nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation onR3, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. Ser. B 6 (2019), 114–160

work page 2019

[5] [5]

Bony, Calcul symbolique et propagation des singularit´ es pour les ´ equations aux d´ eriv´ ees partielles non lin´ eaires,Ann

J.-M. Bony, Calcul symbolique et propagation des singularit´ es pour les ´ equations aux d´ eriv´ ees partielles non lin´ eaires,Ann. Sci. ´Ecole Norm. Sup. 14 (1981), no. 2, 209–246

work page 1981

[6] [6]

Brezis, T

H. Brezis, T. Cazenave, A nonlinear heat equation with singular initial data , J. Anal. Math. 68 (1996), 277–304

work page 1996

[7] [7]

Bringmann, Invariant Gibbs measures for the three-dimensional wave equation with a Hartree nonlinearity II: Dynamics arXiv:2009.04616 [math.AP]

B. Bringmann, Invariant Gibbs measures for the three-dimensional wave equation with a Hartree nonlinearity II: Dynamics arXiv:2009.04616 [math.AP]

arXiv 2009

[8] [8]

Bruned, A

Y. Bruned, A. Chandra, I. Chevyrev, M. Hairer, Renormalising SPDEs in regularity structures, to appear in J. Eur. Math. Soc

work page