Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Cortical credit assignment by Hebbian, neuromodulatory and inhibitory plasticity

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1911.00307 v1 pith:FFQ5KUTG submitted 2019-11-01 q-bio.NC cond-mat.dis-nn

classification q-bio.NCcond-mat.dis-nn
keywords plasticityprobleminhibitoryacetylcholine-dependentassignmentassociationsbalancecortex
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The cortex learns to make associations between stimuli and spiking activity which supports behaviour. It does this by adjusting synaptic weights. The complexity of these transformations implies that synapses have to change without access to the full error information, a problem typically referred to as "credit-assignment". However, it remains unknown how the cortex solves this problem. We propose that a combination of plasticity rules, 1) Hebbian, 2) acetylcholine-dependent and 3) noradrenaline-dependent excitatory plasticity, together with 4) inhibitory plasticity restoring E/I balance, effectively solves the credit assignment problem. We derive conditions under-which a neuron model can learn a number of associations approaching its theoretical capacity. We confirm our predictions regarding acetylcholine-dependent and inhibitory plasticity by reanalysing experimental data. Our work suggests that detailed cortical E/I balance reduces the dimensionality of the problem of associating inputs with outputs, thereby allowing imperfect "supervision" by neuromodulatory systems to guide learning effectively.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Can Biologically Plausible Temporal Credit Assignment Rules Match BPTT for Neural Similarity? E-prop as an Example

    cs.NE 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    At matched task accuracy, e-prop trained RNNs reach neural data similarity comparable to BPTT trained RNNs on Mante 2013 and Sussillo 2015 datasets, with initialization and architecture influencing similarity more tha...

Pith tools