Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 132 references

Physiological and Affective Computing through Thermal Imaging: A Survey

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This survey makes the case that thermal images of the skin can be read as physiological signals—respiratory, cardiovascular, perspiratory, muscular—and that low-cost mobile thermal cameras can move this contactless affective sensing from…

desk verdict A useful survey with a real methodological service (the CAND re-analysis), but its own headline 99.7% number is reported without the subject-independent validation the paper itself demands. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.10307 v1 pith:FBPRWAKQ submitted 2019-08-27 cs.HC cs.CV

Youngjun Cho , Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.HCcs.CV
keywords thermalimagingthermographyaffectivecomputingphysiologicalmentalstressskintemperaturerespirationmonitoringmobilecameras
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This survey argues that thermal images of the skin can be read as physiological signals—cardiovascular, respiratory, perspiratory, and muscular—and that these signals can be linked to affective states such as stress, fear, startle, and love. Its central claim is that a pipeline of region-of-interest selection, automatic tracking, spatial interpretation, and metric extraction turns thermograms into affective measurements. The paper further claims that new low-cost, small thermal cameras make this monitoring possible outside the lab, in mobile and real-world settings. A reader should care because contactless temperature-based monitoring could serve applications from stress-aware workstations to healthcare monitoring without requiring worn sensors or good lighting.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is the four-stage computational pipeline proposed and reviewed by the paper: (1) region-of-interest (ROI) selection on skin, such as the nose tip, nostrils, perinasal area, or finger; (2) automatic ROI tracking, using methods such as the thermal gradient flow (TGF) tracker and 'optimal quantization' that adapts the temperature-to-image mapping against environmental temperature drift; (3) spatial interpretation, typically averaging temperatures over the ROI or integrating thermal voxels; and (4) metrics and features, from simple temperature directional change and slope to variability metrics and the respiration variability spectrogram. The key mechanism is that blood-flow regulation, sweating, breathing airflow, and muscle activity each leave distinctive temperature patterns on the skin that can be separated by choosing the right ROI and interpretation method.

What would settle it

Take a low-cost mobile thermal camera to a humid outdoor site (e.g., a seaside or near a pool) on a hot day, have a person breathe at a known pace, and compare the pipeline's estimated breathing rate against a chest belt; if the correlation drops markedly or the face region cannot be tracked, the central claim of ubiquitous mobile thermal imaging is not supported.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that thermography of the human skin carries multiple physiological signatures that can be computationally linked to affective states: vasoconstriction and vasodilation change skin temperature (notably at the nose tip), sweat gland activation changes perinasal and finger temperatures, the breathing cycle changes nostril and mouth temperatures, and facial muscle contractions change local temperatures. The survey establishes a computational and methodological pipeline—ROI selection, automatic ROI tracking, spatial interpretation, and metric/feature computation—that connects raw thermal video to physiological time series and then to affective labels. It concludes that low-cost mobile thermal cameras, despite lower resolution and unstable sampling rates, are sufficient for many of these measurements, and that recent work has already demonstrated robust respiratory tracking and automatic stress recognition in unconstrained outdoor conditions.

Load-bearing premise

The promise of mobile thermal imaging in everyday settings depends on the assumption that automatic region tracking and temperature handling stay accurate outside the tested conditions—the authors note that swimming pools, the seaside, humidity, extreme heat, and other climates have not been covered; if that tracking fails there, the central claim of ubiquitous mobile thermal sensing is weakened.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Nose-tip temperature drops have been observed across independent studies of mental stress, fear, and cognitive load, making thermal directional change a candidate non-contact stress indicator.
  • Respiratory rate can be extracted from nostril ROI temperatures with very high correlation to a reference belt (r=0.9987) even when the person is walking outdoors or climbing stairs using a low-cost camera.
  • Automatic affect recognition from thermal signatures is possible: a deep-learning system using a respiration variability spectrogram achieved 84.59% accuracy in leave-one-subject-out stress detection.
  • Perspiratory activity, measured from perinasal and finger regions, correlates strongly (r up to 0.968) with standard electrodermal activity sensors, offering a contactless proxy for sympathetic arousal.
  • Because thermal imaging is insensitive to ambient light and does not require skin contact, it is a practical alternative to remote PPG and worn sensors in dark or healthcare settings.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The pipeline's logic could extend beyond the affective states reviewed: the same ROI-tracking and interpretation machinery might be reused for continuous health metrics such as fever screening, dehydration, or respiratory-rate monitoring in daily life.
  • If standard evaluation metrics (Pearson correlation, leave-one-subject-out cross-validation) were uniformly adopted, several optimistic accuracy reports in the literature would likely be revised downward—including the field's own cardiac-pulse estimates—refocusing research on signal quality.
  • Combining thermal cameras with a standard RGB camera could stabilise ROI tracking in extreme humidity or heat, but the added hardware and computation may undercut the portability that makes mobile thermal sensing attractive, so a purely thermal solution remains the key engineering target.
  • The privacy profile of thermal imaging—it does not capture facial identity under ordinary use—could make it the preferred unobtrusive sensing modality in sensitive settings like bedrooms, locker rooms, and hospitals, a consequence the survey implies but does not develop.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This survey reviews the literature on thermal imaging for physiological and affective computing, with the stated aim of establishing computational and methodological pipelines from thermal images of the skin to affective states, and with a particular emphasis on mobile, low-cost thermal cameras for real-world applications. The paper organizes the literature around four physiological thermal signatures (cardiovascular, perspiratory, respiratory, and muscular), summarizes experimental protocols and system specifications in tables, and discusses challenges such as ROI tracking, ambient temperature variation, and evaluation methodology. It also makes prescriptive claims, including a recommendation for leave-one-subject-out (LOSO) cross-validation and a critique of nonstandard metrics such as CAND.

Significance. If the findings are reliable, this survey provides a useful systematization of a scattered and methodologically heterogeneous literature. It performs a service by flagging nonstandard evaluation metrics, highlighting contradictory results (e.g., chin temperature responses in stress), and identifying the need for subject-independent evaluation. The emphasis on mobile thermal imaging and the promise of open-source tooling and datasets are valuable for the community. However, the paper's central claim depends on several quantitative claims from the authors' own prior work, and one of those claims—the 99.7% k-fold accuracy—directly conflicts with the paper's own methodological guidance, weakening the survey's credibility as a neutral assessment.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.2] The reported 99.7% accuracy from a 10-fold cross-validation of the DeepBreath system is presented as evidence supporting the state-of-the-art claim, but the paper does not specify whether folds were split by participant. Given the paper's own warning in §4.3 that non-LOSO k-fold cross-validation can produce 'artificially high results due to training and testing a machine learning model on temporally adjacent samples,' this figure is likely inflated by subject leakage and is not directly comparable to the 84.59% LOSO result. The authors should either provide a subject-independent evaluation with full splitting details or remove the 99.7% figure from the claim.
  2. [§4.3 and §5] The survey promises the release of the TIPA open-source toolkit ('Following this review, we release an open-source toolkit for Thermal Imaging-based Physiological and Affective computing'), but the manuscript does not provide a working URL, repository, or documentation for this toolkit. Without the actual release, the central claim of establishing computational and methodological pipelines cannot be independently verified. The authors should either provide the toolkit and a stable link, or remove the promise and temper the corresponding contribution statement.
  3. [§2.2] The re-analysis of Hamedani et al. reports a Pearson correlation of r=0.58 between the thermal-imaging heart-rate estimates and reference PPG signals, but the aggregation procedure is not described: it is unclear whether this is a per-participant average, a pooled correlation, or computed over a specific time window. The critique of the CAND metric is well taken, but the quantitative re-analysis should be specified so that the reader can assess its validity.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§2.4] The sentence 'the work reported in [74] achieved strong correlations of sequential respiratory rates with the ground truth (r=0.974)' appears to cite the tone-mapping paper by Ledda et al.; according to Table 2, the r=0.974 result is from Pereira et al. [93]. Please correct the citation.
  2. [§4.3] The statement 'Following this review, we release an open-source toolkit' is ambiguous about timing and availability; if the toolkit is not yet released, rephrase to avoid promising a resource that is not accessible at the time of publication.
  3. [§3.2] If the 99.7% accuracy is retained after subject-independent evaluation, the authors should also report the standard deviation across folds and clarify that the 10-fold and LOSO results are not directly comparable.
  4. [Table 4] The use of bold brackets to indicate values that are lower than the system's specifications is not explained in the table caption; a brief note would help the reader interpret the table.
  5. [§2.2] The phrase 'average purse rate' appears to be a typo for 'average pulse rate'; please correct it.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

The survey's review content is largely independently grounded, but the 99.7% k-fold accuracy in §3.2 is a self-reported re-analysis that the paper's own §4.3 LOSO warning identifies as artificially high, making the DeepBreath state-of-the-art claim partially circular.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 3.2, 'Automated affect recognition'; contrasted with Section 4.3, 'Evaluation, Datasets and Toolkits']
    "The reported accuracy was 84.59% ... achieved from a k-fold leave-one-subject-out (LOSO) cross validation. ... Using the released dataset and system (http://youngjuncho.com/datasets), we tested the approach using the k-fold cross validation (k=10) and the accuracy was 99.7%. ... In the classification on human physiological data, LOSO cross validation has been strongly recommended to avoid artificially high results due to training and testing a machine learning model on temporally adjacent samples [15,29,53]."

    The survey's quantitative evidence that DeepBreath is state-of-the-art rests on a 10-fold CV re-analysis of the authors' own released system and dataset. The paper itself states that non-LOSO k-fold on human physiological data produces 'artificially high results due to training and testing a machine learning model on temporally adjacent samples.' Random 10-fold CV can place temporally adjacent clips from the same participant in both training and test folds, so the 99.7% figure is an artifact of the split construction rather than an independent estimate. It is then used to support the claim that the respiration-variability pipeline achieves state-of-the-art performance, so the evidence chain reduces to a self-evaluation that the paper's own methodological guidance identifies as unreliable.

full rationale

This paper is a survey rather than a derivation, so most of its content is a review of published evidence. The core existence claim—that thermal imaging can measure cardiovascular, respiratory, perspiratory, and muscular signatures linked to affective states—is supported by many external studies (Pavlidis, Engert, Or and Duffy, Lewis, Pereira, etc.), not by the authors' own results. The mobile and unconstrained portions lean more heavily on the authors' prior work (Cho et al. 2012-2019), but those works are peer-reviewed and at least one dataset is released, so heavy self-citation alone is not circular. The one substantive circular step is the 99.7% k-fold accuracy reported in §3.2: it is a re-analysis of the authors' own DeepBreath system using 10-fold CV, directly contradicting the survey's own §4.3 recommendation that LOSO is needed to avoid artificially high results from temporally adjacent samples. That figure is not an independent prediction; it is forced by the non-subject-independent split, and it is used to bolster the claim that the pipeline is state-of-the-art. The §4.2 acknowledgement that mobile experiments cannot cover all real-world scenarios is an honest scope limitation, and the promised TIPA toolkit, while not verifiable from the manuscript, affects reproducibility rather than circularity. Overall, the survey's central review claim retains independent content, but the DeepBreath accuracy evidence is partially circular due to the internally flagged evaluation flaw.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The survey introduces no free parameters and no invented entities. Its conclusions rest on three domain assumptions about physiology, experimental induction of affect, and the adequacy of low-cost thermal hardware, plus standard physiological background knowledge.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Skin temperature changes captured by thermal cameras directly reflect underlying physiological processes such as vasoconstriction, vasodilation, and sweat gland activation.
    This mapping is the physiological foundation for all reviewed thermal signatures and is used throughout Sections 2.2 to 2.4 without independent verification in the survey.
  • domain assumption The experimental protocols reviewed, such as the Trier Social Stress Test and IAPS picture viewing, reliably induce the target affective states and their thermal responses generalize across individuals.
    Section 3 depends on this assumption for connecting temperature directional changes to stress, fear, love, and other states, yet the survey itself documents inconsistent results across studies.
  • domain assumption Low-cost mobile thermal cameras with specifications such as those in Table 1 (e.g., NETD below 0.1 °C and sampling rates below 9 Hz) are sufficient for extracting the physiological signatures of interest.
    The real-world mobile imaging argument in Section 1.3 relies on this sufficiency, but Table 4 shows that most prior studies used cameras with higher specifications, so the adequacy of low-end hardware is not established.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Physiological and Affective Computing through Thermal Imaging: A Survey." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FBPRWAKQ

@misc{pith2026190810307,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Physiological and Affective Computing through Thermal Imaging: A Survey},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FBPRWAKQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.10307}
}
read the original abstract

Thermal imaging-based physiological and affective computing is an emerging research area enabling technologies to monitor our bodily functions and understand psychological and affective needs in a contactless manner. However, up to recently, research has been mainly carried out in very controlled lab settings. As small size and even low-cost versions of thermal video cameras have started to appear on the market, mobile thermal imaging is opening its door to ubiquitous and real-world applications. Here we review the literature on the use of thermal imaging to track changes in physiological cues relevant to affective computing and the technological requirements set so far. In doing so, we aim to establish computational and methodological pipelines from thermal images of the human skin to affective states and outline the research opportunities and challenges to be tackled to make ubiquitous real-life thermal imaging-based affect monitoring a possibility.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

132 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Abbas, Konrad Heimann, Katrin Jergus, Thorsten Orlikowsky, and Steffen Leonhardt

    Abbas K. Abbas, Konrad Heimann, Katrin Jergus, Thorsten Orlikowsky, and Steffen Leonhardt

  2. [2]

    Yomna Abdelrahman, Eduardo Velloso, Tilman Dingler, Albrecht Schmidt, and Frank Vetere. 2017. Cognitive heat: exploring the usage of thermal imaging to unobtrusively estimate cognitive load. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 1, 3 (2017), 33

    2017

  3. [3]

    Miika Aittala, Tim Weyrich, and Jaakko Lehtinen. 2015. Two-shot SVBRDF capture for stationary materials. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) - Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 2015 34, 4 (2015), 110–122. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2766967

    doi:10.1145/2766967 2015

  4. [4]

    Fatema Akbar, Ayse Elvan Bayraktaroglu, Pradeep Buddharaju, Dennis Rodrigo Da Cunha Silva, Ge Gao, Ted Grover, Ricardo Gutierrez-Osuna, Nathan Cooper Jones, Gloria Mark, Ioannis Pavlidis, Kevin Storer, Zelun Wang, Amanveer Wesley, and Shaila Zaman. 2019. Email Makes You Sweat: Examining Email Interruptions and Stress Using Thermal Imaging. In Proceedings ...

    arXiv 2019

  5. [5]

    Ane Alberdi, Asier Aztiria, and Adrian Basarab. 2016. Towards an automatic early stress recognition system for office environments based on multimodal measurements: A review. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 59, (February 2016), 49–75. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2015.11.007

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2015.11.007 2016

  6. [6]

    George Bebis, Aglika Gyaourova, Saurabh Singh, and Ioannis Pavlidis. 2006. Face recognition by fusing thermal infrared and visible imagery. Image and Vision Computing 24, 7 (July 2006), 727–

    2006

  7. [7]

    Frank Birklein. 2005. Complex regional pain syndrome. J Neurol 252, 2 (February 2005), 131–138. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-005-0737-8

    work page doi:10.1007/s00415-005-0737-8 2005

  8. [8]

    Thirimachos Bourlai, Pradeep Buddharaju, Ioannis Pavlidis, and Barbara Bass. 2009. On enhancing cardiac pulse measurements through thermal imaging. In 2009 9th International Conference on Information Technology and Applications in Biomedicine, 1–4

    2009

Show all 132 references
  1. [9]

    Mihai Burzo, Mohamed Abouelenien, Verónica Pérez-Rosas, Cakra Wicaksono, Yong Tao, and Rada Mihalcea. 2014. Using infrared thermography and biosensors to detect thermal discomfort in a building’s inhabitants. In ASME 2014 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Expos...

    2014

  2. [10]

    Daniela Cardone, Paola Pinti, and Arcangelo Merla. 2015. Thermal Infrared Imaging-Based Computational Psychophysiology for Psychometrics. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/984353

    2015 doi

  3. [11]

    Y. Cho, N. Bianchi-Berthouze, S. J. Julier, and N. Marquardt. 2017. ThermSense: Smartphone-based breathing sensing platform using noncontact low-cost thermal camera. In 2017 Seventh International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction Workshops and Demos...

    2017

  4. [12]

    Youngjun Cho, Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze, and Simon J. Julier. 2017. DeepBreath: Deep Learning of Breathing Patterns for Automatic Stress Recognition using Low-Cost Thermal Imaging in Unconstrained Settings. In the 7th International Conference on Affective Computing and Intellige...

    2017

  5. [13]

    Youngjun Cho, Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze, Nicolai Marquardt, and Simon J. Julier. 2018. Deep Thermal Imaging: Proximate Material Type Recognition in the Wild Through Deep Learning of Spatial Surface Temperature Patterns. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors ...

    2018

  6. [14]

    Youngjun Cho, Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze, Manuel Oliveira, Catherine Holloway, and Simon Julier

  7. [15]

    Julier, and Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze

    Youngjun Cho, Simon J. Julier, and Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze. 2019. Instant Stress: Detection of Perceived Mental Stress Through Smartphone Photoplethysmography and Thermal Imaging. JMIR Mental Health 6, 4 (2019), e10140. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2196/10140

    2019 doi

  8. [16]

    Julier, Nicolai Marquardt, and Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze

    Youngjun Cho, Simon J. Julier, Nicolai Marquardt, and Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze. 2017. Robust tracking of respiratory rate in high-dynamic range scenes using mobile thermal imaging. Biomed. Opt. Express, BOE 8, 10 (October 2017), 4480–4503. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.8.004480

    2017 doi

  9. [17]

    Youngjun Cho, Sunuk Kim, and Munchae Joung. 2016. Proximity Sensor and Control Method Thereof. US Patent, patent number: 20160061588

    2016

  10. [18]

    Chen, and Thomas S

    Ira Cohen, Nicu Sebe, Ashutosh Garg, Lawrence S. Chen, and Thomas S. Huang. 2003. Facial expression recognition from video sequences: temporal and static modeling. Computer Vision and image understanding 91, 1–2 (2003), 160–187

    2003

  11. [19]

    Coşar, Zhi Yan, Feng Zhao, Tryphon Lambrou, Shigang Yue, and Nicola Bellotto

    S. Coşar, Zhi Yan, Feng Zhao, Tryphon Lambrou, Shigang Yue, and Nicola Bellotto. 2018. Thermal Camera Based Physiological Monitoring with an Assistive Robot. In 2018 40th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 5010–5013

    2018

  12. [20]

    Adair Crawford. 1788. Experiments and observations on animal heat and the inflammation of combustible bodies. Johnson

  13. [21]

    Di Giacinto, M

    A. Di Giacinto, M. Brunetti, G. Sepede, A. Ferretti, and A. Merla. 2014. Thermal signature of fear conditioning in mild post traumatic stress disorder. Neuroscience 266, (April 2014), 216–223. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.02.009

    2014 doi

  14. [22]

    Di Stasi

    Carolina Diaz-Piedra, Emilo Gomez-Milan, and Leandro L. Di Stasi. 2019. Nasal skin temperature reveals changes in arousal levels due to time on task: An experimental thermal infrared imaging study. Applied Ergonomics 81, (November 2019), 102870. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.a...

    2019 doi

  15. [23]

    Horatio Donkin. 1879. On Some Cases of Abnormally High Temperature. Br Med J 2, 990 (December 1879), 983–984. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.2.990.983

    doi

  16. [24]

    Pavlidis, and Panagiotis Tsiamyrtzis

    Jonathan Dowdall, Ioannis T. Pavlidis, and Panagiotis Tsiamyrtzis. 2007. Coalitional tracking. Computer Vision and Image Understanding 106, 2–3 (May 2007), 205–219. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cviu.2006.08.011

    2007 doi

  17. [25]

    Ebisch, Tiziana Aureli, Daniela Bafunno, Daniela Cardone, Gian Luca Romani, and Arcangelo Merla

    Sjoerd J. Ebisch, Tiziana Aureli, Daniela Bafunno, Daniela Cardone, Gian Luca Romani, and Arcangelo Merla. 2012. Mother and child in synchrony: Thermal facial imprints of autonomic contagion. Biological Psychology 89, 1 (January 2012), 123–129. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bi...

    2012 doi

  18. [26]

    P Ekman and WV Friesen. 1977. Facial Action Coding System. Consulting Psychologists Press, Stanford University, Palo Alto

    1977

  19. [27]

    Paul Ekman. 1993. Facial expression and emotion. American Psychologist 48, 4 (1993), 384–392. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.48.4.384

    1993 doi

  20. [28]

    Elam and B

    M. Elam and B. G. Wallin. 1987. Skin blood flow responses to mental stress in man depend on body temperature. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica 129, 3 (March 1987), 429–431. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-201X.1987.tb10609.x

    1987 doi

  21. [29]

    Katherine Ellis, Jacqueline Kerr, Suneeta Godbole, Gert Lanckriet, David Wing, and Simon Marshall. 2014. A random forest classifier for the prediction of energy expenditure and type of physical activity from wrist and hip accelerometers. Physiological measurement 35, 11 (2014), 2191

    2014

  22. [30]

    Grant, Daniela Cardone, Anita Tusche, and Tania Singer

    Veronika Engert, Arcangelo Merla, Joshua A. Grant, Daniela Cardone, Anita Tusche, and Tania Singer. 2014. Exploring the Use of Thermal Infrared Imaging in Human Stress Research. PLOS ONE 9, 3 (March 2014), e90782. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090782

    2014 doi

  23. [31]

    Putnick, and Marc H

    Gianluca Esposito, Jun Nakazawa, Shota Ogawa, Rita Stival, Diane L. Putnick, and Marc H. Bornstein. 2015. Using Infrared Thermography to Assess Emotional Responses to Infants. Early Child Dev Care 185, 3 (2015), 438–447. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2014.932153

    2015

  24. [32]

    Everly Jr and Jeffrey M

    George S. Everly Jr and Jeffrey M. Lating. 2012. A clinical guide to the treatment of the human stress response. Springer Science & Business Media. 28

    2012

  25. [33]

    D. G. Fahrenheit. 1724. Experimenta & Observationes De Congelatione Aquae in Vacuo Factae a D. G. Fahrenheit, R. S. S. Philosophical Transactions (1683-1775) 33, (1724), 78–84. Retrieved September 16, 2018 from https://www.jstor.org/stable/103744

    2018

  26. [34]

    Fei and I

    J. Fei and I. Pavlidis. 2010. Thermistor at a Distance: Unobtrusive Measurement of Breathing. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 57, 4 (April 2010), 988–998. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2009.2032415

    2010

  27. [35]

    Luke Gane, Sarah Power, Azadeh Kushki, and Tom Chau. 2011. Thermal Imaging of the Periorbital Regions during the Presentation of an Auditory Startle Stimulus. PLOS ONE 6, 11 (November 2011), e27268. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027268

    2011 doi

  28. [36]

    Garbey, N

    M. Garbey, N. Sun, A. Merla, and I. Pavlidis. 2007. Contact-Free Measurement of Cardiac Pulse Based on the Analysis of Thermal Imagery. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 54, 8 (August 2007), 1418–1426. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2007.891930

    2007

  29. [37]

    Mark van Gastel, Sander Stuijk, and Gerard de Haan. 2016. Robust respiration detection from remote photoplethysmography. Biomed. Opt. Express, BOE 7, 12 (December 2016), 4941–4957. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.7.004941

    2016 doi

  30. [38]

    Travis Gault and Aly Farag. 2013. A Fully Automatic Method to Extract the Heart Rate from Thermal Video. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, 336–341

    2013

  31. [39]

    Hirokazu Genno, Keiko Ishikawa, Osamu Kanbara, Makoto Kikumoto, Yoshihisa Fujiwara, Ryuuzi Suzuki, and Masato Osumi. 1997. Using facial skin temperature to objectively evaluate sensations. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 19, 2 (February 1997), 161–171. DOI:https...

    1997 doi

  32. [40]

    Ali Ghahramani, Guillermo Castro, Simin Ahmadi Karvigh, and Burcin Becerik-Gerber. 2018. Towards unsupervised learning of thermal comfort using infrared thermography. Applied Energy 211, (February 2018), 41–49. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.11.021

    2018 doi

  33. [41]

    Christiane Goulart, Carlos Valadão, Denis Delisle-Rodriguez, Eliete Caldeira, and Teodiano Bastos

  34. [42]

    Ronald Grant. 1950. Emotional hypothermia in rabbits. American Journal of Physiology-Legacy Content 160, 2 (1950), 285–290

    1950

  35. [43]

    Paul Grossman. 1983. Respiration, Stress, and Cardiovascular Function. Psychophysiology 20, 3 (May 1983), 284–300. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1983.tb02156.x

    1983

  36. [44]

    Hahn, Ross D

    Amanda C. Hahn, Ross D. Whitehead, Marion Albrecht, Carmen E. Lefevre, and David I. Perrett

  37. [45]

    Hai Tao and T. S. Huang. 1999. Explanation-based facial motion tracking using a piecewise Bezier volume deformation model. In Proceedings. 1999 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (Cat. No PR00149), 611-617 Vol. 1. DOI:https://doi.org/10...

    1999

  38. [46]

    PLOS ONE 14, 3 (March 2019), e0212928

    Emotion analysis in children through facial emissivity of infrared thermal imaging. PLOS ONE 14, 3 (March 2019), e0212928. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212928

    2019 doi

  39. [47]

    J. S. Haller Jr. 1985. Medical thermometry–a short history. Western journal of medicine 142, 1 (1985), 108

    1985

  40. [48]

    Kian Hamedani, Zahra Bahmani, and Amin Mohammadian. 2016. Spatio-temporal filtering of thermal video sequences for heart rate estimation. Expert Systems With Applications 54, (2016), 88– 94

    2016

  41. [49]

    Chris Harrison, Hrvoje Benko, and Andrew D. Wilson. 2011. OmniTouch: Wearable Multitouch Interaction Everywhere. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST ’11), 441–450. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2047196.2047255

    2011

  42. [50]

    Healey and R.W

    J.A. Healey and R.W. Picard. 2005. Detecting stress during real-world driving tasks using physiological sensors. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 6, 2 (June 2005), 156–166. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2005.848368

    2005

  43. [51]

    Jingu Heo, S. G. Kong, B. R. Abidi, and M. A. Abidi. 2004. Fusion of Visual and Thermal Signatures with Eyeglass Removal for Robust Face Recognition. In Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshop, 2004. CVPRW ’04, 122–122. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2...

    2004 doi

  44. [52]

    Hall and Arthur C

    John E. Hall and Arthur C. Guyton. 2011. Guyton and Hall textbook of medical physiology (12th ed ed.). Saunders/Elsevier, Philadelphia, Pa

    2011

  45. [53]

    Morris, and Rosalind W

    Javier Hernandez, Rob R. Morris, and Rosalind W. Picard. 2011. Call Center Stress Recognition with Person-Specific Models. In Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction, 125–134. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24600-5_16

    2011 doi

  46. [54]

    Jin-Hyuk Hong, Julian Ramos, and Anind K. Dey. 2012. Understanding Physiological Responses to Stressors During Physical Activity. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp ’12), 270–279. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2370216.2370260

    2012

  47. [55]

    Kan Hong and Sheng Hong. 2016. Real-time stress assessment using thermal imaging. Vis Comput 32, 11 (November 2016), 1369–1377. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00371-015-1164-1

    2016 doi

  48. [56]

    Grafsgaard, and Sidney K

    Stephen Hutt, Joseph F. Grafsgaard, and Sidney K. D’Mello. 2019. Time to Scale: Generalizable Affect Detection for Tens of Thousands of Students across An Entire School Year. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 496

    2019

  49. [57]

    Stephanos Ioannou, Sjoerd Ebisch, Tiziana Aureli, Daniela Bafunno, Helene Alexi Ioannides, Daniela Cardone, Barbara Manini, Gian Luca Romani, Vittorio Gallese, and Arcangelo Merla. 2013. The Autonomic Signature of Guilt in Children: A Thermal Infrared Imaging Study. PLoS ONE 8...

    2013 doi

  50. [58]

    Benjamín Hernández, Gustavo Olague, Riad Hammoud, Leonardo Trujillo, and Eva Romero. 2007. Visual learning of texture descriptors for facial expression recognition in thermal imagery. Computer Vision and Image Understanding 106, 2–3 (May 2007), 258–269. DOI:https://doi.org/10....

    2007 doi

  51. [59]

    Stephanos Ioannou, Paul Morris, Samantha Terry, Marc Baker, Vittorio Gallese, and Vasudevi Reddy. 2016. Sympathy Crying: Insights from Infrared Thermal Imaging on a Female Sample. PLOS ONE 11, 10 (October 2016), e0162749. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162749

    2016 doi

  52. [60]

    Michael Isard and Andrew Blake. 1998. CONDENSATION—Conditional Density Propagation for Visual Tracking. International Journal of Computer Vision 29, 1 (August 1998), 5–28. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008078328650

    1998 doi

  53. [61]

    James Jackson. 1828. Case of a Cartilaginous Tumor in the Trachea, Producing Dyspnœa, &c. The Boston Medical and Surgical Journal 1, 3 (March 1828), 33–36. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM182803040010301

    doi

  54. [62]

    William James. 1884. What is an Emotion? Mind 9, 34 (1884), 188–205. Retrieved September 17, 2018 from https://www.jstor.org/stable/2246769

    2018

  55. [63]

    Jarlier, D

    S. Jarlier, D. Grandjean, S. Delplanque, K. N’Diaye, I. Cayeux, M.I. Velazco, D. Sander, P. Vuilleumier, and K.R. Scherer. 2011. Thermal Analysis of Facial Muscles Contractions. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing 2, 1 (January 2011), 2–9. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/T- A...

    2011 doi

  56. [64]

    Morris, Marc Baker, Vasudevi Reddy, and Vittorio Gallese

    Stephanos Ioannou, Paul H. Morris, Marc Baker, Vasudevi Reddy, and Vittorio Gallese. 2017. Seeing a Blush on the Visible and Invisible Spectrum: A Functional Thermal Infrared Imaging Study. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 11, (2017). DOI:https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00525

    2017

  57. [65]

    M. M. Khan, R. Ward, and M. Ingleby. 2016. Toward Use of Facial Thermal Features in Dynamic Assessment of Affect and Arousal Level. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing PP, 99 (2016), 1–1. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/TAFFC.2016.2535291

    2016

  58. [66]

    Serajeddin Ebrahimian Hadi Kiashari, Ali Nahvi, Amirhossein Homayounfard, and Hamidreza Bakhoda. 2018. Monitoring the Variation in Driver Respiration Rate from Wakefulness to Drowsiness: A Non-Intrusive Method for Drowsiness Detection Using Thermal Imaging. 1 3, 1–2 (2018), 1–...

    2018

  59. [67]

    Trier Social Stress Test

    Clemens Kirschbaum, Karl-Martin Pirke, and Dirk H. Hellhammer. 1993. The “Trier Social Stress Test”: A tool for investigating psychobiological stress responses in a laboratory setting. Neuropsychobiology 28, 1–2 (1993), 76–81. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1159/000119004

    1993 doi

  60. [68]

    Andreas Kistler, Charles Mariauzouls, and Klaus von Berlepsch. 1998. Fingertip temperature as an indicator for sympathetic responses. International Journal of Psychophysiology 29, 1 (June 1998), 35–41. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8760(97)00087-1

    1998 doi

  61. [69]

    Krzywicki, Gary G

    Alan T. Krzywicki, Gary G. Berntson, and Barbara L. O’Kane. 2014. A non-contact technique for measuring eccrine sweat gland activity using passive thermal imaging. International Journal of Psychophysiology 94, 1 (October 2014), 25–34. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.201...

    2014 doi

  62. [70]

    Kalal, K

    Z. Kalal, K. Mikolajczyk, and J. Matas. 2012. Tracking-Learning-Detection. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 34, 7 (July 2012), 1409–1422. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2011.239

    2012 doi

  63. [71]

    PJ Lang, MM Bradley, and BN Cuthbert. 2008. International affective picture system (IAPS): Affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual

    2008

  64. [72]

    M. H. Abd Latif, H. Md Yusof, S. N. Sidek, and N. Rusli. 2015. Thermal imaging based affective state recognition. In 2015 IEEE International Symposium on Robotics and Intelligent Sensors (IRIS), 214–219. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/IRIS.2015.7451614

    2015

  65. [73]

    Yann LeCun, Yoshua Bengio, and Geoffrey Hinton. 2015. Deep learning. Nature 521, 7553 (May 2015), 436–444. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14539

    2015 doi

  66. [74]

    Patrick Ledda, Alan Chalmers, Tom Troscianko, and Helge Seetzen. 2005. Evaluation of Tone Mapping Operators Using a High Dynamic Range Display. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2005 Papers (SIGGRAPH ’05), 640–648. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1186822.1073242

    2005

  67. [75]

    Lewis, Rodolfo G

    Gregory F. Lewis, Rodolfo G. Gatto, and Stephen W. Porges. 2011. A novel method for extracting respiration rate and relative tidal volume from infrared thermography. Psychophysiology 48, 7 (July 2011), 877–887. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01167.x

    2011

  68. [76]

    Koji Kuraoka and Katsuki Nakamura. 2011. The use of nasal skin temperature measurements in studying emotion in macaque monkeys. Physiology & Behavior 102, 3–4 (March 2011), 347–355. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2010.11.029

    2011 doi

  69. [77]

    Zhilei Liu and Shangfei Wang. 2011. Emotion Recognition Using Hidden Markov Models from Facial Temperature Sequence. In Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction, Sidney D’Mello, Arthur Graesser, Björn Schuller and Jean-Claude Martin (eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 240–

    2011

  70. [78]

    J. M. Lloyd. 2013. Thermal Imaging Systems. Springer Science & Business Media

    2013

  71. [79]

    J. S. Lombard. 1878. VI. Experimental researches on the temperature of the head. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. 27, 185–189 (January 1878), 457–465. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1098/rspl.1878.0084

  72. [80]

    J. S. Lombard. 1878. II. Experimental researches on the temperature of the head. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. 27, 185–189 (January 1878), 166–177. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1098/rspl.1878.0033

  73. [81]

    McDuff, Javier Hernandez, Sarah Gontarek, and Rosalind W

    Daniel J. McDuff, Javier Hernandez, Sarah Gontarek, and Rosalind W. Picard. 2016. COGCAM: Contact-free Measurement of Cognitive Stress During Computer Tasks with a Digital Camera. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’16), 4000–4...

    2016

  74. [82]

    C. Liu, L. Sharan, E. H. Adelson, and R. Rosenholtz. 2010. Exploring features in a Bayesian framework for material recognition. In 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 239–246. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2010.5540207

    2010

  75. [83]

    Murthy and I

    R. Murthy and I. Pavlidis. 2006. Noncontact measurement of breathing function. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine 25, 3 (May 2006), 57–67. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/MEMB.2006.1636352

    2006 arXiv

  76. [84]

    DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/ACIIW.2017.8272593

    2017

  77. [85]

    Katsura Nakayama, Shunji Goto, Koji Kuraoka, and Katsuki Nakamura. 2005. Decrease in nasal temperature of rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) in negative emotional state. Physiology & Behavior 84, 5 (April 2005), 783–790. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2005.03.009

    2005 doi

  78. [86]

    Nhan and T

    B.R. Nhan and T. Chau. 2010. Classifying Affective States Using Thermal Infrared Imaging of the Human Face. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 57, 4 (April 2010), 979–987. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2009.2035926

    2010

  79. [87]

    Calvin K. L. Or and Vincent G. Duffy. 2007. Development of a facial skin temperature-based methodology for non-intrusive mental workload measurement. Occupational Ergonomics 7, 2 (January 2007), 83–94. Retrieved May 19, 2016 from http://content.iospress.com/articles/occupation...

    2007

  80. [88]

    Maria Serena Panasiti, Giorgia Ponsi, Bianca Monachesi, Luigi Lorenzini, Vincenzo Panasiti, and Salvatore Maria Aglioti. 2019. Cognitive load and emotional processing in psoriasis: a thermal imaging study. Exp Brain Res 237, 1 (January 2019), 211–222. DOI:https://doi.org/10.10...

    2019 doi

  81. [89]

    Mei and H

    X. Mei and H. Ling. 2011. Robust Visual Tracking and Vehicle Classification via Sparse Representation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 33, 11 (November 2011), 2259–2272. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2011.66

    2011 doi

  82. [90]

    Pavlidis, P

    I. Pavlidis, P. Tsiamyrtzis, D. Shastri, A. Wesley, Y. Zhou, P. Lindner, P. Buddharaju, R. Joseph, A. Mandapati, B. Dunkin, and B. Bass. 2012. Fast by Nature - How Stress Patterns Define Human Experience and Performance in Dexterous Tasks. Sci Rep 2, (March 2012). DOI:https://...

    2012 doi

  83. [91]

    Murthy, I

    R. Murthy, I. Pavlidis, and P. Tsiamyrtzis. 2004. Touchless monitoring of breathing function. In 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2004. IEMBS ’04, 1196–1199. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2004.1403382

    2004 arXiv

  84. [92]

    John Pearson. 1786. Observations and Queries on Animal Heat. Lond Med J 7, Pt 2 (1786), 169–180. Retrieved September 16, 2018 from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5545383/

    2018

  85. [93]

    Carina Barbosa Pereira, Xinchi Yu, Michael Czaplik, Rolf Rossaint, Vladimir Blazek, and Steffen Leonhardt. 2015. Remote monitoring of breathing dynamics using infrared thermography. Biomed. Opt. Express, BOE 6, 11 (November 2015), 4378–4394. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.6.004378

    2015 doi

  86. [94]

    P. E. Pergola, D. L. Kellogg, J. M. Johnson, W. A. Kosiba, and D. E. Solomon. 1993. Role of sympathetic nerves in the vascular effects of local temperature in human forearm skin. American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology 265, 3 (September 1993), H785–H792...

    1993 doi

  87. [95]

    David Perpetuini, Daniela Cardone, Antonio Maria Chiarelli, Chiara Filippini, Pierpaolo Croce, Filippo Zappasodi, Ludovica Rotunno, Nelson Anzoletti, Michele Zito, and Arcangelo Merla. 2019. Autonomic impairment in Alzheimer’s disease is revealed by complexity analysis of func...

    2019 doi

  88. [96]

    Pavlidis, J

    I. Pavlidis, J. Levine, and P. Baukol. 2001. Thermal image analysis for anxiety detection. In 2001 International Conference on Image Processing, 2001. Proceedings, 315–318 vol.2. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIP.2001.958491

    2001

  89. [97]

    M. Z. Poh, D. J. McDuff, and R. W. Picard. 2011. Advancements in Noncontact, Multiparameter Physiological Measurements Using a Webcam. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 58, 1 (January 2011), 7–11. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2010.2086456

    2011

  90. [98]

    Eberhardt, and James A

    Ioannis Pavlidis, Norman L. Eberhardt, and James A. Levine. 2002. Human behaviour: Seeing through the face of deception. Nature 415, 6867 (January 2002), 35–35. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/415035a

    2002 doi

  91. [99]

    Colin Puri, Leslie Olson, Ioannis Pavlidis, James Levine, and Justin Starren. 2005. StressCam: Non- contact Measurement of Users’ Emotional States Through Thermal Imaging. In CHI ’05 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ’05), 1725–1728. DOI:https://...

    2005

  92. [100]

    E. F. J. Ring and K. Ammer. 2012. Infrared thermal imaging in medicine. Physiol. Meas. 33, 3 (2012), R33. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/33/3/R33

    2012 doi

  93. [101]

    Sydney Ringer. 1873. On the Temperature of the Body as a Means of Diagnosis and Prognosis in Phthisis. Lewis

  94. [102]

    David Alberto Rodríguez Medina, Benjamín Domínguez Trejo, Patricia Cortés Esteban, Irving Armando Cruz Albarrán, Luis Alberto Morales Hernández, and Gerardo Leija Alva. 2018. Biopsychosocial Assessment of Pain with Thermal Imaging of Emotional Facial Expression in Breast Cance...

    2018 doi

  95. [103]

    Monica Perusquia-Hernández, Saho Ayabe-Kanamura, Kenji Suzuki, and Shiro Kumano. 2019. The Invisible Potential of Facial Electromyography: A Comparison of EMG and Computer Vision when Distinguishing Posed from Spontaneous Smiles. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Hu...

    2019

  96. [104]

    Albrecht Schmidt. 2002. Ubiquitous computing - computing in context. Lancaster University. Retrieved September 24, 2018 from http://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/12221/

    2002

  97. [105]

    Concealed Information

    Dean A. Pollina, Andrew B. Dollins, Stuart M. Senter, Troy E. Brown, Ioannis Pavlidis, James A. Levine, and Andrew H. Ryan. 2006. Facial Skin Surface Temperature Changes During a “Concealed Information” Test. Ann Biomed Eng 34, 7 (June 2006), 1182–1189. DOI:https://doi.org/10....

    2006 doi

  98. [106]

    Caifeng Shan, Shaogang Gong, and Peter W. McOwan. 2005. Robust facial expression recognition using local binary patterns. In IEEE International Conference on Image Processing 2005, II–370

    2005

  99. [107]

    Caifeng Shan, Shaogang Gong, and Peter W. McOwan. 2009. Facial expression recognition based on local binary patterns: A comprehensive study. Image and vision Computing 27, 6 (2009), 803–816

    2009

  100. [108]

    Shastri, A

    D. Shastri, A. Merla, P. Tsiamyrtzis, and I. Pavlidis*. 2009. Imaging Facial Signs of Neurophysiological Responses. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 56, 2 (February 2009), 477–484. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2008.2003265

    2009

  101. [109]

    Shastri, M

    D. Shastri, M. Papadakis, P. Tsiamyrtzis, B. Bass, and I. Pavlidis. 2012. Perinasal Imaging of Physiological Stress and Its Affective Potential. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing 3, 3 (July 2012), 366–378. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/T-AFFC.2012.13

    2012 doi

  102. [110]

    Salazar-López, E

    E. Salazar-López, E. Domínguez, V. Juárez Ramos, J. de la Fuente, A. Meins, O. Iborra, G. Gálvez, M. A. Rodríguez-Artacho, and E. Gómez-Milán. 2015. The mental and subjective skin: Emotion, empathy, feelings and thermography. Consciousness and Cognition 34, (July 2015), 149–16...

    2015 doi

  103. [111]

    J.R. Stroop. 1935. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology 18, 6 (1935), 643–662. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054651

    1935 doi

  104. [112]

    Fred Shaffer and J. P. Ginsberg. 2017. An Overview of Heart Rate Variability Metrics and Norms. Front Public Health 5, (September 2017). DOI:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2017.00258 32

    2017

  105. [113]

    Tsiamyrtzis, J

    P. Tsiamyrtzis, J. Dowdall, D. Shastri, I. T. Pavlidis, M. G. Frank, and P. Ekman. 2007. Imaging Facial Physiology for the Detection of Deceit. Int. J. Comput. Vision 71, 2 (February 2007), 197–

    2007

  106. [114]

    J. A. Veltman and W. K. Vos. 2005. Facial temperature as a measure of mental workload. In International Symposium on Aviation Psychology

    2005

  107. [115]

    Svaasand, and J

    Wim Verkruysse, Lars O. Svaasand, and J. Stuart Nelson. 2008. Remote plethysmographic imaging using ambient light. Opt. Express, OE 16, 26 (December 2008), 21434–21445. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.16.021434

    2008 doi

  108. [116]

    Gunnar Wallin

    B. Gunnar Wallin. 1981. Sympathetic Nerve Activity Underlying Electrodermal and Cardiovascular Reactions in Man. Psychophysiology 18, 4 (July 1981), 470–476. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1981.tb02483.x

    1981

  109. [117]

    Spalding, C

    Steven J. Spalding, C. Kent Kwoh, Robert Boudreau, Joseph Enama, Julie Lunich, Daniel Huber, Louis Denes, and Raphael Hirsch. 2008. Three-dimensional and thermal surface imaging produces reliable measures of joint shape and temperature: a potential tool for quantifying arthrit...

    2008 doi

  110. [118]

    Gunnar Wasner, Jörn Schattschneider, and Ralf Baron. 2002. Skin temperature side differences – a diagnostic tool for CRPS? Pain 98, 1–2 (July 2002), 19–26. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304- 3959(01)00470-5

    2002 doi

  111. [119]

    Taylor, Sylvan Kornblum, Erick J

    Stephan F. Taylor, Sylvan Kornblum, Erick J. Lauber, Satoshi Minoshima, and Robert A. Koeppe

  112. [120]

    Shuchang Xu, Lingyun Sun, and Gustavo Kunde Rohde. 2014. Robust efficient estimation of heart rate pulse from video. Biomed. Opt. Express, BOE 5, 4 (April 2014), 1124–1135. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.5.001124

    2014 doi

  113. [121]

    Y. Zhou, P. Tsiamyrtzis, P. Lindner, I. Timofeyev, and I. Pavlidis. 2013. Spatiotemporal Smoothing as a Basis for Facial Tissue Tracking in Thermal Imaging. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 60, 5 (May 2013), 1280–1289. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2012.2232927

    2013

  114. [122]

    Ziegler and Paul T

    Lloyd H. Ziegler and Paul T. Cash. 1938. A study of the influence of emotions and affects on the surface temperature of the human body. AJP 95, 3 (November 1938), 677–696. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.95.3.677

    1938 doi

  115. [123]

    CEREBRAL THERMOMETRY

    1877. CEREBRAL THERMOMETRY. The Lancet 110, 2825 (October 1877), 586. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(01)00277-X

    doi

  116. [126]

    S. Wang, Z. Liu, S. Lv, Y. Lv, G. Wu, P. Peng, F. Chen, and X. Wang. 2010. A Natural Visible and Infrared Facial Expression Database for Expression Recognition and Emotion Inference. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia 12, 7 (November 2010), 682–691. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/TM...

    2010

  117. [128]

    Avinash Wesley, Pradeep Buddharaju, Robert Pienta, and Ioannis Pavlidis. 2012. A Comparative Analysis of Thermal and Visual Modalities for Automated Facial Expression Recognition. In Advances in Visual Computing. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 51–60. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/9...

    2012 doi

  118. [214]

    DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11263-006-6106-y

    doi

  119. [247]

    DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24571-8_26

    doi

  120. [742]

    DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imavis.2006.01.017

    2006 doi

  121. [1997]

    NeuroImage 6, 2 (August 1997), 81–92

    Isolation of Specific Interference Processing in the Stroop Task: PET Activation Studies. NeuroImage 6, 2 (August 1997), 81–92. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.1997.0285

    1997

  122. [2011]

    BioMedical Engineering OnLine 10, (2011), 93–109

    Neonatal non-contact respiratory monitoring based on real-time infrared thermography. BioMedical Engineering OnLine 10, (2011), 93–109. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-10-93

    2011 doi

  123. [2012]

    Biology Letters (May 2012), rsbl20120338

    Hot or not? Thermal reactions to social contact. Biology Letters (May 2012), rsbl20120338. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2012.0338

    2012

  124. [2019]

    In the 8th International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction, ACII 2019, In press

    Nose Heat: Exploring Stress-induced Nasal Thermal Variability through Mobile Thermal Imaging. In the 8th International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction, ACII 2019, In press

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.