Recent Advances in Deep Learning for Object Detection

Doyen Sahoo; Steven C.H. Hoi; Xiongwei Wu

REVIEW 3 major objections 7 minor 1 cited by

Recent Advances in Deep Learning for Object Detection

T0 review · 3 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This survey claims that deep-learning object detection is best organized as a two-stage/one-stage dichotomy, with components, learning strategies, and benchmarks making up the rest of the map.

desk verdict A useful but imperfect map of deep learning object detection as of 2019; the narrative is solid, but the benchmark tables need fixing before you trust them. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.03673 v1 pith:WIBCY2D7 submitted 2019-08-10 cs.CV cs.LGcs.MM

Xiongwei Wu , Doyen Sahoo , Steven C.H. Hoi This is my paper · ORCID

classification cs.CVcs.LGcs.MM

keywords objectdetectiondeeplearningconvolutionalneuralnetworkstwo-stagedetectorsone-stagefeaturepyramidanchor-freeinstancesegmentation

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This survey argues that recent deep-learning object detection is best understood through a single split: two-stage detectors that first propose regions and then classify them, versus one-stage detectors that predict classes and boxes directly from feature maps. It claims that performance is determined by a small set of reusable components, namely backbone architecture, proposal generation, and feature representation, together with learning strategies such as data augmentation, imbalance sampling, localization refinement, and cascade learning. If the map is right, it gives researchers and practitioners a reliable way to locate any detector, compare the accuracy-versus-speed tradeoff, and choose where to improve next. The survey also assembles benchmark tables and reviews face and pedestrian detection as the main applied settings.

What carries the argument

The machinery that carries the survey is its taxonomy, built on the two-stage/one-stage dichotomy as the root. The taxonomy organizes every reviewed method into detection components, learning strategies, and applications and benchmarks, so that a detector is described by choices within each category rather than by a single headline number. Within that structure, the review treats feature pyramids and multi-scale feature learning as the key mechanism for handling scale variation, and class-imbalance handling through hard negative mining and focal loss as the key mechanism for training one-stage detectors. The IoU-based evaluation metrics and the benchmark tables are the instruments that make the taxonomy's comparisons concrete.

What would settle it

Retrain two detectors from the same benchmark table under an identical protocol, using the same training data, backbone, augmentation, and test settings, and compare mAP; if the ranking inverts or the gap collapses, the survey's cross-method comparisons are not reliable.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central claim is that every important deep object detector falls into one of two paradigms: two-stage detectors, which use a proposal generator to produce a sparse set of candidate regions and then classify and refine each one, and one-stage detectors, which skip proposal generation and make dense predictions at every location. The survey further claims that the factors controlling detection quality decompose into detection components, including backbone networks, proposal generation, multi-scale and deformable feature learning, and region encoding, plus learning strategies such as data augmentation, imbalance sampling, localization refinement, cascade learning, and test-time processing such as non-maximum suppression. It presents benchmark tables on Pascal VOC and MS COCO that track the accuracy and speed of representative detectors, and it identifies anchor-free, keypoint-based detectors and AutoML-designed architectures as the most active directions going forward.

Load-bearing premise

The survey assumes that the benchmark scores reported by different papers can be compared directly in Tables 2 and 3, even though those papers differ in training data, test-time augmentation, backbone, and implementation details.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If the taxonomy is right, a new detector can be located and understood by its place in the two-stage/one-stage split and by its component choices, giving the field a stable reference map as of mid-2019.
The accuracy-versus-speed tradeoff between the two families becomes a design expectation rather than an accident: two-stage detectors set accuracy records while one-stage detectors set real-time records.
Class imbalance and scale variation emerge as first-order training problems, so progress in sampling strategies, loss design, and feature pyramids should keep improving accuracy across both families.
The benchmark tables imply that anchor-free keypoint detectors and AutoML-based architectures are the directions most likely to push state-of-the-art results next.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The two-family split will probably blur as components migrate, since two-stage detectors adopt anchor-free heads and one-stage detectors adopt cascaded refinement, so a later survey may need a finer-grained axis.
Because the benchmark tables mix training data, backbones, and test-time augmentation, the reported rankings should be read as approximate; identical-protocol re-runs could reorder methods.
A testable extension of the survey's decomposition is to ablate components one at a time within a fixed backbone, and the largest mAP swings would identify which part of the taxonomy carries the field's progress.
The review's list of open problems suggests that low-shot detection and detection-specific backbones may matter as much as anchor-free design in the next stage.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Two things to know. This survey gives a genuinely organized map of deep learning object detection as of mid-2019, with a sensible three-part split (components, learning strategies, applications/benchmarks) and a broad, accurate description of the main detector families. Nothing in it is new—it is explicitly a survey—but that is fine; the contribution is the organization and the coverage. The second thing: the benchmark tables are the weakest part, and the paper's central comparative claim rests on them. The stress-test note is right. Table 2 reports R-CNN at 66.0 mAP on VOC2007 trained on VOC2007 trainval only; the original R-CNN paper reports 58.5 for that exact setting, and 66.0 comes from a different, larger training setup. Table 3 lists DeepRegionlets with ResNet-101, but the published paper uses VGG-16 and reports 39.3/59.8 with multi-scale testing. Several '++' entries are flagged only by a footnote; the table never states what the default protocol is, so readers can't tell which rows are directly comparable. There are also citation slips—SPP-net is cited as [2] instead of [47] in Table 2—and assorted typos.

The conceptual sections are much better. The descriptions of R-CNN, Fast/Faster R-CNN, FPN, YOLO, SSD, RetinaNet, anchor-free methods, and the discussion of learning strategies like loss design and NMS are consistent with the literature and are a fair representation of the field. The applications section, especially face and pedestrian detection, is a good entry point for someone outside those subareas. The survey reads like a competent review, not a careless collage.

But the tables are not decoration; they are the main practical reason to use a survey like this. If a practitioner compares numbers without checking the original papers, they can easily be misled. The good news is that this is fixable: every flagged row needs a re-extraction of the source value and a footnote about the exact training/testing protocol. That is a mechanical correction, not a research problem.

Who is this for? A new graduate student who wants the landscape of detectors before 2020, or a researcher from another area who needs a quick orientation. I would not cite its numbers in work right now until the tables are corrected. But I would send it to review: the scope is useful, the narrative is sound, and the errors are concentrated in a few rows. A serious referee would catch them, and a revision would make this a dependable reference.

Referee Report

3 major / 7 minor

Summary. This manuscript is a survey of deep learning methods for visual object detection, organized into detection components, learning strategies, and applications and benchmarks. It reviews two-stage and one-stage detectors, backbone architectures, proposal generation, feature learning, training and testing strategies, and specialized tasks such as face and pedestrian detection, along with public benchmarks and future directions. The paper also provides two large comparison tables (Pascal VOC and MS COCO) intended to summarize the state of the art.

Significance. If the survey's content is accurate, it offers a useful structured overview of a fast-moving field, with broad coverage and a substantial reference list. The taxonomy (two-stage vs. one-stage, components, learning strategies, applications) is reasonable and the milestone timeline is helpful for orientation. However, the central value of such a survey depends on the reliability of its compiled benchmark results, and the concrete misattributions identified below materially reduce that reliability. The contribution is therefore of moderate significance and needs a careful revision of the benchmark tables and related citations before it can serve as a dependable map of the field.

major comments (3)

[Table 2 (Section 7)] The R-CNN row reports 66.0 mAP on VOC2007 with an asterisk claiming that the model is trained only on VOC2007 trainval. This is inconsistent with the original R-CNN paper, which reports 58.5 mAP for a VGG-16 model trained on VOC2007 trainval; the 66.0 figure corresponds to a different configuration (with additional VOC2012 data and/or ensembled bounding-box regression). As written, the entry misleads readers about the training protocol and inflates the comparison for that row. Please re-verify the number and either correct the value or clarify the exact configuration in the footnote.
[Table 3 (Section 7)] The DeepRegionlets row lists ResNet-101 as the backbone, but the original ECCV 2018 paper reports its COCO test-dev result (39.3 AP, 59.8 AP50) with a VGG-16 backbone and a multi-scale testing variant. The combination of a wrong backbone and the missing '++' marker means the row is not comparable to other rows in the same table that use standard inference. Please correct the backbone and indicate the test-time protocol, or remove the row if the original protocol cannot be cleanly accommodated.
[Table 3 (Section 7)] The table mixes base models, entries marked '++' (multi-scale testing, horizontal flip, etc.), and entries such as DeepRegionlets that use multi-scale testing without the marker. The caption defines '++' but does not state that rows with '++' and rows without it are not directly comparable. Given that the survey's organizing claim is to provide a reliable comparative map of detector performance, the table should include per-row protocol indications (or a separate column) so that readers can make valid comparisons; otherwise the benchmark tables may mislead rather than inform.

minor comments (7)

[Table 2] The SPP-net row cites reference [2], but the correct reference for SPP-net is [47].
[Table 2 footnote] The footnote contains duplicated words ('the the model is trained') and a subject-verb agreement error ('the model are trained'); please correct both.
[Section 3.2.2] The name 'Single-Shot Mulibox Detector' should be 'Single-Shot Multibox Detector'.
[Section 3.5.2] The phrase 'Precise ROI Pooing' should be 'Precise ROI Pooling'.
[Section 4.2.1] The name 'Hosong et al.' should be 'Hosang et al.' (the authors of 'Learning non-maximum suppression').
[Section 8] The word 'sveral' should be 'several'.
[Section 7] The opening sentence lists 'Pascal VOC2007, VOC2007 and MSCOCO'; the second occurrence should be 'VOC2012'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the survey organizes prior published results and makes no derivation or prediction claim that reduces to its inputs.

full rationale

This paper is a literature survey of deep-learning object detection. Its organizing claim is taxonomic (two-stage vs one-stage detectors, components, learning strategies, applications, benchmarks), and its factual content consists of descriptions of prior work plus benchmark tables reproducing numbers from the cited papers. There is no derivation chain in which an output is constructed from an input in a way that makes the output equivalent to the input by definition. The authors' self-citations (e.g., refs [13], [183], [188]) appear only as examples of logo detection, face detection, and related applications; they are not invoked as load-bearing evidence for any taxonomic or comparative claim, and the survey's structure does not depend on accepting those specific results. The benchmark tables could be criticized for inconsistent evaluation protocols across entries, but that is a correctness/comparability concern, not circularity: the table entries are reported external results, not predictions generated from a fitted parameter in this paper. No fitted input is renamed as a prediction, no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work, and no ansatz is smuggled in via self-citation. Accordingly, the appropriate circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters or invented entities appear in this review. The only background assumption is the reliability of the cited literature and the representativeness of the selected papers.

assumptions (1)

domain assumption The cited papers are accurately summarized and their reported results are reliable as published.
The survey does not re-run any experiments, so its entire content rests on trusting the primary sources it cites.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Recent Advances in Deep Learning for Object Detection." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WIBCY2D7

@misc{pith2026190803673,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Recent Advances in Deep Learning for Object Detection},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WIBCY2D7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.03673}
}

read the original abstract

Object detection is a fundamental visual recognition problem in computer vision and has been widely studied in the past decades. Visual object detection aims to find objects of certain target classes with precise localization in a given image and assign each object instance a corresponding class label. Due to the tremendous successes of deep learning based image classification, object detection techniques using deep learning have been actively studied in recent years. In this paper, we give a comprehensive survey of recent advances in visual object detection with deep learning. By reviewing a large body of recent related work in literature, we systematically analyze the existing object detection frameworks and organize the survey into three major parts: (i) detection components, (ii) learning strategies, and (iii) applications & benchmarks. In the survey, we cover a variety of factors affecting the detection performance in detail, such as detector architectures, feature learning, proposal generation, sampling strategies, etc. Finally, we discuss several future directions to facilitate and spur future research for visual object detection with deep learning. Keywords: Object Detection, Deep Learning, Deep Convolutional Neural Networks

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.03673 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** Major milestone in object detection research based on deep convolution neural networks since 2012. The trend in the last year has been designing object [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Taxonomy of key methodologies in this survey. We categorize various contributions for deep learning based object detection into three major categories: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (8 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Overview of different two-stage detection frameworks for generic object detection. Red dotted rectangles denote the outputs that define the loss functions. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Overview of different one-stage detection frameworks for generic object detection. Red rectangles denotes the outputs that define the objective functions. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Diagram of RPN [34]. Each position of the feature map connects [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_6.png]

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Four paradigms for multi-scale feature learning. Top Left: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_7.png]

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: General framework for feature combination. Top-down features are 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_8.png]

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: Example of failure case of detection in high IoU threshold. Purple box [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_9.png]

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: Duplicate predictions are eliminated by NMS operation. The most [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_10.png]

**Figure 11.** Figure 11: Some examples of Pascal VOC, MSCOCO, Open Images and LVIS. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_11.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

A Survey of Simultaneous Localization and Mapping with an Envision in 6G Wireless Networks
cs.RO 2019-08 conditional novelty 1.0 of 10

A broad review of Lidar, visual, and fused SLAM systems, with an unquantified vision for SLAM using future 6G terahertz wireless networks.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

256 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[2]

Girshick, J

R. Girshick, J. Donahue, T. Darrell, J. Malik, Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation, in: CVPR, 2014

2014
[47]

K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, J. Sun, Spatial pyramid pooling in deep con- 35 volutional networks for visual recognition, in: ECCV , 2014

2014
[1]

K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, J. Sun, Deep residual learning for image recog- nition, in: CVPR, 2016

2016
[3]

K. He, G. Gkioxari, P. Doll ´ar, R. Girshick, Mask r-cnn, in: ICCV , 2017

2017
[4]

L.-C. Chen, G. Papandreou, I. Kokkinos, K. Murphy, A. L. Yuille, Se- mantic image segmentation with deep convolutional nets and fully con- nected crfs, in: arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.7062, 2014. 34

arXiv 2014
[5]

Y . Sun, D. Liang, X. Wang, X. Tang, Deepid3: Face recognition with very deep neural networks, in: arXiv preprint arXiv:1502.00873, 2015

arXiv 2015
[6]

Y . Sun, Y . Chen, X. Wang, X. Tang, Deep learning face representation by joint identiﬁcation-veriﬁcation, in: NeurIPS, 2014

2014
[7]

W. Liu, Y . Wen, Z. Yu, M. Li, B. Raj, L. Song, Sphereface: Deep hyper- sphere embedding for face recognition, in: CVPR, 2017

2017

Show all 256 references

[8]

J. Li, X. Liang, S. Shen, T. Xu, J. Feng, S. Yan, Scale-aware fast r-cnn for pedestrian detection, in: IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 2018

2018
[9]

Hosang, M

J. Hosang, M. Omran, R. Benenson, B. Schiele, Taking a deeper look at pedestrians, in: CVPR, 2015

2015
[10]

Angelova, A

A. Angelova, A. Krizhevsky, V . Vanhoucke, A. S. Ogale, D. Ferguson, Real-time pedestrian detection with deep network cascades., in: BMVC, 2015

2015
[11]

Karpathy, G

A. Karpathy, G. Toderici, S. Shetty, T. Leung, R. Sukthankar, L. Fei-Fei, Large-scale video classiﬁcation with convolutional neural networks, in: CVPR, 2014

2014
[12]

Mobahi, R

H. Mobahi, R. Collobert, J. Weston, Deep learning from temporal coher- ence in video, in: Annual International Conference on Machine Learn- ing, 2009

2009
[13]

S. C. Hoi, X. Wu, H. Liu, Y . Wu, H. Wang, H. Xue, Q. Wu, Logo-net: Large-scale deep logo detection and brand recognition with deep region- based convolutional networks, in: arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.02462, 2015

2015 arXiv
[14]

H. Su, X. Zhu, S. Gong, Deep learning logo detection with data ex- pansion by synthesising context, in: 2017 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (W ACV), 2017

2017
[15]

H. Su, S. Gong, X. Zhu, Scalable deep learning logo detection, in: arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.11417, 2018

2018 arXiv
[16]

Vedaldi, V

A. Vedaldi, V . Gulshan, M. Varma, A. Zisserman, Multiple kernels for object detection, in: ICCV , 2009

2009
[17]

Viola, M

P. Viola, M. Jones, Rapid object detection using a boosted cascade of simple features, in: CVPR, 2001

2001
[18]

Harzallah, F

H. Harzallah, F. Jurie, C. Schmid, Combining efﬁcient object localiza- tion and image classiﬁcation, in: ICCV , 2009

2009
[19]

Dalal, B

N. Dalal, B. Triggs, Histograms of oriented gradients for human detec- tion, in: CVPR, 2005

2005
[20]

Viola, M

P. Viola, M. J. Jones, Robust real-time face detection, in: IJCV , 2004

2004
[21]

D. G. Lowe, Object recognition from local scale-invariant features, in: ICCV , 1999

1999
[22]

Lienhart, J

R. Lienhart, J. Maydt, An extended set of haar-like features for rapid ob- ject detection, in: International Conference on Image Processing, 2002

2002
[23]

H. Bay, T. Tuytelaars, L. Van Gool, Surf: Speeded up robust features, in: ECCV , 2006

2006
[24]

M. A. Hearst, S. T. Dumais, E. Osuna, J. Platt, B. Scholkopf, Support vector machines, in: IEEE Intelligent Systems and their applications, 1998

1998
[25]

Opitz, R

D. Opitz, R. Maclin, Popular ensemble methods: An empirical study, in: Journal of artiﬁcial intelligence research, 1999

1999
[26]

Freund, R

Y . Freund, R. E. Schapire, et al., Experiments with a new boosting algo- rithm, in: ICML, 1996

1996
[27]

Y . Yu, J. Zhang, Y . Huang, S. Zheng, W. Ren, C. Wang, K. Huang, T. Tan, Object detection by context and boosted hog-lbp, in: PASCAL VOC Challenge, 2010

2010
[28]

Felzenszwalb, R

P. Felzenszwalb, R. Girshick, D. McAllester, D. Ramanan, Discrimina- tively trained mixtures of deformable part models, in: PASCAL VOC Challenge, 2008

2008
[29]

Everingham, L

M. Everingham, L. Van Gool, C. K. I. Williams, J. Winn, A. Zisserman, The pascal visual object classes (voc) challenge, in: IJCV , 2010

2010
[30]

P. F. Felzenszwalb, R. B. Girshick, D. McAllester, D. Ramanan, Object detection with discriminatively trained part-based models, in: TPAMI, 2010

2010
[31]

D. G. Lowe, Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints, in: IJCV , 2004

2004
[32]

Ojala, M

T. Ojala, M. Pietikainen, T. Maenpaa, Multiresolution gray-scale and rotation invariant texture classiﬁcation with local binary patterns, in: TPAMI, 2002

2002
[33]

Krizhevsky, I

A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, G. E. Hinton, Imagenet classiﬁcation with deep convolutional neural networks, in: NeurIPS, 2012

2012
[34]

S. Ren, K. He, R. Girshick, J. Sun, Faster r-cnn: Towards real-time ob- ject detection with region proposal networks, in: NeurIPS, 2015

2015
[35]

Fukushima, S

K. Fukushima, S. Miyake, Neocognitron: A self-organizing neural net- work model for a mechanism of visual pattern recognition, in: Compe- tition and cooperation in neural nets, 1982

1982
[36]

LeCun, L

Y . LeCun, L. Bottou, Y . Bengio, P. Haffner, Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition, in: Proceedings of the IEEE, 1998

1998
[37]

J. Deng, W. Dong, R. Socher, L.-J. Li, K. Li, L. Fei-Fei, Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database, in: CVPR, 2009

2009
[38]

Girshick, Fast r-cnn, in: ICCV , 2015

R. Girshick, Fast r-cnn, in: ICCV , 2015

2015
[39]

T.-Y . Lin, P. Doll´ar, R. Girshick, K. He, B. Hariharan, S. Belongie, Fea- ture pyramid networks for object detection, in: CVPR, 2017

2017
[40]

Redmon, S

J. Redmon, S. Divvala, R. Girshick, A. Farhadi, You only look once: Uniﬁed, real-time object detection, in: CVPR, 2016

2016
[41]

Redmon, A

J. Redmon, A. Farhadi, Yolo9000: better, faster, stronger, in: CVPR, 2017

2017
[42]

W. Liu, D. Anguelov, D. Erhan, C. Szegedy, S. Reed, C.-Y . Fu, A. C. Berg, SSD: Single shot multibox detector, in: ECCV , 2016

2016
[43]

T.-Y . Lin, P. Goyal, R. Girshick, K. He, P. Doll ´ar, Focal loss for dense object detection, in: ICCV , 2017

2017
[44]

Fidler, R

S. Fidler, R. Mottaghi, A. Yuille, R. Urtasun, Bottom-up segmentation for top-down detection, in: CVPR, 2013

2013
[45]

J. R. Uijlings, K. E. Van De Sande, T. Gevers, A. W. Smeulders, Selec- tive search for object recognition, in: IJCV , 2013

2013
[46]

Kleban, X

J. Kleban, X. Xie, W.-Y . Ma, Spatial pyramid mining for logo detection in natural scenes, in: Multimedia and Expo, 2008 IEEE International Conference on, 2008

2008
[48]

C. L. Zitnick, P. Doll ´ar, Edge boxes: Locating object proposals from edges, in: ECCV , 2014

2014
[49]

Z. Cai, N. Vasconcelos, Cascade r-cnn: Delving into high quality object detection, in: CVPR, 2018

2018
[50]

T. Kong, A. Yao, Y . Chen, F. Sun, Hypernet: Towards accurate region proposal generation and joint object detection, in: CVPR, 2016

2016
[51]

S. Bell, C. Lawrence Zitnick, K. Bala, R. Girshick, Inside-outside net: Detecting objects in context with skip pooling and recurrent neural net- works, in: CVPR, 2016

2016
[52]

J. Dai, Y . Li, K. He, J. Sun, R-fcn: Object detection via region-based fully convolutional networks, in: NeurIPS, 2016

2016
[53]

K. Kang, W. Ouyang, H. Li, X. Wang, Object detection from video tubelets with convolutional neural networks, in: CVPR, 2016

2016
[54]

W. Han, P. Khorrami, T. L. Paine, P. Ramachandran, M. Babaeizadeh, H. Shi, J. Li, S. Yan, T. S. Huang, Seq-nms for video object detection, in: arXiv preprint arXiv:1602.08465, 2016

2016 arXiv
[55]

Rayat Imtiaz Hossain, J

M. Rayat Imtiaz Hossain, J. Little, Exploiting temporal information for 3d human pose estimation, in: ECCV , 2018

2018
[56]

Pavlakos, X

G. Pavlakos, X. Zhou, K. G. Derpanis, K. Daniilidis, Coarse-to-ﬁne vol- umetric prediction for single-image 3d human pose, in: CVPR, 2017

2017
[57]

P. O. Pinheiro, T.-Y . Lin, R. Collobert, P. Doll´ar, Learning to reﬁne ob- ject segments, in: ECCV , 2016

2016
[58]

P. O. Pinheiro, R. Collobert, P. Doll ´ar, Learning to segment object can- didates, in: NeurIPS, 2015

2015
[59]

J. Dai, K. He, J. Sun, Instance-aware semantic segmentation via multi- task network cascades, in: CVPR, 2016

2016
[60]

Huang, L

Z. Huang, L. Huang, Y . Gong, C. Huang, X. Wang, Mask scoring r-cnn, in: CVPR, 2019

2019
[61]

Sermanet, D

P. Sermanet, D. Eigen, X. Zhang, M. Mathieu, R. Fergus, Y . LeCun, Overfeat: Integrated recognition, localization and detection using con- volutional networks, in: arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.6229, 2013

2013 arXiv
[62]

Ioffe, C

S. Ioffe, C. Szegedy, Batch normalization: Accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift, in: ICML, 2015

2015
[63]

H. Law, J. Deng, Cornernet: Detecting objects as paired keypoints, in: ECCV , 2018

2018
[64]

X. Zhou, D. Wang, P. Kr ¨ahenb¨uhl, Objects as points, in: arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.07850, 2019

1904 arXiv
[65]

K. Duan, S. Bai, L. Xie, H. Qi, Q. Huang, Q. Tian, Centernet: Keypoint triplets for object detection, in: arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.08189, 2019

1904 arXiv
[66]

Robbins, S

H. Robbins, S. Monro, A stochastic approximation method, in: The an- nals of mathematical statistics, 1951

1951
[67]

D. P. Kingma, J. Ba, Adam: A method for stochastic optimization, in: arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980, 2014

2014 arXiv
[68]

V . Nair, G. E. Hinton, Rectiﬁed linear units improve restricted boltzmann machines, in: ICML, 2010

2010
[69]

Simonyan, A

K. Simonyan, A. Zisserman, Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition, in: arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.1556, 2014

2014 arXiv
[70]

K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, J. Sun, Identity mappings in deep residual networks, in: ECCV , Springer, 2016

2016
[71]

Huang, Z

G. Huang, Z. Liu, L. Van Der Maaten, K. Q. Weinberger, Densely con- nected convolutional networks., in: CVPR, 2017

2017
[72]

Y . Chen, J. Li, H. Xiao, X. Jin, S. Yan, J. Feng, Dual path networks, in: NeurIPS, 2017, pp. 4467–4475

2017
[73]

S. Xie, R. Girshick, P. Doll ´ar, Z. Tu, K. He, Aggregated residual trans- formations for deep neural networks, in: CVPR, 2017

2017
[74]

A. G. Howard, M. Zhu, B. Chen, D. Kalenichenko, W. Wang, T. Weyand, M. Andreetto, H. Adam, Mobilenets: Efﬁcient convolu- tional neural networks for mobile vision applications, in: arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.04861, 2017

2017 arXiv
[75]

Szegedy, W

C. Szegedy, W. Liu, Y . Jia, P. Sermanet, S. Reed, D. Anguelov, D. Er- han, V . Vanhoucke, A. Rabinovich, Going deeper with convolutions, in: CVPR, 2015

2015
[76]

Szegedy, V

C. Szegedy, V . Vanhoucke, S. Ioffe, J. Shlens, Z. Wojna, Rethinking the inception architecture for computer vision, in: CVPR, 2016

2016
[77]

Szegedy, S

C. Szegedy, S. Ioffe, V . Vanhoucke, A. A. Alemi, Inception-v4, inception-resnet and the impact of residual connections on learning., in: AAAI, 2017

2017
[78]

Z. Li, C. Peng, G. Yu, X. Zhang, Y . Deng, J. Sun, Detnet: A backbone network for object detection, in: ECCV , 2018

2018
[79]

Newell, K

A. Newell, K. Yang, J. Deng, Stacked hourglass networks for human pose estimation, in: ECCV , 2016

2016
[80]

Alexe, T

B. Alexe, T. Deselaers, V . Ferrari, Measuring the objectness of image windows, in: TPAMI, 2012

2012
[81]

Rahtu, J

E. Rahtu, J. Kannala, M. Blaschko, Learning a category independent object detection cascade, in: ICCV , 2011

2011
[82]

P. F. Felzenszwalb, D. P. Huttenlocher, Efﬁcient graph-based image seg- mentation, in: IJCV , 2004

2004
[83]

Manen, M

S. Manen, M. Guillaumin, L. Van Gool, Prime object proposals with randomized prim’s algorithm, in: CVPR, 2013

2013
[84]

Carreira, C

J. Carreira, C. Sminchisescu, Cpmc: Automatic object segmentation us- ing constrained parametric min-cuts, in: TPAMI, 2011

2011
[85]

Endres, D

I. Endres, D. Hoiem, Category-independent object proposals with di- verse ranking, in: TPAMI, 2014

2014
[86]

T.-Y . Lin, M. Maire, S. Belongie, J. Hays, P. Perona, D. Ramanan, P. Doll´ar, C. L. Zitnick, Microsoft coco: Common objects in context, in: ECCV , 2014

2014
[87]

Zhang, X

S. Zhang, X. Zhu, Z. Lei, H. Shi, X. Wang, S. Z. Li, S3fd: Single shot scale-invariant face detector, in: ICCV , 2017

2017
[88]

W. Luo, Y . Li, R. Urtasun, R. Zemel, Understanding the effective recep- tive ﬁeld in deep convolutional neural networks, in: NeurIPS, 2016

2016
[89]

C. Zhu, R. Tao, K. Luu, M. Savvides, Seeing small faces from robust anchors perspective, in: CVPR, 2018

2018
[90]

L. J. Z. X. Lele Xie, Yuliang Liu, Derpn: Taking a further step toward more general object detection, in: AAAI, 2019. 36

2019
[91]

Ghodrati, A

A. Ghodrati, A. Diba, M. Pedersoli, T. Tuytelaars, L. Van Gool, Deep- proposal: Hunting objects by cascading deep convolutional layers, in: ICCV , 2015

2015
[92]

Zhang, L

S. Zhang, L. Wen, X. Bian, Z. Lei, S. Z. Li, Single-shot reﬁnement neural network for object detection, in: CVPR, 2018

2018
[93]

T. Yang, X. Zhang, Z. Li, W. Zhang, J. Sun, Metaanchor: Learning to detect objects with customized anchors, in: NeurIPS, 2018

2018
[94]

Tychsen-Smith, L

L. Tychsen-Smith, L. Petersson, Denet: Scalable real-time object detec- tion with directed sparse sampling, in: ICCV , 2017

2017
[95]

C. Zhu, Y . He, M. Savvides, Feature selective anchor-free module for single-shot object detection, in: CVPR, 2019

2019
[96]

Y . Lu, T. Javidi, S. Lazebnik, Adaptive object detection using adjacency and zoom prediction, in: CVPR, 2016

2016
[97]

J. Dai, H. Qi, Y . Xiong, Y . Li, G. Zhang, H. Hu, Y . Wei, Deformable convolutional networks, in: ICCV , 2017

2017
[98]

Singh, L

B. Singh, L. S. Davis, An analysis of scale invariance in object detection–snip, in: CVPR, 2018

2018
[99]

P. Hu, D. Ramanan, Finding tiny faces, in: CVPR, 2017

2017
[100]

F. Yang, W. Choi, Y . Lin, Exploit all the layers: Fast and accurate cnn ob- ject detector with scale dependent pooling and cascaded rejection clas- siﬁers, in: CVPR, 2016

2016
[101]

Y . Liu, H. Li, J. Yan, F. Wei, X. Wang, X. Tang, Recurrent scale approx- imation for object detection in cnn, in: ICCV , 2017

2017
[102]

Shrivastava, R

A. Shrivastava, R. Sukthankar, J. Malik, A. Gupta, Beyond skip con- nections: Top-down modulation for object detection, in: arXiv preprint arXiv:1612.06851, 2016

2016 arXiv
[103]

H. Wang, Q. Wang, M. Gao, P. Li, W. Zuo, Multi-scale location-aware kernel representation for object detection, in: CVPR, 2018

2018
[104]

K.-H. Kim, S. Hong, B. Roh, Y . Cheon, M. Park, Pvanet: deep but lightweight neural networks for real-time object detection, in: arXiv preprint arXiv:1608.08021, 2016

2016 arXiv
[105]

Ronneberger, P

O. Ronneberger, P. Fischer, T. Brox, U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation, in: International Conference on Medi- cal image computing and computer-assisted intervention, 2015

2015
[106]

Z. Cai, Q. Fan, R. S. Feris, N. Vasconcelos, A uniﬁed multi-scale deep convolutional neural network for fast object detection, in: ECCV , 2016

2016
[107]

Z. Shen, Z. Liu, J. Li, Y .-G. Jiang, Y . Chen, X. Xue, Dsod: Learning deeply supervised object detectors from scratch, in: ICCV , 2017

2017
[108]

S. Liu, D. Huang, Y . Wang, Receptive ﬁeld block net for accurate and fast object detection, in: ECCV , 2018

2018
[109]

J. Ren, X. Chen, J. Liu, W. Sun, J. Pang, Q. Yan, Y .-W. Tai, L. Xu, Accurate single stage detector using recurrent rolling convolution, in: CVPR, 2017

2017
[110]

Jeong, H

J. Jeong, H. Park, N. Kwak, Enhancement of ssd by concatenating fea- ture maps for object detection, in: arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.09587, 2017

2017 arXiv
[111]

P. Zhou, B. Ni, C. Geng, J. Hu, Y . Xu, Scale-transferrable object detec- tion, in: CVPR, 2018

2018
[112]

C.-Y . Fu, W. Liu, A. Ranga, A. Tyagi, A. C. Berg, Dssd: Deconvolu- tional single shot detector, in: arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.06659, 2017

2017 arXiv
[113]

S. Woo, S. Hwang, I. S. Kweon, Stairnet: Top-down semantic aggrega- tion for accurate one shot detection, in: 2018 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (W ACV), 2018

2018
[114]

H. Li, Y . Liu, W. Ouyang, X. Wang, Zoom out-and-in network with recursive training for object proposal, in: arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.05711, 2017

2017 arXiv
[115]

T. Kong, F. Sun, W. Huang, H. Liu, Deep feature pyramid reconﬁgura- tion for object detection, in: ECCV , 2018

2018
[116]

Q. Zhao, T. Sheng, Y . Wang, Z. Tang, Y . Chen, L. Cai, H. Ling, M2det: A single-shot object detector based on multi-level feature pyramid net- work, in: AAAI, 2019

2019
[117]

Z. Li, F. Zhou, Fssd: Feature fusion single shot multibox detector, in: arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.00960, 2017

2017 arXiv
[118]

K. Lee, J. Choi, J. Jeong, N. Kwak, Residual features and uni- ﬁed prediction network for single stage detection, in: arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.05031, 2017

2017 arXiv
[119]

Cui, Mdssd: Multi-scale deconvolutional single shot detector for small objects, in: arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.07009, 2018

L. Cui, Mdssd: Multi-scale deconvolutional single shot detector for small objects, in: arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.07009, 2018

2018 arXiv
[120]

T. Kong, F. Sun, A. Yao, H. Liu, M. Lu, Y . Chen, Ron: Reverse con- nection with objectness prior networks for object detection, in: CVPR, 2017

2017
[121]

B. Lim, S. Son, H. Kim, S. Nah, K. Mu Lee, Enhanced deep residual networks for single image super-resolution, in: CVPR workshops, 2017

2017
[122]

W. Shi, J. Caballero, F. Husz ´ar, J. Totz, A. P. Aitken, R. Bishop, D. Rueckert, Z. Wang, Real-time single image and video super- resolution using an efﬁcient sub-pixel convolutional neural network, in: CVPR, 2016

2016
[123]

Jiang, R

B. Jiang, R. Luo, J. Mao, T. Xiao, Y . Jiang, Acquisition of localization conﬁdence for accurate object detection, in: ECCV , 2018

2018
[124]

Y . Zhai, J. Fu, Y . Lu, H. Li, Feature selective networks for object detec- tion, in: CVPR, 2018

2018
[125]

Y . Zhu, C. Zhao, J. Wang, X. Zhao, Y . Wu, H. Lu, Couplenet: Coupling global structure with local parts for object detection, in: ICCV , 2017

2017
[126]

Galleguillos, S

C. Galleguillos, S. Belongie, Context based object categorization: A critical survey, in: Computer vision and image understanding, 2010

2010
[127]

Ouyang, X

W. Ouyang, X. Wang, X. Zeng, S. Qiu, P. Luo, Y . Tian, H. Li, S. Yang, Z. Wang, C.-C. Loy, et al., Deepid-net: Deformable deep convolutional neural networks for object detection, in: CVPR, 2015

2015
[128]

W. Chu, D. Cai, Deep feature based contextual model for object detec- tion, in: Neurocomputing, 2018

2018
[129]

Y . Zhu, R. Urtasun, R. Salakhutdinov, S. Fidler, segdeepm: Exploiting segmentation and context in deep neural networks for object detection, in: CVPR, 2015

2015
[130]

X. Chen, A. Gupta, Spatial memory for context reasoning in object de- tection, in: ICCV , 2017

2017
[131]

Gidaris, N

S. Gidaris, N. Komodakis, Object detection via a multi-region and se- 37 mantic segmentation-aware cnn model, in: ICCV , 2015

2015
[132]

Cheng, Y

B. Cheng, Y . Wei, H. Shi, R. Feris, J. Xiong, T. Huang, Revisiting rcnn: On awakening the classiﬁcation power of faster rcnn, in: ECCV , 2018

2018
[133]

X. Zhao, S. Liang, Y . Wei, Pseudo mask augmented object detection, in: CVPR, 2018

2018
[134]

Zhang, S

Z. Zhang, S. Qiao, C. Xie, W. Shen, B. Wang, A. L. Yuille, Single-shot object detection with enriched semantics, Tech. rep. (2018)

2018
[135]

Shrivastava, A

A. Shrivastava, A. Gupta, Contextual priming and feedback for faster r-cnn, in: ECCV , 2016

2016
[136]

B. Li, T. Wu, L. Zhang, R. Chu, Auto-context r-cnn, in: arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.02842, 2018

2018 arXiv
[137]

Y . Liu, R. Wang, S. Shan, X. Chen, Structure inference net: Object detection using scene-level context and instance-level relationships, in: CVPR, 2018

2018
[138]

H. Hu, J. Gu, Z. Zhang, J. Dai, Y . Wei, Relation networks for object detection, in: CVPR, 2018

2018
[139]

J. Gu, H. Hu, L. Wang, Y . Wei, J. Dai, Learning region features for object detection, in: ECCV , 2018

2018
[140]

H. Xu, X. Lv, X. Wang, Z. Ren, R. Chellappa, Deep regionlets for object detection, in: ECCV , 2018

2018
[141]

Z. Chen, S. Huang, D. Tao, Context reﬁnement for object detection, in: ECCV , 2018

2018
[142]

X. Zeng, W. Ouyang, B. Yang, J. Yan, X. Wang, Gated bi-directional cnn for object detection, in: ECCV , 2016

2016
[143]

J. Li, Y . Wei, X. Liang, J. Dong, T. Xu, J. Feng, S. Yan, Attentive con- texts for object detection, in: IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 2017

2017
[144]

S. L. Xizhou Zhu, Han Hu, J. Dai, Deformable convnets v2: More de- formable, better results, in: CVPR, 2019

2019
[145]

Girshick, F

R. Girshick, F. Iandola, T. Darrell, J. Malik, Deformable part models are convolutional neural networks, in: CVPR, 2015

2015
[146]

Singh, M

B. Singh, M. Najibi, L. S. Davis, Sniper: Efﬁcient multi-scale training, in: NeurIPS, 2018

2018
[147]

Y . L. Buyu Li, X. Wang, Gradient harmonized single-stage detector, in: AAAI, 2019

2019
[148]

Shrivastava, A

A. Shrivastava, A. Gupta, R. Girshick, Training region-based object de- tectors with online hard example mining, in: CVPR, 2016

2016
[149]

Gidaris, N

S. Gidaris, N. Komodakis, Locnet: Improving localization accuracy for object detection, in: CVPR, 2016

2016
[150]

Zagoruyko, A

S. Zagoruyko, A. Lerer, T.-Y . Lin, P. O. Pinheiro, S. Gross, S. Chintala, P. Doll´ar, A multipath network for object detection, in: BMVC, 2016

2016
[151]

X. Lu, B. Li, Y . Yue, Q. Li, J. Yan, Grid r-cnn, in: CVPR, 2019

2019
[152]

Tychsen-Smith, L

L. Tychsen-Smith, L. Petersson, Improving object localization with ﬁt- ness nms and bounded iou loss, in: arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.00164, 2017

2017 arXiv
[153]

B. Yang, J. Yan, Z. Lei, S. Z. Li, Craft objects from images, in: CVPR, 2016

2016
[154]

Goodfellow, J

I. Goodfellow, J. Pouget-Abadie, M. Mirza, B. Xu, D. Warde-Farley, S. Ozair, A. Courville, Y . Bengio, Generative adversarial nets, in: NeurIPS, 2014

2014
[155]

J.-Y . Zhu, T. Park, P. Isola, A. A. Efros, Unpaired image-to-image trans- lation using cycle-consistent adversarial networkss, in: ICCV , 2017

2017
[156]

Radford, L

A. Radford, L. Metz, S. Chintala, Unsupervised representation learn- ing with deep convolutional generative adversarial networks, in: arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.06434, 2015

2015 arXiv
[157]

Brock, J

A. Brock, J. Donahue, K. Simonyan, Large scale gan training for high ﬁdelity natural image synthesis, in: arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.11096, 2018

2018 arXiv
[158]

J. Li, X. Liang, Y . Wei, T. Xu, J. Feng, S. Yan, Perceptual generative adversarial networks for small object detection, in: CVPR, 2017

2017
[159]

X. Wang, A. Shrivastava, A. Gupta, A-fast-rcnn: Hard positive genera- tion via adversary for object detection, in: CVPR, 2017

2017
[160]

R. G. Kaiming He, P. Dollro, Rethinking imagenet pre-training, in: arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.08883, 2018

2018 arXiv
[161]

R. Zhu, S. Zhang, X. Wang, L. Wen, H. Shi, L. Bo, T. Mei, Scratchdet: Exploring to train single-shot object detectors from scratch, in: CVPR, 2019

2019
[162]

Z. Shen, H. Shi, R. Feris, L. Cao, S. Yan, D. Liu, X. Wang, X. Xue, T. S. Huang, Learning object detectors from scratch with gated recurrent feature pyramids, in: arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.00886, 2017

2017 arXiv
[163]

Hinton, O

G. Hinton, O. Vinyals, J. Dean, Distilling the knowledge in a neural network, in: arXiv preprint arXiv:1503.02531, 2015

2015 arXiv
[164]

Q. Li, S. Jin, J. Yan, Mimicking very efﬁcient network for object detec- tion, in: CVPR, 2017

2017
[165]

Bodla, B

N. Bodla, B. Singh, R. Chellappa, L. S. Davis, Soft-nms – improving object detection with one line of code, in: ICCV , 2017

2017
[166]

Hosang, R

J. Hosang, R. Benenson, B. Schiele, Learning non-maximum suppres- sion, in: CVPR, 2017

2017
[167]

Huang, V

J. Huang, V . Rathod, C. Sun, M. Zhu, A. Korattikara, A. Fathi, I. Fischer, Z. Wojna, Y . Song, S. Guadarrama, et al., Speed/accuracy trade-offs for modern convolutional object detectors, in: CVPR, 2017

2017
[168]

Z. Li, C. Peng, G. Yu, X. Zhang, Y . Deng, J. Sun, Light-head r- cnn: In defense of two-stage object detector, in: arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.07264, 2017

2017 arXiv
[169]

Sandler, A

M. Sandler, A. Howard, M. Zhu, A. Zhmoginov, L.-C. Chen, Inverted residuals and linear bottlenecks: Mobile networks for classiﬁcation, de- tection and segmentation, in: arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.04381, 2018

2018 arXiv
[170]

A. Wong, M. J. Shaﬁee, F. Li, B. Chwyl, Tiny ssd: A tiny single-shot detection deep convolutional neural network for real-time embedded ob- ject detection, in: arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.06488, 2018

2018 arXiv
[171]

Y . Li, J. Li, W. Lin, J. Li, Tiny-dsod: Lightweight object detection for resource-restricted usages, in: arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.11013, 2018

2018 arXiv
[172]

K. S. D. A. Shang, Wenling, H. Lee., Understanding and improving convolutional neural networks via concatenated rectiﬁed linear units, in: ICML, 2016

2016
[173]

Y . D. Kim, E. Park, S. Yoo, T. Choi, L. Yang, D. Shin, Compression of deep convolutional neural networks for fast and low power mobile 38 applications, in: Computer Science, 2015

2015
[174]

Y . He, X. Zhang, J. Sun, Channel pruning for accelerating very deep neural networks, in: ICCV , 2017

2017
[175]

Y . Gong, L. Liu, M. Yang, L. Bourdev, Compressing deep convolutional networks using vector quantization, in: Computer Science, 2014

2014
[176]

Y . Lin, S. Han, H. Mao, Y . Wang, W. J. Dally, Deep gradient compres- sion: Reducing the communication bandwidth for distributed training, in: arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.01887, 2017

2017 arXiv
[177]

J. Wu, L. Cong, Y . Wang, Q. Hu, J. Cheng, Quantized convolutional neural networks for mobile devices, in: CVPR, 2016

2016
[178]

S. Han, H. Mao, W. J. Dally, Deep compression: Compressing deep neural networks with pruning, trained quantization and huffman coding, in: Fiber, 2015

2015
[179]

S. Han, J. Pool, J. Tran, W. Dally, Learning both weights and connec- tions for efﬁcient neural network, in: NeurIPS, 2015

2015
[180]

Osuna, R

E. Osuna, R. Freund, F. Girosit, Training support vector machines: an application to face detection, in: CVPR, 1997

1997
[181]

R ¨atsch, S

M. R ¨atsch, S. Romdhani, T. Vetter, Efﬁcient face detection by a cas- caded support vector machine using haar-like features, in: Joint Pattern Recognition Symposium, 2004

2004
[182]

Romdhani, P

S. Romdhani, P. Torr, B. Scholkopf, A. Blake, Computationally efﬁcient face detection, in: ICCV , 2001

2001
[183]

X. Sun, P. Wu, S. C. Hoi, Face detection using deep learning: An im- proved faster rcnn approach, in: Neurocomputing, 2018

2018
[184]

Y . Liu, M. D. Levine, Multi-path region-based convolutional neural net- work for accurate detection of unconstrained” hard faces”, in: Computer and Robot Vision (CRV), 2017 14th Conference on, 2017

2017
[185]

X. Tang, D. K. Du, Z. He, J. Liu, Pyramidbox: A context-assisted single shot face detector, in: ECCV , 2018

2018
[186]

C. Chi, S. Zhang, J. Xing, Z. Lei, S. Z. Li, X. Zou, Selective reﬁne- ment network for high performance face detection, in: arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.02693, 2018

2018 arXiv
[187]

J. Li, Y . Wang, C. Wang, Y . Tai, J. Qian, J. Yang, C. Wang, J. Li, F. Huang, Dsfd: Dual shot face detector, in: CVPR, 2019

2019
[188]

Zhang, X

J. Zhang, X. Wu, J. Zhu, S. C. Hoi, Feature agglomeration networks for single stage face detection, in: arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.00721, 2017

2017 arXiv
[189]

Najibi, P

M. Najibi, P. Samangouei, R. Chellappa, L. Davis, Ssh: Single stage headless face detector, in: ICCV , 2017

2017
[190]

Z. Hao, Y . Liu, H. Qin, J. Yan, X. Li, X. Hu, Scale-aware face detection, in: CVPR, 2017

2017
[191]

H. Wang, Z. Li, X. Ji, Y . Wang, Face r-cnn, in: arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.01061, 2017

2017 arXiv
[192]

Zhang, Z

K. Zhang, Z. Zhang, Z. Li, Y . Qiao, Jjoint face detection and alignment using multi-task cascaded convolutional networks, in: IEEE Signal Pro- cessing Letters, 2016

2016
[193]

Samangouei, M

P. Samangouei, M. Najibi, L. Davis, R. Chellappa, Face-magnet: Magnifying feature maps to detect small faces, in: arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.05258, 2018

2018 arXiv
[194]

Zhang, X

C. Zhang, X. Xu, D. Tu, Face detection using improved faster rcnn, in: arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.02142, 2018

2018 arXiv
[195]

C. Zhu, Y . Zheng, K. Luu, M. Savvides, Cms-rcnn: Contextual multi- scale region-based cnn for unconstrained face detection, in: Deep Learn- ing for Biometrics, 2017

2017
[196]

B. Yu, D. Tao, Anchor cascade for efﬁcient face detection, in: arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.03363, 2018

2018 arXiv
[197]

Zhang, Z

K. Zhang, Z. Zhang, H. Wang, Z. Li, Y . Qiao, W. Liu, Detecting faces using inside cascaded contextual cnn, in: ICCV , 2017

2017
[198]

Y . Wang, X. Ji, Z. Zhou, H. Wang, Z. Li, Detecting faces us- ing region-based fully convolutional networks, in: arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.05256, 2017

2017 arXiv
[199]

V . Jain, E. Learned-Miller, Fddb: A benchmark for face detection in un- constrained settings, Tech. Rep. UM-CS-2010-009, University of Mas- sachusetts, Amherst (2010)

2010
[200]

S. Yang, P. Luo, C.-C. Loy, X. Tang, Wwider face: A face detection benchmark, in: CVPR, 2016

2016
[201]

J. Han, W. Nam, P. Dollar, Local decorrelation for improved detection, in: NeurIPS, 2014

2014
[202]

Doll ´ar, Z

P. Doll ´ar, Z. Tu, P. Perona, S. Belongie, Integral channel features, in: BMVC, 2009

2009
[203]

Doll ´ar, R

P. Doll ´ar, R. Appel, S. Belongie, P. Perona, Fast feature pyramids for object detection, in: TPAMI, 2014

2014
[204]

C. P. Papageorgiou, M. Oren, T. Poggio, A general framework for object detection, in: ICCV , 1998

1998
[205]

Brazil, X

G. Brazil, X. Yin, X. Liu, Illuminating pedestrians via simultaneous de- tection & segmentation, in: arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.08564, 2017

2017 arXiv
[206]

X. Du, M. El-Khamy, J. Lee, L. Davis, Fused dnn: A deep neural net- work fusion approach to fast and robust pedestrian detection, in: IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (W ACV), 2017

2017
[207]

S. Wang, J. Cheng, H. Liu, M. Tang, Pcn: Part and context information for pedestrian detection with cnns, in: arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.04483, 2018

2018 arXiv
[208]

D. Xu, W. Ouyang, E. Ricci, X. Wang, N. Sebe, Learning cross-modal deep representations for robust pedestrian detection, in: CVPR, 2017

2017
[209]

Benenson, M

R. Benenson, M. Omran, J. Hosang, B. Schiele, Ten years of pedestrian detection, what have we learned?, in: ECCV , 2014

2014
[210]

Z. Cai, M. Saberian, N. Vasconcelos, Learning complexity-aware cas- cades for deep pedestrian detection, in: ICCV , 2015

2015
[211]

Sermanet, K

P. Sermanet, K. Kavukcuoglu, S. Chintala, Y . LeCun, Pedestrian detec- tion with unsupervised multi-stage feature learning, in: CVPR, 2013

2013
[212]

Zhang, L

L. Zhang, L. Lin, X. Liang, K. He, Is faster r-cnn doing well for pedes- trian detection?, in: ECCV , 2016

2016
[213]

X. Wang, T. Xiao, Y . Jiang, S. Shao, J. Sun, C. Shen, Repulsion loss: Detecting pedestrians in a crowd, in: CVPR, 2018

2018
[214]

Zhang, L

S. Zhang, L. Wen, X. Bian, Z. Lei, S. Z. Li, Occlusion-aware r-cnn: Detecting pedestrians in a crowd, in: ECCV , 2018

2018
[215]

J. Mao, T. Xiao, Y . Jiang, Z. Cao, What can help pedestrian detection?, 39 in: CVPR, 2017

2017
[216]

Y . Tian, P. Luo, X. Wang, X. Tang, Deep learning strong parts for pedes- trian detection, in: CVPR, 2015

2015
[217]

Ouyang, X

W. Ouyang, X. Wang, Joint deep learning for pedestrian detection, in: ICCV , 2013

2013
[218]

Mathias, R

M. Mathias, R. Benenson, R. Timofte, L. Van Gool, Handling occlusions with franken-classiﬁers, in: ICCV , 2013

2013
[219]

Ouyang, X

W. Ouyang, X. Zeng, X. Wang, Modeling mutual visibility relationship in pedestrian detection, in: CVPR, 2013

2013
[220]

G. Duan, H. Ai, S. Lao, A structural ﬁlter approach to human detection, in: ECCV , 2010

2010
[221]

Enzweiler, A

M. Enzweiler, A. Eigenstetter, B. Schiele, D. M. Gavrila, Multi-cue pedestrian classiﬁcation with partial occlusion handling, in: CVPR, 2010

2010
[222]

C. Zhou, J. Yuan, Bi-box regression for pedestrian detection and occlu- sion estimation, in: ECCV , 2018

2018
[223]

Ouyang, X

W. Ouyang, X. Wang, A discriminative deep model for pedestrian de- tection with occlusion handling, in: CVPR, 2012

2012
[224]

S. Tang, M. Andriluka, B. Schiele, Detection and tracking of occluded people, in: IJCV , 2014

2014
[225]

Ouyang, X

W. Ouyang, X. Wang, Single-pedestrian detection aided by multi- pedestrian detection, in: CVPR, 2013

2013
[226]

V . D. Shet, J. Neumann, V . Ramesh, L. S. Davis, Bilattice-based logical reasoning for human detection, in: CVPR, 2007

2007
[227]

Y . Zhou, L. Liu, L. Shao, M. Mellor, Dave: A uniﬁed framework for fast vehicle detection and annotation, in: ECCV , 2016

2016
[228]

Gebru, J

T. Gebru, J. Krause, Y . Wang, D. Chen, J. Deng, L. Fei-Fei, Fine-grained car detection for visual census estimation, in: AAAI, 2017

2017
[229]

Majid Azimi, Shufﬂedet: Real-time vehicle detection network in on- board embedded uav imagery, in: ECCV , 2018

S. Majid Azimi, Shufﬂedet: Real-time vehicle detection network in on- board embedded uav imagery, in: ECCV , 2018

2018
[230]

Z. Zhu, D. Liang, S. Zhang, X. Huang, B. Li, S. Hu, Trafﬁc-sign detec- tion and classiﬁcation in the wild, in: CVPR, 2016

2016
[231]

A. Pon, O. Adrienko, A. Harakeh, S. L. Waslander, A hierarchical deep architecture and mini-batch selection method for joint trafﬁc sign and light detection, in: Conference on Computer and Robot Vision (CRV), 2018

2018
[232]

W. Ke, J. Chen, J. Jiao, G. Zhao, Q. Ye, Srn: side-output residual net- work for object symmetry detection in the wild, in: CVPR, 2017

2017
[233]

W. Shen, K. Zhao, Y . Jiang, Y . Wang, Z. Zhang, X. Bai, Object skeleton extraction in natural images by fusing scale-associated deep side out- puts, in: CVPR, 2016

2016
[234]

Kuznetsova, H

A. Kuznetsova, H. Rom, N. Alldrin, J. Uijlings, I. Krasin, J. Pont-Tuset, S. Kamali, S. Popov, M. Malloci, T. Duerig, et al., The open images dataset v4: Uniﬁed image classiﬁcation, object detection, and visual re- lationship detection at scale, in: arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.0...

2018 arXiv
[235]

Gupta, P

A. Gupta, P. Dollar, R. Girshick, Lvis: A dataset for large vocabulary instance segmentation, in: CVPR, 2019

2019
[236]

Bodla, B

N. Bodla, B. Singh, R. Chellappa, L. S. Davis, Soft-nms–improving ob- ject detection with one line of code, in: ICCV , 2017

2017
[237]

Y . Wu, K. He, Group normalization, in: ECCV , 2018

2018
[238]

S. Liu, L. Qi, H. Qin, J. Shi, J. Jia, Path aggregation network for instance segmentation, in: CVPR, 2018

2018
[239]

Y . Li, Y . Chen, N. Wang, Z. Zhang, Scale-aware trident networks for object detection, in: arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.01892, 2019

1901 arXiv
[240]

X. Zhou, J. Zhuo, P. Krahenbuhl, Bottom-up object detection by group- ing extreme and center points, in: CVPR, 2019

2019
[241]

Z. Tian, C. Shen, H. Chen, T. He, Fcos: Fully convolutional one-stage object detection, in: arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.01355, 2019

1904 arXiv
[242]

Zhang, R

S. Zhang, R. Benenson, B. Schiele, Citypersons: A diverse dataset for pedestrian detection, in: CVPR, 2017

2017
[243]

Cordts, M

M. Cordts, M. Omran, S. Ramos, T. Rehfeld, M. Enzweiler, R. Benen- son, U. Franke, S. Roth, B. Schiele, The cityscapes dataset for semantic urban scene understanding, in: CVPR, 2016

2016
[244]

Dollar, C

P. Dollar, C. Wojek, B. Schiele, P. Perona, Pedestrian detection: An evaluation of the state of the art, in: TPAMI, 2012

2012
[245]

A. Ess, B. Leibe, L. Van Gool, Depth and appearance for mobile scene analysis, in: ICCV , 2007

2007
[246]

Geiger, P

A. Geiger, P. Lenz, C. Stiller, R. Urtasun, Vision meets robotics: The kitti dataset, 2013

2013
[247]

B. Zoph, V . Vasudevan, J. Shlens, Q. V . Le, Learning transferable archi- tectures for scalable image recognition, in: CVPR, 2018

2018
[248]

M. Tan, Q. V . Le, Efﬁcientnet: Rethinking model scaling for convolu- tional neural networks, in: arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.11946, 2019

1905 arXiv
[249]

Y . Chen, T. Yang, X. Zhang, G. Meng, C. Pan, J. Sun, Detnas: Neural architecture search on object detection, in: arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.10979, 2019

1903 arXiv
[250]

Ghiasi, T.-Y

G. Ghiasi, T.-Y . Lin, Q. V . Le, Nas-fpn: Learning scalable feature pyra- mid architecture for object detection, in: CVPR, 2019

2019
[251]

B. Zoph, E. D. Cubuk, G. Ghiasi, T.-Y . Lin, J. Shlens, Q. V . Le, Learn- ing data augmentation strategies for object detection, in: arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.11172, 2019

1906 arXiv
[252]

X. Dong, L. Zheng, F. Ma, Y . Yang, D. Meng, Few-example object de- tection with model communication, in: TPAMI, 2018

2018
[253]

Schwartz, L

E. Schwartz, L. Karlinsky, J. Shtok, S. Harary, M. Marder, S. Pankanti, R. Feris, A. Kumar, R. Giries, A. M. Bronstein, Repmet: Representative- based metric learning for classiﬁcation and one-shot object detection, in: CVPR, 2019

2019
[254]

H. Chen, Y . Wang, G. Wang, Y . Qiao, Lstd: A low-shot transfer detector for object detection, in: AAAI, 2018

2018
[255]

C. Peng, T. Xiao, Z. Li, Y . Jiang, X. Zhang, K. Jia, G. Yu, J. Sun, Megdet: A large mini-batch object detector, in: CVPR, 2018

2018
[256]

Shmelkov, C

K. Shmelkov, C. Schmid, K. Alahari, Incremental learning of object de- tectors without catastrophic forgetting, in: ICCV , 2017. 40

2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [2]

Girshick, J

R. Girshick, J. Donahue, T. Darrell, J. Malik, Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation, in: CVPR, 2014

2014

[2] [47]

K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, J. Sun, Spatial pyramid pooling in deep con- 35 volutional networks for visual recognition, in: ECCV , 2014

2014

[3] [1]

K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, J. Sun, Deep residual learning for image recog- nition, in: CVPR, 2016

2016

[4] [3]

K. He, G. Gkioxari, P. Doll ´ar, R. Girshick, Mask r-cnn, in: ICCV , 2017

2017

[5] [4]

L.-C. Chen, G. Papandreou, I. Kokkinos, K. Murphy, A. L. Yuille, Se- mantic image segmentation with deep convolutional nets and fully con- nected crfs, in: arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.7062, 2014. 34

arXiv 2014

[6] [5]

Y . Sun, D. Liang, X. Wang, X. Tang, Deepid3: Face recognition with very deep neural networks, in: arXiv preprint arXiv:1502.00873, 2015

arXiv 2015

[7] [6]

Y . Sun, Y . Chen, X. Wang, X. Tang, Deep learning face representation by joint identiﬁcation-veriﬁcation, in: NeurIPS, 2014

2014

[8] [7]

W. Liu, Y . Wen, Z. Yu, M. Li, B. Raj, L. Song, Sphereface: Deep hyper- sphere embedding for face recognition, in: CVPR, 2017

2017