Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

The frequency of Kozai-Lidov disc oscillation driven giant outbursts in Be/X-ray binaries

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The roughly three-year giant X-ray outbursts of 4U 0115+634 may be the period of Kozai-Lidov eccentricity oscillations of the Be star's tilted disc, provided the disc keeps an eccentric remnant after each eruption.

desk verdict Honest KL-disc model for type II outbursts with a conditional timescale match and a wrong exponent in the period scaling. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.04143 v1 pith:PUSZJ2NN submitted 2019-08-12 astro-ph.HE

Rebecca G. Martin , Alessia Franchini This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords Be/X-raybinariesKozai-LidovoscillationsgiantX-rayoutburstsdecretiondiscs4U0115+634disceccentricitytypeIIneutronstaraccretion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that the roughly three-year recurrence of giant (type II) X-ray outbursts in the Be/X-ray binary 4U 0115+634 is set by Kozai-Lidov oscillations of the Be star's decretion disc. A disc highly inclined to the binary orbit grows eccentric, overflows its Roche lobe, and feeds the neutron star; the same oscillation then returns the disc toward an eccentric state, ready for the next outburst. Using steady-state decretion disc models together with test-particle simulations, the authors derive a disc-averaged KL timescale and find it matches the observed interval only if the disc is not completely destroyed during the outburst. If correct, the mechanism ties outburst frequency to disc aspect ratio, disc size, and binary period, and explains why giant outbursts favour shorter-period binaries.

What carries the argument

The central object is the surface-density-weighted KL oscillation timescale $$\langle \tau_{\mathrm{KL}}\rangle = \frac{\int_{R_{\mathrm{in}}}^{R_t} \Sigma $R^{3}$ \sqrt{GM_1/$R^{3}$}\, dR}{\int_{R_{\mathrm{in}}}^{R_t} \tau_{\mathrm{KL}}^{-1} \Sigma $R^{3}$ \sqrt{GM_1/$R^{3}$}\, dR},$$ built from the test-particle KL timescale of equation (2) and a steady-state decretion disc with $\Sigma \propto R^{-n+s+1}$ and $n=3s+2$. The companion's tidal torque sets the outer truncation radius $R_t$; KL oscillations operate only below a critical outer aspect ratio, and the disc must be thick enough to spread back out between outbursts. This machinery converts the binary parameters and disc structure of 4U 0115+634 into a predicted recurrence interval.

What would settle it

Measure the Be star disc's outer-edge aspect ratio and inclination in 4U 0115+634 during quiescence: if $H/R$ at the truncation radius lies outside roughly $0.06$-$0.11$, or the disc inclination is below the critical KL angle, the KL clock cannot reproduce the observed recurrence. Finding an eccentric, still-misaligned disc remnant immediately after a giant outburst would support the mechanism, while observing a flared, long-period Be/X-ray binary with regularly repeating giant outbursts would contradict the predicted stability boundary.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that KL oscillations of a misaligned Be star disc set the clock for type II outbursts: eccentricity growth makes the disc overflow its Roche lobe, transferring material to the neutron star, and the continuing oscillation returns the disc to an eccentric state so the cycle can repeat. For 4U 0115+634, the analytic disc-averaged timescale agrees with the observed roughly 3 yr giant-outburst recurrence provided the disc retains eccentric material after each outburst; an initially circular steady-state disc predicts a longer timescale except for very large truncation radii and a flat aspect-ratio profile. The paper further constrains the outer disc aspect ratio to the window $0.06 \lesssim H/R \lesssim 0.11$, set on the low side by viscous replenishment between outbursts and on the high side by KL stability, and generalises the condition to show that flared discs are KL-unstable only in binaries with orbital period below roughly 150 days.

Load-bearing premise

The disc must retain a sufficiently massive, eccentric, and misaligned remnant after each giant outburst for the next KL oscillation to start from an eccentric orbit; the paper models only a steady-state circular disc and explicitly defers the interaction of newly added circular material with an eccentric disc to future work.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For 4U 0115+634, the KL oscillation timescale of a steady-state disc matches the observed roughly 3 yr giant-outburst recurrence only if the disc keeps eccentric material after each outburst; an initially circular disc predicts longer intervals except at the largest truncation radii.
  • An initially eccentric disc has a KL timescale up to a factor of about 4 shorter, which the paper links to the observed closely spaced, lower-luminosity outbursts in the same system.
  • The outer disc aspect ratio is bracketed between about $0.06$ and $0.11$ for the mechanism to operate and repeat, constraining disc models and viscosity.
  • For flared discs, KL instability and type II outbursts are predicted to occur preferentially in binaries with orbital periods below roughly 150 days, matching the observed population trend.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The model implies a testable population trend the paper does not quantify: among misaligned Be/X-ray binaries, the giant-outburst recurrence should shorten as the disc truncation radius grows, i.e. with smaller binary eccentricity or larger disc inclination.
  • Since the paper leaves the mixing of freshly added circular material with an eccentric remnant to future work, the observed chaotic, non-periodic outburst spacing may emerge from that mixture; a 3D simulation with continuous mass injection at the inner edge could test this directly.
  • A strong prediction is that very long quiescent gaps between giant outbursts should follow near-total disc destruction, so monitoring disc size immediately after an outburst should anticorrelate with the time until the next outburst.
  • The mechanism is falsifiable per system: spectropolarimetric or interferometric measurements showing a near-coplanar disc or an outer-edge aspect ratio above the critical value would rule out KL-driven giant outbursts in that binary.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper argues that Kozai-Lidov (KL) oscillations of a tilted Be-star decretion disc can produce the giant (type II) X-ray outbursts of Be/X-ray binaries, and it compares the predicted recurrence timescale with the observed ~3 yr interval of 4U 0115+634. The authors present the standard test-particle KL timescale (Eq. 2), calibrate it with N-body integrations (Fig. 2), and then construct steady-state decretion disc models with power-law aspect ratio and surface density profiles (Eqs. 4-9). They compute a mass-weighted global KL timescale (Eq. 10) and find that the circular steady-state disc timescale is generally longer than the observed 3 yr interval, except for constant aspect ratio or very large truncation radii. The paper argues that agreement is restored if the disc is not completely destroyed and retains eccentric, misaligned material after each outburst. It also derives a critical orbital period for KL instability (Eq. 11) and concludes that flared discs in shorter-period binaries are more likely to undergo type II outbursts, in agreement with observed trends.

Significance. The result is significant if it holds: it proposes a specific physical mechanism for the frequency and period dependence of giant outbursts and states falsifiable conditions under which the mechanism would fail, namely low disc misalignment or high disc aspect ratio. The analytic derivation is transparent, the test-particle calibration in Fig. 2 is a useful check of Eq. (2), and the paper does not fit free parameters to the observed 3 yr interval. The main strength is that the model's central ingredients—KL instability criterion, disc viscous timescale, and global oscillation timescale—are assembled in a tractable way. However, the quantitative match to the observed recurrence time is conditional on an unmodeled post-outburst disc state, so the significance of the central claim is not yet established at the level the abstract suggests.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.3; Fig. 6] The central quantitative claim—that the KL disc oscillation timescale matches the observed ~3 yr giant-outburst interval—rests on an unmodeled assumption. Figure 6 shows that the circular steady-state disc timescale is longer than 3 yr except for s=0 or very large truncation radii. The paper then invokes the test-particle eccentricity shortening found in Section 2.2 (factors of 2.7-4.1) and states in Section 3.3 that 'there must be eccentric orbit material left in the disc after the outburst.' However, Section 3 explicitly defers the interaction of newly injected circular material with an eccentric disc to future work. The paper therefore does not demonstrate that a replenished gas disc retains an eccentric, coherent, sufficiently massive remnant after an outburst, nor that the test-particle eccentricity factor applies to a pressure-supported disc with viscous damping and fresh circular injection. As written, the observed interval is used to infer the required remnant rather than predicted from the model. I ask the authors to either model the post-outburst state (or justify its properties with existing simulations) or explicitly reframe the conclusion as a conditional upper limit on the recurrence timescale.
  2. [Section 4, Eq. (11)] The scaling of the critical orbital period with eta in Eq. (11) is internally inconsistent with Eqs. (5) and (6). For s=0.5, the disc aspect ratio at the truncation radius scales as (H/R)(R_t) proportional to h0 eta^{1/2} a^{1/2}, while the critical aspect ratio from Eq. (6) scales as eta^{3/2}. The instability condition (H/R)(R_t) <= (H/R)_crit therefore gives P_crit proportional to eta^3, not eta^{-3/2}. Consequently, the statement in the text that a larger eta (a more extended disc relative to the binary separation) 'leads to a smaller critical orbital period' also has the wrong sign under the paper's own equations. The qualitative short-period trend at fixed eta is not affected, but the quantitative generalization in Section 4, the numerical coefficient in Eq. (11), and the plot in Fig. 7 require correction.
  3. [Section 3.3, Martin et al. (2014a) comparison] The paper cites the first eccentricity peak at about 22 P_orb ~ 1.5 yr in the Martin et al. (2014a) simulation as consistency evidence, but it immediately notes that this simulation used an initial surface density profile Sigma proportional to R^{-1}, which artificially places too much mass at large radii and shortens the first KL oscillation timescale. Since the steady-state isothermal decretion disc used elsewhere in this paper has Sigma proportional to R^{-2}, the simulation comparison is not a quantitative check of Eq. (10). The authors should either quantify the effect of the initial surface density profile or present the simulation comparison only as illustrative of the mechanism, not as support for the specific timescale.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 6] The system name is written as '4U 0115+364' in the Conclusions; this should be '4U 0115+634'.
  2. [Fig. 7 caption] The caption states that the blue lines lie exactly on top of the black lines, but the truncation periods differ for (H/R)_0 = 0.08 and 0.06. Please clarify that the curves overlap before their respective truncation points.
  3. [Fig. 5 caption] The caption labels both line sets as 'lower'; one of the two should be identified as the upper set.
  4. [Sections 3.1.2 and 6] The phrase 'H/R /greaterorsimilar0.06' is a LaTeX rendering artifact and should be typeset as H/R ≳ 0.06.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: Eq. (10) is a self-contained average of the standard KL timescale over the disc; the observed 3 yr recurrence is used for comparison and to motivate, not to fit, the eccentric-remnant condition.

full rationale

The central timescale calculation is not circular. Equation (10) is a weighted harmonic average of the standard test-particle KL timescale (Eq. 2) over the steady-state surface density profile (Eqs. 8-9), and no parameter is fitted to the observed ~3 yr type II outburst recurrence of 4U 0115+634. Section 3.3 makes an honest comparison: the circular-disc model is shown to overpredict the recurrence for most parameters, and the eccentric-remnant condition is introduced as an explicit assumption, with the paper stating that the circular-disc estimates are upper limits. The self-citations to Martin et al. (2014a,b) supply the averaging formula and a hydrodynamical comparison; they do not encode the target observed interval, so they are independent support rather than a load-bearing self-citation chain. The main weakness is interpretive: the observed 3 yr interval is used to infer that an eccentric, partially retained disc is required, which is post hoc scenario selection with a testable condition rather than an algebraic reduction of a prediction to an input. The paper also explicitly flags the missing modeling of circular material injected into an eccentric disc (end of Section 3), a genuine limitation for the quantitative bridge; separately, Eq. (11) appears to have a scaling inconsistency (from Eqs. 5-6 with s=0.5, Pcrit scales as eta^3 (H/R)_0^{-3}, not eta^{-3/2}), but these are correctness/completeness issues, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model is built almost entirely from previously published KL theory and standard disc physics. The free parameters are plausible bracketing choices (disc aspect ratio normalization and flaring index), a truncation radius taken from prior simulations, and an assumed viscosity. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • (H/R)_0, disc aspect ratio normalization at R0 = 50 R_sun = 0.06 and 0.08 explored
    Observational constraints on Be disc aspect ratio are loose; the paper chooses two values to bracket the range. The KL instability and viscous timescale conclusions depend on this choice.
  • s, disc aspect ratio power-law index = 0, 0.25, 0.5
    Free parameter of the flaring model; s=0.5 corresponds to an isothermal disc. Chosen by hand to represent plausible disc structures.
  • Rt, disc tidal truncation radius for 4U 0115+634 = 50 R_sun
    Taken from the SPH simulations of Martin et al. 2014a; the KL timescale is sensitive to Rt because outer material has shorter tau_KL.
  • eta = Rt/a for the general population = 50/95 approx 0.526
    Assumed constant disc-to-binary size ratio when generalizing to other orbital periods (Section 4).
  • alpha, Shakura-Sunyaev viscosity parameter = 0.3
    Used in the viscous timescale eq. (7); value from the Be disc literature, not fitted to the outburst timescale.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math The KL timescale for a test particle is given by eq. (2), with the hierarchical secular approximation and conserved perpendicular angular momentum (eq. 1)
    Standard Kozai-Lidov theory (Kozai 1962; Lidov 1962), used in Section 2.
  • domain assumption A gaseous disc undergoes global KL oscillations if the radial sound crossing timescale is shorter than the KL timescale, and is suppressed when H/R at the outer edge exceeds (H/R)_crit of eq. (6)
    Taken from Martin et al. 2014b and Lubow & Ogilvie 2017; the paper validates against Martin et al. 2014a simulations.
  • domain assumption The Be disc is a steady-state decretion disc with nu*Sigma proportional to R^-1/2, leading to the surface density profile n = 3s+2 (eqs. 8-9)
    Standard accretion/decretion disc theory (Pringle 1981; Martin et al. 2011), used in Section 3.2.
  • domain assumption The disc is tidally truncated at Rt approximately 50 R_sun for 4U 0115+634 and Rt = (50/95)a generally, with the binary torque not explicitly modeled
    From prior hydrodynamical simulations; the KL timescale depends strongly on Rt.
  • domain assumption Spin-orbit misalignment of the Be star imparted by the supernova kick persists for the system lifetime, so misaligned material continues to be fed to the disc
    Synchronization timescale arguments from Hurley et al. 2002; needed for repeat outbursts (Section 3.3).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The frequency of Kozai-Lidov disc oscillation driven giant outbursts in Be/X-ray binaries." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PUSZJ2NN

@misc{pith2026190804143,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The frequency of Kozai-Lidov disc oscillation driven giant outbursts in Be/X-ray binaries},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PUSZJ2NN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.04143}
}
read the original abstract

Giant outbursts of Be/X-ray binaries may occur when a Be-star disc undergoes strong eccentricity growth due to the Kozai-Lidov (KL) mechanism. The KL effect acts on a disc that is highly inclined to the binary orbital plane provided that the disc aspect ratio is sufficiently small. The eccentric disc overflows its Roche lobe and material flows from the Be star disc over to the companion neutron star causing X-ray activity. With N-body simulations and steady state decretion disc models we explore system parameters for which a disc in the Be/X-ray binary 4U 0115+634 is KL unstable and the resulting timescale for the oscillations. We find good agreement between predictions of the model and the observed giant outburst timescale provided that the disc is not completely destroyed by the outburst. This allows the outer disc to be replenished between outbursts and a sufficiently short KL oscillation timescale. An initially eccentric disc has a shorter KL oscillation timescale compared to an initially circular orbit disc. We suggest that the chaotic nature of the outbursts is caused by the sensitivity of the mechanism to the distribution of material within the disc. The outbursts continue provided that the Be star supplies material that is sufficiently misaligned to the binary orbital plane. We generalise our results to Be/X-ray binaries with varying orbital period and find that if the Be star disc is flared, it is more likely to be unstable to KL oscillations in a smaller orbital period binary, in agreement with observations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.04143 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The relative change in the KL oscillation timescale of a particle with varying neutron star companion mass, M2. The solid line has a Be star of mass M1 = 18 M⊙ while the dashed line has M1 = 19.5 M⊙. where Pp = 2π/ p GM1/R3 is the orbital period of the particle that orbits around the Be star with semi-major axis R. We consider here first how properties of the binary orbit might change the KL oscilla￾tion timescale a… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Left: Eccentricity, inclination and phase angle for test particle simulations around the Be star. The orbital plane is initially misaligned by 50◦ with phase angle φ = 90◦ . The orbits are at orbital separation 10 R⊙ (red), 20 R⊙ (magenta), 30 R⊙ (blue) and 40 R⊙ (black). Right: The time of the first KL oscillation eccentricity peak for the analytic prediction (equation 2). The points show the time of the first peak… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The eccentricity (upper), inclination (middle) and phase angle (lower) of test particle orbits that are initially circular and inclined by 50◦ (black lines) and 70◦ (blue lines) to the binary orbital plane at semi–major axis 20 R⊙. The solid lines show an orbit with φ = 90◦ initially and the dashed lines with φ = 0 ◦ initially. material from the star. The interaction of the circular orbit material being added to an … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The disc aspect ratio as a function of radius for s = 0.5 (solid lines), s = 0.25 (dashed lines) and s = 0 (dotted lines). The blue (upper) lines have (H/R)0 = 0.08 and the black (lower) lines have (H/R)0 = 0.06 with R0 = 50 R⊙. The solid red line shows the critical va…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Viscous timescale of a Be star decretion disc according to equa￾tion (7) for s = 0.5 (solid lines), s = 0.25 (dashed lines) and s = 0 (dotted lines). The blue (lower) lines have (H/R)0 = 0.08 and the black (lower) lines have (H/R)0 = 0.06 with R0 = 50 R⊙. 3.2 Surface d…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: shows the KL oscillation timescale for varying disc outer radius for different values of the disc aspect ratio power law, s. Note that the timescale does not depend on the scaling of the disc aspect ratio, (H/R)0, only the power law, s. The larger the disc outer radius…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The KL oscillation timescale for an initially circular steady state decretion disc with surface density distributed as equation (8) between the stellar radius Rin = 8 R⊙ and Rt = 50/95a for s = 0.5 (solid lines), s = 0.25 (dashed lines) and s = 0 (dotted lines). The th…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Why do massive stars form bow shocks? Bulk ISM motion as the main driver of bow shock formation and geometry

    astro-ph.SR 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Bulk interstellar gas motion, not stellar motion, dominates most massive star bow shocks; only about 21% are classical aligned bow shocks.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

86 extracted references · 72 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Acciari V. A. et al. , 2011, , 733, 96

    2011

  2. [2]

    H., 1994, ApJ, 421, 651

    Artymowicz P., Lubow S. H., 1994, ApJ, 421, 651

    1994

  3. [3]

    A., Hawley J

    Balbus S. A., Hawley J. F., 1991, ApJ, 376, 214

    1991

  4. [4]

    E., Carciofi A

    Bjorkman J. E., Carciofi A. C., 2005, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 337, The Nature and Evolution of Disks Around Hot Stars, Ignace R., Gayley K. G., eds., p. 75

    2005

  5. [5]

    Brandt N., Podsiadlowski P., 1995, , 274, 461

    1995

  6. [6]

    Modelling decretion discs in Be/X-ray binaries

    Brown R. O., Coe M. J., Ho W. C. G., Okazaki A. T., 2019, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1906.11591

    work page Pith review arXiv 2019

  7. [7]

    Campana S., 1996, , 239, 113

    1996

  8. [8]

    C., Bjorkman J

    Carciofi A. C., Bjorkman J. E., Otero S. A., Okazaki A. T., S tefl S., Rivinius T., Baade D., Haubois X., 2012, , 744, L15

    work page 2012

Show all 86 references
  1. [9]

    Carciofi A. C. et al. , 2006, , 652, 1617

    2006

  2. [10]

    P., Brown J

    Cassinelli J. P., Brown J. C., Maheswaran M., Miller N. A., Telfer D. C., 2002, , 578, 951

    2002

  3. [11]

    Q., Shao Y., Li X

    Cheng Z. Q., Shao Y., Li X. D., 2014, , 786, 128

    2014

  4. [12]

    Cote J., Waters L. B. F. M., 1987, , 176, 93

    1987

  5. [13]

    H., Jones C

    Cyr I. H., Jones C. E., Panoglou D., Carciofi A. C., Okazaki A. T., 2017, , 471, 596

    2017

  6. [14]

    P., Kiseleva-Eggleton L., 2001, ApJ, 562, 1012

    Eggleton P. P., Kiseleva-Eggleton L., 2001, ApJ, 562, 1012

    2001

  7. [15]

    G., 2019, ApJL, in press

    Franchini A., Martin R. G., 2019, ApJL, in press

    2019

  8. [16]

    G., Lubow S

    Franchini A., Martin R. G., Lubow S. H., 2019, , 485, 315

    2019

  9. [17]

    H., Martin R

    Fu W., Lubow S. H., Martin R. G., 2015 a , , 807, 75

    2015

  10. [18]

    H., Martin R

    Fu W., Lubow S. H., Martin R. G., 2015 b , ApJ, 813, 105

    2015

  11. [19]

    H., Martin R

    Fu W., Lubow S. H., Martin R. G., 2017, , 835, L29

    2017

  12. [20]

    R., Carciofi A

    Ghoreyshi M. R., Carciofi A. C., 2017, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 508, The B[e] Phenomenon: Forty Years of Studies, Miroshnichenko A., Zharikov S., Kor c \'a kov \'a D., Wolf M., eds., p. 323

    2017

  13. [21]

    Giacconi R., Murray S., Gursky H., Kellogg E., Schreier E., Tananbaum H., 1972, , 178, 281

    1972

  14. [22]

    W., 1996, A&A, 308, 170

    Hanuschik R. W., 1996, A&A, 308, 170

    1996

  15. [23]

    T., 2004, , 350, 971

    Hayasaki K., Okazaki A. T., 2004, , 350, 971

    2004

  16. [24]

    Hummel W., 1998, , 330, 243

    1998

  17. [25]

    R., Tout C

    Hurley J. R., Tout C. A., Pols O. R., 2002, , 329, 897

    2002

  18. [26]

    Hut P., 1981, , 99, 126

    1981

  19. [27]

    E., Sigut T

    Jones C. E., Sigut T. A. A., Porter J. M., 2008, , 386, 1922

    2008

  20. [28]

    Kato S., 2014, , 66, 74

    2014

  21. [29]

    Kozai Y., 1962, AJ, 67, 591

    1962

  22. [30]

    Kretschmar P., Nespoli E., Reig P., Anders F., 2013, ArXiv e-prints

    2013

  23. [31]

    Kuehnel M. et al. , 2015, in Proceedings of ``A Synergistic View of the High Energy Sky'' - 10th INTEGRAL Workshop (INTEGRAL 2014). 15-19 September 2014. Annapolis, MD, USA., p. 78

    2015

  24. [32]

    K \"u hnel M. et al. , 2017, , 607, A88

    2017

  25. [33]

    Lee U., Osaki Y., Saio H., 1991, MNRAS, 250, 432

    1991

  26. [34]

    L., 1962, Planet

    Lidov M. L., 1962, Planet. Space Sci., 9, 719

    1962

  27. [35]

    H., Martin R

    Lubow S. H., Martin R. G., Nixon C., 2015, ApJ, 800, 96

    2015

  28. [36]

    H., Ogilvie G

    Lubow S. H., Ogilvie G. I., 2017, , 469, 4292

    2017

  29. [37]

    G., Lubow S

    Martin R. G., Lubow S. H., 2011, ApJl, 740, L6

    2011

  30. [38]

    G., Nixon C., Armitage P

    Martin R. G., Nixon C., Armitage P. J., Lubow S. H., Price D. J., 2014 a , ApJL, 790, L34

    2014

  31. [39]

    G., Nixon C., Lubow S

    Martin R. G., Nixon C., Lubow S. H., Armitage P. J., Price D. J., Do g an S., King A., 2014 b , ApJL, 792, L33

    2014

  32. [40]

    G., Nixon C

    Martin R. G., Nixon C. J., Pringle J. E., Livio M., 2019, New Astronomy, 70, 7

    2019

  33. [41]

    G., Pringle J

    Martin R. G., Pringle J. E., Tout C. A., Lubow S. H., 2011, MNRAS, 416, 2827

    2011

  34. [42]

    G., Tout C

    Martin R. G., Tout C. A., Pringle J. E., 2009, MNRAS, 397, 1563

    2009

  35. [43]

    Miranda R., Lai D., 2015, , 452, 2396

    2015

  36. [44]

    M., McBride V

    Monageng I. M., McBride V. A., Coe M. J., Steele I. A., Reig P., 2017, , 464, 572

    2017

  37. [45]

    T., Imada A., Kambe E., Honda S., Hashimoto O., Ichikawa K., 2011, , 63, L25

    Moritani Y., Nogami D., Okazaki A. T., Imada A., Kambe E., Honda S., Hashimoto O., Ichikawa K., 2011, , 63, L25

    2011

  38. [46]

    Moritani Y. et al. , 2013, , 65, 83

    2013

  39. [47]

    M., Lithwick Y., Rasio F

    Naoz S., Farr W. M., Lithwick Y., Rasio F. A., Teyssandier J., 2013, , 431, 2155

    2013

  40. [48]

    Negueruela I. et al. , 1997, , 284, 859

    1997

  41. [49]

    T., 2001, , 369, 108

    Negueruela I., Okazaki A. T., 2001, , 369, 108

    2001

  42. [50]

    T., Fabregat J., Coe M

    Negueruela I., Okazaki A. T., Fabregat J., Coe M. J., Munari U., Tomov T., 2001, A&A, 369, 117

    2001

  43. [51]

    J., Fabregat J., 1998, A&A, 336, 251

    Negueruela I., Reig P., Coe M. J., Fabregat J., 1998, A&A, 336, 251

    1998

  44. [52]

    T., 2016, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Okazaki A. T., 2016, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 506, Bright Emissaries: Be Stars as Messengers of Star-Disk Physics, Sigut T. A. A., Jones C. E., eds., p. 3

    2016

  45. [53]

    T., Bate M

    Okazaki A. T., Bate M. R., Ogilvie G. I., Pringle J. E., 2002, MNRAS, 337, 967

    2002

  46. [54]

    T., Hayasaki K., Moritani Y., 2013, , 65, 41

    Okazaki A. T., Hayasaki K., Moritani Y., 2013, , 65, 41

    2013

  47. [55]

    T., Negueruela I., 2001, A&A, 377, 161

    Okazaki A. T., Negueruela I., 2001, A&A, 377, 161

    2001

  48. [56]

    \"O zel F., Psaltis D., Narayan R., Santos Villarreal A., 2012, , 757, 55

    2012

  49. [57]

    Paczynski B., 1977, ApJ, 216, 822

    1977

  50. [58]

    M., Carciofi A

    Panoglou D., Faes D. M., Carciofi A. C., Okazaki A. T., Baade D., Rivinius T., Borges Fernandes M., 2018, , 473, 3039

    2018

  51. [59]

    B., Baade D., Faes D

    Panoglou D., Fernandes M. B., Baade D., Faes D. M., Rivinius T., Carciofi A. C., Okazaki A. T., 2019,

    2019

  52. [60]

    E., 1977, , 181, 441

    Papaloizou J., Pringle J. E., 1977, , 181, 441

    1977

  53. [61]

    M., 1996, MNRAS, 280, L31

    Porter J. M., 1996, MNRAS, 280, L31

    1996

  54. [62]

    M., 1999, , 348, 512

    Porter J. M., 1999, , 348, 512

    1999

  55. [63]

    M., Rivinius T., 2003, , 115, 1153

    Porter J. M., Rivinius T., 2003, , 115, 1153

    2003

  56. [64]

    E., 1981, ARA&A, 19, 137

    Pringle J. E., 1981, ARA&A, 19, 137

    1981

  57. [65]

    E., 1991, MNRAS, 248, 754

    Pringle J. E., 1991, MNRAS, 248, 754

    1991

  58. [66]

    Quirrenbach A. et al. , 1997, , 479, 477

    1997

  59. [67]

    W., Cominsky L., Joss P

    Rappaport S., Clark G. W., Cominsky L., Joss P. C., Li F., 1978, , 224, L1

    1978

  60. [68]

    Reig P., 2007, , 377, 867

    2007

  61. [69]

    Reig P., Blinov D., 2018, , 619, A19

    2018

  62. [70]

    A., Kudryavtseva N

    Reig P., Larionov V., Negueruela I., Arkharov A. A., Kudryavtseva N. A., 2007, A&A, 462, 1081

    2007

  63. [71]

    J., 2016, , 590, A122

    Reig P., Nersesian A., Zezas A., Gkouvelis L., Coe M. J., 2016, , 590, A122

    2016

  64. [72]

    E., 2011, , 533, A23

    Reig P., Nespoli E., Fabregat J., Mennickent R. E., 2011, , 533, A23

    2011

  65. [73]

    R \' mulo L. R. et al. , 2018, , 476, 3555

    2018

  66. [74]

    C., Martayan C., 2013, , 21, 69

    Rivinius T., Carciofi A. C., Martayan C., 2013, , 21, 69

    2013

  67. [75]

    S., Wijnands R., Cavecchi Y., Degenaar N., Patruno A., 2017, , 472, 1802

    Rouco Escorial A., Bak Nielsen A. S., Wijnands R., Cavecchi Y., Degenaar N., Patruno A., 2017, , 472, 1802

    2017

  68. [76]

    S., 2019, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1907.04724

    Rouco Escorial A., Wijnands R., van den Eijnden J., Patruno A., Degenaar N., Parikh A., Ootes L. S., 2019, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1907.04724

    2019 arXiv

  69. [77]

    I., Sunyaev R

    Shakura N. I., Sunyaev R. A., 1973, A&A, 24, 337

    1973

  70. [78]

    E., Rosner R., 1986, ApJ, 308, 669

    Stella L., White N. E., Rosner R., 1986, ApJ, 308, 669

    1986

  71. [79]

    A., Zamanov R

    Stoyanov K. A., Zamanov R. K., 2009, Astronomische Nachrichten, 330, 727

    2009

  72. [80]

    D., Garmany C

    Vacca W. D., Garmany C. D., Shull J. M., 1996, , 460, 914

    1996

  73. [81]

    Whitlock L., Roussel-Dupre D., Priedhorsky W., 1989, , 338, 381

    1989

  74. [82]

    S., Bjorkman J

    Wood K., Bjorkman K. S., Bjorkman J. E., 1997, , 477, 926

    1997

  75. [83]

    K., Reig P., Mart \' J., Coe M

    Zamanov R. K., Reig P., Mart \' J., Coe M. J., Fabregat J., Tomov N. A., Valchev T., 2001, , 367, 884

    2001

  76. [84]

    J., Lai D., 2017, , 467, 1957

    Zanazzi J. J., Lai D., 2017, , 467, 1957

    2017

  77. [85]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address author booktitle chapter edition editor howpublished institution journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence a...

  78. [86]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 gl...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.