REVIEW 3 cited by
An Evaluation Dataset for Intent Classification and Out-of-Scope Prediction
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Task-oriented dialog systems need to know when a query falls outside their range of supported intents, but current text classification corpora only define label sets that cover every example. We introduce a new dataset that includes queries that are out-of-scope---i.e., queries that do not fall into any of the system's supported intents. This poses a new challenge because models cannot assume that every query at inference time belongs to a system-supported intent class. Our dataset also covers 150 intent classes over 10 domains, capturing the breadth that a production task-oriented agent must handle. We evaluate a range of benchmark classifiers on our dataset along with several different out-of-scope identification schemes. We find that while the classifiers perform well on in-scope intent classification, they struggle to identify out-of-scope queries. Our dataset and evaluation fill an important gap in the field, offering a way of more rigorously and realistically benchmarking text classification in task-driven dialog systems.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
SUM: Unified Geometric Surgery on Spatio-Temporal Adaptation Vectors for Federated Class Incremental Learning
SUM projects client and task adaptation vectors to remove directional interference during server aggregation, improving federated class-incremental learning accuracy without client-side changes.
-
Integration of Old and New Knowledge for Generalized Intent Discovery: A Consistency-driven Prototype-Prompting Framework
CPP improves generalized intent discovery by using LLM-generated prototypes and verbalizers plus consistency and cross-prediction losses, reporting SOTA on Banking and CLINC without statistical validation.
-
Evaluating LLMs Without Oracle Feedback: Agentic Annotation Evaluation Through Unsupervised Consistency Signals
The ratio of agreement to disagreement between a small student model and an LLM correlates with the LLM's annotation accuracy across ten datasets and can heuristically select better models.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.