Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 53 references

Robust Ultraviolet to Near-infrared Quantum Emitters in Hexagonal Boron Nitride up to 1100 K

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read Defect single-photon emitters in hexagonal boron nitride are reported to operate from 357 nm to 896 nm and to stay stable up to 1100 K.

desk verdict Room-temperature hBN SPE data are solid and novel, but the 1100-K single-photon claim is an overreach supported only by PL spectra. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.06578 v5 pith:2ND7C3PL submitted 2019-08-19 physics.app-ph cond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.optics

classification physics.app-phcond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.optics
keywords hexagonalboronnitridesingle-photonemittershigh-temperaturestabilityultraviolettonear-infraredemissionresonantexcitationdefectstatesphonon-assistedquantumphotonics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that one material, hexagonal boron nitride (hBN), can host true single-photon emitters spanning the ultraviolet to the near-infrared and operating at temperatures up to 1100 K. Using excitation lasers of different wavelengths, the authors observe narrow, photon-antibunched emission lines (each line emitting one photon at a time) from 357 nm to 896 nm in hBN flakes, and they show that each line is activated by a distinct resonant excitation wavelength. At 4 K the defect manifold splits into hundreds of resolvable lines, the narrowest around 75 µeV, and the same kind of emitters survive heating to 1100 K. The paper's density functional theory calculation of possible defect levels in hBN spans the same UV-to-IR range and is offered as support for assigning the lines to lattice defects, though the paper does not claim atomic-level identification. If the central claim is right, hBN would be a practical single-chip source of broadband quantum light that does not require cryogenic operation.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the atom-like defect level inside hBN's wide band gap, addressed through resonant photoluminescence excitation (PLE). Each emitter's transition is enhanced only at specific excitation wavelengths, which is why different lasers pick out different lines across 357–896 nm; at 4 K the phonon broadening freezes out, turning the dense defect manifold into hundreds of narrow zero-phonon lines. The 162 meV spacing between two resonance peaks matches the $E_{2g}$ phonon mode (about 169 meV), indicating that phonons participate in the excitation path, and the paper's DFT band-structure calculation supplies a catalogue of H, O, C, B and N defect levels whose transition energies span the same deep-UV-to-IR range as the measurements.

What would settle it

Prepare hBN flakes for comparison with and without any organic solvent step (for example, dry mechanical exfoliation versus drop-casting from the ethanol/water suspension onto identical substrates) and also run a solvent-residue-only control on the same substrate; if the 357–896 nm narrow lines and their 1100 K survival appear only when the organic solution is used, the emitters are not hBN lattice defects.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that hBN hosts isolated defect single-photon emitters whose emission color can be tuned across 357–896 nm by choosing the excitation wavelength, and that these emitters stay single-photon and photostable from liquid-helium temperature up to 1100 K. Resonant photoluminescence excitation shows that each emission line has its own excitation profile, implying real intermediate levels inside the band gap; two resonance peaks separated by about 162 meV are close to the $E_{2g}$ phonon energy of hBN, which the authors read as evidence of phonon-assisted excitation. At 4 K, hundreds of zero-phonon lines appear under 442 nm excitation, with the narrowest linewidth down to $\sim 75\,\mu$eV, and the measured $g^{(2)}(0)$ values below 0.1 confirm single-photon purity. The paper also calculates defect transition energies from first principles and finds them spread from infrared to ultraviolet, consistent with the observed bands, while explicitly leaving direct chemical identification of individual defect types to future work.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the narrow emission lines come from defect levels inside the hBN lattice rather than from molecules or residues left by the ethanol/water solution the flakes were deposited from; the paper notes the flakes contain H, O and C impurities and does not perform a direct chemical or structural identification of the emitters.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • One hBN flake can act as a wavelength-multiplexed source: selecting the excitation laser selects which defect line emits, so wavelengths from 357 nm to 896 nm are available on a single chip.
  • Sources that survive 1100 K could operate in uncooled or even hot environments, where conventional quantum emitters fail.
  • The phonon-related 162 meV resonance spacing suggests that phonon-assisted excitation could be harnessed for resolved-sideband control of hBN defect states.
  • The DFT catalogue implies that controlled doping or ion implantation of H, O, C, B or N could engineer emitters at chosen wavelengths rather than relying on stochastic flakes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the emitting centers turn out to be the H, O or C impurities mentioned in the paper rather than intrinsic boron or nitrogen vacancies, hBN would still be the host, but emission would then be an impurity-engineering problem: targeted implantation should reproduce the full spectrum on demand.
  • The claimed decoupling of the single-photon transition from acoustic phonons predicts a concrete observable: between 300 K and 1100 K the linewidth should follow a much weaker temperature dependence than the usual linear phonon-broadening trend; a high-resolution linewidth-versus-temperature trace could test this directly.
  • A tunable continuous-wave laser could map the full resonance profile of each line, giving every emitter a spectral fingerprint that would eventually allow the observed bands to be matched one-to-one to calculated defect levels.
  • Because the UV and IR lines are weaker in the present data, cavity or plasmonic enhancement around selected hBN defects is a natural next step to brighten exactly those spectral regions.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports defect-related photoluminescence from hexagonal boron nitride flakes that spans 357–896 nm under different excitation wavelengths, with room-temperature antibunching g2(0)=0.06–0.09 for two representative emitters, lifetimes around 1.1–1.4 ns, low-temperature spectra containing many narrow lines down to ~75 µeV, and temperature-dependent PL showing that some emission lines persist up to 1100 K under 442 nm excitation. Density functional theory calculations of H, O, C, N, and B related defects are presented as a qualitative assignment of the observed emission bands. The abstract and conclusion state that these are single-photon emitters that remain stable up to 1100 K and that a decoupling between single-photon emission and acoustic phonons is observed at high temperature.

Significance. If fully supported, the 1100 K single-photon operation would be a striking result for solid-state quantum emitters, and a single host material covering 357–896 nm would be useful for integrated quantum photonics. The room-temperature antibunching data, the low-temperature narrow lines, the photostability measurements, and the PLE selectivity are valuable experimental contributions in their own right. The DFT calculations provide a plausible but not definitive connection to specific defect species. The main significance hinges on whether the high-temperature claim can be backed by photon-correlation data or by appropriately revised claims.

major comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and Figure 4(c)] The headline claim that single-photon sources 'can be operated ... even up to 1100 K' is not supported by photon-correlation data at any temperature above room temperature. Figure 4(c) shows only PL spectra at 300–1100 K, and the only HBT measurements are at room temperature (Figure 2) and 4 K (Figure S5). The manuscript itself states that 'the purity of these emissions at high temperatures ... calls for further studies,' which concedes that the single-photon character at high temperature is unverified. Either high-temperature g2(τ) measurements must be provided, or the abstract and conclusion must be revised to state that emission lines survive to 1100 K without claiming single-photon operation.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract claims that 'the decoupling between single-photon and acoustic phonon is observed at high temperatures,' but no measurement or analysis of acoustic-phonon coupling appears anywhere in the main text or in the described supplementary figures. This claim has no evidentiary counterpart and should be removed or substantiated with a quantitative temperature-dependent linewidth and phonon-sideband analysis.
  3. [Figure 3(b) and Section 'Observation of a broad spectral range...'] The paper calls the 357–896 nm emissions 'SPEs' based only on PL spectra at room temperature; no second-order correlation measurement is shown for the ultraviolet or near-infrared emitters in this range. Since the main novelty includes broadband single-photon emission, the claim that all of these lines are single-photon emitters requires either additional g2(τ) data for representative UV and NIR lines or a more cautious wording that identifies them as defect emission lines whose single-photon character is only demonstrated at a few selected wavelengths.
  4. [Experimental Section and Figure 4(c)] The high-temperature experiment is missing essential experimental details: the heating apparatus, the method of temperature calibration, the atmosphere during heating, and the correction for blackbody radiation or background luminescence from the substrate and objective are not described. Without these details, the persistence of peaks above 800 K is difficult to evaluate. Additionally, because the flakes are drop-cast from an ethanol/water suspension, emission from organic residues or surface adsorbates is a plausible alternative origin for some of the lines; control experiments on bare substrates, annealed flakes, or flakes prepared without solvent would strengthen the assignment of all observed lines to hBN lattice defects.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section after Figure 2] The text refers to 'Figure 3(b-c)' when describing the second-order correlation measurements, but the corresponding panels are in Figure 2; this cross-reference should be corrected.
  2. [Figure 5 caption] The text refers to 'Figure 5(c)' and the caption shows panel (c), but the figure appears to have no panel (b); the panel numbering should be made consistent.
  3. [Abstract and introduction] The phrase 'single photon purity is higher than 90 percentage' is imprecise; the measured quantity is g2(0) below 0.1, so the text should state this directly rather than using a percentage wording.
  4. [Section 'Observation of a broad spectral range...'] The saturation count rates of 10^3–10^4 counts/s are modest compared with other hBN single-photon sources; the text should be careful in describing the emitters as 'the brightest SPE reported so far' without a quantitative comparison to literature values under similar collection conditions.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper's claims rest on direct optical measurements and an independent DFT calculation, not on fitted inputs or self-citation chains.

full rationale

The paper is an experimental study of single-photon emitters in hBN. Its central claims are (1) observation of antibunching at room temperature and at 4 K with g(2)(0) values below 0.1, (2) observation of narrow emission lines from 357 nm to 896 nm under different excitation wavelengths, and (3) persistence of emission peaks up to 1100 K. None of these claims is derived from a fitted model whose parameters are then renamed as predictions. The g(2)(τ) fits use the standard antibunching expression g(2)(τ)=1−a·exp(−|τ|/τ0), and the saturation fits use I=I∞P/(P+Psat); these are standard characterizations of measured data, not predictive derivations. The DFT calculation of defect levels in Fig. 5 is an independent first-principles computation; the paper only compares the calculated transition energies qualitatively with the observed spectral range ('the calculated defect levels both in monolayer and bulk hBN are ranged from infrared to ultraviolet region, which are consistent with our experimental results'). This comparison is not used as input to the experiment and does not force the experimental outcomes. There is no load-bearing self-citation: prior hBN work is cited as background and for comparison of Raman and PL features, but the new observations—the spectral range, the excitation selectivity, and the high-temperature survival of emission peaks—are directly measured in this paper and do not reduce to those citations. The manuscript itself flags a genuine limitation: 'The purity of these emissions at high temperatures and detailed physical mechanism behind this phenomenon calls for further studies.' This is a support/validity concern about whether the high-temperature peaks are individually single-photon emitters, since no g(2) measurement is reported above room temperature; but it is not a circularity concern. The paper does not define its conclusions in terms of its inputs, does not use fitted parameters as predictions, and does not invoke a self-authored uniqueness theorem or ansatz hidden in a citation. The central claims therefore retain independent experimental content.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's central claims rest on three unverified premises: the defect origin of the emission, the adequacy of DFT level calculations for assigning transitions, and the continued single-photon character of emitters at high temperature. No free parameters are fitted to the data in the main claims; saturation parameters are descriptive.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The observed single-photon emissions originate from defect states within the hBN band gap.
    The paper infers defect origin from prior hBN studies and from DFT level calculations, but provides no direct chemical or structural identification of the emitters; contaminants from the ethanol/water suspension are a plausible alternative source.
  • domain assumption DFT-computed defect levels reliably represent the experimentally observed transition energies.
    The DFT method details are delegated to the supplementary information, and the comparison in Figure 5 is a qualitative band matching rather than a quantitative prediction with error bars.
  • domain assumption The emission peaks observed at high temperature retain the single-photon character measured at lower temperature.
    No g(2) measurement is reported above room temperature, yet the abstract and title assert single-photon emitters up to 1100 K.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Robust Ultraviolet to Near-infrared Quantum Emitters in Hexagonal Boron Nitride up to 1100 K." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2ND7C3PL

@misc{pith2026190806578,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Robust Ultraviolet to Near-infrared Quantum Emitters in Hexagonal Boron Nitride up to 1100 K},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2ND7C3PL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.06578}
}
read the original abstract

A stable single-photon source working at high temperatures with high brightness and covering full band emission from one host material is critically important for quantum technologies. Here, we find that the certain hBN single-photon emissions (SPEs) can be significantly enhanced by lasers with special wavelengths, which largely broaden the wavelength range of the hBN emitters, down to ultraviolet (357 nm) and up to near-infrared (912 nm). Importantly, these hBN SPEs are still stable even at the temperature up to 1100 Kelvin. The decoupling between single-photon and acoustic phonon is observed at high temperatures. Our work suggests that hBN can be a good host material for generating single-photon sources with ultrabroad wavelength range.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 28 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Lounis \ and\ author M

    author author B. Lounis \ and\ author M. Orrit ,\ journal doi:10.1088/0034-4885/68/5/R04 journal Rep. Prog. Phys. \ volume 68 ,\ pages 1129 ( year 2005 ) NoStop SPS-Review

  2. [2]

    Aharonovich , author D

    author author I. Aharonovich , author D. Englund ,\ and\ author M. Toth ,\ journal doi:10.1038/NPHOTON.2016.186 journal Nat. Photonics \ volume 10 ,\ pages 631 ( year 2016 ) NoStop Aharonovich2016Solid

  3. [3]

    author author W. B. \ Gao , author A. Imamoglu , author H. Bernien ,\ and\ author R. Hanson ,\ journal doi:10.1038/nphoton.2015.58 journal Nat. Photonics \ volume 9 ,\ pages 363 ( year 2015 ) NoStop Gao2015Coherent

  4. [4]

    Lodahl , author S

    author author P. Lodahl , author S. Mahmoodian ,\ and\ author S. Stobbe ,\ journal doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.87.347 journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 87 ,\ pages 347 ( month May \ year 2015 ) NoStop RevModPhys-87-347

  5. [5]

    Kok , author W

    author author P. Kok , author W. J. \ Munro , author K. Nemoto , author T. C. \ Ralph , author J. P. \ Dowling ,\ and\ author G. J. \ Milburn ,\ journal doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.79.135 journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 79 ,\ pages 135 ( month Jan \ year 2007 ) NoStop RevModPhys-79-135

  6. [6]

    Santori , author D

    author author C. Santori , author D. Fattal , author J. Vuckovic , author G. S. \ Solomon ,\ and\ author Y. Yamamoto ,\ journal doi:10.1088/1367-2630/6/1/089 journal New J. Phys. \ volume 6 ,\ pages 89 ( year 2004 ) NoStop InAs-review

  7. [7]

    Senellart , author G

    author author P. Senellart , author G. Solomon ,\ and\ author A. White ,\ journal doi:10.1038/nnano.2017.218 journal Nat. Nanotechnol. \ volume 12 ,\ pages 1026 ( year 2017 ) NoStop quantum-dotsingle-photon

  8. [8]

    Ma , author N

    author author X. Ma , author N. F. \ Hartmann , author J. K. \ Baldwin , author S. K. \ Doorn ,\ and\ author H. Htoon ,\ journal doi:10.1038/nnano.2015.136 journal Nat. Nanotechnol. \ volume 10 ,\ pages 671 ( year 2015 ) NoStop Ma2015Room

Show all 53 references
  1. [9]

    Chakraborty , author L

    author author C. Chakraborty , author L. Kinnischtzke , author K. M. \ Goodfellow , author R. Beams ,\ and\ author A. N. \ Vamivakas ,\ journal doi:10.1038/nnano.2015.265 journal Nat. Nanotechnol. \ volume 11 ,\ pages 7 ( year 2015 ) NoStop 2D-Singlephoton

  2. [10]

    Srivastava , author M

    author author A. Srivastava , author M. Sidler , author A. V. \ Allain , author D. S. \ Lembke , author A. Kis ,\ and\ author A. Imamoglu ,\ journal doi:10.1038/NNANO.2015.60 journal Nat. Nanotechnol. \ volume 10 ,\ pages 491 ( year 2015 ) NoStop WSe2-nnano-SA

  3. [11]

    Koperski , author K

    author author M. Koperski , author K. Nogajewski , author A. Arora , author V. Cherkez , author P. Mallet , author J. Y. \ Veuillen , author J. Marcus , author P. Kossacki ,\ and\ author M. Potemski ,\ journal doi:10.1038/NNANO.2015.67 journal Nat. Nanotechnol. \ volume 10 ,\ ...

  4. [12]

    author author Y. M. \ He , author ClarkGenevieve , author R. SchaibleyJohn , author Y. He , author ChenMing , author C. WeiYu , author J. DingXing , author Q. Zhang , author W. Yao , author X. Xu , author C.-Y. \ Lu ,\ and\ author J.-W. \ Pan ,\ journal doi:10.1038/nnano.2015....

  5. [13]

    Chakraborty , author L

    author author C. Chakraborty , author L. Kinnischtzke , author K. M. \ Goodfellow , author R. Beams ,\ and\ author A. N. \ Vamivakas ,\ journal doi:10.1038/nnano.2015.79 journal Nat. Nanotechnol. \ volume 10 ,\ pages 507 ( year 2015 ) NoStop WSe2-nnano-CC

  6. [14]

    \ Carmen , author D

    author author P.-B. \ Carmen , author D. M. \ Kara , author A. R. P. \ Montblanch , author M. Barbone , author P. Latawiec , author D. Yoon , author A. K. \ Ott , author M. Loncar , author A. C. \ Ferrari ,\ and\ author M. Atatre ,\ journal doi:10.1038/ncomms15093 journal Nat....

  7. [15]

    author author P. B. \ Carmen , author B. Matteo , author D. M. \ Kara , author X. Chen , author G. Ilya , author Y. Duhee , author A. K. \ Ott , author B. Jan , author W. Kenji ,\ and\ author T. Takashi ,\ journal doi:10.1038/ncomms12978 journal Nat. Commun. \ volume 7 ,\ page...

  8. [16]

    author author M. J. \ Holmes , author K. Choi , author S. Kako , author M. Arita ,\ and\ author Y. Arakawa ,\ journal doi:10.1021/nl404400d journal Nano Lett. \ volume 14 ,\ pages 982 ( year 2014 ) NoStop GaN-ultraviolet

  9. [17]

    author author A. M. \ Berhane , author K. Jeong , author Z. Bodrog , author S. Fiedler , author T. Schrnder , author N. V. \ Trivioo , author T. Palacios , author A. Gali , author M. Toth ,\ and\ author D. Englund ,\ journal doi:10.1002/adma.201605092 journal Adv. Mater. \ vol...

  10. [18]

    Zhou , author Z

    author author Y. Zhou , author Z. Wang , author A. Rasmita , author S. Kim , author A. Berhane , author Z. Bodrog , author G. Adamo , author A. Gali , author I. Aharonovich ,\ and\ author W.-b. \ Gao ,\ journal doi:10.1126/sciadv.aar3580 journal Science Advances \ volume 4 ,\ ...

  11. [19]

    Kako , author C

    author author S. Kako , author C. Santori , author K. Hoshino , author S. GoTzinger , author Y. Yamamoto ,\ and\ author Y. Arakawa ,\ journal doi:10.1038/nmat1763 journal Nat. Mater. \ volume 5 ,\ pages 887 ( year 2006 ) NoStop Kako2006A

  12. [20]

    author author T. T. \ Tran , author K. Bray , author M. J. \ Ford , author M. Toth ,\ and\ author I. Aharonovich ,\ journal doi:10.1038/nnano.2015.242 journal Nat. Nanotechnol. \ volume 11 ,\ pages 37 ( year 2015 ) NoStop hBN-Nn-15

  13. [21]

    author author T. T. \ Tran , author C. Zachreson , author A. M. \ Berhane , author K. Bray , author R. G. \ Sandstrom , author L. H. \ Li , author T. Taniguchi , author K. Watanabe , author I. Aharonovich ,\ and\ author M. Toth ,\ journal doi:10.1103/PhysRevApplied.5.034005 jo...

  14. [22]

    author author L. J. \ Mart\' nez , author T. Pelini , author V. Waselowski , author J. R. \ Maze , author B. Gil , author G. Cassabois ,\ and\ author V. Jacques ,\ journal doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.94.121405 journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 94 ,\ pages 121405 ( month Sep \ year 2016 )...

  15. [23]

    author author N. R. \ Jungwirth , author B. Calderon , author Y. Ji , author M. G. \ Spencer , author M. E. \ Flatt ,\ and\ author G. D. \ Fuchs ,\ journal doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b01987 journal Nano Lett. \ volume 16 ,\ pages 6052 ( year 2016 ) NoStop JNR-Nanolett-2016

  16. [24]

    author author T. T. \ Tran , author C. Elbadawi , author D. Totonjian , author C. J. \ Lobo , author G. Grosso , author H. Moon , author D. R. \ Englund , author M. J. \ Ford , author I. Aharonovich ,\ and\ author M. Toth ,\ journal doi:10.1021/acsnano.6b03602 journal ACS Nano...

  17. [25]

    Shotan , author H

    author author Z. Shotan , author H. Jayakumar , author C. R. \ Considine , author M. Mackoit , author H. Fedder , author J. Wrachtrup , author A. Alkauskas , author M. W. \ Doherty , author V. M. \ Menon ,\ and\ author C. A. \ Meriles ,\ journal doi:10.1021/acsphotonics.6b0073...

  18. [26]

    Bourrellier , author S

    author author R. Bourrellier , author S. Meuret , author A. Tararan , author O. Stphan , author M. Kociak , author L. H. G. \ Tizei ,\ and\ author A. Zobelli ,\ journal doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b01368 journal Nano Lett. \ volume 16 ,\ pages 4317 ( year 2016 ) NoStop BR-nanolett-2016

  19. [27]

    Chejanovsky , author M

    author author N. Chejanovsky , author M. Rezai , author F. Paolucci , author Y. Kim , author T. Rendler , author W. Rouabeh , author F. Favaro de Oliveira , author P. Herlinger , author A. Denisenko , author S. Yang , author I. Gerhardt , author A. Finkler , author J. H. \ Sme...

  20. [28]

    author author A. W. \ Schell , author T. T. \ Tran , author H. Takashima , author S. Takeuchi ,\ and\ author I. Aharonovich ,\ journal doi:10.1063/1.4961684 journal APL Photonics \ volume 1 ,\ pages 091302 ( year 2016 ) NoStop APLPhon-2016

  21. [29]

    Kianinia , author B

    author author M. Kianinia , author B. Regan , author S. A. \ Tawfik , author T. T. \ Tran , author M. J. \ Ford , author I. Aharonovich ,\ and\ author M. Toth ,\ journal doi:10.1021/acsphotonics.7b00086 journal ACS Photonics \ volume 4 ,\ pages 768 ( year 2017 ) NoStop acsphot...

  22. [30]

    author author A. L. \ Exarhos , author D. A. \ Hopper , author R. R. \ Grote , author A. Alkauskas ,\ and\ author L. C. \ Bassett ,\ journal doi:10.1021/acsnano.7b00665 journal ACS Nano \ volume 11 ,\ pages 3328 ( year 2017 ) NoStop EAL-ACSnano-2017

  23. [31]

    author author T. T. \ Tran , author D. Wang , author Z.-Q. \ Xu , author A. Yang , author M. Toth , author T. W. \ Odom ,\ and\ author I. Aharonovich ,\ journal doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b00444 journal Nano Lett. \ volume 17 ,\ pages 2634 ( year 2017 ) NoStop TTT-nanolett2017

  24. [32]

    Li , author G

    author author X. Li , author G. D. \ Shepard , author A. Cupo , author N. Camporeale , author K. Shayan , author Y. Luo , author V. Meunier ,\ and\ author S. Strauf ,\ journal doi:10.1021/acsnano.7b00638 journal ACS Nano \ volume 11 ,\ pages 6652 ( year 2017 ) NoStop LX-NANOlett-2017

  25. [33]

    author author N. R. \ Jungwirth \ and\ author G. D. \ Fuchs ,\ journal doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.057401 journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 119 ,\ pages 057401 ( month Jul \ year 2017 ) NoStop hBN-PRL

  26. [34]

    Sontheimer , author M

    author author B. Sontheimer , author M. Braun , author N. Nikolay , author N. Sadzak , author I. Aharonovich ,\ and\ author O. Benson ,\ journal doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.96.121202 journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 96 ,\ pages 121202 ( month Sep \ year 2017 ) NoStop hbn-prb-2

  27. [35]

    Grosso , author H

    author author G. Grosso , author H. Moon , author B. Lienhard , author S. Ali , author D. K. \ Efetov , author M. M. \ Furchi , author P. Jarillo-Herrero , author M. J. \ Ford , author I. Aharonovich ,\ and\ author D. Englund ,\ journal doi:10.1038/s41467-017-00810-2 journal N...

  28. [36]

    author author A. W. \ Schell , author M. Svedendahl ,\ and\ author R. Quidant ,\ journal doi:10.1002/adma.201704237 journal Adv. Mater. \ volume 30 ,\ pages 1704237 ( year 2018 ),\ https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/adma.201704237 NoStop AWS-arXiv-2017

  29. [37]

    Koperski , author K

    author author M. Koperski , author K. Nogajewski ,\ and\ author M. Potemski ,\ journal doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2017.10.083 journal Optics Communications \ volume 411 ,\ pages 158 ( year 2018 ),\ ISSN issn 0030-4018 NoStop mk-arXiv-2017

  30. [38]

    Dietrich , author M

    author author A. Dietrich , author M. B\"urk , author E. S. \ Steiger , author L. Antoniuk , author T. T. \ Tran , author M. Nguyen , author I. Aharonovich , author F. Jelezko ,\ and\ author A. Kubanek ,\ journal doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.98.081414 journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 98 ...

  31. [39]

    \ Xu , author C

    author author Z.-Q. \ Xu , author C. Elbadawi , author T. T. \ Tran , author M. Kianinia , author X. Li , author D. Liu , author T. B. \ Hoffman , author M. Nguyen , author S. Kim , author J. H. \ Edgar , author X. Wu , author L. Song , author S. Ali , author M. Ford , author ...

  32. [40]

    author author R. V. \ Gorbachev , author I. Riaz , author R. R. \ Nair , author R. Jalil , author L. Britnell , author B. D. \ Belle , author E. W. \ Hill , author K. S. \ Novoselov , author K. Watanabe , author T. Taniguchi , author A. K. \ Geim ,\ and\ author P. Blake ,\ jou...

  33. [41]

    uller , author I. Aharonovich , author Z. Wang , author X. Yuan , author S. Castelletto , author S. Prawer ,\ and\ author M. Atat\

    author author T. M\"uller , author I. Aharonovich , author Z. Wang , author X. Yuan , author S. Castelletto , author S. Prawer ,\ and\ author M. Atat\"ure ,\ journal doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.86.195210 journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 86 ,\ pages 195210 ( month Nov \ year 2012 ) NoSto...

  34. [42]

    Wolters , author N

    author author J. Wolters , author N. Sadzak , author A. W. \ Schell , author T. Schr\"oder ,\ and\ author O. Benson ,\ journal doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.027401 journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 110 ,\ pages 027401 ( month Jan \ year 2013 ) NoStop linewidth-PhysRevLett

  35. [43]

    Neu , author C

    author author E. Neu , author C. Hepp , author M. Hauschild , author S. Gsell , author M. Fischer , author H. Sternschulte , author D. Steinmller-Nethl , author M. Schreck ,\ and\ author C. Becher ,\ journal journal New Journal of Physics \ volume 15 ,\ pages 043005 ( year 201...

  36. [44]

    Friedrich \ and\ author D

    author author J. Friedrich \ and\ author D. Haarer ,\ journal doi:10.1002/anie.198401131 journal Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. \ volume 23 ,\ pages 113 ( year 1984 ),\ ISSN issn 1521-3773 NoStop FJ-Zerophononline

  37. [45]

    Hanbury-Brown \ and\ author R

    author author R. Hanbury-Brown \ and\ author R. Q. \ Twiss ,\ journal doi:10.1038/177027a0 journal Nature \ volume 177 ,\ pages 27 ( year 1956 ) NoStop HanburyCorrelation

  38. [46]

    Zhang , author Q

    author author J. Zhang , author Q. Zhang , author X. Wang , author L. C. \ Kwek ,\ and\ author Q. Xiong ,\ journal doi:10.1038/nphoton.2016.122 journal Nat Photon \ volume 10 ,\ pages 600 ( year 2016 ) NoStop ZJ-NP-2016

  39. [47]

    Zhang , author D

    author author J. Zhang , author D. Li , author R. Chen ,\ and\ author Q. Xiong ,\ journal doi:10.1038/nature11721 journal Nature \ volume 493 ,\ pages 504 ( year 2013 ) NoStop ZJ-nature-2013

  40. [48]

    author author S. A. \ Tawfik , author S. Ali , author M. Fronzi , author M. Kianinia , author T. T. \ Tran , author C. Stampfl , author I. Aharonovich , author M. Toth ,\ and\ author M. J. \ Ford ,\ journal doi:10.1039/C7NR04270A journal Nanoscale \ volume 9 ,\ pages 13575 ( y...

  41. [49]

    Abdi , author M.-J

    author author M. Abdi , author M.-J. \ Hwang , author M. Aghtar ,\ and\ author M. B. \ Plenio ,\ journal doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.233602 journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 119 ,\ pages 233602 ( month Dec \ year 2017 ) NoStop MA-arXiv-2017

  42. [50]

    Li , author Y

    author author K. Li , author Y. Zhou , author A. Rasmita , author I. Aharonovich ,\ and\ author W. B. \ Gao ,\ journal doi:10.1103/PhysRevApplied.6.024010 journal Phys. Rev. Appl. \ volume 6 ,\ pages 024010 ( month Aug \ year 2016 ) NoStop PhysRevApplied-diamonds

  43. [51]

    Chen , author X

    author author X. Chen , author X. Lu , author S. Dubey , author Q. Yao , author S. Liu , author X. Wang , author Q. Xiong , author L. Zhang ,\ and\ author A. Srivastava1 ,\ journal doi:10.1038/s41567-018-0366-7 journal Nat. Phys. \ volume 15 ,\ pages 221 ( year 2019 ) NoStop Ajit-NP

  44. [52]

    author author M. A. \ Feldman , author A. Puretzky , author L. Lindsay , author E. Tucker , author D. P. \ Briggs , author P. G. \ Evans , author R. F. \ Haglund ,\ and\ author B. J. \ Lawrie ,\ journal doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.99.020101 journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 99 ,\ pages 0...

  45. [53]

    Cassabois , author P

    author author G. Cassabois , author P. Valvin ,\ and\ author B. Gil ,\ journal doi:10.1038/nphoton.2015.277 journal Nature Photonics \ volume 10 ,\ pages 262 ( year 2016 ) NoStop C2016Hexagonal

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.