Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

The Good, the Bad and the Ugly: Evaluating Convolutional Neural Networks for Prohibited Item Detection Using Real and Synthetically Composited X-ray Imagery

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1909.11508 v1 pith:MHRCLNTC submitted 2019-09-25 cs.CV cs.LGeess.IV

classification cs.CVcs.LGeess.IV
keywords imageryx-raydetectionsecurityprohibitedsyntheticallyrealtraining
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Detecting prohibited items in X-ray security imagery is pivotal in maintaining border and transport security against a wide range of threat profiles. Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) with the support of a significant volume of data have brought advancement in such automated prohibited object detection and classification. However, collating such large volumes of X-ray security imagery remains a significant challenge. This work opens up the possibility of using synthetically composed imagery, avoiding the need to collate such large volumes of hand-annotated real-world imagery. Here we investigate the difference in detection performance achieved using real and synthetic X-ray training imagery for CNN architecture detecting three exemplar prohibited items, {Firearm, Firearm Parts, Knives}, within cluttered and complex X-ray security baggage imagery. We achieve 0.88 of mean average precision (mAP) with a Faster R-CNN and ResNet-101 CNN architecture for this 3-class object detection using real X-ray imagery. While the performance is comparable with synthetically composited X-ray imagery (0.78 mAP), our extended evaluation demonstrates both challenge and promise of using synthetically composed images to diversify the X-ray security training imagery for automated detection algorithm training.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. BGM: Background Mixup for X-ray Prohibited Items Detection

    cs.CV 2024-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    BGM, a background-focused augmentation using self patch mixup and color patch mixup, improves X-ray prohibited item detection across PIDray, OPIXray, and CLCXray.

  2. Augmentation Matters: A Mix-Paste Method for X-Ray Prohibited Item Detection under Noisy Annotations

    cs.CV 2025-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A plug-and-play augmentation that mixes same-label item patches and suppresses mismatched high-IoU losses improves X-ray prohibited-item detection under category and bounding-box annotation noise.

Pith tools