Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms homotopic to the identity in dimension 3, Part I: The dynamically coherent case

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Every dynamically coherent partially hyperbolic diffeomorphism on a closed hyperbolic 3-manifold, or homotopic to the identity on a closed Seifert fibered one, is up to iteration a discretized Anosov flow.

desk verdict A genuinely new classification result for 3D partially hyperbolic systems, with a strong Section 3 dichotomy; the main risk is the compressed proof of Proposition 8.1 in the last mile. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.06227 v4 pith:CIT75ZES submitted 2019-08-17 math.DS math.GT

Thomas Barthelmé , Sergio R. Fenley , Steven Frankel , Rafael Potrie This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.DSmath.GT MSC 37D3057R3037C1557M5037D20
keywords partialhyperbolicitydynamicalcoherence3-manifoldsfoliationsAnosovflowsdiscretizedleafconjugacySeifertfibered
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to establish that the broadest useful class of partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms in 3 dimensions is not exotic: they are sampled Anosov flows. Concretely, the authors claim that any dynamically coherent partially hyperbolic diffeomorphism of a closed hyperbolic 3-manifold, and any such diffeomorphism homotopic to the identity on a closed Seifert fibered 3-manifold, has some iterate that moves every point a positive amount of time along the orbits of a single topological Anosov flow. If the proof is right, those systems are leaf conjugate to the time-one map of a topological Anosov flow, meaning their center foliations and coarse dynamics match that model exactly. That would confirm the classification conjecture for these two large families of manifolds and would support the broader expectation that, outside algebraic deformations, 3-dimensional partial hyperbolicity reduces to Anosov flows.

What carries the argument

The central object is a good lift: a lift of the diffeomorphism to the universal cover that commutes with all deck transformations and moves points only a uniformly bounded distance. The paper studies how this lift acts on the leaf spaces of the lifted center-stable and center-unstable foliations. The load-bearing structural tool is the dichotomy above, distinguishing fixing all leaves from translating an R-covered uniform foliation, where R-covered means the leaf space is homeomorphic to the real line and uniform means any two lifted leaves lie at finite Hausdorff distance from one another. Inside fixed leaves, the paper uses perfect fits, special non-intersecting stable and center leaf pairs that force one-dimensional dynamics, together with a graph transform argument to produce fixed center leaves. For translation foliations on hyperbolic manifolds, it invokes a transverse regulating pseudo-Anosov flow and builds compact invariant cores shadowing its periodic orbits, with Lefschetz indices incompatible with partial hyperbolicity.

What would settle it

To falsify the hyperbolic classification, exhibit a dynamically coherent partially hyperbolic diffeomorphism on a closed hyperbolic 3-manifold whose good lift translates both lifted foliations and whose translating cores have no fixed points with the predicted Lefschetz index; the paper says this is impossible. To falsify the supporting theorem, construct a transversely oriented R-covered uniform foliation in a closed hyperbolic 3-manifold whose regulating pseudo-Anosov flow has no singular periodic orbits, contradicting a key structural claim used in the proof.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

At the level of the universal cover, the paper finds a rigid structural dichotomy for the lifted center-stable and center-unstable foliations of any dynamically coherent partially hyperbolic diffeomorphism that is homotopic to the identity. Under mild hypotheses (f-minimality, or the manifold being hyperbolic or Seifert fibered), a good lift either fixes every lifted leaf of a given foliation, or that foliation is R-covered and uniform and the lift translates its leaf space. Reading the two foliations together leaves three cases; the paper eliminates the mixed case and, for hyperbolic or Seifert manifolds, the double-translation case. The surviving double-invariance case is shown to force the center foliation to be the orbit foliation of a topological Anosov flow, and possessing a lift that fixes leaves but no points is the paper's criterion for being a discretized Anosov flow. Hence the main theorems follow from the dichotomy plus two topological exclusions.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is a cited background theorem: in a closed hyperbolic 3-manifold, every plane foliation whose universal-cover leaves are pairwise finitely close and linearly ordered admits a transverse flow whose regular-looking periodic orbits are actually singular; if that theorem or its regularity conditions fail, the hyperbolic classification does not go through.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • On a closed hyperbolic 3-manifold, every dynamically coherent partially hyperbolic diffeomorphism is, after an iterate, leaf conjugate to the time-one map of a topological Anosov flow; no transitivity or volume-preservation assumption is needed.
  • On a closed Seifert fibered 3-manifold, the same conclusion holds for dynamically coherent partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms homotopic to the identity, and an iterate can genuinely be necessary, as the paper's examples show.
  • The dichotomy implies that mixed behavior is impossible: if a good lift fixes the leaves of one center foliation, it fixes the leaves of the other as well.
  • In the translation case on a hyperbolic manifold, every periodic orbit of the regulating pseudo-Anosov flow is shadowed by a compact invariant core for the diffeomorphism, with matching Lefschetz index.
  • The hypotheses of the main theorems force the center-stable and center-unstable foliations to be f-minimal, so standard results known for transitive or volume-preserving partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms apply in this setting.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The invariant-core mechanism used to kill double translations should adapt to the atoroidal pieces of general JSJ decompositions once a transverse regulating flow exists there; the paper notes this missing piece, so the extension is an open direction rather than a proved result.
  • If the classification is correct, the center foliation of any such diffeomorphism is essentially unique within the sampled-flow model, which could be tested computationally on explicit algebraic examples by comparing lifted leaf-space actions.
  • A quantitative reading of the Lefschetz obstruction suggests that any homotopy-to-identity partially hyperbolic map on a hyperbolic 3-manifold, coherent or not, should have unavoidable translational behavior in at least one foliation, constraining the branching examples one can build.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies dynamically coherent partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms in dimension 3 that are homotopic to the identity. It establishes a structural dichotomy for the lifted center-stable and center-unstable foliations: for a good lift, either every leaf of both lifted foliations is fixed, or both foliations are R-covered and uniform and the lift acts as a translation on both leaf spaces; the mixed case is eliminated. Under double invariance the authors prove that the diffeomorphism is a discretized Anosov flow. For Seifert fibered manifolds, a rotation-number argument produces a good lift fixing a center-stable leaf, yielding Theorem A. For hyperbolic 3-manifolds, the paper uses regulating pseudo-Anosov flows and constructs invariant cores shadowing periodic orbits, then rules out double translation, yielding Theorem B. The overall strategy is to prove the classification conjecture of Hertz-Hertz-Ures in these settings.

Significance. If the arguments are correct, this is a major contribution to the classification of 3-dimensional partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms: it proves the Hertz-Hertz-Ures conjecture for hyperbolic manifolds and for the identity homotopy class on Seifert fibered manifolds, assuming dynamical coherence. The paper is carefully structured and contains several tools of independent interest, including the dichotomy for foliations preserved by good lifts, the graph transform argument, and the construction of invariant cores for translations of R-covered foliations. The dependence on deep external results, such as Candel's theorem, Thurston-Calegari-Fenley regulating flows, and Paternain's expansivity criterion, is clearly signaled. However, the proof of the central Proposition 8.1 contains a load-bearing step that is only asserted, and the final contradiction in the hyperbolic case is not fully justified. These gaps are local and appear fixable, but they are essential to Theorem B.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 8, Proposition 8.1] The second half of Proposition 8.1 is not actually proved. The last paragraph of the proof states that it 'follows directly from the homotopy invariance of Lefschetz index together with Lemma 8.8', but no argument is given that the fixed set of f-hat^k_gamma in a leaf L remains in a common compact set throughout the homotopy, nor that fixed points cannot enter or leave the core T_gamma during the homotopy. The negative Lefschetz index conclusion is exactly what produces the contradiction in Section 9, so this step is load-bearing and must be supplied. In particular, the index formula in Remark 8.2 is never derived.
  2. [Section 8, Facts 8.3 and 8.4] The construction of the neighborhoods P_i_L and N_i_L and the induction in Claims 8.9 and 8.11 depend crucially on Fact 8.3 (uniform quasi-geodesic efficiency of the intersection foliations) and Fact 8.4 (exponential expansion of the regulating flow along unstable leaves in terms of Hausdorff distance between leaves). Both are stated as facts with only broad citations to [Fen02, Cal07] and a comment that the second is 'standard'. The proof of Proposition 8.1 requires quantitative uniform constants and explicit thresholds, and it is not clear that the cited results carry exactly these estimates for the particular regulating pseudo-Anosov flow obtained from Theorem D.3. Please state these facts with full hypotheses, give precise theorem references, or prove them.
  3. [Section 9, Proof of Theorem B] The final contradiction is underjustified. The map h = gamma composed with f-hat^k is not a partially hyperbolic diffeomorphism of M in the usual sense: gamma is a deck transformation and the paper does not show that h preserves the partially hyperbolic splitting or that it uniformly expands the unstable direction. The assertion that 'any fixed leaf L is repelling along the unstable manifold through x_L' therefore needs a proof. Moreover, the claim that 'the closed interval between L_0 and gamma(L_0) is fixed so cannot contain only repelling fixed points' is not derived; one must show that the fixed leaves in this interval form a finite family whose Lefschetz indices are compatible, and that a purely repelling configuration is incompatible with the translation action on the leaf space. This argument must be expanded before Theorem B can be considered established.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract] The French abstract appears to contain corrupted encoding (for example, '˜A c©tudions' and '˜A c©'), which should be fixed.
  2. [Remark 7.3] There are typos: 'not a dicretized Anosov flow' should be 'not a discretized Anosov flow', and 'fk_k,i' should be 'f_{k,i}' or similar.
  3. [Proposition 9.1] The statement uses the symbol gamma both for a deck transformation and for a periodic orbit of the pseudo-Anosov flow, which is confusing; please rename one of them.
  4. [Section 2.2.2] The phrase 'an line's worth of stable leaves' should be 'a line's worth of stable leaves'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the classification is derived from the stated partial-hyperbolicity and coherence hypotheses together with independent external theorems; author self-citations are ordinary references to prior published results and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain proceeds from dynamical coherence and a good lift to a foliation dichotomy (Corollary 3.21), then eliminates mixed behavior (Theorem 5.1), converts double invariance into a discretized Anosov flow (Theorem 6.1 with Proposition 6.5), and rules out double translations in the hyperbolic case using the coarse-dynamics Proposition 8.1 and Proposition 9.1. At no point is a quantity used in the argument defined in terms of the target conclusion. The equivalence between being a discretized Anosov flow and having a lift that fixes every center leaf and moves points a bounded distance (Section 6.2 and Proposition G.2) is proved from the definition via Bonatti-Wilkinson and Paternain, not assumed by design. The cited regulating pseudo-Anosov flow theorem (Theorem D.3, from Thurston, Calegari, and Fenley) and the singularity result (Proposition D.4, from Fenley's earlier published work) are external theorems with stated assumptions that do not include the classification being proved; they are not fitted to the present data and do not reduce to the paper's inputs. Author self-citations such as [Fen02], [Fen13], [HPS18], and [HP14,HP15] are normal references to prior published mathematical results and provide independent support. References to the companion paper [BFFPa] are explicitly for the sequel and are not load-bearing for the main theorems here. The least rigorous steps, such as the uniform quasi-geodesic and expansion estimates (Facts 8.3 and 8.4) and the assertion that the second half of Proposition 8.1 follows directly from homotopy invariance, are potential gaps in justification, but they are under-proved rather than circular: they do not presuppose the theorem being proved. Since no equation or construction in the paper is equivalent to its own input by definition, the paper has no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The proof is non-circular and parameter-free. It relies on a network of external theorems in 3-manifold topology and foliation theory, listed above as axioms. No free parameters or invented entities are introduced. The invariant cores Tγ constructed in Section 8 are derived mathematical objects, not postulated entities, and they carry independent evidence via their Lefschetz index.

assumptions (7)
  • standard math A taut foliation without compact leaves on a closed 3-manifold not finitely covered by S2×S1 has universal cover homeomorphic to R3 and every leaf lifts to a properly embedded plane (Novikov-Palmeira structure theory).
    Invoked in Section 3.1 and Theorem B.1 to obtain complementary half-spaces and product leaf spaces.
  • standard math Candel's uniformization theorem: a taut foliation with no holonomy invariant transverse measure admits a metric that restricts to a hyperbolic metric on each leaf.
    Used in Lemma 3.20 and Lemma 4.11 to obtain Gromov hyperbolicity of leaves and the coarse contraction arguments.
  • standard math Thurston-Calegari-Fenley: every transversely oriented R-covered uniform foliation in a hyperbolic 3-manifold admits a transverse regulating pseudo-Anosov flow.
    Load-bearing for Proposition 8.1 and the elimination of double translations in Section 9.
  • standard math The regulating pseudo-Anosov flow for such a foliation is genuinely pseudo-Anosov with p-prong singular orbits when the fundamental group is not virtually solvable (Proposition D.4).
    Proposition 8.1 uses prong counts and Lefschetz indices of the invariant cores Tγ.
  • standard math Mostow rigidity: every homeomorphism of a closed hyperbolic 3-manifold has an iterate that is homotopic to the identity.
    Used in Theorem B and Proposition A.3 to obtain a good lift after finite iteration.
  • domain assumption Partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms on 3-manifolds with virtually solvable fundamental group are already classified, so restricting to non-virtually-solvable π1 loses no generality.
    Stated in the Convention after Section 2.1 and justified by Theorem F.5 and [HP14, HP15].
  • domain assumption Dynamical coherence: there exist f-invariant foliations Wcs and Wcu tangent to Ecs and Ecu, with the center foliation Wc obtained by intersections.
    This is the explicit standing assumption of Part I; Part II [BFFPa] is announced to remove it. It is used throughout the paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms homotopic to the identity in dimension 3, Part I: The dynamically coherent case." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CIT75ZES

@misc{pith2026190806227,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms homotopic to the identity in dimension 3, Part I: The dynamically coherent case},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CIT75ZES}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.06227}
}
read the original abstract

We study 3-dimensional dynamically coherent partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms that are homotopic to the identity, focusing on the transverse geometry and topology of the center stable and center unstable foliations, and the dynamics within their leaves. We find a structural dichotomy for these foliations, which we use to show that every such diffeomorphism on a hyperbolic or Seifert fibered 3-manifold is leaf conjugate to the time one map of a (topological) Anosov flow. This proves a classification conjecture of Hertz-Hertz-Ures in hyperbolic 3-manifolds and in the homotopy class of the identity of Seifert manifolds.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.06227 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Axes The other possibility is that one finds gaps, which look roughly like Reeb components as in the right half of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. We call V the (open) region between K and L. Its closure, which is simply V = K ∪ V ∪ L, is called the closed region between K and L. K L U V W U U 0 W0 W [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Translation-like behavior 3.1.3. Translated leaves. Similarly, if fe moves some leaf, then it does so in a “translation-like” manner as is illustrated in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (9 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The leaves c and s make a CS-perfect fit, but not a SC￾perfect fit. The leaves c and s 0 make a perfect fit. 4.2. Finding fixed center leaves. The following proposition is the main result of this section. Proposition 4.4. Let f : M → M be a dynamically coherent partial…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: A perfect fit forces expansion on a center ray. 4.2.2. Perfect fits and expanded center rays. In the following lemma we find that the topology of the stable and center foliations in L forces a stable ray in our gap to expand. Lemma 4.7. h acts as an expansion on c 0 wi…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The center ray may land by merging in c in the non￾dynamically coherent case [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The domain R is mapped onto itself by h. We will need two lemmas. The first is that the gap is “uniformly thin”: Lemma 4.10. The leaves s + and s − are a bounded Hausdorff distance apart with respect to the path metric on L. Proof. Since this gap is part of the axis As…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: If a stable ray in L stays close to the axis of the deck transformation γ which is a hyperbolic isometry, then its projec￾tion in M has to accumulate on a circle stable leaf. Proof of Lemma 4.9. Let y1 and y2 be points in s + that lie on either side of, and far away fr…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The combination of fixed and non-fixed center leaves allows to construct a center leaf intersecting s1 and fe(s1) in the axis As (fe) = As (γ). Recall that, since there does not exist closed stable leaves in M, γ must act freely on the stable leaf space in L. Thus γ ad…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The fixed center circle and the circles in the boundary of π(B) are joined by a stable leaf. Recall (see Proposition B.2) that there exists leaves in Wfcs with non-trivial stabilizer. Then f-minimality implies that such leaves are dense. Thus, we may assume that both …
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: The image of a large tubular neighborhood of the lift of the prong by fe in a given center stable leaf. As in Lemma 8.7 for any leaf L in Fe, we write xL to be the (unique) intersection of δ with L. Let a i L , with i = 1, . . . , p, be all the ideal points on the bou…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: shows a case where j2 is not equal to i2: It may be that fe(C) stretches well into P j2 (fe(L)) and out of Dfe(L) . Thus, as in the figure, the intersection fe(C) ∩ Dfe(L) can have two components C1 and C2, neither of which intersects both P i1 fe(L) and P i2 fe(L) . …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Partially Hyperbolic Dynamics with Quasi-isometric Center

    math.DS 2024-11 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Non-wandering partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms with quasi-isometric center on closed 3-manifolds are either skew products over a torus Anosov map or discretized Anosov flows, and volume-preserving ones are ergodic.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references · 72 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Avila, M

    A. Avila, M. Viana, and A. Wilkinson, Absolute continuity, L yapunov exponents and rigidity I : geodesic flows , J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) 17 (2015), no. 6, 1435--1462. 3353805

    work page 2015

  2. [2]

    Barbot, Caract\'erisation des flots d' A nosov en dimension 3 par leurs feuilletages faibles , Ergodic Theory Dynam

    T. Barbot, Caract\'erisation des flots d' A nosov en dimension 3 par leurs feuilletages faibles , Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems 15 (1995), no. 2, 247--270

    1995

  3. [3]

    , Flots d' A nosov sur les vari\'et\'es graph\'ees au sens de W aldhausen , Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 46 (1996), no. 5, 1451--1517

    work page 1996

  4. [4]

    , Actions de groupes sur les 1-vari\'et\'es non s\'epar\'ees et feuilletages de codimension un, Ann. Fac. Sci. Toulouse Math. (6) 7 (1998), no. 4, 559--597. 1693597

    work page 1998

  5. [5]

    , De l'hyperbolique au globalement hyperbolique, Habilitation \`a diriger des recherches, Universit\'e Claude Bernard de Lyon, 2005

    work page 2005

  6. [6]

    Anomalous Anosov flows revisited

    T. Barthelm \'e , C. Bonatti , A. Gogolev , and F. Rodriguez Hertz , Anomalous Anosov flows revisited , Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (2017), arXiv:1712.07755

    work page Pith review arXiv 2017

  7. [7]

    Barthelm \'e , S

    T. Barthelm \'e , S. Fenley , S. Frankel , and R. Potrie , Partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms homotopic to identity in dimension three II: branching foliations , arXiv

    work page

  8. [8]

    , Research Announcement: Partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms homotopic to the identity on 3-manifolds , 2018 MATRIX Annals

    work page 2018

Show all 78 references
  1. [9]

    , Dynamical incoherence for a large class of partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms , ArXiv e-prints (2020)

    2020

  2. [10]

    Bonatti, L

    C. Bonatti, L. J. D\'iaz, and M. Viana, Dynamics beyond uniform hyperbolicity, Encyclopaedia of Mathematical Sciences, vol. 102, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2005, A global geometric and probabilistic perspective, Mathematical Physics, III. 2105774

    2005

  3. [11]

    Bonatti , A

    C. Bonatti , A. Gogolev , A. Hammerlindl , and R. Potrie , Anomalous partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms III: abundance and incoherence , arXiv e-prints (2017), arXiv:1706.04962

    2017 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Bonatti, A

    C. Bonatti, A. Gogolev, and R. Potrie, Anomalous partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms II : stably ergodic examples , Invent. Math. 206 (2016), no. 3, 801--836. 3573973

    2016

  5. [13]

    Bonatti and N

    C. Bonatti and N. Guelman, Axiom A diffeomorphisms derived from A nosov flows , J. Mod. Dyn. 4 (2010), no. 1, 1--63. 2643887

    2010

  6. [14]

    Bonatti, K

    C. Bonatti, K. Parwani, and R. Potrie, Anomalous partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms I : D ynamically coherent examples , Ann. Sci. \'Ec. Norm. Sup\'er. (4) 49 (2016), no. 6, 1387--1402. 3592360

    2016

  7. [15]

    Bonatti and A

    C. Bonatti and A. Wilkinson, Transitive partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms on 3-manifolds, Topology 44 (2005), no. 3, 475--508. 2122214

    2005

  8. [16]

    Bonatti and J

    C. Bonatti and J. Zhang, Transverse foliations on the torus T^2 and partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms on 3-manifolds , Comment. Math. Helv. 92 (2017), no. 3, 513--550. 3682779

    2017

  9. [17]

    Bonatti and J

    C. Bonatti and J. Zhang , Transitive partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms with one-dimensional neutral center , arXiv e-prints (2019), arXiv:1904.05295

    2019 arXiv

  10. [18]

    M. Brin, D. Burago, and S. Ivanov, On partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms of 3-manifolds with commutative fundamental group, Modern dynamical systems and applications, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2004, pp. 307--312. 2090777

    2004

  11. [19]

    M. I. Brin and Ja. B. Pesin, Partially hyperbolic dynamical systems, Uspehi Mat. Nauk 28 (1973), no. 3(171), 169--170. 0391178

    1973

  12. [20]

    Brittenham, Essential laminations in S eifert-fibered spaces , Topology 32 (1993), no

    M. Brittenham, Essential laminations in S eifert-fibered spaces , Topology 32 (1993), no. 1, 61--85. 1204407

    1993

  13. [21]

    Burago and S

    D. Burago and S. Ivanov, Partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms of 3-manifolds with abelian fundamental groups, J. Mod. Dyn. 2 (2008), no. 4, 541--580. 2449138

    2008

  14. [22]

    Burns and A

    K. Burns and A. Wilkinson, Dynamical coherence and center bunching, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 22 (2008), no. 1-2, 89--100. 2410949

    2008

  15. [23]

    Buzzi , T

    J. Buzzi , T. Fisher , and A. Tahzibi , A dichotomy for measures of maximal entropy near time-one maps of transitive Anosov flows , arXiv e-prints (2019), arXiv:1904.07821

    2019 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Calegari, The geometry of R -covered foliations , Geom

    D. Calegari, The geometry of R -covered foliations , Geom. Topol. 4 (2000), 457--515 (electronic)

    2000

  17. [25]

    , Foliations and the geometry of 3-manifolds, Oxford Mathematical Monographs, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2007

    2007

  18. [26]

    Camacho and A

    C. Camacho and A. Lins Neto, Geometric theory of foliations, Birkh\"auser Boston, Inc., Boston, MA, 1985, Translated from the Portuguese by Sue E. Goodman. 824240

    1985

  19. [27]

    Candel, Uniformization of surface laminations, Ann

    A. Candel, Uniformization of surface laminations, Ann. Sci. \'Ecole Norm. Sup. (4) 26 (1993), no. 4, 489--516

    1993

  20. [28]

    Candel and L

    A. Candel and L. Conlon, Foliations. I , Graduate Studies in Mathematics, vol. 23, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2000. 1732868

    2000

  21. [29]

    II , Graduate Studies in Mathematics, vol

    , Foliations. II , Graduate Studies in Mathematics, vol. 60, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2003. 1994394

    2003

  22. [30]

    Carrasco , F

    P. Carrasco , F. Rodriguez Hertz , J. Rodriguez Hertz , and R. Ures , Partially hyperbolic dynamics in dimension 3 , ArXiv e-prints (2015)

    2015

  23. [31]

    P. D. Carrasco , E. Pujals , and F. Rodriguez-Hertz , Classification of partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms under some rigid conditions , arXiv e-prints (2019), arXiv:1903.09264

    2019 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Casson and D

    A. Casson and D. Jungreis, Convergence groups and S eifert fibered 3 -manifolds , Invent. Math. 118 (1994), no. 3, 441--456. 1296353

    1994

  25. [33]

    Crovisier and R

    S. Crovisier and R. Potrie, Introduction to partially hyperbolic dynamics, available from the authors webpage

  26. [34]

    L. J. D\'iaz, E. R. Pujals, and R. Ures, Partial hyperbolicity and robust transitivity, Acta Math. 183 (1999), no. 1, 1--43. 1719547

    1999

  27. [35]

    D. B. A. Epstein, Periodic flows on three-manifolds, Ann. of Math. (2) 95 (1972), 66--82. 0288785

    1972

  28. [36]

    Fenley and R

    S. Fenley and R. Potrie , Ergodicity of partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms in hyperbolic 3-manifolds , arXiv e-prints (2018), arXiv:1809.02284

    2018 arXiv

  29. [37]

    S. R. Fenley, Anosov flows in 3 -manifolds , Ann. of Math. (2) 139 (1994), no. 1, 79--115

    1994

  30. [38]

    , The structure of branching in A nosov flows of 3 -manifolds , Comment. Math. Helv. 73 (1998), no. 2, 259--297

    1998

  31. [39]

    , Foliations, topology and geometry of 3-manifolds: R -covered foliations and transverse pseudo- A nosov flows , Comment. Math. Helv. 77 (2002), no. 3, 415--490

    2002

  32. [40]

    Dedicata 99 (2003), 61--102

    , Pseudo- A nosov flows and incompressible tori , Geom. Dedicata 99 (2003), 61--102. 1998929

    2003

  33. [41]

    , Rigidity of pseudo- A nosov flows transverse to R -covered foliations , Comment. Math. Helv. 88 (2013), no. 3, 643--676. 3093506

    2013

  34. [42]

    Franks and B

    J. Franks and B. Williams, Anomalous A nosov flows , Global theory of dynamical systems ( P roc. I nternat. C onf., N orthwestern U niv., E vanston, I ll., 1979), Lecture Notes in Math., vol. 819, Springer, Berlin, 1980, pp. 158--174

    1979

  35. [43]

    Gabai, Convergence groups are F uchsian groups , Ann

    D. Gabai, Convergence groups are F uchsian groups , Ann. of Math. (2) 136 (1992), no. 3, 447--510. 1189862

    1992

  36. [44]

    Ghys, Flots d' A nosov sur les 3 -vari\'et\'es fibr\'ees en cercles , Ergodic Theory Dynam

    \'E . Ghys, Flots d' A nosov sur les 3 -vari\'et\'es fibr\'ees en cercles , Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems 4 (1984), no. 1, 67--80

    1984

  37. [45]

    Gourmelon, Adapted metrics for dominated splittings, Ergodic Theory Dynam

    N. Gourmelon, Adapted metrics for dominated splittings, Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems 27 (2007), no. 6, 1839--1849. 2371598

    2007

  38. [46]

    Hammerlindl and R

    A. Hammerlindl and R. Potrie, Pointwise partial hyperbolicity in three-dimensional nilmanifolds, J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) 89 (2014), no. 3, 853--875. 3217653

    2014

  39. [47]

    , Classification of partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms in 3-manifolds with solvable fundamental group, J. Topol. 8 (2015), no. 3, 842--870. 3394318

    2015

  40. [48]

    Systems 38 (2018), no

    , Partial hyperbolicity and classification: a survey, Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems 38 (2018), no. 2, 401--443. 3774827

    2018

  41. [49]

    , Classification of systems with center-stable tori, Michigan Math. J. 68 (2019), no. 1, 147--166. 3934607

    2019

  42. [50]

    Hammerlindl, R

    A. Hammerlindl, R. Potrie, and M. Shannon, Seifert manifolds admitting partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms, J. Mod. Dyn. 12 (2018), 193--222. 3824728

    2018

  43. [51]

    Handel, Global shadowing of pseudo- A nosov homeomorphisms , Ergodic Theory Dynam

    M. Handel, Global shadowing of pseudo- A nosov homeomorphisms , Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems 5 (1985), no. 3, 373--377. 805836

    1985

  44. [52]

    Hasselblatt and Y

    B. Hasselblatt and Y. Pesin, Partially hyperbolic dynamical systems, Handbook of dynamical systems. V ol. 1 B , Elsevier B. V., Amsterdam, 2006, pp. 1--55. 2186241

    2006

  45. [53]

    Hatcher, Notes on basic 3-manifold topology

    A. Hatcher, Notes on basic 3-manifold topology

  46. [54]

    Hempel, 3 - M anifolds , Princeton University Press, Princeton, N

    J. Hempel, 3 - M anifolds , Princeton University Press, Princeton, N. J.; University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, 1976, Ann. of Math. Studies, No. 86. 0415619

    1976

  47. [55]

    M. W. Hirsch, C. C. Pugh, and M. Shub, Invariant manifolds, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 583, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York, 1977. 0501173

    1977

  48. [56]

    Inaba and S

    T. Inaba and S. Matsumoto, Nonsingular expansive flows on 3 -manifolds and foliations with circle prong singularities , Japan. J. Math. (N.S.) 16 (1990), no. 2, 329--340. 1091166

    1990

  49. [57]

    Jaco, Lectures on three-manifold topology, CBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics, vol

    W. Jaco, Lectures on three-manifold topology, CBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics, vol. 43, American Mathematical Society, Providence, R.I., 1980. 565450

    1980

  50. [58]

    Mann, Rigidity and flexibility of group actions on the circle, Handbook of group actions

    K. Mann, Rigidity and flexibility of group actions on the circle, Handbook of group actions. V ol. IV , Adv. Lect. Math. (ALM), vol. 41, Int. Press, Somerville, MA, 2018, pp. 705--752. 3888699

    2018

  51. [59]

    G. D. Mostow, Quasi-conformal mappings in n -space and the rigidity of hyperbolic space forms , Inst. Hautes \'Etudes Sci. Publ. Math. (1968), no. 34, 53--104. 0236383

    1968

  52. [60]

    Navas, Groups of circle diffeomorphisms, spanish ed., Chicago Lectures in Mathematics, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 2011

    A. Navas, Groups of circle diffeomorphisms, spanish ed., Chicago Lectures in Mathematics, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 2011. 2809110

    2011

  53. [61]

    S. P. Novikov, The topology of foliations, Trudy Moskov. Mat. Ob s c. 14 (1965), 248--278. 0200938

    1965

  54. [62]

    C. F. B. Palmeira, Open manifolds foliated by planes, Ann. Math. (2) 107 (1978), no. 1, 109--131

    1978

  55. [63]

    Parwani, On 3-manifolds that support partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms, Nonlinearity 23 (2010), no

    K. Parwani, On 3-manifolds that support partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms, Nonlinearity 23 (2010), no. 3, 589--606. 2586372

    2010

  56. [64]

    Paternain, Expansive flows and the fundamental group, Bol

    M. Paternain, Expansive flows and the fundamental group, Bol. Soc. Brasil. Mat. (N.S.) 24 (1993), no. 2, 179--199

    1993

  57. [65]

    Perelman , The entropy formula for the Ricci flow and its geometric applications , ArXiv Mathematics e-prints (2002)

    G. Perelman , The entropy formula for the Ricci flow and its geometric applications , ArXiv Mathematics e-prints (2002)

    2002

  58. [66]

    , Finite extinction time for the solutions to the Ricci flow on certain three-manifolds , ArXiv Mathematics e-prints (2003)

    2003

  59. [67]

    , Ricci flow with surgery on three-manifolds , ArXiv Mathematics e-prints (2003)

    2003

  60. [68]

    Potrie , Robust dynamics, invariant structures and topological classification , arXiv e-prints (2018), arXiv:1802.05291

    R. Potrie , Robust dynamics, invariant structures and topological classification , arXiv e-prints (2018), arXiv:1802.05291

    2018 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Charles Pugh and Michael Shub, Stable ergodicity, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.) 41 (2004), no. 1, 1--41, With an appendix by Alexander Starkov. 2015448

    2004

  62. [70]

    Rodriguez Hertz, M

    F. Rodriguez Hertz, M. A. Rodriguez Hertz, and R. Ures, Tori with hyperbolic dynamics in 3-manifolds, J. Mod. Dyn. 5 (2011), no. 1, 185--202. 2787601

    2011

  63. [71]

    , A non-dynamically coherent example on T ^3 , Ann. Inst. H. Poincar\'e Anal. Non Lin\'eaire 33 (2016), no. 4, 1023--1032. 3519530

    2016

  64. [72]

    Rosenberg, Foliations by planes, Topology 7 (1968), 131--138

    H. Rosenberg, Foliations by planes, Topology 7 (1968), 131--138. 0228011 (37 \#3595)

    1968

  65. [73]

    Scott, The geometries of 3 -manifolds , Bull

    P. Scott, The geometries of 3 -manifolds , Bull. London Math. Soc. 15 (1983), no. 5, 401--487. 705527

    1983

  66. [74]

    Shannon, Personal communication

    M. Shannon, Personal communication

  67. [75]

    W. P. Thurston, 3-manifolds, foliations and circles I

  68. [76]

    J. L. Tollefson, Involutions of S eifert fiber spaces , Pacific J. Math. 74 (1978), no. 2, 519--529. 0645400

    1978

  69. [77]

    Wilkinson, Conservative partially hyperbolic dynamics, Proceedings of the I nternational C ongress of M athematicians

    A. Wilkinson, Conservative partially hyperbolic dynamics, Proceedings of the I nternational C ongress of M athematicians. V olume III , Hindustan Book Agency, New Delhi, 2010, pp. 1816--1836. 2827868

    2010

  70. [78]

    Zhang , Partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms with one-dimensional neutral center on 3-manifolds , arXiv e-prints (2017), arXiv:1701.06176

    J. Zhang , Partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms with one-dimensional neutral center on 3-manifolds , arXiv e-prints (2017), arXiv:1701.06176

    2017 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.