Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Second order estimates for complex Hessian equations on Hermitian manifolds

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read On compact Hermitian manifolds, χ-plurisubharmonic solutions of complex Hessian equations with gradient-dependent right-hand sides have uniformly bounded second derivatives.

desk verdict Good technical extension of PPZ's second-order estimate to Hermitian manifolds, with one unproved imported inequality that stops the proof from fully closing. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.03599 v2 pith:OTMSSFNF submitted 2019-08-09 math.AP math.CV

classification math.APmath.CV MSC 35J1553C5558J0535B45
keywords complexHessianequationssecondorderestimatesHermitianmanifoldsχ-plurisubharmonicfunctionsfullynonlinearellipticaprioritorsionmaximumprinciple
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

On a compact Hermitian manifold, the paper proves a uniform second-order estimate for $\chi$-plurisubharmonic solutions of the complex Hessian equation $(\chi+\sqrt{-1}\,\partial\bar\partial u)^k \wedge \omega^{n-k} = \psi(z,Du,u)\,\omega^n$, assuming $\chi \ge \varepsilon\omega$. The bound $|D\bar D u|_\omega \le C$ depends only on known data, not on the particular solution. This is the missing a priori estimate needed to run the continuity method and conclude existence and regularity for these fully nonlinear equations on non-Kähler manifolds, where torsion produces extra third-order terms. A second theorem extends the estimate to equations whose background Hessian itself depends on the gradient of the unknown.

What carries the argument

The maximum-principle test function is $G = \log P_m + \phi(|Du|^2) + \varphi(u)$, where $P_m = \sum_j \lambda_j^m$ and $\lambda_j$ are the eigenvalues of $g = \chi + \sqrt{-1}\,\partial\bar\partial u$ with respect to $\omega$. Differentiating $G$ twice, contracting with $\sigma_k^{pq}$, and using Hermitian commutation formulas produces a long inequality in which the third-order terms are controlled by a tensor lemma for $\sigma_k$ (Lemma 3.1) and by choosing $\phi$ and $\varphi$ as exponentials with widely separated exponents. The torsion enters through extra terms $T \ast D^3u$; the auxiliary function is modified so that these become absorbable, and the argument closes by invoking the inequality $A_i + B_i + C_i + D_i - E_i \ge 0$ from the Kähler case.

What would settle it

On a compact Hermitian manifold with non-zero torsion, take any smooth $\chi$-plurisubharmonic function with $\chi \ge \varepsilon\omega$ and compute the tensors $A_i, B_i, C_i, D_i, E_i$ defined after (3.22) at a point where the maximum-principle test function $G$ attains its maximum; if $A_i + B_i + C_i + D_i - E_i < 0$ for some $i$, the proof's final step fails, and the eigenvalue bound would need another argument.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 1.1: every $C^4$ $\chi$-plurisubharmonic solution of the Hermitian Hessian equation with gradient-dependent right-hand side and $\chi \ge \varepsilon\omega$ satisfies $|D\bar D u|_\omega \le C$, with $C$ uniform. The proof achieves this by adapting the Kähler-manifold maximum-principle argument to the Hermitian case, modifying the auxiliary function so that torsion terms of the form $T \ast D^3u$ are absorbed into favorable third-order terms. Theorem 1.3 gives the analogous bound when the Hessian is replaced by $\chi + \sqrt{-1}\, a \wedge \partial u - \sqrt{-1}\, \bar a \wedge \bar\partial u$, so the result covers equations whose coefficients depend on the gradient as well.

Load-bearing premise

The argument leans on an inequality, imported from the Kähler case, that says $A_i + B_i + C_i + D_i - E_i \ge 0$ for every $i$; the paper does not prove this inequality for the torsion-modified tensors of Section 3, and if it fails for some Hermitian manifold, the maximum-principle closure and hence the bound may collapse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For $k=n$, the result gives the second-order estimate for the complex Monge-Ampère equation on Hermitian manifolds when the right-hand side depends on the gradient.
  • Together with standard higher-order elliptic estimates, the bound yields $C^\infty$ regularity and existence for fully nonlinear Hessian equations on Hermitian manifolds under the $\chi$-plurisubharmonic admissibility condition.
  • The gradient-dependent $\chi$ case (Theorem 1.3) puts equations whose coefficients include first derivatives of the unknown into the same a priori estimate framework.
  • The uniform bound gives compactness of admissible solution families, which is exactly what the continuity method needs to cross from the linearized equation to the nonlinear one.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The inequality $A_i + B_i + C_i + D_i - E_i \ge 0$ is imported from the Kähler proof without a Hermitian verification; testing it on explicit torsion-modified tensors would either close the gap or expose a counterexample.
  • A natural next step is to relax the $\chi$-plurisubharmonic hypothesis to the $\Gamma_k$ cone; the present technique does not obviously survive that relaxation, since positivity of $g$ is used to control the negative third-order terms.
  • The same maximum-principle format should generalize to almost Hermitian manifolds for all $k$, using non-integrable commutation formulas, though the torsion estimates would need to be reworked.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proves a priori second-order estimates for χ-plurisubharmonic solutions of the complex Hessian equation (χ+√−1∂∂u)^k ∧ ω^{n−k} = ψ(z,Du,u)ω^n on compact Hermitian manifolds, under χ ≥ εω. The proof follows the maximum-principle method of Phong–Picard–Zhang [26], with a test function log P_m + φ(|Du|^2)+φ(u) and a modified auxiliary function to handle torsion terms. Theorem 1.1 is the main result; Theorem 1.3 is an outlined analogue when the form χ is replaced by χ+√−1(a⊗∂u−\bar a⊗\bar ∂u).

Significance. If the proof can be completed, the result would be a natural and useful extension of [26] from Kähler to Hermitian manifolds, providing the missing second-order estimate needed in the continuity method for these equations. The manuscript contains a detailed and mostly careful maximum-principle calculation; the treatment of the torsion terms via the modified test function is a plausible and interesting idea. The main obstacle is a single but load-bearing algebraic inequality that is imported from [26] without verification in the Hermitian setting, so the current manuscript is not yet a complete proof of the stated theorems.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 3, after (3.22)] The assertion 'By the arguments as in [26], we may assume without loss of generality that A_i+B_i+C_i+D_i-E_i ≥ 0, for every i=1,...,n' is load-bearing and unproved. Since 1−δ ≥ 1−φ''/(2φ'^2), the negative E_i terms can be neglected only if the stated pointwise inequality holds for each i. The tensors A_i,...,E_i are formed from Hermitian covariant derivatives D_i g_{p\bar p}, and the preceding estimates (e.g., (3.15) and (3.20)) use torsion commutation identities, so it is not automatic that the Kähler proof in [26] carries over verbatim. The authors should state the precise algebraic lemma from [26], prove it (or show that it is a purely algebraic inequality valid for arbitrary v_p = D_i g_{p\bar p}), and specify the range of m for which it holds; m is never fixed in the proof and the inequality may depend on it.
  2. [Section 4, after (4.7)] Theorem 1.3 is only outlined, and its final step says 'the proof is the same as that of Theorem 1.1.' Because the corresponding step in Theorem 1.1 depends on the unproved inequality in the previous comment, Theorem 1.3 inherits the same gap. Please either provide the full verification for the tensors defined with g̃ = χ+√−1∂∂u+√−1(a⊗∂u−\bar a⊗\bar ∂u), or explicitly say which parts are identical and prove the nontrivial ones.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Equation (2.3)] The definition of Γ_k(M) contains the typo 'A^{1,1}(M, R^n)'; it should be 'A^{1,1}(M, R)' since σ_k(h) is a real-valued function.
  2. [References] Reference [11] appears corrupted as 'Dinew-Ko/suppress lodziej'; it should be 'Dinew-Kołodziej'. Reference [20] contains the typo 'Kähler manfold'.
  3. [Equation (3.23)] The constants in the line '- C/β - C/τ' are not tracked precisely: with β=τ=1/(6e^{M(-u+L)}), one obtains -C/β - C/τ = -12C e^{M(-u+L)}, not simply '-Cφ'. The conclusion is unaffected, but the displayed formula should be corrected.
  4. [Section 4] Theorem 1.3 is labeled an 'Outline of proof'. If this is intended to be a full proof of a main theorem, the paper should either upgrade the outline to a complete argument or clearly state that the details are analogous and available upon request.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the second-order estimate follows from the differentiated equation and maximum principle, with all cited tools external.

full rationale

The central claim, Theorem 1.1, is a uniform second-order bound |D Dbar u| <= C for solutions of the complex Hessian equation. The proof differentiates the equation (2.5), introduces the maximum-principle test function G = log Pm + phi(|Du|^2) + phi(u), and derives chain inequalities (3.7)-(3.23). The one step that might appear suspicious is the assertion after (3.22): 'By the arguments as in [26], we may assume without loss of generality that Ai+Bi+Ci+Di-Ei >= 0, for every i = 1,...,n.' This is an imported result from the external paper [26] (Phong-Picard-Zhang), not from the present authors' own prior work, and it is not a renamed version of the target estimate. The paper does not verify that the Hermitian torsion terms preserve the inequality, so this is a potential correctness gap, but it is not circularity: the cited argument is independent of the present theorem's conclusion and is not defined in terms of the quantity being estimated. Similarly, Lemma 3.1 is quoted from [19], another external source. No parameter is fitted to the data being predicted; the constant C depends only on the stated known quantities, and the estimate is not assumed as an input. Theorem 1.3 is an adaptation of the same argument, not a redefinition of the equation's data. There are no load-bearing self-citations and no construction by which the conclusion equals an input. Therefore the paper is not circular in the sense defined here.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard analytic tools (maximum principle, elementary symmetric polynomial identities, commutation formulas) and on one imported inequality from [26] that is not proved here. There are no fitted parameters and no new postulated entities. The main gap in the proof is the unverified Hermitian analogue of the A_i+B_i+C_i+D_i-E_i >= 0 inequality.

assumptions (4)
  • standard math Lemma 3.1 from Guan-Ren-Wang [19]: for tensors in the Gamma_k cone, a lower bound on -sigma^{pp,qq}_k w_{ppi} w_{qqi} plus a positive term involving |D_i sigma_k|^2 / sigma_k.
    Invoked at (3.19)-(3.20) to control negative quadratic third-derivative terms and to define the constant K. Not proved in this paper.
  • standard math Commutation formulas (2.8)-(2.9) for covariant derivatives on Hermitian manifolds with torsion, cited from Tosatti-Weinkove [43].
    Used throughout Section 2 to commute derivatives and to express torsion terms in (2.16) and (2.18).
  • standard math The identity sigma_l(lambda) = sigma_l(lambda|p) + lambda_p sigma_{l-1}(lambda|p) and concavity properties of sigma_k on the positive cone Gamma_k.
    Used in Section 3 to estimate the B and D terms and to derive (3.20) and related bounds.
  • ad hoc to paper The inequality A_i + B_i + C_i + D_i - E_i >= 0 for every i, imported from Phong-Picard-Zhang [26].
    Stated 'by the arguments as in [26]' after (3.22) without proof or verification in the Hermitian/torsion setting. The final eigenvalue bound depends on this inequality.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Second order estimates for complex Hessian equations on Hermitian manifolds." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OTMSSFNF

@misc{pith2026190803599,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Second order estimates for complex Hessian equations on Hermitian manifolds},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OTMSSFNF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.03599}
}
abstract

We derive second order estimates for $\chi$-plurisubharmonic solutions of complex Hessian equations with right hand sides depending on gradients on compact Hermitian manifolds.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Dirichlet Problem for the $k$-Hessian Equation on a complex manifold

    math.DG 2019-09 accept novelty 8.0 of 10

    The Dirichlet problem for complex k-Hessian equations on compact Hermitian manifolds with boundary is solved under the assumption that a smooth subsolution exists.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [26]

    Phong, S

    D.H. Phong, S. Picard and X.W. Zhang, A second order estimate for general complex Hessian equations, Anal. PDE 9 (2016), 1693-1709

  2. [12]

    Feng, H.B

    K. Feng, H.B. Ge and T. Zheng, The Dirichlet Problem of Fu lly Nonlinear Equations on Hermitian Manifolds, preprint, arXiv: 1905.02412. SECOND ORDER ESTIMATES 15

  3. [1]

    Alekser and M

    S. Alekser and M. Verbitsky, Quaternionic Monge-Amp` ere equations and Calabi problem for HKT-manifolds, Israel J. Math. 176 (2010), 109-138

  4. [2]

    Ball, Differentiability properties of symmetric an d isotropic functions, Duke Math

    J.M. Ball, Differentiability properties of symmetric an d isotropic functions, Duke Math. J. 51 (1984), 699-728

  5. [3]

    Blocki, Weak solutions to the complex Hessian equatio n, Ann

    Z. Blocki, Weak solutions to the complex Hessian equatio n, Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 55 (2005), 1735-1756

  6. [4]

    Caffarelli, L

    L. Caffarelli, L. Nirenberg and J. Spruck, The Dirichlet p roblem for nonlinear second order elliptic equations, III: Functions of the eigenvalues of th e Hessian, Acta Math. 155 (1985), 261-301

  7. [5]

    Cheng, and S.T

    S.Y. Cheng, and S.T. Yau, On the existence of a complete K¨ ahler metric on noncompact complex manifolds and the regularity of Fefferman’s equatio n, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 33 (1980), 507-544

  8. [6]

    Cherrier, ´Equations de Monge-Amp` ere sur les vari´ et´ es hermitiennes compactes, Bull

    P. Cherrier, ´Equations de Monge-Amp` ere sur les vari´ et´ es hermitiennes compactes, Bull. Sci. Math. (2) 111 (1987), 343-385

Show all 49 references
  1. [7]

    Chu, L.D

    J.C. Chu, L.D. Huang and X.H. Zhu, The Fu-Yau equation in higher dimensions, Peking Math. J. 2 (2019), 71-97

  2. [8]

    Chu, L.D

    J.C. Chu, L.D. Huang and X.H. Zhu, The Fu-Yau equation on c ompact astheno-K¨ ahler man- ifolds, Adv. Math. 346 (2019), 908-945

  3. [9]

    Chu, L.D

    J.C. Chu, L.D. Huang and X.H. Zhu, The 2-nd Hessian type eq uation on almost Hermitian manifolds, preprint, arXiv: 1707.04072

  4. [10]

    Chu, V.Tosatti and B.Weinkove, The Monge-Amp` ereequation for non-integrable almost complex structures, J

    J.C. Chu, V.Tosatti and B.Weinkove, The Monge-Amp` ereequation for non-integrable almost complex structures, J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) 21 (2019), 194 9-1984

  5. [11]

    Dinew and S

    S. Dinew and S. Ko/suppress lodziej, Liouville and Calabi-Yau type theorems for complex Hessian equations, Amer. J. Math. 139 (2017), 403-415

  6. [13]

    Fu and S.T

    J.X. Fu and S.T. Yau, The theory of superstring with flux o n non-K¨ ahler manifolds and the complex Monge-Amp` ere equation, J. Differential Geom. 78 (2008), 369-428

  7. [14]

    Fu and S.T

    J.X. Fu and S.T. Yau, A Monge-Amp` ere-type equation motivated by string theory, Comm. Anal. Geom. 15 (2007), 29-75

  8. [15]

    Goldstein and S

    E. Goldstein and S. Prokushkin, Geometric model for com plex non-K¨ ahler manifolds with SU (3) structure, Comm. Math. Phys. 251 (2004), 65-78

  9. [16]

    Guan and H.M

    B. Guan and H.M. Jiao, Second order estimates for Hessia n type fully nonlinear elliptic equations on Riemannian manifolds, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 54 (2015), 2693- 2712

  10. [17]

    Guan and Q

    B. Guan and Q. Li, Complex Monge-Amp` ere equations and totally real submanifolds, Adv. Math. 225 (2010), 1185-1223

  11. [18]

    Guan and X

    B. Guan and X. Nie, Fully nonlinear elliptic equations w ith gradient terms on Hermitian manifolds, preprint

  12. [19]

    Guan, C.Y

    P.F. Guan, C.Y. Ren and Z.Z. Wang, Global C2-estimates for convex solutions of curvature equations, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 68 (2015), 1287-1325

  13. [20]

    Hou, Complex Hessian equation on K¨ ahler manfold, Int

    Z.L. Hou, Complex Hessian equation on K¨ ahler manfold, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2009, 3098-3111

  14. [21]

    Hou, X.N

    Z.L. Hou, X.N. Ma and D.M. Wu, A second order estimate for complex Hessian equations on a compact K¨ ahler manifold, Math. Res. Lett. 17 (2010), 547-561

  15. [22]

    Jbilou, ´Equations hessiennes complexes sur des vari´ et´ es k¨ ahl´ eriennes compactes, C

    A. Jbilou, ´Equations hessiennes complexes sur des vari´ et´ es k¨ ahl´ eriennes compactes, C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 348 (2010), 41-46

  16. [23]

    Kobayashi, K¨ ahler-Einstein metric on an open algeb raic manifold, Osaka J

    R. Kobayashi, K¨ ahler-Einstein metric on an open algeb raic manifold, Osaka J. Math. 21 (1984), 399-418

  17. [24]

    M. Li, C.Y. Ren and Z.Z. Wang, An interior estimate for co nvex solutions and a rigidity theorem, J. Funct. Anal. 270 (2016), 2691-2714

  18. [25]

    Li, On the Dirichlet problems for symmetric functi on equations of the eigenvalues of the complex Hessian, Asian J

    S.Y. Li, On the Dirichlet problems for symmetric functi on equations of the eigenvalues of the complex Hessian, Asian J. Math. 8 (2004), 87-106

  19. [27]

    Phong, S

    D.H. Phong, S. Picard and X.W. Zhang, The Fu-Yau equation with negative slope parameter, Invent. Math. 209 (2017), 541-576

  20. [28]

    Phong, S

    D.H. Phong, S. Picard and X.W. Zhang, On estimates for th e Fu-Yau generalization of a Strominger system, J. Reine Angew. Math. 751 (2019), 243-27 4

  21. [29]

    Phong, S

    D.H. Phong, S. Picard and X.W. Zhang, Fu-Yau Hessian equ ations, preprint, arXiv: 1801.09842, to appear in J. Differential Geom

  22. [30]

    Phong, J

    D.H. Phong, J. Song and J. Sturm, Complex Monge-Amp` ereequations. Surveys in differential geometry. Vol. XVII, 327-410, Surv. Differ. Geom., 17, Int. P ress, Boston, MA, 2012

  23. [31]

    Song and B

    J. Song and B. Weinkove, On the convergence and singularities of the J-flow with applications to the Mabuchi energy, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 61 (2008), 210- 229

  24. [32]

    Sun, On a class of fully nonlinear elliptic equations on closed Hermitian manifolds II: L∞ estimate, Comm

    W. Sun, On a class of fully nonlinear elliptic equations on closed Hermitian manifolds II: L∞ estimate, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 70 (2017), 172-199

  25. [33]

    Sun, On uniform estimate of complex elliptic equatio ns on closed Hermitian manifolds, Commun

    W. Sun, On uniform estimate of complex elliptic equatio ns on closed Hermitian manifolds, Commun. Pure Appl. Anal. 16 (2017), 1553-1570

  26. [34]

    Sz´ ekelyhidi, Fully non-linear elliptic equations on compact Hermitian manifolds, J

    G. Sz´ ekelyhidi, Fully non-linear elliptic equations on compact Hermitian manifolds, J. Dif- ferential Geom. 109 (2018), 337-378

  27. [35]

    Sz´ ekelyhidi, V

    G. Sz´ ekelyhidi, V. Tosatti and B. Weinkove, Gauduchonmetrics with prescribed volume form, Acta Math. 219 (2017), 181-211

  28. [36]

    Tian, On the existence of solutions of a class of Monge -Amp` ere equations, Acta Math

    G. Tian, On the existence of solutions of a class of Monge -Amp` ere equations, Acta Math. Sinica (N.S.) 4 (1988), 250-265

  29. [37]

    Tian, A third derivative estimate for Monge-Amp` ere equations with conic singularities, Chin

    G. Tian, A third derivative estimate for Monge-Amp` ere equations with conic singularities, Chin. Ann. Math. Ser. B 38 (2017), 687-694

  30. [38]

    Tian and S.T

    G. Tian and S.T. Yau, Complete K¨ ahler manifolds with ze ro Ricci curvature. I, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 3 (1990), 579-609

  31. [39]

    Tian and S.T

    G. Tian and S.T. Yau, Complete K¨ ahler manifolds with ze ro Ricci curvature. II, Invent. Math. 106 (1991), 27-60

  32. [40]

    Tosatti, Y

    V. Tosatti, Y. Wang, B. Weinkove and X.K. Yang, C2,α estimates for nonlinear elliptic equations in complex and almost complex geometry, Calc. Var . Partial Differential Equations 54 (2015), 431-453. 16 WEISONG DONG AND CHANG LI

  33. [41]

    Tosatti and B

    V. Tosatti and B. Weinkove, Estimates for the complex Monge-Amp` ere equation on Hermitian and balanced manifolds, Asian J. Math. 14 (2010), 19-40

  34. [42]

    Tosatti and B

    V. Tosatti and B. Weinkove, The complex Monge-Amp` ere equation on compact Hermitian manifolds, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 23 (2010), 1187-1195

  35. [43]

    Tosatti and B

    V. Tosatti and B. Weinkove, Hermitian metrics, ( n − 1, n − 1) forms and Monge-Amp` ere equations, preprint, arXiv: 1310.6326, to appear in J. Rein e Angew. Math

  36. [44]

    Tosatti and B

    V. Tosatti and B. Weinkove, The complex Monge-Amp` ere e quation with a gradient term, preprint, arXiv: 1906.10034

  37. [45]

    Yau, On the Ricci curvature of a compact K¨ ahler man ifold and the complex Monge- Amp` ere equation

    S.T. Yau, On the Ricci curvature of a compact K¨ ahler man ifold and the complex Monge- Amp` ere equation. I, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 31 (1978), 339-411

  38. [46]

    Yuan, On a class of fully nonlinear elliptic equati ons containing gradient terms on compact Hermitian manifolds, Canad

    R.R. Yuan, On a class of fully nonlinear elliptic equati ons containing gradient terms on compact Hermitian manifolds, Canad. J. Math. 70 (2018), 943 -960

  39. [47]

    Yuan, Regularity of fully nonlinear elliptic equa tions on Hermitian manifolds, II, preprint

    R.R. Yuan, Regularity of fully nonlinear elliptic equa tions on Hermitian manifolds, II, preprint

  40. [48]

    Zhang, Hessian equations on closed Hermitian mani folds, Pacific J

    D.K. Zhang, Hessian equations on closed Hermitian mani folds, Pacific J. Math. 291 (2017), 485-510

  41. [49]

    Zhang, A priori estimates for complex Monge-Amp` ere equation on Hermitian manifolds, Int

    X.W. Zhang, A priori estimates for complex Monge-Amp` ere equation on Hermitian manifolds, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2010, 3814-3836. School of Mathematics, Tianjin University, Tianjin, P.R.Ch ina, 300354 E-mail address : dr.dong@tju.edu.cn School of Mathematical Sciences, Pek...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.