Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 36 references

Ishibashi States, Topological Orders with Boundaries and Topological Entanglement Entropy II -- Cutting through the boundary

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that when an entanglement cut ends on a gapped boundary, the topological entanglement entropy is fixed by the half-linking matrix $\gamma_{xc}$, which takes over the role the modular $S$ matrix plays for cuts without…

desk verdict Solid companion paper that makes the explicit Abelian case for half-linking-matrix control of boundary TEE; the advertised universality of Eq. (2.14) is qualified by the paper's own r-dependence in Sec. 3.3. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.07700 v1 pith:X5PQ2BYJ submitted 2019-08-21 hep-th cond-mat.str-elquant-ph

Ce Shen , Jiaqi Lou , Ling-Yan Hung This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thcond-mat.str-elquant-ph
keywords topologicalentanglemententropygappedboundarieshalf-linkingnumberIshibashistatesAbelianChern-Simonstheoryanyoncondensationtwistedcharactersboundaryconformalfield
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks what controls the topological entanglement entropy of a 2+1-dimensional topological phase when the entanglement cut is drawn so that it starts and ends on gapped boundaries, the physical edges where certain anyons condense and cease to be conserved. The authors argue that in that geometry the topological part of the entropy is governed not by the bulk modular $S$ matrix but by the half-linking number $\gamma_{xc}$, the same quantity that diagonalizes defect fusion rules. For a strip whose cut touches two boundaries carrying the same condensate, each cut contributes $-\ln\gamma_{x0}$ to the entropy on top of the area term; when the two boundaries carry different condensates, extra terms such as a $\log\sqrt{2}$ Majorana contribution appear. If correct, this turns boundary data into a computable, geometry-dependent probe of the bulk topological order and extends the Ishibashi-state technology to open systems with physical edges.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the half-linking matrix $\gamma_{xc}$: the transformation between the Wilson-loop basis labelled by confined sectors $x$ and the Wilson-line basis labelled by shared condensed sectors $c$ on a cylinder with two gapped boundaries; in Abelian Chern-Simons theories it equals $S_{xc}/\sqrt{S_{0c}}$, where $S$ is the modular $S$ matrix. This matrix fixes the modular transformation of the twisted characters that appear in the Renyi entropy, and it enters the construction of Cardy-like boundary states $|B_x\rangle=\sum_c (\gamma_{xc}/\sqrt{\gamma_{0c}})|c\rangle_L\otimes|c\rangle_R$, which provide the closed-string picture. The Ishibashi state at each fake cut is the other half of the machinery: it glues the two sides of the cut and produces the reduced density matrix whose trace powers are the twisted characters.

What would settle it

In a lattice realization of the $Z_N$ toric code with electric boundaries at both ends, compute the von Neumann entropy of a strip whose cut touches both boundaries: the claim predicts a topological part of $(1/2)\ln N$ per cut, independent of the microscopic edge term. Alternatively, in the effective edge theory, changing the edge parameter $r$ should shift the entropy by exactly $-N\ln\tilde r$ as in Eq. (3.48); either observation going otherwise would falsify the $\gamma_{xc}$ control.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that, for a cylinder of 2+1-dimensional topological order with gapped boundaries, bi-partitioned by a strip whose vertical entanglement cuts terminate on the boundaries, the reduced density matrix is assembled from Ishibashi states whose trace powers yield twisted characters, and the modular transformation of these characters is governed by the half-linking matrix, $\chi_x(\tilde q)=\sum_c \gamma_{xc}\chi_c(q)$. The topological entanglement entropy is then $-\ln\gamma_{x0}$ per cut when both boundaries share the same condensate, in direct analogy to the role of the modular $S$ matrix in the absence of boundaries. The paper verifies this by explicit open-string quantization of edge modes in the $Z_N$ toric code for electric/magnetic, electric/electric, and magnetic/magnetic boundary conditions (including the extra $\sqrt{2}$ from a Majorana mode in the electric-plus-magnetic case), by constructing closed-string boundary states from $\gamma_{xc}$ that need not be diagonal rational-conformal-field-theory boundary states, and for generic $2\times 2$ $K$-matrix Abelian Chern-Simons theories, where a Poisson-resummation argument identifies the transformation matrix $\sigma_{xc}$ with $\gamma_{xc}$ and proves a condensed-confinement duality. It also shows that the normalization of $\gamma$ can be altered by the edge parameter $r$; the unitary normalization is singled out at the symmetric point $r=1$, and other choices shift the topological entropy by $-N\ln\tilde r$.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that an entanglement cut ending on a gapped boundary behaves exactly like a physical gapped boundary, with a particular symmetric choice of edge normalization; if the cut's endpoint is not pinned by the bulk topological order, the claimed topological entropy is not universal.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For cuts ending on two boundaries with the same condensate, the topological entropy is $-\ln\gamma_{x0}$ per cut; in the $Z_N$ toric code with electric-electric or magnetic-magnetic boundaries this gives $(1/2)\ln N$ per cut, hence $\ln N$ for the strip.
  • When the cut ends on two different condensates (electric and magnetic in $Z_N$), the ground state is unique and a Majorana zero mode at each junction contributes an extra $-\ln\sqrt{2}$, so the topological term is $-\ln 2$ for the strip.
  • The half-linking matrix yields closed-string boundary states for non-diagonal RCFTs, so the Ishibashi/Cardy machinery applies to boundary conditions not captured by diagonal rational conformal field theories.
  • For generic $2\times 2$ $K$-matrix Abelian theories, the same formula holds with $\gamma_{xc}$ identified with the unitary matrix $\sigma_{xc}$ from the lattice resummation; the condensed-confinement duality guarantees the construction is symmetric under swapping condensate and confinate.
  • In the doubled-theory case $B=C\boxtimes\bar C$ with a diagonal Lagrangian algebra, $\gamma_{xc}$ reduces to $S^C_{xc}$, so the boundary-touching formula reproduces the familiar closed-surface result after unfolding.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If boundary-touching topological entanglement is genuinely controlled by $\gamma_{xc}$, then the entropy of an open geometry is a family of boundary-sensitive invariants labelled by pairs of condensates; measuring it on cylinders with different boundary pairs could be used to extract the Lagrangian algebra of an unknown topological phase.
  • The $r$-dependence of the topological term suggests that, in any concrete material, boundary-touching entanglement measures a combination of bulk order and edge-junction data; comparing a measured value with the unitary prediction would test whether the junction sits at the symmetric point.
  • The same twisted-character and half-linking machinery should apply, via the folding trick, to entanglement cuts that pass through gapped interfaces rather than terminate on boundaries; computing interface entanglement this way gives a concrete prediction that lattice simulations can check.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies entanglement entropy in 2+1 dimensional Abelian Chern-Simons theories with gapped boundaries, in the case where the entanglement cut touches or cuts through a physical boundary. The authors argue from bulk-boundary correspondence that the Rényi entropies involve twisted characters, and that the topological contribution to the entanglement entropy is controlled by the half-linking matrix γ_xc, in analogy to the role played by the modular S matrix on closed surfaces. They illustrate the claim with explicit Z_N toric-code examples (electric/magnetic, electric/electric, magnetic/magnetic boundary conditions), a generic 2×2 K-matrix analysis, and an extended Z_pq example. They also construct Ishibashi/Cardy-type states from γ_xc and discuss a condensed-confined duality. The central formula is Eq. (2.14), S_same bc = 2N(cl/12ε − ln γ_x0), and the paper emphasizes that the normalization of γ can be altered by the edge parameter r, shifting the apparent topological entropy by a non-universal amount.

Significance. If the claimed universality held, the paper would establish a boundary analogue of the Kitaev-Preskill/Levin-Wen topological entanglement entropy, replacing the modular S matrix by the half-linking matrix when the cut meets a gapped boundary. The explicit Abelian computations are a real strength: boundary conditions are imposed, modes are quantized, Ishibashi states are constructed, and the modular transformations are performed with Poisson resummation; the e+e and m+m results match the earlier lattice computation [3]. The closed-string picture and the condensed-confined duality are useful and go beyond the existing literature. However, the central universality claim is not established because the normalization of γ, and hence the value of −ln γ_x0, depends on a choice of edge parameter that is not fixed by the bulk topological order; the paper's own Section 3.3 demonstrates this dependence explicitly. The contribution is therefore significant but requires either a proof that the symmetric choice r=1 is forced, or a reformulation of the result as a conditional statement about a chosen junction regularization.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.3, Eq. (3.48)] The central claim expressed in Eq. (2.14), that the topological entanglement entropy for a cut touching a gapped boundary is −ln γ_x0 per cut, is not invariant under the edge parameter r introduced in Appendix A. Equation (3.48) shows γ_xc → γ_xc/√\tilde r and ΔS_EE = −N ln \tilde r, and Appendix A states that V_IJ, hence r, is not fixed by the bulk Chern-Simons action. The paper's own Z_pq construction in Section 3.3 requires r_T = q/p to impose conformal boundary conditions and produces a half-linking matrix with a different normalization from the unitary one in [14]. Until the symmetric choice r=1 is shown to be forced by topological invariance, or the result is restated as conditional on a concrete edge definition, the advertised replacement of the S matrix by the half-linking matrix is not established.
  2. [§3.1, Eq. (3.1)] The computation assumes that the endpoint of the entanglement cut obeys the same conformal boundary condition as a physical gapped boundary, Eq. (3.1), with the normalization r=1. The introduction explicitly acknowledges that the precise treatment at the junction affects the topological entanglement entropy. The recovery of the lattice results [3] for the e+e and m+m cases is strong evidence for those specific boundary conditions, but it does not select the junction condition for general boundaries such as the Z_pq case. The paper should either derive this junction condition from the bulk topological data or state clearly that the resulting −ln γ is a property of a chosen junction regularization rather than a universal topological invariant.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§3.1] The word 'incontractible' appears twice in the paragraph beginning 'In e+e/m+m case GSD=N'; it should be 'non-contractible'.
  2. [§3.3] The quantity \tilde r is defined only as 'the least positive number which makes r\tilde r a perfect square'; this definition is ambiguous for general rational r and should be stated explicitly, for example in terms of the squarefree part of r.
  3. [§3.0.1] The convention for q changes between Eq. (2.3), where q = exp(iτ) with τ = i2πϵ/l, and the discussion after Eq. (3.9), where q is set to exp(−8πϵ/2l); the factor of 2 from the closed-string doubling should be explained more prominently to avoid confusion.
  4. [§3.0.1] The phrase 'the Majorana mode supposedly trapped at the junction' is informal; since the trapping is a stated physical result, either cite the proof or phrase it as a claim to be established.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No construction-level circularity: the half-linking matrix and the boundary topological entanglement entropy are independently derived from edge-mode quantization in the Abelian examples, though the general framework relies on companion self-citations and the paper itself exposes an r-dependent normalization caveat.

full rationale

The central result (2.14) is not an input restated as a prediction. For the same-condensate Abelian cases, the paper starts from the conformal boundary conditions at the entanglement cut (Eq 3.1), quantizes the resulting open-string modes, constructs the Ishibashi state, and obtains the twisted character by Poisson resummation (Eq 3.23). The coefficient of the modular transformation is then computed to be gamma_xc = S_xc / sqrt(S_0c) (Eqs 3.21, 3.26, 3.44-3.47), so the entropy formula (2.14) is a derived consequence rather than a definition. The half-linking matrix and the defect Verlinde formula are taken from the same group's companion paper [14] (Eqs 2.6-2.10), and this is a genuine self-citation; however, in the Abelian sector the paper rederives gamma independently from the K-matrix data, and the cited defect Verlinde formula is a mathematical lemma whose assumptions do not include the target entropy. The lattice comparison in Section 3.0.2 is a consistency check with a different construction, not a fitted input. Section 3.3 is important: Eq (3.48) shows that changing the edge parameter r rescales gamma and shifts the claimed topological entanglement entropy by -N ln tilde r, and the Z_pq example gives a half-linking matrix with non-unitary normalization. This is a non-universality or correctness caveat about the central claim, not a circularity, because the computation is not using the target answer as an input. Overall, no equation reduces to its own input by construction; the score reflects the reliance on companion self-citations and the unresolved normalization ambiguity.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The calculations assume standard anyon condensation and boundary CFT machinery. The main non-trivial input not rederived in this paper is the defect Verlinde formula and half-linking matrix from the same authors' companion paper [14]; in the Abelian examples these are computed independently, but the general claim inherits their correctness. The edge parameter r is a genuine free parameter that shifts the final entropy, which is the paper's own acknowledged non-universality.

free parameters (1)
  • r (edge velocity ratio) = r=1 in main Z_N computations; r_K=1, r_T=q/p in the Z_pq example
    The matrix V in the boundary action (A.4) is not determined by the bulk Chern-Simons action; only the ratio r^2=V22/V11 enters. The paper chooses the symmetric point r=1 to make γ unitary. Eq (3.48) shows a different r rescales γ and shifts the topological entanglement entropy by -N ln \tilde r.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Gapped boundaries are characterized by a Lagrangian algebra A of condensed anyons.
    Used throughout Section 2 and Appendix A.1 to construct boundary conditions and conformal boundary states.
  • domain assumption The defect Verlinde formula and half-linking matrix of Shen and Hung [14] are correct.
    Invoked at Eq (2.10) and (3.25) to convert boundary-state overlaps into twisted characters; not proved in this paper and is a same-author citation.
  • domain assumption An entanglement cut can be treated as a fake physical boundary and glued with an Ishibashi state, even when the cut ends on a gapped boundary.
    Core strategy of Section 2.1; underlies Eq (2.2)-(2.3). Plausible in the bulk-boundary correspondence picture but not derived from a lattice or a TQFT path integral.
  • ad hoc to paper The junction of the cut and the gapped boundary obeys the same conformal boundary condition as a physical boundary, with the normalization r=1.
    Eq (3.1) imposes physical boundary conditions at the cut endpoints. Section 3.3 shows varying r changes the γ normalization and the entropy, so this choice is not forced by the bulk theory.
  • domain assumption The folding trick maps interfaces between topological orders to gapped boundaries.
    Invoked in Section 2 to justify studying boundaries rather than interfaces; a standard CFT/TQFT tool.
  • standard math Standard modular transformation properties of eta and theta functions and the Poisson resummation formula.
    Used throughout the character computations; collected in Appendices D and E.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Ishibashi States, Topological Orders with Boundaries and Topological Entanglement Entropy II -- Cutting through the boundary." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/X5PQ2BYJ

@misc{pith2026190807700,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Ishibashi States, Topological Orders with Boundaries and Topological Entanglement Entropy II -- Cutting through the boundary},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/X5PQ2BYJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.07700}
}
read the original abstract

We compute the entanglement entropy in a 2+1 dimensional topological order in the presence of gapped boundaries. Specifically, we consider entanglement cuts that cut through the boundaries. We argue that based on general considerations of the bulk-boundary correspondence, the "twisted characters" feature in the Renyi entropy, and the topological entanglement entropy is controlled by a "half-linking number" in direct analogy to the role played by the S-modular matrix in the absence of boundaries. We also construct a class of boundary states based on the half-linking numbers that provides a "closed-string" picture complementing an "open-string" computation of the entanglement entropy. These boundary states do not correspond to diagonal RCFT's in general. These are illustrated in specific Abelian Chern-Simons theories with appropriate boundary conditions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.07700 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Ground state basis states on a cylinder. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. “Open string” modes in the folded picture and “closed string” modes in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. KΩµν and Ωµν are invariant subspaces of AAT From (3.27,3.33 and 3.34) we can also derive Ω T µνK−1Ωµν = 0 (3.35) It is easily observed here that the “confined direction” Ωµν indeed satisfies the equation for “condensed direction” (3.35). For a fixed bulk topological order, the condensate M and confinate N for some boundary(given by boundary condensate M) become the confinate and condensate respectively for another b… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: 1D sublattices of the charge lattice Z 2 we have (see appendix E) X m∈x+Γ exp(−πmTAATm) = 1 µ(Γ)p p(A) X m∈Γ? exp(−πmT (AAT ) −1m + 2πix Tm) = 1 µ(Γ)p p(A) X n∈KΓ? exp(−πn T K−1 (AAT ) −1K−1n + 2πix T K−1n) = 1 µ(Γ)p p(A) X c∈C X n∈c+Γ˜ exp(−πn TAATn + 2πix T K−1 c) = …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The 4 boundary condensates of D(S3) Dijkgraaf-Witten model, related by the C ↔ F duality and the condensed-confined duality. D η and θ functions We list here the definitions and basic properties of Dedekind η−function and Jacobi θ−function. η(τ ) = q 1 24 Y∞ n=1 (1 − q…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 13 canonical work pages

  1. [3]

    Entanglement Entropy of Topological Orders with Boundaries

    C. Chen, L.-Y. Hung, Y. Li, and Y. Wan, “Entanglement Entropy of Topological Orders with Boundaries,” arXiv:1804.05725 [cond-mat, physics:hep-th] (Apr., 2018) . http://arxiv.org/abs/1804.05725. 00001 arXiv: 1804.05725

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

  2. [14]

    A Defect Verlinde Formula

    C. Shen and L.-Y. Hung, “A defect verlinde formula,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.08285 (2019)

    work page Pith review arXiv 2019

  3. [1]

    Tunneling Topological Vacua via Extended Operators: (Spin-)TQFT Spectra and Boundary Deconfinement in Various Dimensions,

    J. Wang, K. Ohmori, P. Putrov, Y. Zheng, Z. Wan, M. Guo, H. Lin, P. Gao, and S.-T. Yau, “Tunneling Topological Vacua via Extended Operators: (Spin-)TQFT Spectra and Boundary Deconfinement in Various Dimensions,” PTEP 2018 no. 5, (2018) 053A01, arXiv:1801.05416 [cond-mat.str-el]

    arXiv 2018

  4. [2]

    Characterizing topological order by the information convex,

    B. Shi and Y.-M. Lu, “Characterizing topological order by the information convex,” Phys. Rev. B99 no. 3, (2019) 035112, arXiv:1801.01519 [cond-mat.str-el]

    arXiv 2019

  5. [4]

    Seeing topological entanglement through the information convex,

    B. Shi, “Seeing topological entanglement through the information convex,” arXiv:1810.01986 [cond-mat.str-el]

    arXiv

  6. [5]

    Ishibashi states, topological orders with boundaries and topological entanglement entropy. part i,

    J. Lou, C. Shen, and L.-Y. Hung, “Ishibashi states, topological orders with boundaries and topological entanglement entropy. part i,” Journal of High Energy Physics 2019 no. 4, (2019) 17

    work page 2019

  7. [6]

    Entanglement Entropy, Quantum Fluctuations, and Thermal Entropy in Topological Phases

    Y. Hu and Y. Wan, “Entanglement Entropy, Quantum Fluctuations, and Thermal Entropy in Topological Phases,” JHEP 05 (2019) 110, arXiv:1901.09033 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2019

  8. [7]

    Correspondence between bulk entanglement and boundary excitation spectra in 2d gapped topological phases

    Z.-X. Luo, B. G. Pankovich, Y. Hu, and Y.-S. Wu, “Correspondence between bulk entanglement and boundary excitation spectra in two-dimensional gapped topological phases,” Phys. Rev. B99 no. 20, (2019) 205137, arXiv:1806.07794 [cond-mat.str-el]. 35

    work page Pith review arXiv 2019

Show all 36 references
  1. [8]

    The Quantum Double Model with Boundary: Condensations and Symmetries,

    S. Beigi, P. W. Shor, and D. Whalen, “The Quantum Double Model with Boundary: Condensations and Symmetries,” Communications in Mathematical Physics 306 no. 3, (Sept., 2011) 663–694. http://arxiv.org/abs/1006.5479. 00092 arXiv: 1006.5479

    2011 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Topological Quantum Computation with Gapped Boundaries,

    I. Cong, M. Cheng, and Z. Wang, “Topological Quantum Computation with Gapped Boundaries,” arXiv:1609.02037 [cond-mat, physics:quant-ph] (Sept., 2016) . http://arxiv.org/abs/1609.02037. arXiv: 1609.02037

    2016 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Boundary Hamiltonian theory for gapped topological phases on an open surface,

    Y. Hu, Z.-X. Luo, R. Pankovich, Y. Wan, and Y.-S. Wu, “Boundary Hamiltonian theory for gapped topological phases on an open surface,” JHEP 01 (2018) 134, arXiv:1706.03329 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2018 arXiv

  4. [11]

    From effective Hamiltonian to anomaly inflow in topological orders with boundaries,

    Y. Hu, Y. Wan, and Y.-S. Wu, “From effective Hamiltonian to anomaly inflow in topological orders with boundaries,” JHEP 08 (2018) 092, arXiv:1706.09782 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2018 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Gapped Boundary Theory of the Twisted Gauge Theory Model of Three-Dimensional Topological Orders,

    H. Wang, Y. Li, Y. Hu, and Y. Wan, “Gapped Boundary Theory of the Twisted Gauge Theory Model of Three-Dimensional Topological Orders,” JHEP 10 (2018) 114, arXiv:1807.11083 [cond-mat.str-el] . [JHEP18,114(2020)]

    2018 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Generalised twisted partition functions,

    V. B. Petkova and J.-B. Zuber, “Generalised twisted partition functions,” Physics Letters B 504 no. 1-2, (Apr., 2001) 157–164. http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0011021. 00164 arXiv: hep-th/0011021

    2001 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Topological entanglement entropy in Chern-Simons theories and quantum Hall fluids,

    S. Dong, E. Fradkin, R. G. Leigh, and S. Nowling, “Topological entanglement entropy in Chern-Simons theories and quantum Hall fluids,” Journal of High Energy Physics 2008 no. 05, (2008) 016. http://stacks.iop.org/1126-6708/2008/i=05/a=016. 00126

    2008

  8. [16]

    Interface Contributions to Topological Entanglement in Abelian Chern-Simons Theory,

    J. R. Fliss, X. Wen, O. Parrikar, C.-T. Hsieh, B. Han, T. L. Hughes, and R. G. Leigh, “Interface Contributions to Topological Entanglement in Abelian Chern-Simons Theory,” Journal of High Energy Physics 2017 no. 9, (Sept., 2017) . http://arxiv.org/abs/1705.09611. 00012 arXiv: ...

    2017 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Edge theory approach to topological entanglement entropy, mutual information and entanglement negativity in Chern-Simons theories,

    X. Wen, S. Matsuura, and S. Ryu, “Edge theory approach to topological entanglement entropy, mutual information and entanglement negativity in Chern-Simons theories,” Physical Review B 93 no. 24, (June, 2016) . http://arxiv.org/abs/1603.08534. 00031 arXiv: 1603.08534

    2016 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Theory of defects in Abelian topological states,

    M. Barkeshli, C.-M. Jian, and X.-L. Qi, “Theory of defects in Abelian topological states,” Phys. Rev. B88 (2013) 235103, arXiv:1305.7203 [cond-mat.str-el] . 36

    2013 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Gapped Domain Walls, Gapped Boundaries and Topological Degeneracy,

    T. Lan, J. Wang, and X.-G. Wen, “Gapped Domain Walls, Gapped Boundaries and Topological Degeneracy,” Physical Review Letters 114 no. 7, (Feb., 2015) . http://arxiv.org/abs/1408.6514. arXiv: 1408.6514

    2015 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Blumenhagen and E

    R. Blumenhagen and E. Plauschinn, Introduction to conformal field theory: with applications to string theory. No. 779 in Lecture notes in physics. Springer, Dordrecht ; New York, 2009. OCLC: ocn310400947

    2009

  13. [21]

    Topological boundary conditions in abelian Chern-Simons theory,

    A. Kapustin and N. Saulina, “Topological boundary conditions in abelian Chern-Simons theory,” Nuclear Physics B 845 no. 3, (Apr., 2011) 393–435. http://arxiv.org/abs/1008.0654. 00075 arXiv: 1008.0654

    2011 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Protected edge modes without symmetry,

    M. Levin, “Protected edge modes without symmetry,” Physical Review X 3 no. 2, (May, 2013) . http://arxiv.org/abs/1301.7355. 00109 arXiv: 1301.7355

    2013 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Boundary degeneracy of topological order,

    J. C. Wang and X.-G. Wen, “Boundary degeneracy of topological order,” Physical Review B 91 no. 12, (Mar., 2015) . https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.91.125124. 00041

    2015 doi

  16. [24]

    Topological orders and Edge excitations in FQH states,

    X.-G. Wen, “Topological orders and Edge excitations in FQH states,” Advances in Physics 44 no. 5, (Oct., 1995) 405–473. http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/9506066. 00002 arXiv: cond-mat/9506066

    1995 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Hopf symmetry breaking and confinement in (2+1)-dimensional gauge theory,

    F. A. Bais, B. J. Schroers, and J. K. Slingerland, “Hopf symmetry breaking and confinement in (2+1)-dimensional gauge theory,” JHEP 05 (2003) 068, arXiv:hep-th/0205114 [hep-th]

    2003 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Broken quantum symmetry and confinement phases in planar physics,

    F. A. Bais, B. J. Schroers, and J. K. Slingerland, “Broken quantum symmetry and confinement phases in planar physics,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 (2002) 181601, arXiv:hep-th/0205117 [hep-th]

    2002 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Condensate-induced transitions between topologically ordered phases,

    F. A. Bais and J. K. Slingerland, “Condensate-induced transitions between topologically ordered phases,” Physical Review B 79 no. 4, (Jan., 2009) 045316. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.79.045316

    2009 doi

  20. [28]

    A Theory of topological edges and domain walls,

    F. A. Bais, J. K. Slingerland, and S. M. Haaker, “A Theory of topological edges and domain walls,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (2009) 220403, arXiv:0812.4596 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    2009 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Classification of Topological Defects in Abelian Topological States,

    M. Barkeshli, C.-M. Jian, and X.-L. Qi, “Classification of Topological Defects in Abelian Topological States,” Physical Review B 88 no. 24, (Dec., 2013) . http://arxiv.org/abs/1304.7579. 00058 arXiv: 1304.7579

    2013 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Anyon condensation and tensor categories,

    L. Kong, “Anyon condensation and tensor categories,” Nucl. Phys. B886 (2014) 436–482, arXiv:1307.8244 [cond-mat.str-el] . 37

    2014 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Bicategories for boundary conditions and for surface defects in 3-d tft,

    J. Fuchs, C. Schweigert, and A. Valentino, “Bicategories for boundary conditions and for surface defects in 3-d tft,” Communications in Mathematical Physics 321 no. 2, (2013) 543–575

    2013

  24. [32]

    Ground State Degeneracy of Topological Phases on Open Surfaces,

    L.-Y. Hung and Y. Wan, “Ground State Degeneracy of Topological Phases on Open Surfaces,” Physical Review Letters 114 no. 7, (Feb., 2015) . http://arxiv.org/abs/1408.0014. 00031 arXiv: 1408.0014

    2015 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Generalized ADE Classification of Gapped Domain Walls,

    L.-Y. Hung and Y. Wan, “Generalized ADE Classification of Gapped Domain Walls,” Journal of High Energy Physics 2015 no. 7, (July, 2015) . http://arxiv.org/abs/1502.02026. 00006 arXiv: 1502.02026

    2015 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Boundary conditions, fusion rules and the Verlinde formula,

    J. L. Cardy, “Boundary conditions, fusion rules and the Verlinde formula,” Nuclear Physics B 324 no. 3, (Oct., 1989) 581–596. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/055032138990521X. 01113

    1989

  27. [35]

    Boundary Conformal Field Theory,

    J. Cardy, “Boundary Conformal Field Theory,” arXiv:hep-th/0411189 (Nov., 2004) . http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0411189. 00339 arXiv: hep-th/0411189

    2004 arXiv

  28. [36]

    J. P. Serre, Cours d’arithmetique. 1994. 38

    1994

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.